Thi' Heavor is printod on 100% iwycloH papr»r rf'(\volo ycnir copy #mv.thebeaveroiiliiie.co.iik ver 13 February 2007 Issue 659 The newspaper of the LSESU J 1 1 • , O ( I2> 1 c^^ck Me SU^s,k k Cfa^. , C J Teachers and tutors donteiveashic 3* W'iai>rJKft)£i0K)L"}4w)CW»ell and his clones, had seized control of the room - quidcly transforming it into a base for their endless protests, rationing water supplies and even coercing one notable right winger to join them to fi^t the Fbrces of Evil with a mop. Hacktavist watched closely as the Fbsdst Green Army O^d fcy Ffeld-Marshall CouztnQ'), Fknatic fkninists and all sorts of anarchists raucous^ rioted in the Old Building. What a wdccme party for some fat Irish guy! Meanwhile one much-loved sabbatical, suffered the most terrible torment last week, while simply trying to do his duty. Poor Constipated AU declared he had "society heads coming outta ass". Ihis painful e:q)eriaice was apparently due to the strain of the MisKcanmunication officer actually hav- ing to do some work for a change, and not some bizarre consequence of Dewj's frequent Mass-Debating. Although his giiifriend was away in New York... In any case Hacktavist hollers a big 'Get Wdl Soon' to everyone's favourite falafel vendor But de^iite the predicament of our poor Cocntns Officer, critics of Comical Ali have dis-re^pectfulty continued their accusatioos. One Hack whinged about how predous uruoQ funds weie wasted on the £100 C^obal Qq;) while others launched attacks on how the Dewj is "destrpyirig democracy". Luckity a Do-ji-^t defence ^'ston was in place in the fbnn of Green Ken; who continued to remind us all what a sweetie our Comms officer realfy is. And finally, Hacktavist in His efforts to do his duty and dish the dirt was 'facebooking* Hacks of all shapes, sizes and political affiliation last week - an activity whidi led to some rather interesting revelations. One Caress HeathCock states she likes what hs* boyfriend "makes [her] watch". Hacktavist will leave what this could be up to the reader's iinagina< tion... HacktavistOthebeaveronline.co.uk 08 leaver! 13 February 200': COMMENT&ANALYSIS COMMEN ANALYSIS Is freedom of expression too much to ask for? Andrew Perraut demands justice for imprisoned Egyptian blogger Free speech at what price? c&a@thebeaveronline.co.uk IBeaver 2nd Floof, East Building ISE Students' Union London WC2A 2AE email: fhebeaverSlse.ac.uk Published since 1949. While we study at the LSE we live in a free country, but imagine that this was not so. Imagine that, after your last class of the day, you decide to write a brief blog post before heading off to dinner with friends. A day goes by—perhaps a week—but suddenly there is a knock on the door, and as you open it, you immediately know that your life is over. The knock on the door may be nothing but an Orwellian nightmare for you and me, but it is the reality for millions of people who are subject to tyranny every day. However, it is reality for Egyptian blogger Kareem Amer, who desperately needs your help. Kareem is my age, twenty-two, and, like me, he occasionally posts on a blog. But Kareem's 'knock on the door' came last November, when he was arrested by Egypt's state security service. He was imprisoned without bail for the "crime" of promoting secularism and daring to suggest that women should be considered equals in society. Since then, his family has not been 15th Febraary has been declared "Free Kareem Day" allowed to see him, and they live in fear of what might be happening to him. Kareem's trial will take place later this month, and experts believe that the judge will sentence him to nearly a decade's imprisonment for nothing more than expressing his opinions. This case is not an isolated incident; it is part of a recent crackdown on political dissent throughout the country. Amnesty International has called Kareem's arrest "a further erosion of freedom of expression in Egypt" and a dangerous precedent for the future. If a stand is not taken now, the consequences for liberty in that country will be dire. This case is about more than just one man. 'Whether you personally agree with what Kareem said or not, I hope that everyone is prepared to defend his right to say it. I urge everyone who believe in human rights, everyone who believes in freedom of expression, to do something about it. And there is something very real that you can do. This Thursday, IStfi February has been declared "Free Kareem Day," a time when Amer's supporters will demonstrate peacefully in six cities throughout the world. The London rally will take place in front of the Egyptian Embassy from 3pm to 6pm. By protesting, we will show the government that they cannot destroy Kareem's life—or his right to speak his mind—while no one is watching. Each person who participates puts more pressure on Egypt to honor their pledge to protect human rights within their borders. They can get away with tyranny only if we are willing to look away. Join us on Thursday—LSE students will meet in front of the Peacock Theatre at 2pm to walk to the Embassy and join the protest. I encourage you to visit FreeKareem.org for more information about the case and to sign the online petition for his release. Send an email to Andrew.Perraut@gmail.com to leam more about the rally or to help out. Come to support Kareem. Come to support the right to free speech. Dan Sheldon and Aled Fisher thinks the LSE can do more to improve its IT services through open source technology Adulation for open source Dan Sri Ion isher WebCT, Outlook, LSE for You... so much of our time at the LSE is spent interacting with computers, it's surprising we even find time to speak to each other. Yet how much do we actually know about the software that we use? Our attitude is generally one of technological ignorance; hardly surprising considering we are a social sciences university. However, is it sensible to leave something so integral to our degrees to the whim of IT Services and contractors behind closed doors? This closed-door attitude extends to the software itself: the LSE mainly uses closed source, proprietary packages such as Microsoft Windows and Office. Nothing necessarily wrong with that, but if it doesn't do what we want it to do, there's not a lot we can do about it. Despite paying for this software, its usage is highly restricted by law. In general, you cannot study, copy, modify or redistribute the software that you use. This raises some big civil liberty questions: does Microsoft retain any rights to documents you produce with their software? And what claim does YouTube have on your videos? This is where open source comes in. In essence, open source means that the mechanics behind the software is freely available to all to read, adapt and improve. The result of this is a public, collaborative form of development which is highly responsive to demand (no matter how niche) and unconcerned with commercial pressures. It isn't profitable to make software which caters specifically to people with disabilities, but open source democratises innovation like this. To allow scientific and cultural progress to be constrained by strict legal and commercial interests is hugely damaging - just imagine if you had to pay a licence fee each time you quoted an author in your essays! Think this is some fif Our website, the primary window into LSE student life, is an embarassment hippy dream? Speak to Facebook, Google, Wikipedia and countless other leading technology firms who owe their success to open source. Open source is a proven model not only for producing well designed, virus free and cost effective software but also for profitable businesses, too. The potential of open source for social good is even greater when writ large. ¦Wikipedia is an incredibly successful experiment in free knowledge which has challenged the media monopoly. There are even attempts to create open source consumer products like 'OpenCola', which aims to liberate the instructions and ingredients behind the brown stuff! Whist the LSE is making some strides towards a smarter approach on technology with blogs and podcasts, it is not enough. For example, we are still using a five year old, barely usable version of WebCT when we could be using the open source alternative, Moodle. Believers in the power of the market should support open source too. Why is there no real alternative to Outlook? Because it is difficult to reverse engineer the protocol that it uses to communicate with Exchange servers. The anti-trust cases against Microsoft demonstrates its perverse distortion of the market - the only way to combat this is through open standards. As the network neutrality debate in the US highlighted, open standards and the principle of equality are essential to balance the dangerous effects big business can have on the technology we depend on. We should embrace projects like the $100 laptop project, which aim to close the digital divide and reduce inequalities. Brazil has taken a lead by adopting Linux, the open source operating system, in its government offices, saving millions of dollars in licence fees. It is not enough to demand that the School wises up to technology - the SU must, too. Our website, the primary window into LSE student life, is an embarrassment; poorly designed, rarely updated and inaccessible. We have been tied into a contract with a web marketing firm for the past few years which, on first glance, looks like a good deal: we pay nothing and get a slice of advertising revenues. However, their one-size-fits-all approach to websites clearly doesn't suit our Union. With exciting things like Web 2.0 and social networking in vogue we should be using technology to build a truly democratic Union, reaching out to .all students and prospective students and capitalising on our name to bring in more revenue. You only have to walk down Houghton Street to see how old-fashioned we are: masses of paper are wasted on posters for our vibrant student events. If we had an effective way of communicating online we could take the lead on this crucial environmental issue and shame the School into scrapping the masses of printed committee reports they produce. Equally, it is pointless to substitute paper for PCs when banks of computers hum away unused 24 hours a day. Any future policy the SU and School devise must balance environmental concerns with the diverse and energetic nature of our student body. With ID cards, RFID chips and online voting (at least in our SU) coming soon, it is time for all of us to reclaim the code that rules our lives from the control of the rich, geeky few. aph: Nigel Stead EXECUTIVE EDITOR Sidhanth Kamath MANAGING EDITOR Chris Lam SECRETARY Lucie Gouiet NEWS EDITORS Laura Deck; Alt Moussavi; Timothy Root C&A EDITOR Chun Han Wong FEATURES EDITORS Charlie Samuda; Christine Whyte PART B EDITORS Kevin Perry; Daniel B.Yates SPORTS EDITOR Laura Parfitt DESIGN EDITOR Aditi Nangia WEB EDITOR Min Ou PHOTOGRAPHY SUB EDITOR Liam Chambers COMMISSIONING SUB-EDITOR Charlie Hallion LISTINGS SUB-EDITOR Neeraj Patel THE COLLECTIVE: Chair: Fatima Manji collectivechair@the-beaveronline.co.uk Ismat Abidi; Ross Allan; Sam Ashton; Sancha Bainton; Fadhil Bakeer-Markar; Vlshal Banerjee; Wit Barber; Alex Barros-Curtis; Peter Barton; Rothna Begum; Neshy Boukhari; Clem Broumley-Young; James Bull; Sam Burke; Andy Burton; Sumit Buttoo; Ed Calow; Jess Cartwright; James Caspell; Claire Cheriyan; Chris Colvin; Laura Coombe; Owen Coughlan; Patrick Cullen; Peter Currie; James Davies; Michael Deas; Ali Dewji; Jan Daniel Dormann; Matt Dougherty; Simon Douglas; Aled Dilwyn Fisher; Alex George; Ben Gianforti; Patrick Graham; Rupert Guest; Steve Gummer; Andrew Hallett; Shanela Haque; Chris Heathcote; Josh Heller; Kevin Heutchi; Tahiya Islam; Lois Jeary; William Joce; Andhalib Karim; Laleh Kazemi-Veisari; Joel Kenrick; James Ketteringham; Arthur Krebbers; Sanjivi Krishnan; Laura Kyrke-Smith; Ben Lamy; Charles Laurence; Roger Lewis ; Shu Hao Don Lim; James Longhofei; Ziyaad Lunat; Jami Makan; Kim Mandeng; Jessica McArdle; Joey Mellows; Nitya Menon; Llbby Meyer; Sophie Middlemiss; Daisy Mitchel-Forster; Richard Morrow; Doug Olhrei; Erin Orozco; Aba Osunsade; Rob Parker; Matthew Partridge; Rajan Patel; John Philpott; Rebecca Pillinger; Keith Postler; Danielle Priestley; Joe Quaye; Tanya Rajapakse; Gareth Rees; Ricky Ren; Louise Robinson; Daniel Sheldon; Alex Small; Rebecca Stephenson; Jimmy Tam; Alex Teytelboym; Meryem Torun; Angus Tse; Molly Tucker; Vladimir Unkovski-Korica; Rosamund Urwin; Louise Venabies; Alexandra Vincenti; Simon Wang; Claudia Whitcomb; Greg White; Amy Williams; Yee To Wong; PRINTED BY THE NORTHCLIFFE PRESS If you have written three or more articles for The Beaver and your name does not appear in the Collective, please email: thebeaver.editor@lse.ac.uk and you will be added to the list in next week's paper. The Beaver is available in alternative formats. The views and opinions expressed in The Beaver ate those of the contributors and not necessarily those of the editors or the LSE Students' Union. COMMENT&ANALYSIS heaven 13 February 2007 09 COMMENT &A NALYSIS c&a@thebeaveronline.co.uk leaver Established 1949 - Issue 658 LSE teaching quality in question ...perhaps some soul searching is in order The front-page article in this week's Beaver may seem like a scoop, but to be honest, it will come as no surprise to any student at the LSE; this is what is most shocking about the new figures. For the teaching at a world-class institution such as this one to be almost universally acknowledged as 'crap' by its students, something must be going drastically wrong. At any university, most students will admit that they have at least one sub-par lecturer or teacher: the sort who grade unfairly, can't speak in public to save their lives or who are, well, just plain rubbish. That's understandable - academics are notoriously uninterested in anything besides their field of research. Even Oxbridge produces complaints about some of its teaching staff. However, Oxford and Cambridge employ the tutorial system, which makes up for lack of quality with sheer quantity of face time - students spend hours a week with each of their class teachers, not to mention compulsory lectures and independent study. Previously, the LSE was the only university among the top 3 in the UK without it, and the fact that it maintained such high standards with a minimum of teacher-student contact was credited to superb teaching quality. This survey shows that students, at least, have a very different view. The information also highlights the LSE's plummet from eleventh to seventeenth in the 2006 World University rankings from the Times Higher Education Supplement. What could have been dismissed as a fluke now looks ominously foreboding for the School's future as a global centre of excellence. Even worse from the student perspective, as the academic reputation of the School suffers, so do graduate prospects. If a majority of students find the teaching quality at odds with the School's reputation, it will not be long before the world takes notice and begins to agree. The survey begs the question; what is causing such widespread dissatisfaction among students, the people who make the LSE what it is (and pay the salaries of the 'shit' staff in question)? Surely a major factor is the impracticality of fobbing undergraduate teaching off on Ph.D students, who are paid a pittance and are understandably more concerned with their own degrees. It's also not clear how much training class teachers are offered. The problem of personal tutors relates not only to the academic performance (or lack thereof) of students, but also to their pastoral care; the ease with which students can fall off the radar during the year is embarrassing. Each tutor is assigned a large number of students, and there is no system in place to ensure regular contact; is it any wonder tutors and students barely even recognise one another? In an institution where so much emphasis is placed on self-discipline and independent study, it's vital for the school to be taking more responsibility for their progress and keeping a better eye on its' students. Whatever the reasons for the results that The Beaver has uncovered, it is clear the School needs to do something about it. Mile-high on LSE money ...is far from responsible expenditure An institution aiming to provide an all-round academic experience to its students should look beyond classrooms and seminars. First-class administration, organisational efficiency, student welfare and support services, provision of accommodation; the non-academic aspects which count little towards intellectual stimulation, but bear great significance towards a wholesome education. To be able to invest quality money towards the satisfaction of student needs, responsible spending of school funds is fimdamental. The recent release of travel expenses of top LSE personnel is highly revealing with regards to school policy on responsible expenditure. It is rather disconcerting to discover that Henrietta Moore, Deputy Director and Professor of Social Anthropology, spent £4,084.00 on a trans-Atlantic flight to New York in November 2004 when it cost only £3,790.00 for her flight to Thailand a mere four months later. The fact that a similar trip to the Big Apple made by Ms Moore a year ago cost a comparatively inexpensive £2,658.20 should have sent alarm bells ringing. To add insult to injury, £1,807.00 was all it cost for Deputy Director Sarah Worthington on a New York flight in December 2005. First-class administration? Or first-class lavishness? Such are the unnecessary luxuries that could easily have been spent on more meaningful things. Money that could have seen better usage through emergency student loans, research grants, refurbishment of school facilities, organisation of public lectures or raising the meagre salaries of LSE cleaners. How justifiable are demands for increases in top-up fees when senior school officials are thoughtlessly splashing LSE cash on official trips? As premier institution of social sciences with an economic focus, the irony cannot be lost on students who show concern for the nature of governance of our School. Letters to the Editor The Beaver offers all readers the right to reply to anything that appears in the paper. Letters should be sent to thebeaver.editor@lse.ac.uk and should be no longer than 250 words. All letters nnust be received by 3pm on the Sunday prior to publication. The Beaver reserves the right to edit letters prior to publication. "student night" Dear Sir Your paper last week contained a number of damaging and false allegations apparently made by Bernie Taffs with regards to security in the Students' Union which must be refuted. Firstly, Mr Taffs seems to misunderstand the Data Protection Act and our CCTV cameras. The Students' Union has a sophisticated and fully legally compliant CCTV system. We will shortly be upgrading our system at considerable expense, and these plans have been fully discussed and agreed with LSE Security. Secondly, Mr Taffs claims that we do not allow LSE Security to attend Crush. This again is untrue. Unless legally required (for example if they were to be in a drunk or disorderly state) LSE Security staff are welcome to attend Crush. Indeed we believe they would be impressed to observe what is an extremely well run and safe student night. However SIA legislation would make it illegal for them to take an active part in the securty of the venue unless they are SIA (Sectirity Industry Authority) badged, something that all concerned are fully aware of. Thirdly, Mr Taffs claims that we under-report incidents of crime, and do not provide names and addresses of those involved. If an incident occurs all relevant details are passed on to Mr Taffs by the next working day. While all are asked for names and addresses if these are often not available this is due to many students, even if victims, being unwilling to provide them. The only recent incident where a theft was not reported to Mr Taffs was because LSE Security staff at reception did not record it, something Mr Taffs should consider before accusing LSESU staff of negligence. LSE Security and the Students' Union should continue to work closely together for the safety of our students. Unfortunately, Mr Taffs' good work in many other areas of the school is imdermined by untrue or outdated outbursts like that reported in your last edition. Joel Kenrick LSE SU Treasurer On behalf of the Team Sabbatical "great job" Dear Sir We would like to express our disillusionment with the simplistic and one dimensional debate over the appointment of Peter Sutherland KCMG as Chair of LSE Council. It appears commonplace for hacks to discard British Petroleum as "environmental and social abusers". Some have even resorted to accusing Sutherland of violating human rights and "murder" in his role as chairman of BP. Such populist anti-business rhetoric has entered the mainstream of the SU. BP has helped local communities prosper. It is an outstanding employer that offer great job prospects. Having links to BP is beneficial to students. It is misleading to morph the oil company into some 'big evil monster' based on a select number of scattered incidents. The facts tell a different stoiy. Since January 2003, BP group companies have received over 80 independently-judged awards related to their environmental and social performance, including; No. 2 world's top green company (BusinessWeek), "Most Respected Energy Company" (Financial Times), "Energy Company of the Year" and Gold Award winner in the Renewable Energy category (2005 Energy Business Awards), 2006 Catalyst Award for advancing women in the workplace Whilst BP may have damaged the environment, it is undeniable that if global warming is to be avoided, companies with the capital and innovative potential of BP will be central to solving it. It is illogical to assume Sutherland is inherently "evil" and obsessed with "marketisa-tion" of education, based on his involvement with BP. Sutherland has had a distinguished past in politics, the judiciary and business, and is a generous philanthropist. Whilst BP has committed serious mistakes, presenting an inaccurate portrait of it is intellectually lazy and potentially dangerous. This attitude - which rejects the nuances of complex issues - offers no solutions to the problems facing students, the School, society and the environment at large. Mud-slinging and personal attacks don't foment constructive politics. P^cts do, and it would be beneficial if The Beaver had been more willing to report them in your recent coverage of this issue. Eddy Fonyodi Arthur Krebbers Student members of the Court of Governors, 2005 onwards Kav Patel AU and SU Executive Gareth Rees Gustav Lange Eva-Maria Asari Ross Allan Society Presidents Ben Biggs Daisy O'Brien Cliff Chow Chris Heathcote Charles Laurence Carys Morgan Doug Oliver _"jack last"_ Dear Sir After having the honour of being mentioned in the Union Jack last week, I felt it necessary to write to you and tell you that my name is Ruhana Ali. 