The Beaver 'Newspapera^h^^^L^^^^^^Fir5^ublishe^TZ^94^^^^^*''***^0tt^eptember^00^^™*"**|'^^^^^ssi^^ Features and Politics in Latest Music and Film blink, Page 8 in b:art, Page 12 Freshers' Week Special Issue - all you need to get.fo know the LSE Strike Alert! Freshers' Week disrupted by pay dispute El Barham LSE's Freshers' week is set to be disrupted in the protracted struggle for an increase in London Weighting for the staff of the school. Strikes today and Friday at the LSE will involve the 170 members of UNISON, the public service union, and the 350 members of the Association of University Teachers (AUT).This incorporates one day of imdergraduate registration and one day of Freshers' Fayre, to ensure the maximum amount of disruption for the school. Currently, employees in higher education in London receive a higher salary than similar workers across the country by £2,134 per aimum to compensate for the elevated cost of living in the capital. However, it has long been felt that this is insufficient, especially since housing and transport costs have risen dramatically in recent months. To give some idea of the diminutive scale of the payment, an armual travelcard for zones 1-4 costs £1,136, more than half of the salary increase: employees cannot afford to live in or commute to London. So-called new universities already receive a higher rate of London Weighting, of £3,500 a year, despite having lower bank balances and other public service workers in London are also given a much more generous subsidy. The fire service receives £4000 and the Metropolitan police receive £7,000 per aimum. The result of the low rate of London Weighting is that there is a high staff turnover as disillusioned employees move on to more lucrative jobs. This means that there is a lack of continuity of staff, so problems cannot be dealt with efficiently as a series of different people have the task of resolving them. Any training given to members of staff is also lost when they leave. UNISON UNISON UNISON 4K««r ECEHT PAY TIBED OF THE WEIGHTING I From left to right: Julia Rapkin; Anne Scott; Chris Husbands; Daniel Peppiatt Although other institutions such as King's College London have attempted to avoid proposed strikes by offering a settlement to the unions, the LSE has steadfastly refused to even answer requests for negotiations. Therefore, UNISON and AUT feel that they have no choice but to proceed with the strikes during a time when they will put the school under the maximum amount of pressure. These strikes are the latest in a series to try a secure a "fairer" amount of London Weighting of £4000, as previous attempts have yielded no results. Dr Chris Husbands, President of the LSE AUT said: "Our members are pretty fed up - our salaries are way out of line with most of the country. "The school has been extremely haughty and consistently used condescending language. Our requests for negotiations have been ignored; the only concession we have been given is the promise of a series of public meetings on low pay, which seems inadequate." The fact that the school claims to be financially buoyant and has been engaged in a high profile renovation of the library and the campus has exacerbated anger over the school's refusal to cooperate. Dr Husbands said: "It's not as if the school can't afford it. LSE is one of the better off London institutions and the finances are more than able to cope. There has been a great deal of needless flamboyant expenditures, such as the very expensive library, and it feels as if the school is putting its facilities before its staff." Students could also be adversely affected by the strikes since it is necessary to register in order to receive this term's instalment of the student loan and to apply for council tax exemption. New arrivals are also going to be affected by the potential disruption to Freshers' Fayre as some members of the executive team are reluctant to participate, while the pickets outside will cause confusion. In short, the vital Freshers' period, key to the social life of recent arrivals, will be tarnished. However, Julia Rapkin, chairperson of UNISON at LSE, was keen to emphasise that the strikes are not intended to cause problems for the student body. She said: "We are not interested in disrupting things for students - we have their interests at heart. We want to improve the school as a whole and securing a reasonable amount of London Weighting will help to ensure that the school can retain and recruit the necessary staff to rim the institution." The LSE Students' Union (SU) is mandated to support strikes aimed to increase the London Weighting by a motion passed last year at a Union General Meeting (UGM) and will therefore be producing a joint statement with the AUT and UNISON to inform students about the reasons behind the strikes. SU officers have been involved in talks with the unions so are in a position to know how best to soften the blow of the strikes for students whilst not easing life for the establishment. A global email has been sent to explain the issue to students. Jo Kibble, SU Treasurer and UNISON member, explained; "The negotiations have been frank, honest and open. It is in our interest to cooperate as if we don't ask UNISON and AUT for special exemption