'Thank you and keep up the good work. Unnamed Deputy of the UGM "history's obiection" Dear Sir I write to express the Department of International History's objection to the article by Sachin Mehta (LSE: Not value for money, 30 January 2007), in particular his claims about its pastoral provision. The Department is proud of its deserved reputation for thorough and rigorous teaching. It has played a leading role in the creation of the School's new code of practice for personal tutors, and members of staff observe this code scrupulously. I have seen evidence which suggests that every one of Mr Mehta's teachers and tutors in the Department have gone out of their way to be helpful to him. They share my disappointment that he has, unfairly and without foundation, chosen to drag the Department into his broadside against proposed rises in tuition fees. Undergraduates in the Department have a forum - the Staff-Student Committee- at which they can raise issues. The minutes of Staff-Student Commmittee meetings are brought to Departmental staff meetings at which they are discussed in detail; the Department takes students' concerns seriously and does its best to respond to specific issues or criticisms. It is unfortunate that the students making these complaints have failed to take advantage of this apparatus. Dr J Chatterji Departmental Tutor Department of International History "hates Sacha" Dear Sir I read Simon Douglas' letter with regards to the International History Department. Frankly, I didn't understand why he felt the need to identify his tutor by name. Perhaps he just wasn't brave enough to confront her directly during his first two years, so since he was editing the C&A pages, he felt he can finally have a go at her. How mature! Also, he complained that his former tutor "couldn't pick me in a line-up", yet he got the tutor's surname and position wrong. I was also puzzled by Ariel Elkin's response to Sacha (Ed-sic) Mehta. My guess is that he was either approached by the principal or the PR department, or has unusually close ties to the LSE, or just hates Sacha (Ed-sic) with a passion. And he's "sick and tired" of hearing opinions like Sacha's (Ed-sic)? I agree, let's just impose our views on everybody else! Who cares about freedom of speech? Also, I'd like to ask him which other University of London libraries LSE students can "freely borrow books from", apart from Senate House. Romina Spina "the finger" Dear Sir Following my article dated 30th January, I would like to make the following points clear. My article was not a wholesale attack or slamming of the History Department, but simply a criticism of the LSE and the tuition fee process in general. To reiterate, I believe that students pay too much, and that if intuitions continue to wish for increases in the level of fees, there must be greater justification and accountability of where this money is being spent. I feel that some people believed mistakenly that I was pointing the finger solely at the History Department, however this was not the case, instead I was commenting on areas I believed that the LSE could improve on as a whole, if tuition fees continue to increase. The impression people got was that I totally dismissed the teaching of the History Department as woeful, again this was not my intension, and I apologize for any hurt caused. However I am glad that the article has caused some debate over whether the LSE is worth the money! Sachin Mehta "impressively free" Dear Sir As a member of the Media Group "old guard", I feel compelled to comment on what appears to be a steady decline in the quality and objectivity of your news, to say nothing of the editorial independence of the paper. It is an open secret that this year's sabbatical team are asserting increasing influence over content, both directly under the guise of checking for libel, and indirectly through their relationship with editors. I wiU not pretend that the "old days" were wholly wonderful and impressively free of outside influence, but perhaps The Beaver might consider a return to reporting, disinterested editors, proper sourcing and real news. Stacy-Marie Ishmael Honorary Student "thought police" Dear Sir The signatories of the "parental instinct" letter published last week either didn't read or imderstand my column, are stupid, or as is more probable - both. I think the number of signatories says more about the bandwagon mentality and egos of the signatories than it does about serious objection to my pen. The whole point of the part in which I discussed my approaching the feminist stall was self-deprecation, a sentiment which seems wholly lost on the signatories. And I didn't misrepresent anybody or anything - if the ladies who I spoke to were out of step with the signatories, that's their problem. In fact, sounds like a case for the thought police! With regard to the discussion of "maternal instinct"; it is not an exclusive term. Maternal instinct does not preclude paternal instinct, as the signatories suggest. Furthermore, maternal instinct does not just mean having children; it can be expressed in a whole variety of ways - and to think it was me who was being accused of narrow-mindedness! I end with this plea: do not employ hysterical, inflated nonsense whenever someone says "ladies" or "girls". Your silly whines betray the noble acts of the suffragettes, whom I admire beyond measure. To modify Michael Winner's remarks: "Calm down dears, it's just a newspaper column!" Samuel Burke The Right Approach io| leaver I 13 February 2007 COMMENT&ANALYSIS COMMENT & ANALYSIS c&a@thebeaveronline.co.uk Students'Union Rant RAG heart-Break: SU's bad Jessi Cartw The highly-anticipated fundraiser extraordinaire RAGbreak met an unceremonious still-bom end. Jessica Cartwright thinks the SU is to blame for RAGbreak's demise This week is Raising and Giving week and it had the opportunity of being kicked off to a great start by a highly lucrative, fun and extremely exhilarating fundraising event. However, the LSE SU's apparent inability to successfully promote and organise this event, known as 'RAGbreak', led to its poor support and subsequent cancellation. The majority of you are probably wondering what RAGbreak even is and why it should matter to you. The aim of RAGbreak is that groups of students have just 52 hours to get as far away from their university as possible and back again; without spending a single penny on travel. It's a fun-filled challenge and it's all in the name of charity. In recent years participants at the University of Cambridge have made it as far a field as Tokyo, Toronto and Prague. The winners of the 2006 Manchester RAGbreak escaped to New York! Unfortunately almost every LSE student we asked for sponsorship hadn't even heard of RAGbreak and no one knew it was occurring at the LSE; as a result just 2 groups applied to take part. This is largely due to the fact that RAGbreak had very limited publicity; it doesn't even exist on the LSE SU RAGweek website. Any publicity that existed lacked detailed information and if you took the initiative to find out more at the SU reception, your questions went unanswered. The failure of RAGbreak is yet another example of the SU's ability to squander opportunities The failure of RAGbreak is yet another example of the SU's ability to squander opportunities through a lack of reviewing their policies in how they promote events and carry out ideas that are poten- tially brilliant. The purpose of the SU is surely to employ its power to draw together the diverse and fragmented nature of the 8000 strong LSE student body. It should use this power to promote events such as RAGweek to a much greater extent and realise their full potential. In reality the majority of students at the LSE have relatively little knowledge about the SU's weekly topics and agendas; fliers serve purely to add litter on Houghton Street. The very fact that many events organised by the SU have had such poor turnouts should trigger a response. However, the failure of this latest event proves that the LSE SU is making little effort to close the gap between the Union and the vast majority of students. For us the cancellation of RAGbreak was a personal disappointment, and it also meant that the charities will not receive the £312 of sponsorship that we alone had managed to raise. In the future it is necessary for the LSE SU to pull its finger out and become more proactive in its organisation and promotion of events; find new ways of interacting with the majority of the student body to actively encourage greater participation. This was a wasted opportunity; hopefully next year RAGbreak can achieve its full potential because it is a fantastic way to raise money for charity, while at the same time you get to spend the weekend travelling all over the country and potentially the world, having fun and learning some crucial skills that you won't ever gain from classes and essays. Just to demonstrate what could potentially be raised by RAGbreak; Manchester University's 2006 RAG Jailbreak raised £9000. Hopefully next year we can all participate, because if just 10 more groups had joined us, we could have raised £3000; surely that's worth the SU investing more time and effort in promoting these events. Democracy besieged Be afraid. Be very afraid. The Students' Union is under siege, and Douglas Oliver makes a call to arms to resist illiberal practices In his article dated 23rd January "New Labour are New Tories" James Caspell defines political variety in our Students' Union as that of "left and right" and warns against the "faux" left represented, he claimed, by Daniel Sheldon. Whilst this distinction is one-dimensional, it ignores a more pressing ideological battle currently faced by our Union. That is the division between those students who believe in student politics which is of a liberal and democratic nature and those - like Caspell and a small number of others - who are opposed to it. Whilst students on both sides of this division share views on important issues facing the School and the world, the gulf is borne not just out of differing modi operandi, but of fundamentally differing ideological perspectives. Over the last year or so, the LSESU Green Party founded by Caspell has steadily increased its political strength and visibility on campus. The party has promoted issues and campaigns which many students, including myself, feel important and sympathise with; environmen- tal issues, Iraq on a national and international level, and the nature of Peter Sutherland's appointment. Naturally, there are issues which we disagree with. This heterodoxy of outlook is not a thing to regret but rather to be welcomed - its existence facilitates the crucible of debate which students come to the LSE from all over the world to participate in. This forum of debate and argument allows us to appreciate the strengths and weaknesses or our preconceptions and hence "seek new perspectives". This tradition of freedom of speech and discussion was established by the School's founders, the Webbs, and, with regards to the student body, is protected by the SU's Constitution. Most students would agree that these aspirations represent the essence of the LSE. It is because of this that the disdain Caspell and others have shown toward these liberal and democratic principles is so disturbing. This mindset was first illustrated after the 2004 Michaelmas Term SU elections, when Caspell sought to overturn the election of Winston Churchill as Honorary Vice-President but have been illustrated on many occasions since. Despite the clear will of hundreds of students, Caspell temporarily succeeded in persuading C&S to over-turn the result based on an obscure interpretation of the Constitution, before sense was later seen. Since then, the Green Party's electoral strength has been increased through poorly contested elections and prospered in conditions of student apathy. They have sought to ensure that Society "block votes" (in the form of e-mail endorsement by Society committees) play a crucial influence in deciding SU elections. In my former capacity as SU Returning Officer, I was initially shocked when he deliberately contravened election rules - such as leafleting in the voting room. However, I and others have since become used to this anti-democratic approach which came to manifest itself time and again. For instance, certain Greens orchestrated a call for the unnecessary over-turn of last year's SU Societies election. Caspell attempted before last term's elections to persuade C&S to rule out a student's candidature based on a technicality on their nomination form. Meanwhile - and more dangerously vis-a-vis the Union - various Green Officers have sought to reduce participation in the Union General Meeting by instituting an unnecessary paper throwing ban. It came as little surprise that after The Beaver published stories which the Greens found unflattering, the I was initially shocked when he (Caspell) deliberately contravened election rules - such as leafleting in the voting room Party was caught attempting to fill the paper's governing body with its own members in order that it could elect its own sympathetic news editor. Each of these anecdotes can in themselves be ignored on first inspection as innocuous examples of over-zealous student politicking and "hackery". However, taken together, they provide incontrovertible evidence of a developing and pernicious force operating within our student governance which directly threatens the pluralism and open access which defines it. That is why the nature of the protest aimed at Sutherland last term was so passionately opposed by many students. It was not because they approved the man the protest opposed, but because it was deliberately aimed at undermining free speech and because it prevented students and members of the public from participating and questioning him. The protest taken in itself might have been more easily ignored by students had it not been indicative of a broader illiberal trend. The authoritarian agenda that Caspell and others have pursued in recent times has damaged the Students' Union -the focus on important stu-dent-related campaigns has been lost. Nonetheless, it is regarded with great antipathy by the vast bulk of students who are generally liberal in outlook. Those who stand on that side of the divide have allowed themselves to be ignored for too long by failing to sufficiently engage in student politics. Whilst Caspell is correct to consider the importance of the left-right divisions in our Union, it is clear that its significance is far smaller than the struggle to secure a pluralistic Union open for all students. The argument can be won, but it wiU require the large numbers of normal students - typically apathetic to the SU - to get involved and give it support come the elections in week 8. The Vladical Left i eat u res thebea veron 1 i n e.co. uk The Right Approach Vladimir Unkovski -Korica People have often said to me that one can't be green without being red, and one can't be red without being green. On the face of it, that is not true. Ever larger numbers of scientists, politicians and even fossil fuel corporations are coming around to the idea that action is necessary to stop climate change before it is too late. Last year. Sir Nicholas Stern's report argued . that the cost of not acting on climate change would be greater for the world economy than taking action. Just over a week ago, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), bringing together more than 2500 scientists from over 30 countries, concluded that global warming was an 'unequivocal' fact very likely (90%) caused by human activity. An ever broader mood is growing across the world that we need to do something before it is too late. A1 Gore's documentary 'An Incovenient Truth' singled out energy production and heavy industry (particularly the burning of fossil fuels to create electricity), as well as transport, as being most responsible for excessive C02 emission. Restructuring these is a massive challenge. The primary problem. Gore seems to be suggesting, is the lack of political will - borne of the power of the corporations whose activities lie at the heart of the system. As a matter of fact, the oil industiy and its associates are both the vital nerve-centres of a dynamic economy and vastly influential pressure-groups in a costly electoral and political game. Gore's spot on when he explains, quoting socialist author Upton Sinclair: "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it." How can we expect change, then? This is where Gore starts getting fuzzy. He shows how, while Japan and the EU can produce more energy-efficient cars than the US as a result of environmentally-friendly legislation, similar efforts are scuppered in California by the car industries. But surely, what is missing is political leadership: mass movements led by Martin Luther King and Gandhi flash across the screen to remind us of how change is possible against the odds. Even if Gore had become President in 2000 could we have expected him to act any differently in power than Blair? Rich in rhetoric and promises. New Labour presided over a 3% increase in carbon gas emissions between 1997 and 2005. Surely, there was political support - but no political will for change. The only solutions that are guaranteed to work are ones that challenge the fundamentals of the system itself. For it is clear that when relations of production become established, and with them great centres of wealth-creation and power, those with an interest in retaining their privileged positions become very resistant to change. The only changes they are willing to countenance are ones that will not significantly impact on their position in society. Thus, they may accept limitations in one set of fields (fossil fuel-related ones), if they are guaranteed revenues or privileges in other fields (nuclear, for example) and if they fear the costs of global climate change sufficiently. But even here, we rely on their goodwill. Frequently, we are warned not to frighten them by putting pressure on them - they may be scared off real change if they fear for their position. Best let a dynamic market sort itself out. Right? Wrong. The task of cutting C02 emissions is not best left to those who have got us here in the first place. Instead of investing in public and mass means of transport, producing locally and opting for renewable energy, most politicians and corporations argue for the nuclear solution. That this is costlier seems not to be a problem since corporations and governments are not run by ordinary people. That extraction and transport of materials necessary for generation of nuclear power are carbon-intensive is also conveniently forgotten. That nuclear waste remains a horrific problem is downplayed. That nuclear accidents can be as destructive as a dirty bomb is not emphasised. That nuclear power-stations across the world are often a precursor to nuclear weapons as the sole guarantee of a country's sovereignty in an age of permanent war is passed over when discussing Iran. To challenge the chaos and inertia at the heart of global capitalism - to stop global climate change - is best achieved by being green and red. Notes on Nothing Head of Politics Desk: Charlie Doughaty Head of Society Desk: Ikssannund OnArin Head of Business/Careers/Law Desk: Sminn^Qjpta Political Correspondents: iStegiaiMDe, Business Correspondent: Sam Burke It is hard to believe that problems with your gas bill could ever be fatal but for millions of pensioners living alone in the UK not being able to afford to keep the boiler running can be a life or death issue. Pensioners in Scotland are more likely to freeze to death than those in Siberia due to gross mismanagement of benefits and rising fuel bills. A report by the energy comparison website uSwitch discovered this week that half of Britain's pensioners were cutting back on other necessities to meet their rising heating costs and one in five believed their health would suffer if heating continued to get more expensive. It seems highly unlikely that, with only three years left and little action so far, the government will reach its target of taking people out of 'fuel poverty' by 2010. Anyone who hadn't made up their mind on whether climate change is a mild concern to be worried about by sandal-wearing Guardian readers or more dangerous than a nuclear war was given food for thought by two pieces of news this week. Firstly Britain's richest ginger Sir Richard Branson offered $25 million (probably spare change for him) to whoever could come up with the best way of curbing fossil fuel emissions and save our planet. Answers on a postcard please. Although this seemingly selfless gesture may have had something to do with the recent launch of Virgin Media it's not hard to look beyond the cynicism and feel a little more optimistic about the state of those ice caps. If big business, supposedly the enemy of ice caps, rainforests and cuddly looking polar bears, is prepared to reach into its pocket (for whatever reason) and do something which could bring about a qualitative rather than quantitative curb on emissions then maybe we can breath a little easier "owever the government of Norway were feeling less ^__.cheerful and last week they unveiled a 'doomsday vault' in the Svalbard mountains near the north pole. Unfortunately as exiting as that sounds this is not the home of some kind of megalomaniac or a project for the world's leaders to inhabit in the event of a nuclear winter This is the "International Seed Vault" designed to preserve specimens of crops in case they don't survive the changes in the planets environment. Doomsday vault sounds a lot cooler though. Residents of Boston recently feared that doomsday was even closer than previously suspected when a promotional stunt by the Cartoon Network was misinterpreted as a terrorist threat. Jim Staples, manager of the channel resigned on Saturday after battery-powered signs displaying the logo of "Aqua Teen Hunger Force" - a new program being launched by the network - were mistaken as bombs all over the city generating a state of high alert. Cartoon Network have paid the city $2 million in damages. ^ ^ Tf it's not broke; don't fix it!" That was my I usual retort when challenged on what I JLthought of House of Lords reform. The House of Lords has been brought into disrepute by the "Cash for Peerages" saga. Whatever, the outcome of the police enquiry, it appears that there has been at best a lack of transparency worthy of a criminal investigation, and at worst, wholesale corruption of the worst order. It's a right mess - and has been for a while. Let's look at some of the Prime Minister's appointments to the House of Lords. Among Blair's first nominations to the Lords was tennis partner, Michael Levy. During opposition. Levy raised £7 million for Tony Blair. He is nicknamed "Lord Cashpoint". Lord Sainsbury of Turville, another major donor who has given about £13 million to Labour since 1994 was also elevated to the Lords and made a government minister, though he resigned in October 2006 after being questioned by the police. Other donors who made it to the Lords include Ruth Rendell, the crime writer (£15,000); David Puttnam, the Oscar-winning film director, (£25,000); and Michael Montague, a largely unknown businessman who died in 1999 (£1 million). Waheed Alii, the multimillionaire founder of Planet 24 Television, made free party political films for Labour worth an estimated £100,000 and also made it to the Lords. But Labour are not alone in the dock. The Conservatives and Lib Dems appear equally to blame. Among recent Tory peers are prominent donors Irvine Laidlaw, the Scottish entrepreneur; and Stanley Kalms, the former chairman of Dixons. I'm not going to waste time talking about the Liberal Democrats; sufficient to say that "google-ing" the terms "Michael Brown dodgy money to liberal democrats" will show you that the Lib Dems are up to their neck in it. No party is without sin. How then do we address the "Cash-for-Peerages" problem? Some friends of mine have called for the reinstitution of the old feudal lords. It's a good idea in theory, but of course, it is entirely unfeasible in today's political climate - not to mention potential gene-pool issues. Another idea is to scrap the timeless institution; such an act would be the missing piece in the constitutional vandalism jig-saw, which has been hastily put together over the past decade. The most serious prospects arising from this saga are two fold. Firstly; House of Lords reform. The Commons will decide how far to introduce an elected element - ranging from a 50% elected to an all-elected House, The debate on this question is contrived. The aim is not to improve the House per se in it's function as a secondary revising chamber Rather, it is to add legitimacy to an institution with flagging credibility. Conservatives should work for an effective second chamber not for a PR coup for Labour. The second prospect on the horizon is, in the absence of honours and peerages, state-funding for political parties. This would be a disaster. There is a moral wrongness of using tax-payers money to fuel the parading of political egos; money that ought to be spent where it is needed. If you cannot convince individuals and groups that your ideas and integrity are worth investing in, then you should not be allowed to rob the British people. They want to make incumbency equivalent to an appointment-for-life; ironic given that they're trying to undo just that in the House of Lords. But what I didn't already tell you is that we already have state-funding of the political system. One of politics' best kept secrets is that Labour, the Conservatives, Lib Dems and other parties already get between £19.32m and just under £50m each year to fund their operations. This existing state fimding has also increased by a massive 430% since 1997 and there is clear evidence that MPs supplement this through their allowances. There is little doubt that things need to change. But Conservatives must ensure that through the course of the change we do not lose the Chamber which provides so much in expertise and quality scrutiny, at such little cost. It is, in terms of the number of hours sat and the total cost of running the Chamber, the best value legislature in the world. Be on your guard; when the Government seek to replace that gem, they may well be tempted to steal the Crown - perish the thought! 12 leaver j 13 February 2007 FEATURES: Vc Family Ties An LSE talks about the pain caused by prejudice. It is heartbreaking when your own family members refuse to accept a partner based on prejudice. My parents threatened to throw me out of the house when I brought my first boyfriend home. Simply because he was from a different part of the same country as me. Unfortunately, I am not the only one who has gone through this. The media today has sensationalised the words 'racism' and 'religious intolerance', but in daily life, the prejudices are rarely as overt. Some of the most open minded family members can be very unsympathetic to relationships outside their accepted norms and educated individuals can be marked by deep-set intolerances and perhaps this is what is most dangerous. These subtle prejudices can fester in one's mind until it eventually ruins good friendships and often relationships. The LSE is 'international' in every sense of the word; our staff and students are made up of people from various ethnicities and religions. As a result, inter-racial as well as interfaith relationships are nothing new."It doesn't bother me that my boyfriend is from a different religious background than me. I embrace and respect his beliefs and he in turn does the same. In fact that's what makes our relationship so interesting," says a third year Government student. But the story is not that simple across the board. Particularly prevalent in relationships where one or both partners are from a traditional cultural background, family members can be very unsympathetic to relationships outside their accepted norms. "I'm Chinese and my girlfriend is Caucasian. It raises a lot of eyebrows and is something I find very hard to discuss with my parents. If things get more serious it will be very hard for us to get married. It just won't be accepted in my family," says a second year Economics student. In some families neither race nor religion is a factor that raises objections towards a relationship, but wealth, educational background or ambition can be a determining factor in the acceptance of it. Many a time parents will insist that their children must date or marry a person of the similar or higher level of education and income but as a third year Accounting and Finance student asserts; "you can't choose these things when you're attracted to someone." Certainly, there are very successful relationships where one partner is completely career orientated while another may be a school dropout! Keeping in the spirit of Valentine's Day, incontestably, love transcends these factors. At the end of the day each of us has our own yardstick to measure the suitability of a spouse and when this is different from one's family, homes can be torn apart. "My boyfriend is Muslim while I am a Hindu. But I believe that even if my parents have objections to his religious background, when I convince them of his personality as well as academic strength and ambition they should come around," says a second year Government and History student. "Ironically, despite living in a city like London that is a melting pot of multicultural-ism and going to a university that celebrates diversity and differences, many people have to revert to a seemingly traditional lifestyle at home." The problems are age-old but through education and awareness, there may be a new way to tackle these issues. Ultimately it can be very difficult to choose between love and prejudice, between romantic relationships and family. But as the saying goes, "you must be the change that you wish to see in others." 50% highe the actual cost of going on a date is 50 per cent greater in London than anywhere else in the country £8biilion amount spent on dating per year in the UK £200 average cost of a date in Britain tSoiirce: www.pmewswire.co.uk Can't buy me love Deejay Lammers asks if it's all worth it From the male perspective, it is difficult to be consistently cheap when taking your partner out on a date. Difficult, and perhaps quite socially unacceptable. Difficult, but not impossible. The average cost of a date in Britain is £200. I don't usually hit this level of love, and I'd say that it is unnecessary to do so, r^^even in London. With '*<11planning, flTtf^^iy^and sound situa-j||l||B^K vw tional judge-ment ("let's go home and H watch Star Trek videos"), m8^@BBfcyour wallet will forever stay filled on a night out with the missus. Briefly focussing on the dining element of humanoid relations, it seems the possibility of a 'cheap date' does exist. However, before, I must note the disadvantages of being cheap. My thinking is that firstly, she might not like it, and if you do it consistently, she might leave you. This is when cool judgement is needed, and more money splurged out on the next date. Upgrade from the meal for two at Burger King to a burger and beer at Spoons. This usually gives you time to re-think the strategy, whilst keeping your partner feeling the loved-up high. More importantly, from personal experience it's quite dangerous to be always dining on the cheap, particularly if you're having to head into unknown territory to find your meal. A visit to the deep countryside in order to cull your own beef or pick your own fruit, could end up as a run from the farmer in flat cap, with rifle, shouting " Jap!" On the other hand, one could have chosen an excursion to urban fields; a Chinese restaurant on a Peckham estate. Half an hour earlier, you were licking your lips at the thought of chicken chow-mien, followed by post dinner cosying with your partner. Half an hour later, you are encircled by a gang of hooded teenagers who are vying for immigrant blood. On the other hand, this could also be a bit of a thrill, and might even kick-start that faltering relationship. For something dangerous, the author can suggest the seafood noodles at the cheap, (but actually pretty good) 'Big Noodle' restaurant in Elephant Castle. Approaching closing time, the concrete turns into an imaginary battlefield, and then there's the rat maze of tunnels underneath the ring road - nothing gets the adrenalin pumping more than the run from the restaurant to the tube station. whilst dodging the hoodlums. Many suggest that you should treat the whole thing as a game - how little money can you spend on your partner, whilst still being able to keep them keen. If he can get away with taking her on an a la carte three piece meal at Chicken Cottage (fries included), on their six month anniversary, then he's a winner After the meal, there is even more opportunity to practice thriftiness. For instance, some of the inexpensive dating ideas suggested on www.betterbudget-ing.com include the 'follow them date'. The instructions go, that when your date arrives, you each designate a stranger to follow on the street. If the person you are following stops, then you choose another one to follow. Or even better is the 'scavenger hunt date'. Both of you draw up a list of totally random things to find, and you both set out to find them. The person who is first to find everything on the list wins some good loving. Maybe it's best to actually just spend that extra, and avoid all the hassle. Some of the problems remain unmentioned - for instance the coristant nagging that you are not treating him or her with due respect. The true cost of economising. Remember that. f 40^^' 1- + + two tuesday the thirteenth of february, two thousand and seven K:.}' Interview PartB is reunited with its birth Wolfmother JIBOMI Valentine's Survival Kit 'm 1 I.............................................I I llris tile t'eiirei' j I LOTS OF CHOCOLATE I I so you'll get flit ami never leave me | I from....................................I !r}n to ¦' 1 ¦ taken seriously? "Is it important? Do you have to do that? We played with a guy once who has a sheet of glass with a microphone taped on it and a belt full of effects pedals. It's really performance art and it sounds amazing, but it's not music. Maybe that's advancing music because he's exploring things that haven't been done before. But there are only so many notes in an octave and so many things you can do with that. I read a book when I was a student called 'The Cosmic Octave' which is all about how certain vibrations really resonate within the body. That's why there are common chord structures that you hear in pop songs all the time, because they're the sort of tones that people react well to. There are certain primal things about four-four time, it's just something that works. "A lot of people slag us off as just being a cover band, or a retro band. People say that we sound like Black Sabbath but duh! Black Sabbath is the starting point for all stoner rock music. John Lennon said he wanted to be Elvis and Ozzy Osbourne said he wanted to be like The Beatles but then Metallica said they wanted to be Black Sabbath although they didn't like The Beatles. People used to openly declare their influences but now it seems like that's a bad thing. What we throw in to the equation is just instinctive for us. We don't set out to emulate anyone. If it sounds like something that's been done before, well, I don't care, I'm having a good time." 'Good time' is a bit of an understatement -accolades and awards have been thrown at them and they have even been honoured with inducting Led Zeppelin in to the UK Music Hall of Fame, playing 'Communication Breakdown' in front of the likes of Jimmy Page. "I've spent most of my life avoiding doing work and last year was by far the busiest year of my life. Everything is going so well. If you were to say to us three years ago that all these things would happen we'd have been like 'yeah, sure!'. It's amazing how quickly things iiave happened, but on the other hand we did spend six years hanging out, just jamming." Honestly, he doesn't know he's born! Most bands spend their entire lifetimes touring around toilet venues, swigging warm cider and getting deep-vein thrombosis and/or herpes in the backs of cramped tour vans. Yet Wolfmother, within two years of signing to Modular records, have achieved rock-god status that defies their critics. Wolfmother give people what they want to hear - pure, unadulterated rock music that is highly entertaining without trying to be funny or ironic (stand up please The Darkness) - and they don't have some grand motive to change roclc and roll for centuries to come. They just want to play music and make people go crazy - a nice, non-violent, caring crazy at that! a. SIX tuesday the thirteenth of febraary, t\ Sex Mat Assuming it all goes well on Valentine's Day, you're probably going to need somewhere romantic to demonstrate your new found love in a physical way. While the problems of shared student housing and halls are well documented, those dark alleyways behind Houghton Street can be hard on the knees. Which is where our patented Sex Mat comes in - simply place on the ground to transform anywhere from secluded LSE corridors to the dingiest corner of London into an urban love pad. Like a game of TVvister without the charade of decency, we've also included some handy pointers for our favourite moves. Enjoy! © + As a student, and a student in London at that, it is almost impossible for you to be anything else but broke. You drink the cheapest available beer, walk everywhere, and don't really eat just so that you can afford your busy social life. When you see those clipboard-carrying charity representatives on the street, you avoid them without fail, but with the self-satisfied feeling that it's alright: you're a student, you've got no money i0'h anyway. What's amazing is that for 51 weeks of the year, you almost get away with that' argument. The one week that you definitely don't, however, is RAG week. The fact is, skint and stingy as you may be, you are still about 47 times better off than the people that KAG week aims to help, and this is your opportunity to help them and have fun while you do. LSE RAG week is about doing just a little bit more than you usually do. That's not a lot more, that's just a little bit more. RAG week is about the spare change in your pocket, the half hour extra you spend volunteering, and most of all, thinking about why. With so many activities planned and so many ways to get involved, you've got absolutely no excuse. ^ In this pull-out you'll find society listings and advertisements, profiles of the official RAG Week charities and information about what RAG really means: information we think is essential for you to get the most out of RAG Week, and for RAG to get the most out of you! The money from every advert in this section goes directly to the nominated charities, as does the donation that we asked froiii you when you picked up the paper. If you didn't donate, go back and do it now. Dig deep! + 13 February 2007 me baby Profiles of the RAG charities...just to prove that all that money really is going to a good cause. By Dan Sheldon Link Community Development is a small group of organisations which aim to improve education in rural African communities through working with local schools and authorities, twinning with schools in Europe and placing UK teachers in African schools. It was founded in 1989 by students at Cambridge University in support of education in South Africa, and has reached out to Ghana, Uganda and Malawi since then. LCD starts from the premise that education is the key to national prosperity and health. They seek to improve the potential of disadvantaged people in Africa to gain meaningful employment by sharing and developing appropriate skills through education. One major strand of LCD's work is the training it offers to teachers, par- ents and officials. This is more than just telling educators what to do - LCD strives to work within existing systems to build partnerships regional education departments. It then uses this grassroots knowledge to influence national education policies across Africa. In South Africa, where LCD has a very high profile, it has been contracted by the Department of Education to provide key services at district level and helps to coordinate education policy nationally. A key attribute of LCD is its understanding of the need for a combination of high quality teaching with effective management of schools and district education offices. They provide training for headteachers and managers to manage school finances and governance. Working with schools, they produce School Development Plans to prioritise areas of improvement. School Improvement Grants are for the most urgent needs, and are tied to good governance and financial management. HIV/AIDS is a major issue in rural Africa, and LCD realises the impact it has on the education sector. They provide training for headteachers and governors to help raise awareness, prevent the spread of HIV/AIDS and provide support those affected by the disease in the school community. The Linking programme is integral to LCD as an organisation. It aims to twin schools -primary, middle, special and secondary - in the UK with counterparts in Africa, teaching students about the wider world and providing essential funding to African schools. Many schools, such as Wellesley Park Primary School has found this programme invaluable. Jenny, 9, sums up her thoughts on the project succinctly: "It means that they're very special friends because they're friends so far away." So far LCD has helped over half a million young people in Africa. LCD Events Manager Tina Sloane, a former LSE student, is adamant of the effectiveness of their work. "Because LCD is such a small charity, RAG Week really will make a massive difference. The changes we make go beyond the education system - it has been proven that it makes a lasting difference to African communities." ADVERTISEMENT TO; e:0;N;Ii3b^IVJjINlj TiWjE: 0;F- llNj WHY? *LaS!t we\N"- Pint Glass Drink yourself into a state of i^lanthropy. Great Oimoj-uJ Street r Children's Chartty | CiOSHCC -H SUwww.businesssodety.co.u WHICH 4 fx w-M JOIN US FOR 1 VVWW.BUSINe Bloomberg CltigrOU|Sr Deutsche Bank m mERNi HAS? K) MEM EVENTS rAILHRED ALERTS SSSOCIETY.CaUK waYoung ioldman >adis JPMorgan O Merrill Lynch + J-ebruary 2007 Advertisement ¥ RUN •••'""'(SSSS^S^' ^ Society WORK SMART & PLAY HARD. RUN Society wishes every one a iLappA^ KUAV- y^exjA x:f 2007- the year of the Boar And we are not done yet...... DONEl Ice Skating BBQ Paintball Karting DONE DONE DONE DONEl Bath Cambridge Oxford |DONE| Stonehenge Bicester Cardiff Warwick Castle Newcastle Brighton York Portsmouth Edinburgh + Emdil58i,80Q,rim3 r\. • Celebration of the 50th Anniversary of the Treaty of Rome: European Quk, Dinner, and Night out im Mtmk im? ivhkh willl ^n knowkdg^ ©r t© jii^t mm p©(0ple fwm «£)itfeer wnfs! • FBSA Entente Cordiale Annual Meeting: Ch&teau de Breteuil 27th April 290? Ardund Bdli^ 'mi Fresftdh stoimts mdi leadkg spedkefs will at the CMt^u de Breteui! near ¥m& April to di^ss iilie foUiipe of tire Fmfteo-BrMsh rektbfts m the li^i of the pofefetas raised M Davos'" World Eeoftomic Fomin, mch as dimate change or developmeftt T1»e Entenle Cofdiale Ammd Summit will coftskt of conferences and workshops with ^ ouManding guest speaikers, in magniiflceftt Chlteau de Breieuil Students will also take part ^ in a black-tie dianer dad party. This eveat Is a great «i|i|>ortiinity to shure your vkws m c^alem^rary challea^ witli stadeats fkum tlie 6 FI^A aaiversitks md guest Saiat<^r !^deats> It will also provide exceptional communication opportunities with imeniational students in the waim awd stimulating atmospheie of irtie event!! £ For more tnformatton on these 2 events, email us: su.soc.fbsa@lse.ac.uk ! 1 4. + Wish China a peaceful and prosperous future. piittlli 1. On Feb. 10, 2007, China and Seychelles agreed to promote pragmatic cooperation In tourism, fishery, human resources and other areas. 2. Construction of the village for the 2010 World Expo in Shanghai began on February 8, 2007. The village has a total ground area of 540.000 square kilometers. By the time the project Is completed in 2009, It will be able to accommodate nearly 10,000 visitors. 3. Chinese Premier Wen JIabao spent the New Year holiday visiting farmers and citizens at a revolutionary base in east China's JIangsu Province In the first two days of 2007, conveying New Year greetings to the locals. 4. Children from Arabian countries performed at Spring Festival celebrations held by residents of the Wangling Community In the Chaoyang district In Beijing on February 8, 2007. Nearly 40,000 expatriates from 53 countries and regions live In the Wangjing Community. 5. The children demonstrated the art of tea-making In Qlntal Road. Chengdu, Sichuan Province. Hangzhou. Chengdu and Dalian were named "China's best tourist cities" on Thursday. 6. The Ministry of Science and Technology (MST) announced, that China vwll Invest 30 billion yuan in 147 key science programs, such as developing maglev trains and wind power stations or seawater desalination technologies. 7. China has begun a massive reconstruction of old buildings to make them more energy efficient. 