from the strikes, then this will be returned and they will support our campaign against top-up fees. "The SU will do everything in its power to help students to cope with the effects of the strikes. We will send a joint letter to the school and will lobby for them to settle with the unions - the strikes don't have to happen. The onus Continued Page 2 Meet the new Director: Howard Davies Biographi/ Page 6 The Beaver Tuesday 30th September 2003 The Beaver News Page 2 Strikes Continued from Page 1 lies with the school to prevent the problem that the massive disruption to the vital Freshers' period will cause." The school is currently going through a period of regime change, as the LSE's new Director, Sir Howard Davies, will officially succeed Professor Tony Giddens, Third Way expert, on October 1st. This has been an impediment to the school's ability to respond to the demands made by the unions, as Tony Giddens has left the problem for his replacement, who has not yet arrived. However, the unions do not accept that this is a sufficient excuse for the School's behaviour. Dr Husbands said: "I suspect that the school administration is treading water in the interim period before Howard Davies arrives, so they are avoiding making any decisions, but Tony Giddens' departure should not be an impediment to negotiations. King's is in the same position as they are changing their Principal, yet they have managed to settle." The unions met with Sir Howard on September 25th, and although he apologised for derogatory remarks made by his predecessor, no financial offers were made, meaning that the strikes are going ahead. Alternative arrangements for registration have therefore been organised: imdergraduates are mainly unaffected as the staff who deal with their registration are not affiliated to the imions, although late registration on the Monday and the Tuesday will be carried out on Wednesday; postgraduate registration on the affected days will be moved to the following Monday and Tuesday. Sir Howard is, however, reported to have been more conciliatory during a recent talk. This informal meeting is more than the unions have been granted in the past, so it is possible that a compromise could be reached in the future. Also, as other London institutions break ranks and raise their London Weighting, it will become more difficult for the LSE to continue to refuse the unions' request. Dr Husbands said: "The settlement at King's, for example, shows that if a reasonable offer is made then members are prepared to accept it. If we receive a reasonable response from the school, then we will advise our meinbers to vote yes to a settlement. I am optimistic about our chances for the fight." The other settlement packages offered to the unions by London institutions include King's offer of a £100 one-off payment and a 4% increase to the existing London Weighting in 2004-5 and City University's offer of an £100 increase for 2004-5 with a further £80 increase the following year. Union members at these institutions will decide whether to accept the proposals this week. SOAS and Birkbeck College have received similar offers to King's, and have rejected them with a 52%-90% vote in favour of further strike action. Accordingly, strikes were held at these institutions, as well as University College London, last week. Protests go on but the LSE drops out Mark Power LSE Student activists were among those who joined the throngs this Saturday to protest against Britain's continued engagement in the Iraq war and its aftermath. A small but dedicated group gathered in Houghton Street at 11 am in order to join marchers from other University of London colleges on Oxford Street before joining the main march at its Hyde Park meeting point. Police estimated that the protestors numbered 20,000 while organisers pitched their estimate at just under 100,000. Whilst the turn-out was low in comparison to pre-war protests, particularly among student activists, LSE SU General Secretary Elliot Simmons, who attended the march himself, suggested that the numbers were encouraging considering the term is yet to start and the LSE Stop The War Coalition and its counterparts have had little time or opportimity to publicise the march to their members and supporters. Critical commentators in the LSE SU were quick to proclaim the death of the LSE STWC and the anti-war movement in general within the school. Speaking to The Beaver, right-wing pundit Alykhan Velshi proclaimed that the STWC's support had "plummeted quicker than a Saddam Hussein statue in central Baghdad." He went on to simnise that the LSE had seen "the last ¦ -t Many Protesters - few from the LSE throngs of the grubby would-be revolutionaries who invaded our campus last year." Velshi went on to claim that the STWC has nothing left to fight against, given that the post-war reconstruction of Iraq is going so well. Speaking in return, Mr James Meadway, a leading LSE STWC Activist declared that he believed the war "has vindicated the peace movement." Despite his anti-war campaign being rubbished as a combination of American-bashing hysteria and 60s peacenik nostalgia, Meadway was firm in his conviction that the war has shown that the Bush-Blair axis was never interested in a stable future