8. The opening ceremonies of the six-party talks on North Korea's nuclear program, occured in Beijing. February 8, 2007. The six-party talks on the Korean Peninsula nuclear issue resumed on Thursday afternoon In Beijing, focusing on the first steps towards denuclearization of the peninsula. prepared by Ran Kong r lary, two thousand and seven seven .a B. eight tuesday the thirteenth of february, two thousand and seven rebels and devils abaosunsade attends the official launch of sennple clothing, and speaks to stuartsempte ¦¦ ^ ¦ t i ¦ ¦¦ i 7^- It appears tonight that mannequins are passe. As we arrive at "Dream Bags Jaguar Shoes" in Shoreditch, the shop windows are occupied by topless girls in metallic knickers, downing drinks and throwing sacks of flour at each other. Adorned with face glitter, the lovely ladies are the first thing you see, gyrating and staring out boldly at the sea of pervy pedestrians congregating amongst the paparazzi - this is the launch of Stuart Sample's new clothing line. A week later, when we visit Stuart's studio, I ask where the inspiration for the concept came from. " W e just thought it would be fun.", he replies casually, stroking his pet iguana. Fun indeed. If the launch was a theme party, it's theme would be "Exclamation Mark". Nothing, from the attendees to the music, to the clothing collection itself, was understated. The night was about great things: great people, great music, great conversation - and great clothes. Who did you have in mind when you designed this collection? "I didn't target groups, I just thought of people like us... thought about what we'd wear... just amusing ourselves, really. Just having fun." And oh boy, do Stuart and co. know how to have fun. Arriving at his launch in our everyday garb of jeans and tees, we felt direly oiit of place amongst the fashionable extravagance commonplace in London's East End. Like a disco I ball refracting infinite rays of light, so each individual (bar us and a few suits) stood out, establishing their own spectrum. My friend Nadine's favourite character was the "individual of an I indeterminable gender clad in a neon-I patterned tracksuit, with thick black I painted on eyebrows. Perhaps inspired [by a previous John Galliano catwalk I show?" Or perhaps inspired by a trip to Brick Lane's "Absolute Vintage" warehouse via an inspirational pit stop to a highlighter factory. This is Shoreditch after all, where no rulesj * apply. I ask Stuart if this is wh; S he, like many other young artists y chose to make this neighbour-! -4^ hood his base. w "I've been living in the East End' since I first moved to London three years ago; it's the creativej^" ' area of London. Many of the peoplej j I collaborate with work around the; fOld Street area so I'm definite!; inspired by it." And who wouldn't be? As| we walk down Curtain Roa len route to the launch, we pass] [everything from classy bou Itiques and kitsch cafes to a j dodgy office block whose sign; I tempts you with the offer ofj "Passports and Visas". Then there are the people: the scenesters, the fashionistas, the artists. And the druggies, drugdealers and whores. This is life as some people live it, and even the briefest of visits to Old Street makes you feel like a genuine part of it. This is a place where your reality of being another ordinary student on a straight-laced social science course fades into a mirage, as it did for us by the time we were on our third round of complimentary drinks at the launch - bopping away to the live folk band whilst chatting animatedly to the other guests. I worm my way through the crowded room to ogle at the rail displaying the collection. The hoodies and t-shirts are striking - bold cuts, bold prints and bold statements. I ask Stuart what forms the basis of his designs, "All my work has text, usually associated with the people featured in them." Referring to my favourite t-shirt in the collection, he elaborates,"...such as Edie Sedgwick's face here, with the words 'Poor Little Rich Girl' - the Andy Warhol film she starred in." And the colours? "It's a shade of ^ • ¦«r.. pink I've ^ always i used." - ' ' ' ' Perhaps Stuart is so confident and casual about his latest project because he has experience in the field, although he isn't simply a designer, he's an artist. He tells me that whilst designing for "Just Another Rich Kid" he always had the idea of eventually designing on his own. As he takes us through his studio, we admire his paintings in progress and his collection of others' pieces, including a one-of-a-kind original woodblock of the album artwork for Thorn Yorke's "The Eraser", given to Stuart by the singer/artist himself. I ask Stuart one last question -how does he think people will describe his clothes? "Flamboyant. And romantic - the ruffles make it romantic." I couldn't agree more with the description, though I might add "funky" to the list. But don't take my word for it, check it out for yourselves. The collection is available now, log on to www.no-one.co.uk. For more information on the artist, visit www. stuartsempie. com roses are dead hollieastman is hoving none of it this Valenine's Doy Don't get me wrong, I'm not anti-love/relation-ships, but just like a puppy at Christmas they should be for life, not for a day. The day is supposedly about showing your love, with all couples totally, absolutely involved in the whole "I love you" ordeal. If you really love someone, should you wait to be compelled by the greeting card companies to show your feelings? Wouldn't it be more romantic if you did all the things you're coerced into doing on February 14th when you simply feel the volition to do so? I don't get it. How did a day originating from the martyrdom of two guys called Valentine, which just so happened to occur during Roman fertility festivals, snowball into the card-buying frenzy that we find ourselves in the midst of? Feb 14th is the greeting cards companies' second biggest earner after Christmas. Now Christmas I understand - there's food, presents and a fat guy with a beard... but with Valentine's Day, all you get is an obese, incontinent infant with wings, firing arrows at unsuspecting victims, and some half-dead, over priced foliage if you're lucky. Today, it seems that Valentine's Day's sole purpose in the universe is to make all single people feel depressed, and all couples feel psychotically obliged to spend obscene amounts of money on oversized internal organs made out of chocolate, ill-fitting indecent lingerie, and vomit-inducing cards filled with sentiments more suited to a Fifty Cent song than a Shakespearian sonnet. The original valentines were beautiful verses scribed by Chaucer, but now they're verbal diarrhoea. "I well luv u dar-linn" really moves me to tears, if only because of the appalling grammar. And I can't comprehend the whole anonymity thing. On any other day of the year, if you received a card from a supposed stranger which declared their undying love, you would think you've fallen victim to a stalker. Call the police, close your curtains, set your Facebook profile to private and expect to find a horse's head in your bed.Yet when it happens on V-day it's not considered psycho, but romantic? Plus, there's always the embarrassment of the overriding doubt that the card isn't actually from Mr/Miss Right, but from your Mum. I suggest the Anti-Valentines Day. In Korea they have a Black Day, where all the guys who didn't get valentines meet up and eat black Jajangmyun noodles. But why stop with black food? This V-Day, make a stand. Embrace your inner Year 9: wear all black, dye your hair black, paint your nails black - you get the idea. Mourn for the old pure days of Love, when Clintons didn't dictate how people felt, when love wasn't spelt with a "u", and when "fittie" wasn't used as a redundant substitute for a compliment. Alternatively, focus on the whole anonymous gift giving idea and start sending birthday, anniversary, congratulations and sympathy cards to random addresses incognito. You're bound to make some new friends, even if it is with the local police in the form of a restraining order. And just think; only 365 days tiU the next one... can't wait! That totally romantic yet somewhat tacky time of year has come upon us again. Sadly, some greet this day with a sense of foreboding. For singletons, perhaps the reason is obvious - one year closer to their fate of dying a lonesome death almost as bad as receiving a^ sympa-t h e t i Valentine's card from your mum. AndJ for couples, the obliga-__ tion of spending time< _ with (and buy-" ing presents for)^ significant others can'' be a tiresome tall order. I suggest we break free of the shackles of Valentine's Day resentment, and embrace the holiday in all its loved-up glory. It should be a chance to express our love for one another - and what better way than with roses, kinky underwear and other ^r elation-/'^shiD. and tacky novelties? Numerous risque outlets of the Anne Summers variety (including BHS, rather disturbingly...) offer an array of gifts. Some are full to bursting with visu-4 al, tactile and edible erotica sure to add spice to any ___ ship, always a fantastic end to a night out in our very own London. But "^Valentine's Day isn't just for couples; it should be a time for us to appreciate friends and family, too. Instead of allowing in depression and ice-cream Bridget FJones-style, use this time of ^year to get together with all acquaintances and celebrate life and love through an entertaining mixture of tackiness, kinkiness and perhaps even a little romance... ...or not chrishare redefines romonce tuesday the thirteenth of february, two thousand and seven nine some words danielyates christens our new section by writing around some things If music is the food of love, then food is... I guess, in vague syllogistic terms, the music of love. If Shakespeare can equate these two things, then who are we to argue sense? What really doesn't make sense is the idea that there are amorous symphonic qualities to a scotch pie. Or that someone looking to find love, might spend time' listening to a meringue. The sound of food is rarely sexy. The clatter, clank and whirrs of the kitchen, punctuated by high-decibel swearing when someone gets accidentally burned or a chef decides to 'speak', these are not sexual sounds. The high-frequency screaming of dying lobsters, pans hissing and spitting like particularly frightened cats, most food preparation entails some kind of violation and this can be heard. Some chefs, in the market-led drive to sexu-alise their profession, pretend the sound of food is sexy. 'Listen to that' Nigella will say, as she palpates a chicken head. And it's only because those words are sprung from such luscious and delicious lips that we pay any credence to her babbling. 20 blackbirds in a pie might be funny, but it's going to make a horrible noise. Those musical birthday cake candles might be amazingly annoying but they are also cheap and horrible and an affront to technology. No, the sound of food is terrible. However, when mediated and imagined by musicians, food can actually sound quite hot. Cibo Matto released a fantastically delectable album dedicated to the delights of gastronomy, with songs entitled 'Beef Jerky', 'Artichoke' and 'White Pepper Ice Cream' amongst others. Artichoke includes the lyrics "Can you peel my petals one by one? Your hands are like a rusty knife Are you gonna keep on peeling me? Are you gonna keep on peeling me? Are you gonna keep on peeling me? What am I gonna be on the pan? Will I be burnt black? Can you squeeze a _ lemon on me? A lemon on me?" I think you'll agree that's impossibly hawt. Matthew Herbert released an album called 'Plat du Jour'. One of the tracks is a sample of the destruction, by steamroller, of the romantic dinner Nigella Lawson prepared for geopolitical love-fucks Bush and Blair in honour of dubya's 2003 visit to the UK. The resulting*^ 'song' sounds more horrific and sickening than any 'yo blair' soundbite. Crunching crockery, twisted china, it's the sound of catastrophe. And what more apt a* sound could one hope for on valentine's day? I'm hoping that valentines will pass without my total and complete break- down. Without the mental disintegration that being loveless on this day of love, this enshrining of amore, could entail. I'm planning to sit in my bedroom with some biscuits and a pack of tesco's sushi, watching sick porn and muttering swearwords under my breath. This does mean I have to go to tesco on valentines day, and try to remain immune to the forlorn presence of singletons buying single pints of milk and ready-meals for one. Their weird and hopeful eyes, full of whatever magazine article that told them a supermarket is a good place to meet 'prospective partners'. The soul- shaterring tragedy of life is rarely so clear and apparent. I might find myself falling apart in the deli aisle. Going all emotional in the frozen food section. Hopefully I'll get home in one piece, in piece enough to go online and submit some fake personal ads. Like these -> Angry, debilitated, ex silicon-miner. Have own laudanum. WTLM someone with own limbs. For pistol fights at dusk. Must have own laudanum. This is a terrifying world. I am the only worthy edifice in it. You are probably a tree. You know what I'm saying. Man, 35. Box no. 7213. Reply to this advert, then together we can face the harsh realities of my second mortgage and estranged child. M, 38, WLTM woman with 70 active credit cards. Box no. 8624 Morbidly obese, procrastinating heroin addict. Seeks someone with will enough for two. And hairy mouth. Sqmd master. Come and see my squids. They are plentiful and will rule the world when properly trained. Male, 18. WLTM male. You are okay just there. Please don't touch the squids, EVER. Woman, 38. Useful. Stylish pair of jeans, seeks leopard-print spandex chin-guard, for reasons. Ready to kill for no reason. Box no. 7436 Severely disabled veteran of two Iraq wars. Seeks someone with a flexible moral stance and enough fingers to pull a trigger. I am tired. Pig Eyed horse-frightener with electronic part. Crabs. Valentine's Day...a time when people are meant to show how much they love each other. Call me cynical, but it's become a 'Hallmark holiday', one big hassle. Constantly seeing all these red hearts in shops is doing my head in, but ultimately, unless you want to make your special someone think you don't care, you're obliged to organise all the romantic gestures - cards, flowers, chocolates, gifts and, of course, dinner reservations. Admittedly, the latter is of the greatest importance; a bad meal on Valentine 's Day can quite honestly ruin it for me. Food is undeniably rather integral to love in my opinion - it's "the way to a man's heart" - or a women's too! So what could be more romantic than going to a restaurant where you can share food with your Valentine? Tapas at 'Ortega', a self-described Spanish tapas bar and cantina, sounded like a perfect idea, so I took mi amor along to check it out. Upon entering the establishment, I was stuck by its size. Misleading from the outside, inside it was actually fairly large, with a wide sweeping staircase leading to a larger area downstairs. However this didn't detract from the cosy, intimate atmosphere. The walls appeared to be a dark red (appropriate) and though there was nothing particularly noteworthy, exposed brickwork and the occasional antique looking candelabra gave the place a certain degree of rustic charm. This was added to by the amorous alcoves along one wall, which made dining more private - and thus, more romantic. There was also red wall lighting in the alcoves, which got me wondering whether this place was designed with Valentine's Day in mind! Decent lighting is always paramount - too bright and you spend your time squinting rather than gazing into each other's eyes, too dark and you're not sure what exactly you're putting into your mouth. Ortega's however, was just right, and I was fascinated by the collection of different lampshades (in shades of red of course) which had been made into a feature. The lighting created a perfect romantic atmosphere, topped off by the obligatory candle on the table for flickering firelight. Not so romantic, however was being surrounded by suits. . . . bemused by the chatter around us, it did bring the romantic rating down a bit, however I expect on Februaiy 14th the suits won't be there. The conversations of those around us were soon drowned out by the scraping of dishes, as every last morsel was I m Though we were not the only couple there, we were clearly outnumbered by work colleagues, and either the table arrangements or the acoustics meant that I was far more informed than I wanted to be on one banker's contract, business trips, and his colleague's gossip about him chasing a 17 year-old schoolgirl. Love may be blind but it sure isn't deaf. Though rather sought - the food was that good! Despite a large drink menu, we opted for water, and then spent ages poring over a wide selection of tapas, eventually ordering two dishes, 'Champinones con queso azul' (mushrooms with blue cheese) and 'Fabada Asturiana'. Arriving swiftly at our table, the mushrooms were succulent and delicious, though after a while the blue cheese became slightly overbearing. The 'F^bada Asturiana', cited by Ortega as 'Spain's second most famous dish after paella', was exceptionally tasty (if a tad salty). However, consisting of a white bean and chorizo stew, it was impossible not to notice that it seemed to be a rather more up-market, classy version of that student staple - sausages and beans! Being in Spanish restaurant, trying their paella was a must. The 'Ortega' paella was flavoursome, combining seafood and chicken with mushrooms, peppers and rice so deliciously. The chicken was perhaps overcooked, and not as tender as it could have been, but everything else was spot on. My sweet tooth craving dessert, a 'Copa de Helado' (vanilla and chocolate ice-cream sundae with fudge pieces, banana and caramel sauce) was ordered, to share romantically of course. It was one sexy sundae. Rich but not heavy, it was definitely the highlight of the evening.aiting staff was excellent, which was pleasantly surprising. It transpired upon receiving the bill that this could be explained by the fact that, contrary to my expectations (and the Ortega website!), no service charge was added. For London, the price of the meal was fairly cheap, and would have come in at £15 if we hadn't had dessert. Drinks were reasonably priced as well, with glasses of Sangria for £2.95, and cocktails for £4.95. For Valentine's Day, Ortega is offering a 'Menu romantico', a 3 course meal for £25 per person, and also offer a deal on a bottle of Cava that night. Needless to say, after such a lovely evening I was left feeling slightly love-struck! Ortega is a restaurant sasharobehmed reviews a restaurant B. tuesday the thirteenth of february, two thousand and seven the art of the valentine's day nnix-tape ioisjeary saves your relationship with a last-minute present idea If you're paralysed with fear because you still haven't brought your loved one a Valentine's Day present then worry no more, help is at hand! The art of the mix-tape is an ancient skill going back all the way to, oohh, the 1970s. It has the distinct benefit of being remarkably cheap and self-indulgent whilst appearing to be thoughtful and caring. Musos and losers have spent years perfecting their mix-tape technique and now I bring you the three golden rules of '-'4 this fine and noble art form: ¦rf-- IPick a theme - Now, it shouldn't be too hard to settle on a theme for your Valentine's Day mix-tape should it? A theme helps you to filter through the hours of music you have on iHines to pick songs that will have some sort of coherent feel and this helps you to avoid making dire mistakes, such as The Prodigy's 'Smack My Bitch Up'. 'Love' is a nice, simple idea suitable for the occasion in question, although if you're a cocky bugger you might want to go for 'sex' as a general theme (which, depending on your • : sexual tastes, might make The Prodigy a 8!ij|»^JS;i)good choice after all!). If you're sad and alone then 'I hate myself and want to die' isn't a bad idea for a title and songs should focus on desperation, loneliness ^and the black abyss of your soul. I recommend The Cure and Radiohead, ¦y J/seems to someone looking at your I Tback catalogue that you just appeared on Secretly Canadian ^itoe year as a fully formed talented act, what came before that? Well I'd been playing music since I was a kid. You know I taught myself how to play guitar basically and just from listening to the radio I would just play along to the radio. I would throw on a record and try to come up with some version of that song. At the same time I started writing music pretty early so by the time I was about ten I could basically play to a decent enough level that I was constantly writing songs so by the time I was twelve or thirteen I was in a fully functioning band and we wrote entirely original material. So from that point on I played and toured a lot and wrote a lot of music so I had been doing it for quite a while by the time the Secretly Canadian started as a label. I ended up being one of the very first releases, but I changed, I mean the style was really evolving even from the very first record. I was trying to put a finger on how to be able to do these songs with or without a band. So you know sometimes the guitarist couldn't make it to the show and I always felt like that's no reason to cancel the whole show, maybe there's a way that I could be a solo artist. You are definitely someone with a constantly evolving sound, where do you feel like that is heading? I have no idea, I never have an idea about that. I once in a while have a solid idea of how I want a record to sound. Before there's any songs basically I say this is the kind of record that I want to make and these are the kinds of songs and themes and types of lyrics that I want to work on for a few months and, you know, sometimes it's a success, sometimes it turns out to be something totally different, but it's always the goal to make a record that sounds different than the last. o whilst interestingly, Keane, Coldplay and James Blunt have a similar effect of making me want to walk out in front of a bus. 2 Use something unusual - Of course there is room for some tradition but don't go solely for obvious choices because you'll appear boring and unoriginal. The Beatles' 'All You Need Is Love' is as predictable as they come, as is 'Wonderwair by Oasis (which, if you're thinking of using, may I recommend Cat Power's fabulously lo-fi version). Pretentiousness is the order of the day when you're working on a mix-tape, so don't be afraid to include the most obscure, up-itself nonsense you can find. Spoken poetry is suitably pompous and if you write and read it yourself you will earn your place in the higher echelons of What were you objectives when you sat down to start making new album 'Let Me Go, Let Me Go, Let Me Go'? More or less I just gave myself the challenge to compose an entire record in a studio. And I gave myself I think I had like two and half days basically to do it, maybe almost three days, and I wasn't entirely sure where I wanted to go lyrically with that record, I just knew that if I got in there and worked really, really hard that all the songs would somehow be linked lyrically. And then it only took snobbery! Alternatively, use the mix-tape as an opportunity to showcase new bands that you love, but that haven't been discovered yet. Not only will you appear to be at the cutting-edge of new music but you'll also be able to justify ripping off copy-right laws for the pur-I poses of promotion. 