for Iraq. Meadway's comments echo articles in the national press, particularly The Guardian, regarding the strength of the STWC nationally. The STWC has galvanised cross-party support and now has 500 affiliated organisations. It is becoming the fastest growing political movement in Britain. With a stable, secure and democratic Iraq being far from fruition, it seems Mr Velshi's dismissal of the anti-war movement may be somewhat premature. As a sign of things to come, speaking to last Saturday's rally. Mayor of London Ken Livingstone promised that the capital would not welcome the visit of George Bush later this year. With calls for Londoners to take to the streets in protest it would seem that what Mr Velshi terms as "grubby would-be revolutionaries" will be in full force on Houghton Street and beyond this year. James Meadway takes on the right "There's nothing left to Liberate" El Barham Contentious proposals to introduce liberation officers at King's are to be submitted to King's SU coxm-cil after being rejected twice by the students' imion executive committee and council last year. Last year's plans to introduce officers to represent minority groups on campus and tackle the prejudice they face were referred to KCLSU executive, where they were volubly derided by then KCLSU president David Utting. He led the argument against the introduction of part-time officers on the basis that there was no need or interest for them at King's. In his words, "There's nothing left to liberate". However, some feel that the extremely close vote of 6-5 against was not so much the result of Utting's sublime rhetoric as his alleged bullying tactics. During his tenure, he tried to no confidence three sabbatical officers, including the President of the University of London Union (ULU). A King's insider confided to The Beaver: "David Utting is the main problem - people are afraid that if they stand up against him, he'll no confidence them and they'll lose their jobs. People are worried about the fall-out. "The idea that there is no interest in welfare issues at King's is ridiculous. Three of ULU's liberation officers are King's students, so there is definitely a desire to get involved. There was also a person who actually asked to take on the work of women's officer last year and she was turned down, so a student I Welcome to your ' I I Students' Unioni King's Students' Union was refused the right to help other students. It's just there is no outlet to gauge interest". King's has an Equality and Diversity Department, which aims to tackle inequality at King's, ensuring that "current students, job applicants and members of staff are treated solely on the basis of their merits, abilities and potential without any unjustified discrimination" and there is a full-time Welfare and Representation sabbatical officer. Given these provisions, it is possible to argue that liberation issues are adequately dealt with without creating part-time positions to duplicate the work already being done. However, Susie Reilly, former Bang's student and currently ULU Welfare and Student Affairs Officer, believes that this does not negate the necessity for liberation officers at her old university. She said: "The role of liberation officers is an extremely important one especially as King's is such a large university. It is important there is support at universities for people who have been removed from their home networks. Liberation officers represent minority groups, campaigning on their behalf to change attitudes, lobby for a change in legislation and to raise awareness of issues affecting that group. This is a large workload - too much for a single sabbatical." LSE liberation officers concur with this assessment. Alice Brickley, LSE's Students with Disabilities Officer said: "There is more than enough work for a part-time officer; you can always do more. It's a cliche, but the job is as big as you make it". Sian Errington, Equal Opportunities (Female) said: "I find the idea that King's is somehow okay very hard to believe - there's loads to do." In fact, belief in the value of liberation campaigns, normally run by part-time officers, is so strong that Bang's students are being invited to participate in non-LSE specific campaign events. Rowan Harvey, LSE Education and Welfare sabbatical said: "It is important that everyone has access to liberation campaigns and support and it shouldn't matter which side of The Strand you come from." It is hoped that King's new executive team will give a more favourable response this time around. Susie Reilly said: "I believe that all Universities should consider creating liberation officer positions; it may be that uptake initially is slow but this is more likely to be caused by a lack of publicity than a lack of need. However, the current King's sabbatical team is fantastic and I hope they can sort this issue out. The Beaver Tuesday 30th September 2003 Page 3 JheBeaverNeivs Alumni Storm Houghton Street El Barham Campus changes were displayed in all their glory as alumni of all ages flocked back to Houghton Street on 20th September. Graduates Of the Last Decade (GOLD) invited former graduates of all ages to a campus street party for the first organised reunion for alumni. In future, events will be tailored for those who graduated one decade previously, but this experimental first event was open to all. i-am. Alumni - here 1954 - 1957 Graduates who had studied at the LSE as long ago as 1949 and as recently as 2001, took advantage of the chance to meet up with old friends, reminisce over past experiences and sample delicious fare from the barbecue. Glorious weather ensured a good turn out and Houghton Street and the Tuns were teeming with people. Event organiser, alumnus Reza Nader-Sepahi (97-99) said: "The idea was to provide something relaxed to give people a chance to catch up and also show off the new developments that have been carried out by the school. "It was difficult to organise as we had to cater for all ages, but this party is also a test for future events to give us a better idea of what works and what could be done to improve the experience. We just want people to enjoy themselves." Over 400 people did just that, and were obviously delighted to relive memories from their time at LSE, to a soundtrack that Crush would be proud of, proving that students do not change over the decades. "I remember protesting here about something, though I can't remember what" said Michael Safan (54-57), indicating Houghton Street, the usual genesis of campaigns and marches. "Oh yeah - it was Suez". The renovations to campus were also duly noted. Alia Kocherezhkina (98-99) said: "When I was here the library was a real mess, and there was always construction work going on, so it's good to see that's finished. The Tuns needs a makeover though." One of the most eagerly anticipated moments of the day was a guided tour of the LSE to show former students exactly what had changed since their lecture years. Unfortunately, a power-cut in the Old Building prevented the tour from taking place, so Mr Nader-Sepahi gallantly stepped in, fulfilling contractual obligations with a brief virtual tour. Fortunately, the building that aroused the most interest was available for casual perusal. The British Library of Political and Economic Science opened its doors to all, over the weekend of September 20^^^, as part of London Open House, a charity event which aims to give members of the public access to buildings of architectural interest. Library Archives oncusplay Over 880 people came to view the library, normally reserved for students, to explore, admire and criticise the brainchild of LSE alumnus, Norman Foster. Alumni were able to amble from the neighbouring street party to the library, to take an audio tour or participate in the other activities on offer Architectural company Foster and Partners and construction managers Bovis Lend Lease gave talks to help elucidate the technical details of design and construction, and an exhibition dealing with the library's construction was also on display. Those more interested in the academic aspect of the building were catered for as the archives, usually used by a mere 100 people per month, were also available for inspection. "The reaction of people coming in has been very positive," effused Rowena Macrae-Gibson, assistant librarian. "The talks have been well received and many people have expressed an interest in the school having viewed its facilities." Recent graduates were perhaps more interested in the new library than most. Tara McCormack (98-99) said: "When I was here it was a nightmare because they were moving books out of the old library and into the new one when I was trying to do my dissertation. I prefer the old library - there were lots of nice nooks and crarmies where you could lose yourself for a couple of hours, which you can't do in this new one. Overall, both events were extremely successful and complemented each other well, pulling a wider spectrum of interested people to view the school. The last word of the day goes to Mr Nader-Sepahi, who summed up the weekend -"in every respect, it was true LSE style". LSE Career Event At Deutsche Bank we share your passion to out-think, out-smart, out-perform. It's this passion that makes us one of the world's leading financial institutions. And it's why the world's most demanding clients trust Deutsche Bank to deliver. Deep insights. Cutting edge thinking. Fresh solutions. Total commitment. Are you ready? Meet representatives from our business to discover the types of roles available and how our world-class training program will prepare you for a flying start... Date: Wednesday, October 8" 2003 Time: 6.30pm Venue: Deutsche Bank, Winchester House, 1 Great Winchester St, London EC2N 2DB To register for this event please email your name to event.signup(S)db.com with your university name in the subject line. Apply online at www.db.com/careers. Interviews will commence in October 2003. - t i. - " km v- ^ \ assion to Perform. ^' % leSsche Bank m The Beaver Tuesday 30th September 2003 IheBeacerNeux Page 4 New course packs arrive Transport Fight fees Last year, trying to find books from your reading list was a chore indeed, but this will certainly be reduced thanks to the introduction of course packs. In the past, book retrieval meant a trudge to the library, armed with a list of text books a foot long. If you were lucky, a few of those listed would be available for loan. Once inside, accessing the relevant