3 Be thoughtful - It's remarkably easy to get self-involved when making a mix-tape and end up filling it with stuff that you like but that the recipient positively abhors. Do try to take their musical preferences into consideration. A friend once made me a mix-tape full of her favourite bands, all of which can be described with the horrendous suffix '-core'. However, aware that I'm a sensi- ing songs that we have actually had a while to work on, on tour What led you to ditching the Songs: Ohia moniker? It wasn't a... well basically it was because it had come up on the ten year anniversary of putting out records under that name. And you know I thought I was writing a different type of song, and I really didn't revisit most of those old songs for years and years. And I really felt like that ten years was a separate tive soul with a fondness for harmonicas, she substituted all of the screaming, ear assaulting songs for the fluffy acoustic versions, which was friendlier on my ears and much appreciated. Also try to cast your mind back to various events during your relationship then pick songs that reflect them - how did you meet? What song was playing when you had your first dance/kiss/shag? If you don't remember ask whoever lives next door in your halls or drop it in to conversation to see if your partner remembers (if they're female there is a 99% chance they will)! If you don't put any thought into it, your carelessness will be preserved on tape for years to come and will come back to haunt you. And there you have it. Pop the songs on a tape (for the retro amongst you) or CD (for those of you firmly in the 21st century) then write a nice lovey-dovey message, which I draw the line at helping you with, and your lover will be in mix-tape heaven. I'll be honest, you might find yourself being promptly dumped, owing to the fact that your partner will finally discover your shit taste in music or will see you for the tight-fisted emo that you really are . . . but at least you'll have something to give them when the dreaded day dawns. about one or two songs and I realised I had a lot of ideas for the types of songs I wanted. And because I was very happy with Ghost Tropic which basically written entirely in the studio, and also Pyramid Electric Company was also basically all written in the studio. This literally just means you're in the studio and you sleep in the studio and you wake up in the morning and you record songs. And doing that in a proper studio is fantastic, it's a rare, rare, rare occurrence, I have only done that a few times. So you go into these intense two day sessions without any Ijrics or arrangements? Well basically as I said there's at least a framework for the song , in the more recent recording sessions it's been record- entity, totally, and it was really that simple. It wasn't a calculated effort to write songs in a different way. It's just that after about ten years of doing it and touring a lot I realised I'd started to be less self-conscious about how the songs might be interpreted and didn't see that happening in the early days. I would write the song and if I felt like it was a good song so be it, but if there was something that didn't set right with me just because I felt that it would be misinterpreted or the people would have a hard time dealing with what the lyrics were all about or the types of recordings I did, you know, I would change it so that it felt more comfortable all around. But these days I don't really write with an audience in mind. When you talk about interpretation, does that include the press? Is there anything we do to piss you off? I really don't read the press and reviews. It's a waste of time. Sometimes someone has a great article or a great review. So I understand that press has it's place, I guess. And there are a lot of people who get their music based on what they read about a band or a review of a record turns someone on to a record that they might never have ever heard. I never buy my music based on that, and, like I never go to see a movie that I read a review of unless it is something pretty obscure really interesting that I would never have heard of. Must be qxiite tempting to read the reviews though? Well, it's fine to just glance at them, it's, you know, if it's something that they get it totally wrong, they already have their opinion and it's already in ink, I'm not going to track every interviewer down and say I think you totally misconstrued what I was saying. Like I said, it's more interesting to me to just concentrate on writing music. Do you enjoy your time on stage? Yeah, I mean that's the main, the main draw for me, is that in that hour or so that I'm on stage I really am able to reconfigure songs and lyrics and change it around. So to me I don't consider myself really a performer, I'm just a songwriter. And yes I'm on stage and yes there's an audience there and I appreciate that they pay their hard earned money to come see live music and buy the record and support the band. But yeah that hour on stage is really, it means everything to me. What would your desert island book be? I think, an unabridged dictionary. iangordon talks to the singer-songwriter atDout his memphis blues jason nnolina tuesday the thirteenth of february, two thousand and seven eleven a climate of love angustse doesn't want you to break up, he just wants you to see a film It's Valentine's Day, the time when you shower your significant other with roses, chocolates and similar gifts, all in the name of some commercialisable quality they call love. You might be thinking of what to do on the day. I would like to recommend you see Climates, an art-house breakup film. Believe me, I have no personal vendetta against you or your relationship. The film is simply worth watching, maybe even a personal lesson of what you're in for Isa, a photography professor, isj on a rare holiday with Bahar, a TV producer. The trip to a historic ruin is a J field day for the academic, but we seej the stark contrast of Bahar looking J bored and ultimately sad. We don't^ know why she's unhappy, but thisJ spontaneous and lonely outburst! sets the sense of foreboding right at| the beginning. Soon the 'it's over'i moment comes, again at the ironic setting of a sunny beach. What rais-"' es the stakes is that Isa and Bahar are! played by director Nuri Bilged Ceyland and his wife Ebru Ceylanf respectively. To have a real-life cou-l pie inflict emotional harm againstl each other (even though 'it's acting')| is at the very least admirable. Nuri goes one step further,! using horror film techniques to/ heighten the discomfort. A mas-f terly sequence occurs at the/ beach: we see Bahar lying still| and emotionless. A blurry figure emerges, a moment similar tol other films when someone isf knocked unconscious by ar assailant. It's actually Isa, whol gives her a kiss and says a sim-| pie 'I love you'. The warmness isl immediately extinguished! though, when Isa playfullyl buries Bahar in the sand but! then covers her face completely.^ Bahar wakes up- it was a bad dream. Later, we see Isa practicing his breakup lines alone, but slowly the cam- Since you're at LSE, you've almost certainly tried to learn a foreign language at one point or another, so you'll appreciate Z's struggles as she attempts to tell the story of her year in London learning English. The book is written as Z's (short for Zhuang Xiao Qiao, which she doesn't believe anyone will be able to pronounce) diary, from her flight from Beijing to London and her return a year later. As the story continues her English gradually improves, an attempt at showing character development. Within two months she moves in with a man she barely knows, a supposed drifter living in Hackney. Their relationship is seemingly based] on the differences between] them and their previous lives. However, this character is completely unsympathetic, while Z appears constantly] needy, so that the eventual] collapse of their relationship is not so much a tragic development as it is both characters finally coming to their| senses. The concept is fantastic. Anyone who has come to live in London will sympathise]_____ with Z and native Londoners will appreciate the outsider's perspective. Yet so many of the characters, rather than appearing human or vulnerable, come across as helpless and unlovable. The male lead is sup era moves to the left and we, see Bahar actually sittingi next to him. Such tech-T niques are particularlyj useful in conveying the j emotions ^ the. Serap sees her stalker, hurriedly enters her home, pauses, and then lets him in. They sit down and chat. 'You haven't been around for a while. Is Bahar out of town again?' Serap asks. 'What has it got to do with Bahar?'Isa retorts. Serap gives a prolonged, almost menacing laugh, while Isa is dumbfounded. Rape or rough sex? You may wonder during the infidelity scene. It may be comical to some- Isa trying to stuff a nut in Serap's mouth. But the disgust that one feels towards Isa is unavoidable. Climates might have some-, thing to say on mas-^c u 1 i n i t y ^PerhapSj t h ( charac-' Jters face atl I this point ofl J their relation-l fship: the inse-1 curity, and thel fear and calcula-1 tions on what thel next move may be. The two parti ways and return tol their jobs. Isal encounters his old^ friend Guven in al rainy day in Istanbul.! With him is Serap, who] iBahar referred to as 'al Serap incident' previ-' ously at the beach. An old flame? We later see Isa hiding outside Serap's house. life", but instead seems to be too concerned with his own anarchic-outsider sense of superiority to create any kind of chemistry with Z. When cracks appear in their whirlwind love affair, you can't help but be glad that the characters have come scene" reflects^ Isa's humilia-'' tion under th^ almost omnlscienP Serap. Perhaps he feels the'' need to overpower the other in^ response, or even in defence.! Perhaps Isa is simply cruel fori 'not trying' at the first place./ But the negativity changes] soon when Isa decides go to^ the snowy eastern Turkey/ k to reunite with Bahar. Isa isl Fa flawed man, even pathet-1 ic, but he's also a needy persoiT" seeking romantic love and companion- ship. Is there reconciliation in the end? It's deliberately ambiguous, and fitting for this film. The film spans the seasons of a year, the breakup occurring in the happy summer and ending with a flicker of hope in the gloomy winter Whether the relationship will blossom again in spring is left out, but .Nuri uses this structure to Ijuxtapose the constant —Jcoldness of the characters, [iflP^^^Bor simply to portray the changes in a relationship as time goes by. It is also an [opportunity to show the inner .photographer in Nuri, cap |turing the scenic kextremes of environments, [mesmerising in itself j symbolic of the peaks and Itroughs of all relationships. IThe acting may be restrained land deliberately icy, but the Icinematography is majestic, fClimates is also Nuri's love 1 letter to Ebru, the close-ups Jof her delicate face perfectly 'capturing her character's sub-f tie expressions of pain, irony l^and disquiet. Do you want to impress your other one, (pretending) to have a sophisticated appreciation of the arts and the cinema? Do you fancy deprecating your manhood and portray yourself as just as needy (well, not as abusive) as Isa? Regardless of your intentions. Climates is an honest portrait of a relationship. It may be one that has gone wrong, but it doesn't drudge in depression. Climates is certainly one of the most beautiful films of the year, and it just might just be one of the best too. Climates is showing in Curzon Soho, Renoir and Barbican. takes an new slant on it by heading each diary entry with a word Z has learnt that day, starting with Hostel, moving through Hero, and ending with concepts such as Infinity. This turns the book from being a reverse-travel guide to the UK to more of a basic comparison between traditional Western and Chinese ideas, which again would be all the more appealing if the Western ones were given by someone a little more compassionate than The Man From Hackney. While The Concise Chinese-English Dictionary) is very funny in places ("How j I finding important places j like Big Stupid Clock?"), its | humour is lost in the entirely j frustrating lead relationship, \ and the unending wish to; bang their heads against a \ brick wall until they get their j act together. Any chances of seeing London through a new set of eyes is also lost when an entire chapter is spent describing her encounter with Soho strippers. If the novel does seem a little jaded and cynical, it's not the fault of the writing, which manages to describe the situations of the characters well, despite the necessarily restricted language. Nonetheless, it is difficult to escape the feeling that you've seen these characters before in other books many times before. back to reality rather than living in their fantasy world of egg salad and phal-lic sculptures. While the diary structure has pretty much been done to death, 'The Concise posed to be an enigmatic loner "adrift in Chinese-English Dictionary for Lovers' a concise english-chinese dictionary for lovers hollybontoft reviews xiaolu guo's book iii teajj William Blake, who largely influenced the Romantic Movement, has been proclaimed a genius by such writers as T.S. Eliot and William Wordsworth. Yet other accounts of this supposed genius of poetry paint a different picture. From an early age, Blake was prone to mystical visions. He reportedly conversed with the angel Gabriel and the Virgin Mary in addition to seeing a whole range of other ghostly historical figures. His wife once even remarked, "I have very little of Mr. Blake's company. He is always in Paradise." The leading Romantic poet. Lord Byron, also held somewhat dubious social credentials. Physically, Byron suffered from a club foot, which caused him to limp. Socially, it is reported that Byron once paid £7000 to a teenage Greek boy for homosexual encounters and Italian language lessons. Worse yet, several speculate that Byron and his half sister, Augusta, had a child together For a man who is said to have had sex with two hundred and fifty women in a year, I suppose this is just par for the course. Percy Bysshe Shelley was met by personal tragedy many times. His first wife, Harriet Westbrook, drowned herself in . the Serpentine after Shelley ran away . ; with his second wife, Mary. Shortly afterwards, the custody of Harriet and Shelley's two children was given to Harriet's parents who fought for legal recognition of Shelley's inability to raise his own children. Shelley was reportedly also constantly chased by creditors. So this Valentine's Day, just remember: even if you don't have somebody to spend the special day with, it could be worse! You could be a Romantic poet! fun facts about romantic poets erinorozco writes m B. twelve tuesday the thirteenth of february, two thousand and seven Down I. throaty (not gallopy) (6) 4. bewildered (6) 9. more succulent (7) 10. dead froggy currency (5) II. happiness or train noise (5) 12. all the same (7) 13. another one does it in a queen song (4-3-4) 18. between time (7) 20. detach (5) 22. occupy for free or bend down (5) 23. things to wear (7) 24. little leopard (6) 25. in a feeble way (6) 1 8 6^ 1 ; 4 8 3 1 6 9 5 1 7 5 4 S 91 4 5 7 2 7 3 2 1 7 3 Across 1. take over (6) 2. bye bye (5) 3. little snort (7) 5. not in uniform (5) 6. really enthusiastic (7) 7. move the tents (6) 8. a child of five could solve this clue, fetch me a child of five. (7-4) 14. walk in on (7) 15. to not be a fan of (7) 16. shambolic affair (6) 17. squalid (6) 19. oldstyle (5) 21. letter-shaped collared jumper (1-4) 8 3 8 3 7 5 9!..... i 2:1^^' 3 S ^411 ...........-i— 7 2 —¦ +-—¦¦¦* -¦ - i : 8; 19 1 ^8! I ^ 5j4;8 .....1........9 1 ¦ i ... 1 Er P. i \-< rI, - Auntie Shaw is away this week, so answering your questions will be Dr. P, in a piece os shameless advertising for his new film, School for Scoundrels. Dear Dr P. I just can't find the courage to ask for a date - so I'll be lonely again this Valentine's Day. I'm in my final year, have lots of friends and make good grades. I can handle the big presentations but I can't deal with the pressure of asking out the girl I fancy. How can I overcome my fear of hearing the word "No"? - Steve, 21 Hell son you shouldn't be afraid of the word "No", you must have said it enough times! "Hey Steve, you got a date this weekend?" "Steve, you get laid last night?" - NO! You know I can't even call you a loser, because a loser is someone who tries and faUs, you're less than that; you don't even try! Get yourself into my school now before you end up Steve, 40, collecting comic book characters and listening to Lionel Richie on your own for the 900th time. If you can spare five minutes from downloading pom on your computer go take a look at my prospectus -www.schoolforscoimdrels.movie.co.uk/ Dear Dr P. I've been seeing my girlfriend for six months now and I love her a lot. Things are going great but she says she isn't ready for us to become more physical. I respect her boundaries but I'm starting to get a little impatient, especially as I know she's had physical relationships in the past. I want to make Valentine's Day special so she feels comfortable and we can take our relationship onto the next level, what do you suggest? - Jeff, 19 Are you kidding me? What relationship? You haven't managed to get any off this chick in six months and you think Valentine's is going to be any dif- ferent? It's a special day son, not a miracle day! Did you ever wonder why she's got frisky in the past and not with you? It's 'cause her last boyfriends were lions, rather than whiney little pussies. A lion doesn't ask for what he wants, he takes it! My advice is either start leEiming how to run sh*t or spend the rest of your life eating it! Dear Dr P. My boyfriend and I have had so many wonderful years but recently things are becoming stale. He's always ignoring me and going 'out with the lads', and I know him and his friends spend all their time chatting up sleazy women. I really love him and want us to get back to the way we were, what should I do? - Kimberly, 20 It makes me sick when guys don't realise when they have it good. I see neglect like this a lot at my hospital and it always breaks my heart a little. You deserve better, a caring, sensitive guy who imderstands you. We should discuss this problem further Kimberly. You could come seem me during my office hours but I'm afraid I'm volunteering at an orphanage this week. Perhaps we could meet up for dinner instead and spend some time really focusing on you. School for Scoundrels is released on 23rd February Copyright © 2007 Paramount Pictures. All Rights Reserved. Auntie will return next week, If you want to share (or scare) her with your problems, rants and general nonsense, please get in touch at thebeaver.partb@Ise.ac.uk or through Auntie Shaw on Facebook. As explicit and long as you want; the juicier the better - let's push those editorial boundaries to their limits! You are guaranteed to remain completely anonymous. /alentine's Day IBeaverl 13 February 2007 13 Rosanruno ! ' ¦ says love is colour-blind, unless you're a Red I did something I never thought I would do today: I paid my £5 and joined the Conservative Party. Not, I hasten to add, because I have had a Cameron conversion. Hell no, I find him every bit as objectionable as his predecessors. Rather, I did it for the boyfriend. Whilst I am a feminist and a socialist from a long line of such ilk (my grandfather stood as a Labour candidate | in 1955) and am studying the lefty subject of development, my^ boyfriend, Gregory, is not only a card-carry-ing Tory but works at the House of Commons for one of the more right-wing Conservative MPs, a man who proudly displays his three Margaret Thatcher portraits in his office. I joke that Maggie is the other woman in Greg's life is and he has stood as a Conservative candidate: he couldn't really be any more of a Tory. My reason for joining the Party, aside from the possibility of internal sabotage, was so I would be able to sup-him in the future, even if I don't have any intention of ever voting blue. In days of old, before Labour sold out on the NHS and just about every- thing else it ever stood for, Greg and I would have turned up at the polls to cancel out each other's votes. If we were US citizens, we would still be doing that now. As it is, I opposed the Iraq war and thus vote for and support the Liberal Democrats, but probably for Greg this is little easier than my being a true Labourite. A fellow conservative invited him to join the facebook group "Everybody Hates Lib Dems", which he naturally had to decline, since I assume there is at least one Lib Dem he does not dislike. A number of people have told me that they find Greg and my with similar values to your own. Obviously, Greg and I have rather different views on many issues: on Europe, immigration, the Iraq war and the Bush administration to name but a few. We are, however, both Catholics, although this used to make our political differences seem all the more incongruous to me: it surprised me that, from similar starting points we could end up with such different views as to how the world should be. Prior to dating Greg, I thought of the Conservative Party as uncaring: to asylum seekers, the homeless and to women. A religion which teaches compassion, which asks its followers to be the Good Samaritan, is clearly incompatible with an uncaring political outlook. But Greg has shown me that my prejudices are deeply unfair, that the Tories are not the cold-hearted bastards I believed them to be. Well, not all of them anyway. Through him I have met many Conservatives, which has made me realise that Tories are human too; some of them are even rather fun, I would never have imagined two years ago that I would attend the Blue and Green Event (the poor man's Black and White Ball), but I had a great time. The free champagne the Tories are not the cold-hearted bastards I believed them to be relationship puzzling: whilst they consider differences in race, religion and age unproblematic, they believe such an enormous political dichotomy in a relationship to be an insurmountable problem. I suppose they feel political beliefs are an expression of a person's values, and it seems natural to them that we should choose to be with someone who shares most of ours. They are not alone in this view: there are a surprisingly large number of dating sites on the internet devoted to finding your soul mate based upon your political stance, the fairly logical justification being that you can meet people undoubtedly helped, but actually people at the party weren't that different from my friends. I am often asked if going out with Greg has made me more right-wing but the reverse is true: it has made me>^:, more radical, more left- ' wing, since it has forced me to think more deeply about many issues. People also keep telling me that one day I will be a Tory wife, an idea which, unsurprisingly, I find utterly repellent. Thatj title makes me think of the blue rinse brigade, fij forever baking cakes for the village fete,f^® reading "The Daily Mail", the newspaper^ I would like to see banned, and moaning that things were so much better in the "good old days". Luckily, for a Conservative, Greg is now rather in tune with the feminist movement (something few would have imagined prior to our relationship), probably entirely due to my ranting at him for the last fifteen months about the still considerable gender inequalities in society. Thus his response to the suggestion of my being a Tory wife was rather sweetly that actually it is he who is going to be the Lib Dem husband. I am not going out with Greg for his political beliefs; I love him despite them. But there is one real positive too: we do have some very stimulating arguments. Politics is one of our most frequent topics of discussion, since it is a subject we are both passionate about. We have even had what descended into a slanging match about the legacy of Margaret Thatcher: Greg pointed out that the Conservative Party is the only party to have had a female leader, which he claims is beneficial to the feminist movement, a fair argument perhaps, but I think having a female leader would only have been significant if Maggie had pushed forward a feminist agenda. This argument got rather heated: anyone listening would ¦ have been rather surprised to discover that we were not arguing about any relationship problems but the political legacy of a former Prime Minister. Greg and I both very opinionated and like the sound of our own voices; of course, when I talk over him, it is because I am making a vitally important point and when he talks over me, he is usually failing to listen to said very important point. But generally, our arguments are rather fun, and it jii certainly beats fighting over who does the washing-up. Greg explains our relationship with the slogan,"sleep socialist, vote Tory". I am not sure it requires any kind of explanation: I know it would bore me immensely to date someone who agreed with everything I ever said. Yet I never imagined myself going out with a conservative; I imagined J settling down with a liberal who read "The Guardian" and volun- -^ teered for Amnesty. But I doubt he would have made me laugh half as much as Greg does, nor would that relationship have given me nearly as many good stories for my memoirs. FEATURES ilnferview m STERN Fatima Manji interviews the These days, academic Sir Nicholas Stern is quite the celebrity; as he says himself: "It's boon wall to wall media", since his report on 'The Economics of Climate Change' was published. Even as we sit outside the Stern Review office in HM Treasury building, waiting to interview him, I'm reminded of his international pi'ominence: we're informed he's on the phone to the leader of the Opposition in Australia. Storn, who has held a number of high profile jobs including Chief Economist at both the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) and at the World Bank, is due to return to the LSE in June as IG Patcl Chair of Economics and Development, and Head of the India Observatory within the Asia Research Centre. When we are introduced however, he comes across as friendly and pretty down to earth, telling me Fatima was also his mother's middle name. He smiles and seems incredibly pleased when I ask him about his imminent return to LSE - he must have been quite impressed with the reception he received when he came to speak back in November. "I've been meaning to return to the LSE, ever since I've left. It was always my intention to go back," he says. "It was only ever meant to be a temporary departure, I thought I would go back after the EBRD and indeed I did go back but after a couple of months I was offered the job as Chief Economist of the World Bank. After that I meant to go back again, but Gordon Brown intervened. This will be my third attempt to go back! Third time suc-ce.ssful!" he adds. Stern once allegedly said he "had an idea what the Greenhouse effect was but wasn't entirely sure", I ask him if this has now changed. "I'm not an expert on the science of climate change," he says. "I wouldn't ever pretend to be, when we first started in summer 2005 - we read up and got a team together I wasn't an expert and I had an open mind." He insists upon the idea that he is primarily an economist who "built on the received science" and embarked upon the report unprejudiced: "What I wanted to stress by, saying something like that -whether I said that or not eighteen months ago - is that I started with an open mind." But will Stern's near-celebrity status make it difficult for him to be accessible to students as an academic once again? "Look - I'm going back because I like being with academic colleagues and I like being with students," says Stern, firmly resisting any such allegation. "In the EBRD, in the World Bank...here - I worked very much with young teams and I enjoy that." He talks of his career and how much of it has been spent working in academia: "For 24 years I was a full time academic economist, close to policy - however. From late 1993 to now I have been at the EBRD, the World Bank and now in Government, but two thirds of my career has been in academic life." In his new role at the LSE, Stern will be concentrating on research relating to India, includ- ing returning to the village he first began studying in 1974. He tells me "I don't want to be too rigid about what I want to do, but a strong Indian element, a strong Asian element and a strong climate change element will be involved." So why is an economist studying climate change? Here Stern is brutally blunt: "Well because it was on the economics of climate change. That's why." In true (supposedly) politically unbiased civil service style, Stern simply did what was required of him. "We built on the received science, we didn't question the science...and we looked very much at the economics of risk." And to those who are critical of his work and claim 'the science' is flawed he says: "The science of climate change in my view is pretty well established. There are always a few small minority of scientific dissidents - but there are a very small minority." Some of these 'scientific dissidents' have claimed climate change is not driven by the use of fossil fuels. We need to get people to understand the link between action now and what happens later...the longer you wait, the bigger the problem Stern's response to such claims is that; "There is a consensus on climate change that human activity plays a powerful role. Scientific dissidents are very few. It's not for me to judge -it's for the scientific community to judge and they've given their judgement." He simply but eloquently expresses what education people need on climate change. "We need to get people to understand the link between action now and what happens later. It is true there are very long lags in this. But the longer you wait, the bigger the problem." Stern knowledgeably explains the process of greenhouse gas concentration, what can be done to control the flow and the possibility of there being reversibilities. Clearly, now he must have more than just "an idea" of what it's all about. Stern's report may be over 700 pages, but he evidently has the ability to summarise concepts effectively and provide clear explanations. He con- IBeaver 113 February 2007 |i5 FEATURES:/nte?*uieu; RESPONSE man charged with investigating the econonnics of clinnate change cisely outlines the role for the UK: "Whatever the UK does it has to do it in a way that makes it easy for other countries. It has to work very much through Europe. Europe is a big player and the UK is playing a big role in shaping European policy. We have to build on common trading schemes ...whatever we do has to be in the context of building collaboration. Be it in terms of common pricing, technology and so on. Now in order to do that, we have to show good policies ourselves." And all this "has to be set in context of how to bring in other countries", says Stern. "Well actually, that's strong language" he adds, looking a little thoughtful and then correcting himself: "not how to bring in other countries, but how to work with other countries." Environmentalists have been critical of Stem and claim his report is not far-reaching enough. "Doesn't your report protect the status quo of Western industrial capitalist development?" I ask. "Why should we continue to have faith in such a system?" A buzzer rings in the office at this point, almost as if an emergency alarm bell had just gone off - perhaps I had asked the question they'd all been dreading? Turns out it was only some kind of machine. Stern meanwhile, looked unfazed and calmly replies: "We emphasised very strongly the equity part of the story - it is the richest countries that are responsible for probably - three-quarters of the greenhouse gases, which are there now. For that reason and because they are richer, they should bear the lions share of the cost in adjustment. So that is crystal clear" SIR NICHOLAS STERN the statue OF LlBERTlEi It is the richest countries that are responsible for three-quarters of the greenhouse gases He talks to me of how contraction and convergence (a policy endorsed by the LSE Students Union at a Union General Meeting) is one of many solutions: "The key thing is to Nicholas Stern studied mathematics at the Cambridge and received his PhD at Oxford. He was a lecturer at Cambridge and Professor of Economics at Warwick University and LSE in addition to lecturing at universities in China, France, Japan and the United States. Out of all of his former academic institution he chose to return to LSE and will be returning here in July to be G Patel Chair of Economics and Development, and Head of the India Observatory within the Asia Research Centre. Since leaving LSE in 2000 Stern has been Chief Economist for the World Bank, a senior adviser to the President of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Gordon Brown recruited him as a permanent secretary at H.M. Treasury. As a senior civil servant he has run the Government Economic Service and been the Director of Policy for The Commission for Africa. He was knighted in 2004. Sir Nicholas is a founder of AFC Wimbledon, after the former football club was sold and moved to Milton Keynes. In July 2005 Sir Nicholas Stern began his review into the economic impact of climate change. recognize equity. And the importance of equity. The important thing is coming up with solutions which are both equitable and efficient. There are lots of ways of doing that, of which contract and converge is one - but the key thing that is going to drive the equity story, is for the rich countries (and we made this clear), to take on the lion's share - 60-80% of the responsibility for financing the world's carbon reductions. That's the key equity part of the story. How you put that into practice - there are many ways of doing it. The key thing is to get the rich countries to take on that responsibility." What of the idea floating around the media, that the Chancellor deliberately commissioned Stem's report to be able to push through green taxes? Stem seems completely unsurprised at this question, having probably heard it too many times before. Again he calmly tells me: He had an open mind. I'm sure, as I did when we started this. He hadn't spent a lot of time studying it and neither had I. We both started with an open mind, I don't think he had a pre-arranged agenda and he certainly didn't communicate one to me, I don't think he had one." And what is Stem's relationship like with Gordon Brown? Here, Stern replies rather hastily (perhaps even a little too quickly);"Its fine. Fine. We were together in India...sitting having a glass of wine with him night before last" says Stern. Once again, he reiterates: "Yeah, we get on fine. I mean, he asked me to do it. He asked me to do the report commission for Africa." I move on to an even more interesting question: Is it true that you met Fidel Castro whilst on holiday with your family? "That's true" says Stern smiling. "He was charming. We met him just after his 75^*^ birthday...we went off for lunch with him and we were there for five and a half hours. Just the five of us and him and one of his people. He was full of ideas. We were on holiday, but I was Chief Economist of the World Bank at the time - so you can't be completely private, and he invited us all to lunch -fantastically interesting." I want to ask him more on his encounters with both Castro and the Chancellor, but my time is over So finally, what would he like to add - perhaps a message to LSE students? "I'm looking forward enormously to coming back" he says looking delighted at another mention of the LSE. "LSE is an amazing place and one of the many reasons to love it, well let me just give you one - is the mix of the students from all countries - I enjoy that immensely. When you teach - they've experienced quite a lot of what you're talking about. And they're very smart." A pretty nice note to end on and I'm guessing he's hoping LSE students are equally excited about having him back. Later as one of his team escorts us out of the building, she speaks of how he agreed to be interviewed for The Beaver, because of his special attachment to the LSE. As we walk past what appears to be the Chancellor's office, I signal to The Beaver's photographer and take a sneaky look in. Unfortunately I couldn't spot Gordon - otherwise it would have been interesting to ask him about 'Green Taxes' and his own vei-sion of the Brown-Stem relationship. Tfte Stem Review of the Economics of Climate Change provides the most thorou^ and rigorous analysis to date of the costs and risks of climate change, and the costs and risks of reducing emissions." Joseph Stigtitz "I very much welcome The Stern Review which provides a much needed critical economic analysis of the issues associated with climate change" "Despite using many good references, [it] is selective and its conclusions flawed. Its fear-mongering arguments have been sensationalized, which is ultimately only likely to make the world worse off." Bjorn Lomborg "The start prospects of climate change and its mounting economic and human costs are clearly brought out in this searching investigation. The world would be foolish to neglect this strong but strictly time-bound practical message." Amartya Sen "The voluminous Stern report adds disappointly little to what is already the conventional wisdom." Nigel Lawson The Stern Review conclusions The thi'i'ats of clUnate change: —Exttvnie wt'iUhol- foiild reduce global Gross Domestic Product (CH)!') by up to I'h., --'I'here is a 50% chance that avevago global temperatures could rise by five degrees Celsius. —In the woisit case scenario global consumption per he:id would fall Goven\ments slKHiltl: - -Promote cleaner energy and transport technology, with non-fossil (ue)s accounting for (50% ol energy output by —Create a global market (or carbon pricing. --Si;t new target to reduce carbon emissions tjv by 1!020 and (iO"n by --Work with the World Hank and other t'inuaeial institutions to creaie a $20bu fund to tielp poov countries iidiust to climate change challenges. ul IBeaver 113 Febmaiy 2007 FEATURES:Po/iYzcs Get me elected.com Politics Correspondent Greg Wliite surfs the internet for up-and-coming politicians The Internet, that cavernous place where you get your news, celebrity gossip, sports scores, and illegal music downloads, is, being invaded. Not by porn addicts and sexual predators, they are already there, but something far more sinister: politicians. The last domain of pure bias and candor is being stripped of reality by a set of politicians from both sides of the Atlantic seeking their country's highest offices. Candidates see this as a direct means to communicate with the electorate, make themselves appear more approachable (without ever having to shake your germ - covered hand), and funnel money more efficiently into their campaign war chests. With this unbridled digital assault on the electorate in full swing, it is time a complete review of these characters and their Internet personalities be made. We'll start from the West with France and their Presidential election. Now, I am not an expert on French politics, mostly because my language skills limit me to ordering food and lying that I am not American, but there really only seems to be two viable candidates in this one: Socialist leader Segolene Royal and centre-right UMP leader Nicholas Sarkozy. There are ^ other people involved, but (' they are either quasi-fascist or quasi-communist and from where I come from they are either in power or in Vermont, respectively. I am, for the most part, impressed with Sarkozy's site; both its layout and design. 'There is lots of personal information, a fancy countdown clock to the election, and various pictures of him looking creepy. And that is really where this site fails. Sarkozy, even when candidly speaking to some factory workers, has the appearance and style of that guy in your lecture who makes it a point to laugh at every joke the speaker makes, talk to them after, and perhaps dine with them for the sole purpose of an investment banking recommendation. No matter how flashy your website is, it will not cover up your general creepiness (or is it Frenchness)? On to Britain, where the only real standout is the cherubic housewife pin-up David Cameron, leader of the t § Conservative Party. Cameron's website is moderately stylish, utilizing more of a feng shui approach than Sarkozy. Plenty of videos here where Cameron candidly answers your questions, making vague policy points and looking like the adult version of that 16 pound baby bom in Mexico last week. He generally seems like a nice guy, who cares about tweed wearing Britain without actually wearing any. He might want to work on his analogies though; the old bottom rung of a ladder out on society bit is sounding a little tired. And then there was America. Since they invented the Internet, they have a leg up on the competition. But my God are they awful at everything but the making money part, the websites that is. First and foremost, I was shocked that Republicans knew how to use computers. Do they not have people to do that sort of thing for them while they farm, sail, and eat endangered species on a whim? So, naturally, finding a candidates website was a surprise, while finding it in black and white was not. It could be because Senator John McCain, Republican candidate for President, looks scary and deathlike in colour. Or it's because those are the only two colours he knows because he went colour-blind in that Korean torture camp, (which is just a fact and not a joke). Or it's because the world is black and white and you are either with US or the terrorists. Or maybe its because his website designer is a boring human being. Whatever the reason, this site is crap and is best left alone, in the corner, contemplating how to convince the electorate a Republican president can read again. Now onto the Democrats who, with the panache of Jamie Oliver or Martha Stewart, have spruced themselves up for the big show. We will start with the weaker of the two. Senator Barack Obama. While obviously the most compelling human being since Jesus Christ, Senator Barack Obama has a lot to do to make his website compete with the quality of his opposition, Obama's site is simple and plain, but not in the balanced Cameron sort of way. More like an empty house in Chelsea: plenty of promise and high rent, but lacking a leather armchair or two. There are two videos here that could, in less democratic countries, be labeled propaganda. But he is so above politics that the story of his life seems more like an inspirational Disney film than a piece of heavy-handed electioneering. Obama has a lot to do online before he can compete with the 3000-ton gorilla of Democratic Internet politics, Clinton. Senator Hillaiy Clinton, (a bit Thatcher a bit Oprah), is gallantly running in a soccer-mom tracksuit to the Democratic nomination. Her website, while full of fun facts, including a delightful trip down Mr. Clinton memoiy lane, cannot overcome her general scariness. She's not scary like Sarkozy, more scary like that mother of a friend that wanted to know everything about your life over break, for the sole purpose of telling everyone else at church next weekend. Hillary finds new ways of taking the 'friendly-mother-at-a-bake-sale' voice and talking about very serious things, while at the same time making you feel full of rich, chocolate goodness as you hear about the suffering of Hurricane Katrina victims. The site is a bit like those soup kitchens the Nazis had for poor people, except people who own computers are not poor, the speeches are not as well structured, and no mustache. Hilary Clinton cannot speak like her husband, sounds incredibly awkward no matter what she is talking about, and is as stiff as the mother from American Beauty. No flashy graphics can save you from her conversations, boring as a re-run of The OC (except for the lesbian one, which is always appealing). The politicos'websites : www.desirsdavenir.org Tasteful and understated like a Chanel suit, there is little here for the anarcho-cynicalists. www.d iscosa rii Cv Howard Dean: The original internet kid By There have been a lot of mur-murings recently about the potency of the internet's influence on politics. Web-Cameron is wooing the internet generation one at a time, Barack Obama has a Flacebook group, and according to Mr. White's piece this week. Senator McCain's website seems to be DOA.Yet before we all get excited about the internet's potential to mobilize voters and raise funds, I would like to look back at the original internet maverick: Howard Dean. You might not recognise the name now, but Dean was the hero of grass-roots politics in the US during the 2004 elections. He was able to use the internet to create an activist base 31,000 strong using networking websites similar to MySpace or F^cebook and in a year raised more than 45 million dollars, most of it over the internet. But, before the Dean train could get out of the station, he came an embarrassing third in the Iowa primary elections, and that was the end of that. How did his 'average joe' activists fail him and lose him the Democratic nomination? The main reason is that the internet appeals to a younger inter-net-sawy base, and in the case of most politics, it is not the internet-sawy activists who decide elections—it's the affluent and their savings. And I'm betting they're nc t surfing the net, downloading video-manifestos and subscribing to pod-casts . His defeat underscores the importance of traditional politics in today's society. Howard Dean wasn't able to capitalize on his internet revolution because he wasn't able to exploit the more popular American political traditions of coffees and dinners, partly because of his maverick status. He simply couldn't reach the average voter. How important vnll the internet be in upcoming elections throughout Europe and America? How successful will the internet be in helping Obama raise the $100 million that's expected to be the buy-in for the 2008 American presidential elections? If Howard Dean's story tells us anything, it's that the internet won't make much of a difference. There will be great cheers and lots of enthusiasm, but in the end it will all come down to kissing babies, visiting community halls and, as always, the 1^: size of the campaign fund ¦'W i. f»CCOUNTING SOCIETY Understanding a £270bn Financial Services Business Spealeers: Hitesh Pate! (Partner from KPMG), Professor R.Macve and Dr. J. Norton 22/2/2007 5.15PM Room H216 Deloitte. Deloitte Firm Visit 05/03/2007 AClOO Homework Help Session Every Wednesday 1-3PM G107 Email: su,soc.accountina@lse.ac.uk O ?t§b LSE BridgeleeMjf Wmmi tse -mA WMnfCTiTwwvTwS'. WB vwWI VwtaH 0^009 Kor free mcmber&hip and more i nfor jrtali Hfi, «rnjii! $M r?99 rWH vil' Tililiii'W- Jtoik ll *&(& tfWtSi fcriX ShflkSell. >3^9K SMfcflJf iT^Ti IKWW "fclWfc frfl Iklk ItyiliPwAri^wAl- ftrft mwn -«|||9rrr«>i |99in5 vC 08 ^SNem m vma ^OtTn^ipeRvQ W 1^n9refOS ^ vwl9P» Fritt Supwv^^s^ Platy-Stt^s^s Ourlf^ y««liinQi& For players Of aTi stamdarts Gftipyh ifWt ^ im# £.1^ «iii Ir^ i-SS. fin<%c SacciTif %"0!ilsj Sikc fe 1har4? Dur -sportsw!