floor involved a cost/benefit analysis of waiting for several hours for a lift or negotiating the strange stairs. Whichever route you chose, a 45-minute hunt for the book would follow, if you were lucky. Now, 38 courses have signed up for the creation of a course pack. These are a collation of one chapter at most from as many books from the reading list of the course as legal restrictions will allow. This means that the packs are not completely comprehensive, but will save much library angst. The cost of packs will be based on the rate of 4p per page; a penny cheaper than photocopying in the Library. However, it still works out as the most economic option of obtaining the material. This is because several of the books cannot be removed from the library, which means an extra pence charged for each page photocopied on the premesis. Compiling the packs involved chasing lecturers of courses to persuade them to participate in the scheme, going through the lists to decide what can legally be included, getting the books from the library in the manner described above and finally photocopying all the pages for inclusion - literally tens of thousands. Donny Surtani, LSE alumnus and co-ordinator of the course packs said: "The idea of the producing course packs was to help students by giving them access to scare library resources. They will save time, stress and money as we have been able to photocopy books at a lower rate than is possible in some cases." Willingness to participate in the scheme has varied by department, with gold stars going to the Sociology and Government department. Well over half the Government department's undergraduate coxirses will have a course pack. Within Sociology, departmental manager Joyce Lorinstein, contacted all the academics in her department. Donny Surtani - Course Pack King strongly encouraging them to cooperate. For some courses a course pack is not suitable, as they are predominantly textbook based, such as Mathematics and Statistics, and Economics courses. Since for legal reasons, only one chapter per book can be included in a pack, it is impossible to create a pack for a course based entirely on a single book. However, some departments refused point blank to participate in the scheme: International Relations decided that the packs would 'spoon-feed' students and the Geography department did not respond to requests for co-operation. Available course packs can be ordered from the Students' Union Copy Shop from the first week of lectures and most will be ready for collection from that week. A few will take imtil the following week to arrive, but it is hoped the number of these will be very few. The library also produces course packs for about 40 courses, including many in the History department, which can be ordered from them directly. If your course does not have a pack, despair not. Several courses are split into two parts, the second of which are covered by packs which will be available in the Lent Term. It is also hoped that the success of this year's scheme wiU help to persuade more academics to participate in the future especially if they face pressure from students. Donny Surtani told The Beaver: "Students who believe that their course is suitable for a pack should contact the lecturer and us, so we can lobby the lecturer on their behalf. Hopefully we can sign up more courses to the scheme." Mayor of London, Ken Livingstone, last week imveiled an extension to the Student Travel Scheme that will benefit some of the city's most cash strapped students living on National Rail lines. The ten million pound expansion of the student photocard scheme means that students will be able to use the 30% discount to purchase tickets on national rail in the London area as well as the existing discounts on tubes, buses trams and the Docklands Light Rail network. Speaking at the unveiling of the scheme, Ken Livingston said that although he doesn't have the power to abolish tuition fees, "this measure will help to ease the financial burden for London Students." The extension will be of vital aid to those who have moved south of the river in order to find cheaper rents, but find their transportation options limited by the higher prices of traveling on national rail services. LSE SU General Secretary Elliot Simmons was among other enthusiastic supporters of the scheme, adding that it will "greatly benefit those sections of the student community who commute to LSE". He was quick to point out however, that the scheme will not come into effect 4^^^ January 2004, leaving many students starting the year paying full price for their transport. This has often been a problem for the scheme which has been persistently dogged by delays in registration, and applications meaning students are typically not issued with their photocards until November, following the previous session's expiration in September. The scheme will be hailed as a victory for ULU who have been campaigning for a the extension for two years. Commenting on the plans, ULU president, Chris Piper said: "ULU is delighted that the Student Photocard Scheme has been extended to include overland rail travel." he added that tens of thousands of students will benefit. Enthusiastic support came also from Prof. David