- f?ie Cttgf'sh Bntijc- iinbri & the Yc->jii& Ch&ss^s Braae cyk {•(,'i-l)C,fto,i#tiiebeaveroiiline.co.uk by Friday Aled Dilwyn Fisher Environment and Ethics Officer, Monday, 13.00 Anushka Shenoy General Course Officer, Tuesday 13.00 Sid Kamath Executive Editor, The Beaver, Tuesday 14.00 E204 Fadhil Bakeer Markar International Students Officer, Tuesday 13.00 All Dewji Communications Officer, Tuesday 16.00 Emma Hallgren Students with Disabilities Officer, Tuesday 15.00 Jimmy Tam General Secretary, Thursday 14.00 Michail Retsinas Mature and Part-Time Students' Officer, Wednesday 16.00 D302 Joel Kenrick Treasurer, Thursday 14.00 Alex Finnegan LGBT Officer, Thursday 14.00 (Alex Vincenti's office) Adrian Beciri Returning Officer, Thursday 14.00 James Caspell Postgraduate Officer, Thursday 15.00 Zee Sullivan Women's Officer, Thursday 10.00 D703 Louise Robinson Residences' Officer, Thursday 12.00 Alexandra Vincenti Education and Welfare Officer, Friday 14.00 Shanela Haque Anti-Racism Officer, Fhda!/11.00 Arthur Krebbers Societies' Officer, Friday 13.00 www.lsesu.com/whatson , ::y SPORTS 13 February 2007 AU Rant Nixon wants you to get involved Kathryn Nixon October 2004, and it's my first Wednesday night. I'm walking down Houghton Street with my roomie, who has joined one of the sports teams, and we're late: our first mistake but not, unfortunately, our last. We hear chanting, as if the New Zealand rugby team are singing the Hakka, and we start to get nervous. Actually "nervous" is an understatement. I was bricking myself. Upon entering the "Tuns, we were joining an institution that we'd love to hate and hate to love for the rest of our time at LSE; little did we know then that we'd sold our Wednesday nights down the river for the next three years. Inevitably, we were fined straight away. A few games of "taps" and "the number after 20" were followed by dodgy team karaoke while the LSERFC and LSEFC hurled abuse at each other in the form of some unexpectedly witty chants ("gay are Football" - being my favourite lyric). The ladies were usually talking to the FC, after being left hanging . by Men's Rugby (since they ¦ were busy sticking to their rigid rules of no talking to girls before 9pm and only drinking with their left hands). The evening was topped oft with a visit to Walkies, where you either ended up snogging half of the rugby team or alternatively, had an intellectual conversation with Gareth Carter. Finally, Crispy Duck was on the cards; if you were really unlucky though, you wouldn't end up there but at Zac Lewis' flat instead. That being said, this is what the AU and Wednesday nights were all about and as much as I hate to admit it, I loved it. Gone are the days, however, that the AU used to be written about in The Beaver for their appalling behaviour and sexual ways, frowned upon by their own kind, and gone are the legends that once were notorious, usually to be found in C120. What could this be attributed to? Is this a reflection of the new AU Exec, or is this a reflection on the current 3rd years failing to show the rest how a Wednesday night is really done, in favour of the TV and their 'degree'. Or could it per- haps be a reflection on the sorts of student that now select the LSE for their degree, or can it be due to the loss of some of the real characters that used to populate the LSE? For example, to name but a few: Knoxy: Notorious for turning up at the UGM battered on a Thursday after a 24hr binge drinking session, would commence smoking and then take to the stage where he'd love to And who are the LSERFC? Yes they can often be spotted frequenting the gym after injecting various substances into their bodies in order to increase their body mass... If only they gained intelligence in proportion with this increase in size, conversation wouldn't actually be such a difficult concept for them and Wednesday nights less of a 'risk' to other members of the AU. argue with the chair and use more than four letter words to confuse as many of his opponents as possible. What's more impressive is that he's now at Harvard. Ball sucker: You can work that one out for yourselves. Taffy: Won the "Tuns award" for being the biggest pisshead by a mile. Fabs: He's got a white man's cock and remains a serial womaniser. Miller: Possibly the biggest RFC cock you'd ever meet. Sandy: What a legend, constantly battered... and constantly out on a Wednesday. Hester: Was there a night she didn't end up in tears? As of September '06, the LSEFC now clearly dominate a Wednesday night. However, despite their ever increasing numbers and wide variety of hoodies, most would prefer to spend a Wednesday night at home watching Desperate Housewives. 1 Want free food and drinKP Then become a BeaverSports Editor. No previous experience necessary, just enthusiasm and a sense of humour. Literacy a plus, but not essential. To run, nominate yourself by emailing editor@thebeaveronline.co.uk by Wednesday 5pm My advice to you, current guys and girls of the AU, is to 'get involved', and I mean get is thiis a reflection on the current 3rd years failing to show the rest how a Wednesday night is really done? seriously involved. It's not fair to let such a small minority of AUers get all the liver damage. We want more banter, we want more outrageous antics. Try not to give a flying fuck about what that prat from your econ class might think, or the guy you've had your eye on, because no matter what you do, the people you care most about will love you no matter how much of a prick you make of yourself. Take a leaf out of Parfitt's book and punch a guy in Walkabout, or do a Swartwood and get intimate with anyone who's got their 'pot noodle horn' on. Even better, do a Burkimshur and get (fully) naked, and maybe even wrestle in various female shower areas. And for Christ's sake, do a Nixon and get so twatted that you unable to remember any of your evening; being vommed on, refused service and taking off your bra. So for those of you who weren't aware, bring on Veterans Day: Wednesday, Feb 21st, where the oldies will show the newbies how it's really done. Quote Facebook, and the great Tristram Leach himself: "Houghton Street will reverberate once more to the hymns of Woden and of Thor, as that impeccably noble institution, the LSERFC, is augmented by some of its finer products of recent history. These brave Vallhallans, smoking bloody execution, will return to their alma mater, eyes clouded, perhaps, with tears of reminiscence, but hearts of true English oak, and sinews of incorrodable Welsh steel: ready to do Gin with all who stand against them, and to see decorum done or death befall them first. Come one, come all, and let us roister! For goodness sake come properly attired, and bring your Gincathlon shoes!" The AU seem all too keen to don their LSE sportswear but none are man (or woman) enough to follow anything through on a Wednesday night. So GET INVOLVED. The future of the LSE AU is at stake... Our next AU President? With the elections looming and no obvious choices for the next AU President, BeaverSports has come up v\dth the ideal candidate for the job. I think I may have seen this person in Walkabout before... Shane Warne's arm: for precision paper throwing The head of Danica Patrick: for quick thinking and asthetics of course Unlike previous years in the AU, there appears to be a distinct lack of leadership from the current AU captains. In particular, the rugby captains, whose "gay hair" approach to rugby is failing to match up. One source would indicate that in the beforetime, people such as Tristram Leach were instrumental in the moulding and guidance of the rest of the rugby team, making them the guys that everybody loved to hate. Either way, enough of the guys; what about the girlies? Who are you? What happened to the drunken, violent, binge-drinking statistics the papers talked about (bar WRFC and Naomi Snider)? Gone are the days of "Do you know who I am?!" upon entering Walkabout from various AU Exec members, as are the ladies who were typically known for being girls who enjoyed a night out and maybe even the walk of shame home! Pamela Anderson's chest: for floatation in emergences and beer smugglage George Best's liver: it lasted him well even at the extremes. An essential organ for any Wednesday night go-er A beer belly: Not so much an ideal quality," more an inevitability Venus William's legs: Great for the Barrel run, a pub crawl, running from bouncers, falling down stairs... oh and for sport-related activities Beaver | 13 February 2007 21 SPORTS Rnxing Throwing punches below the belt SPORTSDESK Simon Horner O'neil 'Supernova' Bell, the undisputed Cruiserweight (200 lbs) champion of the world, recently attacked a sparring partner with a hatchet. He now finds himself in police custody. Our own Prince Naseem Hamed, chose to show his remorse for paralyzing a father of two in a road accident by leaving prison in a stretched limousine and subsequently suffered the ignominy of being stripped of his MBE.. With role models like these it is small wonder that boxing has become a minority sport, watched by few and practiced by fewer. Boxing's many enemies, who reduce the 'sweet science' to a mere visceral and malicious blood sport would undoubtedly see this only as a good thing. But it is actually a great pity, since the benefits, particularly to participants are legion. In schools across the London Borough of Bromley, children are discovering this first-hand, as boxing is back on the curriculum, and your reporter for one thinks that this can only be a good thing. It is the most physically demanding of all British Tennis sports requiring fitness levels above and beyond those required to complete 90 minutes of football, whilst at the same time instilling the discipline and respect that many Premier League footballers sorely lack. With the stalking horse of childhood obesity now the principle threat to our nation's health, any and all options to put this particular equine out to pasture should be considered. And for those concerned with young children dealing out internecine brain damage, most of the training is non-contact, and the small proportion that isn't, involves head guards, and large, soft sparring gloves, very different from those used in the professional ranks. And if I could pound for moment, t i m c - less cliche, boxing truly is a potential focus for troubled young minds, and can save them from a life of street crime. Proof of this is easily found amongst the Boxing Hall of Flame, many of whom came from impoverished backgrounds and used boxing as a way to escape their penury. To properly rejuvenate the sport though, (and its reintro-duction into schools is a good start) the sport needs to have spectators, and to draw those it needs popu-1 a r cham-p i o n s at its summit. It not a fear of obesity that compelled Robbie Fowler to kick a ball against a wall in Toxteth for hours a day, but rather seeing his idol Ian Rush celebrating goal after goal in front of the Kop. The main obstacle to increasing boxing's audience numbers is the farcical nature of the TV coverage, dominated as it is by the inexorable politics of the American networks. To watch Ricky Hatton, Manchester's own IBF Light-Welter the world, requires a money and enough midnight oil to last until at least 5 AM; this is too much for the die hard fanatic, let alone the curious newby. This does not help British fighters raise their profile, and that is why so few of them are household names. There are actually British world champions at Super-Middle weight, Light Heavy weight and Cruiser weight, it would be pleasantly surprising if many could name them; this is not the arrogance of the esoteric, but the simple reality was that people have long stopped taking an interest. Furthermore there are 4 sanctioning bodies at each weight meaning that there are four 'world' champions per category. It is by having recognized world champions that interest in the sport is created, this current system ensures that this never happens by completely devaluing the concept. But all is not lost, the situation has recently improved with Frank Warren, the gatekeeper of British Boxing promotion switching his franchise from Sky to ITV. People are now watching boxing in numbers not seen since the glory days of the British middle-weights, when Nigel Benn and nemesis Chris Eubank enthralled a nation that famous Saturday night. As a result millions watched Joe Calzaghe's destruction of Jeff 'Left-Hook' Lacey to become undisputed Super-Middle weight champion of the world, in March of last year. ITV have also covered the stellar rise of Olympic silver medalist Amir Khan, a potential role model to millions if ever there was one. There is much wrong with the state of boxing but there is clear potential for the phoenix to rise from the ashes, simply by making it easier for people to get involved. If you build it, • they will come. British tennis state? Not great SPORTSDESK Sumit Buttoo ^he state of British tennis... .. .Is not great. Most of you probably already knew that, but have you looked more carefully at how relatively bad a state it's in, and why? It doesn't seem like anyone has been asking that question lately, and it's arguably a factor in causing the situation to get this bad. Recently, people have been marvelling at Andy Murray, the teenage Scottish sensation, who apparently signals a return to the elite for British tennis. Maybe he will be a player right at the top in the very near future, but what about the other British tennis players? Seasoned pros Tim Henman and Greg Rusedski are on their last legs, and the other two players in the British top 5 are Richard Bloomfield and Alex Bogdanovic, whose low profiles (indicated by the fact that you've never heard of them) are well deserved. But wait until you've seen the British ladies top 5: Anne Keothavong, Melanie South, Katie O'Brien, Amanda Keen, and Sarah Borwell. Unless you're a keen follower of the qualifying rounds of tournaments, I'll bet you've never heard of these people. The five aforementioned men will prob- The weather is the obvious one that most people will try to pin the blame on, and you can't really argue ably make up the Great Britain team in the Davis Cup tie against Holland, and that match is in the Euro/African Zone. This means that Britain is currently nowhere near the best 16 nations who play in the Davis Cup proper ie the World Group. When I looked into this, in 2002 I came up with some interesting facts. The UK had eleven players in the top 500, one in the top 20, and zero in the top 10. Contrast that with Spain who had forty-nine in the top 500, four in the top 20, three in the top 10, and two in the top 5 players in the world. I'm sure you'll agree that's pretty impressive. In fact in my study of the top 13 tennis playing countries, only Switzerland, Holland, Thailand, and Chile had fewer players than Britain in the top 500. This means we were behind countries such as Czech Republic and Argentina. So what's changed since then? First of all, the top 5 men in 2002 were Lleyton Hewitt, Andre Agassi, Juan Carlos Ferrero, Carlos Moya, and...Roger Federer! The top 5 currently consist of Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, Nikolay Davydenko, Andy Roddick, and Fernando Gonzales. The UK now has one in the top 500, one in the top 20, and zero above that. At best, that's no more than a minor improvement. There's not much point in me giving you the figures for all of the countries I mentioned above, but I think it's worth comparing with Spain again, which had the most favourable numbers in 2002. Spain now has thirty-eight in the top 500, three in the top 20, two in the top 10, and one in the top 5. These numbers still put Britain to shame, and Spain is still the dominant force in the top 20. There are several possible root causes for these embar- rassing figures. The weather is the obvious one that most people will try to pin the blame on, and you can't really argue with that. Parts of Spain seem to be sunny almost all day and night, whilst Britons are lucky to see the sun for half the day even in the summertime. Shorter and colder days could also be a factor. Also, and possibly more problematically, Britain does not have a tennis culture. Tennis is seen, for the most part, as a fun activity that you undertake on a Sunday summer afternoon. Alas that's not a winning formula for identifying, honing and carrying through a world-beater. Tennis also ranks behind football and rugby in schools. This means that few schools have dedicated tennis facilities, as they do for football and rugby. You can't just play tennis anywhere like you can with football. Solutions to these could be to build more indoor facilities that don't price out the lower income brackets, and improve the opportunities to play at school. That's where you are most likely to find people who have natural ability, but who couldn't afford to do so, or didn't even know they had it. Easier said than done, perhaps, but no-one really seems to be saying it at all. I'm sure you can think of other issues that need to be addressed for us to produce our own Roger Federer, or even someone half as good as him. Murray has the potential, but we need more hopefuls to be sure that British tennis has a successful future, or any kind of future at all. m 22 leaver [ 13 February 2007 SPORTS IbaPunter Alternative sports Matthew JCG Partridge There are two big events that are about to take place in the next few weeks. The first one is obviously the Oscars. However, I've covered the Oscars extensively in my last few columns so I doubt that you want to hear about them again. This leaves the ICC World Cup. Although the fact that sixteen teams are participating makes it difficult to handicap we can safely eliminate Holland, Canada, Bermuda, Ireland, Scotland from the running. Zimbabwe, Bangladesh and Kenya are also very unlikely to win, although punters may have gone a bit too far in the odds offered. We can also eliminate New Zealand, India from the remaining seven due to their poor form. Although I appreciate that home advantage is always important I would suggest that you can eliminate the West Indies as well since their over-reliance on an aging Brian Lara makes them vulnerable. This leaves South Africa, Pakistan, England, Sri Lanka and Australia. I don't think Sri Lanka have a good enough team and I don't really rate Australia's bowling attack without either Wame or McGrath. Therefore I am backing South Africa, Pakistan and England on Betfair.com at traditional odds of (7.2/1), (9.5/1), (12.5/1) respectively. This is because all of these three teams have both plenty of bowling and batting talent, especially England and Pakistan. Indeed, William Hill's offer of a commission-free bet of (14/1) on England winning makes the odds on England even better. Because of this offer I would only advise using Betfair.com for backing South Africa and Pakistan. If you weigh each bet so that your winnings are equal on each team (so that you place relatively more on the team with the shorter odds) this will translate into a straight bet on the three teams with traditional odds of (2.52/3). If yop are prepared to cover your position after the first round, I would also advise putting some money down on Zimbabwe, Bangladesh and Kenya since at least one of them will qualify for the final six and their odds will consequently shorten dramatically. However, this strategy is not for the faint hearted and if they do progress into the final six, I don't suggest that you keep the money on the table. Use any advice given here at your own risk and don't gamble what you cannot afford to lose. Columnist(s) may have positions in wagers mentioned. Prices quoted are correct at time of going to press. Is it a bird? Is it a plane? No, it's a Nokia 3210 r Jk S^RTSDESK Gabs Butu It's not about how slim it is, how many mega-pixels it has or even whether it works: it's about how far it goes, and we're not talking battery life either. You'll do better with mega-pecs as opposed to mega-pixels, and 'a 3210 will out-do the latest Samsung any day'. The sport brought to you by the very fathers of modern day mobile communications technology, the Finns, has found its way onto our shores, with the first UK Mobile Phone Throwing Championships taking place last Summer and another to come this year. The 'sport' entails flinging a cellular phone (preferably heavy, old and no longer in J use) across a field, the win-/ ner evidently being