Rhind, Chairman of 'London Higher', the group of 41 Higher Education institutions, explained: "This is great news. In these tough times for many students, they need all the help they can get." Top-up fees will face strong opposition, again, following a new survey commissioned by the Association of University Teachers (AUT). Parents of 550 children now under 16, said that an extra £3,000 a year for tuition fees would make a difference to their children going into higher education. These children will be the first victims should top-up fees be introduced. In fact, 71% indicated that the surcharge would reduce the likelihood of their children going to university and 72% believed that it would make their child apply for a cheaper course. Sally Hunt, general secretary of the AUT, said: "The survey takes the government's argument apart over top-up fees'. The results have provided ammunition for a possible Labour backbench revolt, which will manifest itself at their conference in Bournemouth, despite the fact that fees has deliberately been left off the agenda. Labour Students, which is affiliated to the national party and have the opportunity to submit a motion at conference, declined to use the opportunity to bring fees up for discussion. It is hoped that the rebellion, and a protest organised by Bournemouth University and Art's Institute in the form of a mock funeral to bury free education, will make the government rethink it's position. Apology The Beaver is not always perfect -we all make mistakes. But we like to think that we can freely acknowledge our faults and try to make amends. Therefore, we would like to apologise to Dave Willumsen. Dave made some invaluable contributions to The Beaver Freshers' Guide, which we hope you have all be able to read. However, due to an honest, but reprehensible oversight, we failed to include Dave's name in the list of contributors. Dave - we are very sorry for this and sincerely apologise. Don't forget to pick up your copy of the Freshers' Guide this week! Jobs for the Boys - phoning for funds Laura Harvey Every evening in the heady heights of Tower 1, a group of students beaver away on the phone - chatting to alumni, updating them on the latest activities on campus and raising much-needed funds for scholarships, hardship bursaries, facilities and school projects. Last year, over 2,000 former students, parents, and governors donated to the Annual Frmd, a great deal of them making donations over the telephone to the team of persistent and enthusiastic telephone frmdraisers. These donations helped pedestrianise the campus, build the new library, run the Saturday Schools Scheme and give financial aid to many students from all over the world. A call from the Annual Fund is not just about fundraising - it's about involving alumni, informing them of the services available to them, and getting valuable feedback about our alumni programs. Callers also get to talk to himdreds of people from different backgrounds, working in all sorts of professions, and can often have fascinating conversations - one caller was even given top tips from the speechwriter of the Secretary General of NATO! The Annual Fund is one of the best-paid jobs on campus, providing part-time employment to 20 students, work- ing at least 2 evening shifts per week. Callers phone alumni from 6.30 -9.30pm Monday to Thursday, and 5 -8pm on Simday. Aside from the excellent pay, there are always prizes up for grabs for the best callers, including STA travel vouchers, dinner for two, SU gym membership, free ice-skating and membership to the National Film Theatre. The Annual Fund is currently recruiting the new team of student callers for the next year. If you like talking to people all over the globe, and think you have what it takes to be an enthusiastic, dedicated telephone fimdraiser for the LSE, if you like the soimd of flexible shifts, great pay and brilliant prizes, then please fill in an application form online at the Annual Fund website: http://www.lse.ac.uk/col-lections/LSEAnnualFund/ If you would like more information about the Annual Fimd, please contact Laura Harvey - l.i.harvev@lse.ac.uk Money spinner - alumni canvased The Beaver Tuesday 30th September 2003 Page 5 Your Welfare Finding your Feet? Read On.... Education and Welfare The Union has a full time Education and Welfare Sabbatical to help you find solutions to any problems you may experience while studying at the LSE. Their job is divided between academic issues and welfare campaigning, and they can help sort out individual prob lems as well as representing your views to effect change within the school. If you have opinions on the school's academic or support services the Edwelfare Sabb should be your first port of call. This year the post is held by Rowan Harvey. She can be reached at su.edwelfare@lse.ac.uk or in E299 (East Building, 2nd floor). Advice and Counselling Centre Staffed by Sue, Schimpf, Shanna and Naledi, the SU Advice and Counselling Centre is open from 10.30am to 4pm during term time and September, and from 10.30am to 2pm during vacations. Our advisers can help with a range of issues including housing problems, immigration matters, employment queries, welfare benefits, grants, fee status, and disability rights. We will