the person that throws it the fur-1 thest. Working class heroes,* football hooligans and ' couch potatoes step^ forward ¦jva. please: any. one c a n" enter and^ as the organisers state, "This is your chance to ' become a UK Champion". Last year's victor by a comfortable margin was Chris Hughff, who hurled his handset close to the entire length of a football field - 92.3 meters - in the process setting a new national record. He was agonizingly close to Mikko Lampi of Finland's world record of 94.7 meters. The throwing of mobiles in a competitive setting has taken the alternative sports world by storm, sweeping across Europe and gathering increased popularity with each competition. Obviously, those ingenious Finns have taken to it like fish to water . They've developed different strains of the sport; 'Original', where length of throw is all that counts and 'Fi'eestyle', where length, style, aesthetics and 'creative choreographies' are all factors in determining a winner. They've even got a junior event: according to organisers, "The children are thrilled ; to be allowed to throw 1, away those expensive , phones". In J addition, the Netherlands has particularly embraced the activity, with one of the small nation's major cell-phone networks setting up its own tournament with some great prizes and a good level of media coverage. To most, save the radically competitive folk out there and those of us that are lucky enough to possess the innate ability to lob a cell-phone a long way, mobile phone throwing is purely a novelty. It does nevertheless serve a noble purpose: charity. "According to estimates, 75 million mobile phones are languishing in cupboards and drawers across the UK. Placed end-to-end, these would stretch the entire length of the Great Wall of China almost five times over. These phones can either be recycled for their materials or donated to poorer countries". If your interest has been sparked by this unorthodox implementation of the cellular phone , the UK championships are set to be held at the Tooting ^B e c "Athletics Complex in South London, some time in August. The location of training sessions may prove slightly problematic; safety and self-dignity being potential issues. And you thought "The Extreme Ironing World Championships" showed ingenious use of a household item. Cricket "The Highland fling England can celebrate now! SPORTSDESK Alex Small It's funny how quickly things change in sport. Commentators and pundits make a living (or, in-the case of this humble unpaid hack, the occasional rude comment on The Beaver's website) joyfully proclaiming the ' terminal decline of their teams, writing things like 'tour of woe', 'my mum could bowl better than him' and 'absolutely crap'. The recent history of both England's cricket and rugby teams would seem to be a case in point. A year ago, England rugby was a complete shambles, so bad that the only rational response was one of utter disbelief and quiet, sorrowful reflection on how the mighty had fallen. Similarly, England's cricket team only two weeks ago was enduring its third successive month of playground bullying at the hands of Australia, and had only won one game on tour. But, thank God, some of our national sportsmen evidently have more backbone than our supremely overpaid footballers. Unbeaten after the second week of the six nations, Jonny Wilkinson and co. can look forward to Ireland next week with some hope, although their 20-7 victory against Italy on Friday was admittedly less than convincing. Both Phil Vickery, England's new captain, who looks like a bricklayer, and the coach Brian Ashton expressed some regret that England were unable to convert pressure into points against a strong Italian defence. But with the return of experienced players like Mike Tindall, Jason Robinson and, of course, Jonny Wilkinson, the feeling is that England are a competitive team again. In particular, with Wilkinson wearing the number ten, as the Italy game seems to demonstrate, England don't even have to play that well to win. I was at Twickenham for England vs Scotland on the Friday before last, and towards the end of the game the importance of this was revealed to me. The sky had gone dark over the stadium and England were stretching their lead at every opportunity and Wilko was in his trademark squat preparing to kick for goal. In that moment of stillness, thousands of camera flashes all over the ground lit up the stadium as everyone tried to get a piece of the returning hero. Running back to his team after bagging another three points, Wilkinson got not a nod from his team mates. To the rugby watching public, he has become an almost messianic figure; now, in his resurrection, every bit as good as he was before. To his team mates, he's just doing his job. England's return to the game of rugby has, if anything, been less surprising than England's dramatic comeback victory in the one-day series against Australia. England sealed an impressive first finals win over Australia on Friday with a no less determined performance on Sunday in the Sydney rain (it does rain in Australia, apparently), winning by 34 runs. And the tables seemed to have comprehensively turned on the Aussies when they found themselves in Screw you, you Aussie bastards, you can stick the Ashes up your arse the most Pom-like position of 5 for 63 after twelve overs, courtesy of some fine opening bowling from Liam Plunkett. Andrew Flintoff had another good game back as skipper, scoring 42 and taking the decisive wicket of 'Mr Cricket' Mike Hussey for a duck, only a week or so after Duncan Fletcher had admitted that Flintoff performed better without the captaincy. But it was Paul Collingwood's performance that was once again the catalyst for victory. Having driven England's successful run-chase of 252 last Friday with a masterful 120 not out, Collingwood impressed again on Sunday, scoring 70 and taking two wickets. Collingwood is one of those players who, not possessing a classic cover drive or flowing footwork, will always be vjrritten off in by the purists during a period of bad form. What he lacks in style, however, he makes up for with determination and absolute professionalism. Most of all, he certainly seems to enjoy sticking it to the Aussies. At Adelaide in the second match of the test series, Collingwood's magnificent 200 was followed by a terrible England crash and bum and one can only speculate as to what effect that might haw had on him. And then, at Sydney in the final test, he made the mistake of sledging Shane Warne and received a bit of a humiliation, as Warne sledged back about Collingwood's MBE and dedicated his 71 to him, Australia winning by ten wickets. But form has returned for Collingwood and other key players and with it they have made the Warne-less Australia look ordinary. In both these tales there is perhaps a lesson to be had. Sport, like life, goes up and down, and the temptation to gloat at the return to winning ways is immense. This is especially true with the cricket and England's recent catalogue of embarrassing defeat. At the end of the Ashes, an Australian tabloid printed the following statement with vitriolic glee: 'This time, the last time, there'll be no relief until the shell of the English cricket team lays on the SCG turf, picked bare of wings, legs and barely squirming, a chorus line of Aussie Terminators dancing around the torso'. Except that hasn't happened. In fact, England won, and the temptation to gloat is in fact so enormous that I am going to do exactly that. Screw you, you Aussie bastards, you can stick the Ashes up your arse and I don't see any Aussie Terminators now. Ah, that feels better! + SPORTS Running Beaver | 13 February 2007 23 Runners brave barbarian frontier Sports resultsp jn brief .......ll,;: Charlie Dougherty I realize I'm not a native and don't understand the subtleties of the English psyche, but when I was told that the running team was in the London College League, I admit that I was naive and thought the league would be in London. It is for the most part, but when I heard that we would be oft to Reading on some frozen February afternoon, I thought "Wow! This must be some important race!" Well it isn't. Yet it is the venue where you see the real runners, those that don't mind going outside the M25 to wear short shorts and gloves at the same time. LSE had one Teann of the week of the largest male turnouts, with seven undergrads and one sturdy lecturer showing up. However, the Women's team was nowhere to be found. Some of them were struck by the six hour flu, which prevented them from running but not (thank god) from missing the ULU social that evening. Strong characters, they are. And the rest of the team? They know who they are, and I know where they live. Despite the lack of a women's team, the men made LSE proud and kept up the pace. The course had only one hill, but ¦ by the end of the race you had gone up it six times. The race started brilliantly, timed f to correspond with the release of about fifty 12 year olds from school, and one of them, being a delightful school child, decided to put his lardy ass right in our path. But after a few elbows found his face he learned his lesson, and I learned that Schadenfreude's a wonderful thing. Team captain Tom "my legs are much longer than yours" Beedell had a strong start, coming around the first lap in 4th and finishing a solid 6th. Lawrence Leong kept it casual, finishing 24th. He was followed closely by this writer in 30th, James May in his traditional Neon Hot Pants at 31st (believe it or not he's single, ladies) and Andy "Wouldn't it be nice to breathe out of my nose" Hardman was in 32nd. Sam Martin closed out the field at 42nd, and sadly a delightful school child decided to put his lardy ass right in our path Michael Lui had to pull out with an injury. All said and done, it was a typical race, the fast were fast, the not so fast were slow, and there were dogs everywhere threatening to trip you up. It was the first LCL race of the season, and for many the transition to racing again was painful. For me it was also a journey of self-discovery. I discovered that Reading isn't an hour and a half away and there isn't border control on the M25, despite what I was told. The funny things you learn traveling outside the countr—I mean, city. lentre back - 7ths Adier-Full back-4ths Kouppas - Centre mid -7ths Football heads represent losers whose pictures I can't see on Facebook - left wing - 6th5 Men's Hockey Ists lost to Imperial Medics in the quarter finals of the ULU cup. The score was 1-1 and 1-3 after penalties Ladies 1st IV tennis 7-3 victory over Imperial Finished 2nd in BUSA league 1 and qualified for BUSA knockout trophy Playing against a team we had previously lost to, the girls showed true conviction and put on a show that combined great entertainment and great tennis. - Sanch Men's Football LSE 7ths 2 London School Pharmacy 1 of Women's Rugby LSE 49 St.George's 5 LSE 15 Middlesex Uni 5 Netball ULU Reserve final LSE 2nds 17 UCL 2nds 51 cup semi We've been given loads of walkovers this week - maybe the other universities ar? too afraid to pUy us?! -Libby Meyer Men's Rugby LSE 3rds 45 St. Barts 17 Women's hockey Are the BUSA SE 4a league Champions! ;¦ iker - 6ths + Embarrasing handset? Rurm|iig Sublime Sixes win, RUMS whinge Nathan Capone & Rich Morrow LSEFC 6's RUMS 4th.s St Albans Rums 4ths are wankers. No other word can really do them better justice. Twats is too mild and although cunts would also be fitting it might be going as far to suggest that they are on the same level as the bone-headed, ill-educated morons on the Queen Mary team. It's not that they try to break our legs in tackles or give us any nasty foul-mouthed abuse, they just whinge. The moaning, whining, griping and protesting didn't stop for the entire match. In fact, it even continued after it. At the slightest hint of bodily contact, they would complain to the referee, like that kid at primary school who would always grass you up to the teachers if you swore. And just to' labour their point, they would frequently dive in a style not unlike a cross between a gunshot victim, an Olympic springboard champion, and Cristiano Ronaldo. Of course they had no problem with dishing out bad tackling themselves; Bobby was unfortunate enough to take a knee right in the family jewels. The RUMS responded with a sportsmanlike "For fuck's sake get up". One only hopes that this isn't the way in which these student medics will treat their patients when they become doctors: "For fuck's sake get up", "But my leg's been cut oft..." "Get up, stop faking". We would particularly like to single out their ginger knob of a captain and their lippy striker with the receding hairline for being a pair of prize wankers. So it was all immensely satisfying when the Sixes emerged victorious at the final whistle. Not that we made it easy on ourselves: proceedings began ominously when train cancellations meant that the trip to St. Albans had to be completed by a walk, two buses, a train, a taxi and a jet ski. Matters were not helped when the RUMS captain started sending skipper Rich menacing text messages, threatening that if we didn't get there by 2:30, we'd forfeit the game. We'd like to reiterate: wanker. Nor were we helped by the absence of centre-back Rob. He'd managed to get lost in a field somewhere (literally), whilst attempting to follow an ordinance survey map, which Rich, our resident geographer and (clearly) an expert on maps, had sent round in an e-mail. The play was scrappy and chances were few and far between. 'Steady' Eddy surged forward from his left-back position and sent a curling shot just barely high and wide. Rich attempted to show him how it was done, and was similarly close from twenty yards minutes later. Unluckily, Bobby had to see his volley tipped around the post by an (admittedly superb) save by the RUMS keeper. Who is also a wanker, At twenty minutes, Drela found himself on the edge of the area with the ball perfectly teed up for a crisp volley; he let the ball fly, and fly it did, off for a throw-in. Full marks for effort. : Ihcy would c^jniplain to the referee like that kid at pri-maiy school who would always grass you up to the teachers anyway. So it was left for our strikers to open the scoring. Nathan 'Brownie' Muruganadan terrorized the defence like Hezbollah (too soon?) a mazy run put him one-on-one with the keeper but he was unable to get the finishing touch, leaving birthday-boy Robyn to tuck the ball away. The 6's looked on top but as we often do, somehow nodded off at the back like we'd been slipped some Rohypnol, letting one RUMS striker stroke a ball across the goal for the other to stick into the net and equalize. Disappointed, but not discouraged, the second half started brightly and the 6's went on the attack. Erlend was tireless down the right wing and Bobby probably covered a distance equivalent to the Tour de France throughout the match. Yet it was debutante goalkeeper Joe Wilkins who was at the top of his game, injured since trials last term with a broken finger, he made several crucial saves at the feet of onrushing RUMS players. The 6's defence was bolstered when Rob finally escaped from the field he was trapped in and slotted into the With renewed confidence, the 6's went for the winner and duly got their reward when Brownie dashed through the defence and slotted deftly past the keeper. Not that it was over by any means. It took a heroic backwards diving save from Wilko to tip a twenty yard drive over the bar like a bodyguard taking a bullet (the slow-motion replay actually shows him going "nooooooo..."). Jann and Ollie put in crunching tackles in midfield to ensure that RUMS didn't get near the goal again (by this stage they were putting double axels into their dives). The RUMS referee also did his best to fuck with the clock: "How long mate?""About twenty seconds." He called full-time about ten minutes later. Wanker. It didn't matter, the 6's were into the quarters and as happy as Gary Glitter would be if he discovered that he had the internet in his prison cell. RUMS continued to whinge even after the final whistle, complaining that we had ringers on our team. That's right, we're all Chelsea under twenty-ones in disguise. Wankers. i $ I ^ m : N bet I'll find you in our room tomorrow having a sneaky old flick," Kathryn Nixon , . i A Rude Awakening Members of staff from PuLSKfm were broadcasting as pari of their RAGnthon from midnight on Monday when the hhickout disrupted their shows. The RAGathon is an annual RAG week event, during wliich PuLSKfm broadcast non-stop for one week. The broadcast was disrupted by the bh>ckout at approximately 1:30 am. Due to RA-(iathon rules stating that PuLSEfm staff arc not allowed to leave the building PuLSKfm "staff slept in the New Theatre. They were woken up hitcr on morning by security and asked to leave the campus due to the School being closed for the day. Broadcasting for the RAGathon resumed at midnight on Monday. Ali Moussavi, News Editor Anti-clockwise from top: 1) Fire Service pumping out water from submerged power sub-station, 2) High velocity pumps working overtime, 3) King's College chaos, 4) Students outside Old Building excited about a day off, .¦5) The building above which the sub-station is located ^^eaver I i3~February^ 2007 AGListings street Collections: Haggles will be out and about all week with tins either collecting donations on Houghton Street or raiding target zones around the neighbourhood to try to raise as much as possible! To get involved, visit the RAG stall in the Quad. BAG Sale: Visit the RAG stall in the Quad between 10am-4pm to check out our fabulous line of RAG merchandise. We've got two types of classic RAG tshirts in 6 different colours as well as redesigned RAG pint glasses. New for this year, we've also got glow-in-the-dark RAG wristbands which let you skip the queue at RAG CRUSH this Friday! RAGathon: PuLSEfm will be broadcasting live from the Quad all week as part of their RAGathon festivities. Visit them and cast your vote for which LSE celeb you want to get GUNKED! RAGreels: Come down to the Quad or visit loosetv.co.uk to see a selection of shortfilms themed around 'A Helping Hand'. Vote for your favourite by donating to RAG. Big Beaver: Big Beaver is back and better than ever this year. Visit the House by traveling through the Quad to Squash Court 3 and be sure to check out the final event on Friday at 8 in the Underground Bar Library Fines for BAG: For all of week 6, library late fines can be paid to LSESU RAG week. Visit the service counters and pay your built-up fines: it's an easy way to contribute to RAG! BAG Week Blind Date: Fill out a questionnaire and be matched up with your soul mate! Eternal happiness in return for a £4 donation, what more could you want? Contact Sahar at s.zafar@lse.ac.uk to sign up. 6pm - 8pm 7pm RAG Biryani Eating Competition:" How many plates of rice can you eat in one sitting?" come and watch the LSE's bravest eaters try to down as much food as they can to raise money for RAG. [Quad] liance Show: "So you think you can dance?" the annual dance society show. Come and see a range of stylos of dance being performed in this spectacular show.You might even get to join in... £3 in advance (buy from SU Reception). £4 on the door. Doors open: G:45pm. Performance: 7pm. All proceeds to RAG [Old Theatre) qS LU ^ 52 8pm RAG @ AU: Our collections teams will be out at AU Wednesday night to raise as much money as possible through wacky games and collection tins. p 4pm - 5pm 5.30pm Dpm - 8pm 7pm - 11pm 3pm - 7pm u_ VD 8pm - 2am RAGforum: "Terrorism, Torture and Trident: The many functions of International Law" with Christopher Greenwood QC. £1 donation required for admission. [Hong Kong Theatre] RAG Pro-Evo 6 Tournament: Group stage matches. To enter sign up on Houghton Street at ISOC stall on Monday and Tliesday. Entry £4. Winners receive paintballing tickets for themselves and seven friends. (V303 and S300] RAGreels Grand Finale: now that you've checked out the short films at www.looselv.co.uk and in the Quad throughout the week, come to the grand finale to hear from the filmakers themselves and hear the winner announced! [New Theatre] RAGoff: Pay £1 to RAG to battle against others to be crowed "king / queen of the dance". Part of Dance Society Paily. Free if you purchased a ticket for the Dance Show (bring ticket) otherwise £1 members, £2 non-members. A free drink for the first 100 people who arrive. Free food at 7pm, [Underground Bar] RAGcrawl: Join us for the annual RAG Week pubcrawl as we travel the city in fancy dress stopping visiting pubs to collect donations (and have drinks, of course). Meet at 3pm to join a team and be assigned a route. [The Three Ibns] RAG Pro-Evo 6 Tournament: Knock-out round matches. To enter sign up on Houghton Street at ISOC stall on Monday and Tuesday. Entiy £4. Winners receive paintballing tickets for themselves and seven friends. [U103 and U203] Dance Show: "So you think you can dance?" the annual dance society show. Come and see a range of styles of dance being performed in this spectacular show. You might even get to join in... £3 in advance (buy from SU Reception). £4 on the door. Doors open: 6:45pm. Performance: 7pm. All proceeds to RAG [Old Theatre] Big Beaver Final: Come down and see the monies tallied and the winner of Big Beaver 2007 announced! [Underground Bar] BAG Crush! There will be all kinds of RAG activities happening at CRUSH including boat races, bottle races, and even some good old fashioned RAG collecting. Wear your RAG wristband and get free queue-jump! o C/2 3 MONDAY-THURSDAY, 01:00 - 03:00 BIKE - I'm teaching Dan Dolan to ride a bike over the course of the week, if he fails to ride down Houghton street on Friday then he has to give us £100. TUESDAY, 12:00 WORLD BECOBD - PuLSEfm will be attempting to break a world record. It will not be official as we were unable to get the adjudicator in for it. TUEDAY, 14:00 LSE IBON MAN - rugby, football, hockey and martial arts go head to head and put through rigorous challenges to find LSEs Iron Man. WEDNESDAY. 14:00 BLIND DATE - traditional Cilia Black style. WEDNESDAY, 20:00 - 00:00 VALENTINES - live valentines double date, so if your lonesome this year tune in to hear pulsefm fall in love!! THURSDAY, 14:00 & 22:00; FRIDAY, 14:00 HACK IDOL - 4 hacks/sabbs/celebs recording a 'single' on Tuesday, these will be played on thurs between 2 and 10, with the winner being announced at 10 pm. The winner will then play live on IViday at 2.30 on the stage. FRIDAY, 15:00 GUNKING - Sabbatical officers getting gunked with brunch bowl leftovers - throughout the week all the money raised in the quad through song requests and general collection will be placed into the bucket of choice jiepending on whom they want to see gunked. PRESEHrS TH£ SHORT FllM FESTtl V At FOR CHARTrY "RIMSBASiDONTHE ,