normally arrange a private appointment for you with an adviser - although, if you have a quick enquiry, we may be able to assist you at our reception desk. We administer several SU fimds, for example, funds for Students with Disabilities, Students with Childcare costs and a Women's Right to Choose Fimd. We can also offer advice on debt, grants, loans and other possible sources of financial help for those in difficulty. We also provide legal advice on most housing issues including checking new tenancy agreements/contracts. The Centre can also book you an appointment with one of our two student councillors. Sheila Gill and David Glass. The Service is independent, free and fully confidential. Nightline - 020 7631 0101 Another forum for information and advice, Nightline is a confidential listening support service nm by students for students in London. Calls cover all areas of student life, including relationship and course difficulties, debt and family problems, as well as information on cinema and club listings. The lines are open from 6pm to Sam every night of term. Nightline is always on the lookout for new student volunteers. If you think this might be your cup of tea (and no experience is necessary), call the helpline and chat to one of the volunteers on duty or e-mail london@nightline.org.uk . For the new e-mail listen-, ing service, see the website at www.nightline.org.uk. Condoms etc. The SU dispenses free condoms from the Education and Welfare Sabbatical's office E299. This year for the first time we are also dispensing free lubricant, dental dams and female condoms so there's something to suit everyone. If you are latex intolerant contact the Edwelfare Sabb to arrange a special supply. The service is entirely confidential. To avoid unplarmed pregnancies visit the free contraceptive clinic at St Philip's Medical Centre. Dedicated clinics are held Monday - Friday between 13.30 - 14.30 and you don't need an appointment. All contraceptive jk prescriptions are free in the UK and, emergency contraceptive pills (effective ' within 72 hours of improtected intercourse) are also available through the clinic. You do not have to be a registered patient to attend the contraceptive clinic Health Care St Philip's Medical Centre offers care under the National Health Service for students resident in the catchment area, offering general practice care including weekend and emergency cover All new students should register with the Medical Centre, St Philip's, Building X, Sheffield Street, as soon as possible after arrival to ensure eligibility for NHS treatment, and for information on all the services available. These include medical, nursing, immunisation and counselling services. All students and mem-^ bers of staff under the age of 25 should '^'&^also have the Meningitis C vaccination. Private services offered at the Centre include osteopathy, physiotherapy and therapeutic massage. There is also a dental service, for which there is a fee. You can register when you book an appointment. Returning students who have not yet registered, or who have changed address, should register as soon as possible - don't wait until you are ill before registering. Details of the NHS, free vaccinations and other services for students registered at St Philip's and beyond can be found at: www.lse.ac.uk/medicalcentre. Ifc^^Tjeri Personal Attack Alarm Pick up your free 130 decibel personal attack alarm from the Advice Centre in E297 (East Building, 2nd floor). Safe bus The Students' Union nms a free safety bus to all halls of residence after its Friday night events. The bus nms every hour on the hour from 11pm from outside the Peacock Theatre. It is open to all, although priority will be given to students travelling alone. This year we are also running a bus home from Blast Off which will run at^, - 11pm and 12pm on Tuesday night. Safety For more information on staying safe in London pick up a safety guide from Student Union Reception (Ground Floor East Building). Liberation! The Students' Union is committed to equality of opportunity for all. If you would like to get involved in our liberation campaigns (Womens, Disabilities, Anti-Racism or Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgendered) visit the welfare section of the xmion website, located at www.lse.ac.uk/union for more information. Central Catering Services Our catering facilities offer a wide range of foods, drinks and services together with the opportunity to socialise with friends and colleagues. You need never go off campus to satisfy your hunger or thirst! Brunch Bowl: Old Building 4th Floor Term: Monday-Friday 9am-7.30pm: Vacation: Monday-Friday 9am-5pm Huge selection of hot and cold foods and drinks available all day long in a buzzy atmosphere. Breakfasts; excellent value hot breakfast and healthy options. Lunch: International dishes; pizzas; filled jacket potatoes; pasta; stir-fry cooked to order; fish and chips; self-help salad bar; lots of vegetarian choices - stir- fry, fish and chips and salad bar available all afternoon during term. Supper in Term: an ever-changing choice of hot dishes and snacks, salad bar. All day: Hot and cold drinks, sandwiches, salads, snacks, yoghurts etc. All food and drinks available for eat-in or take-away. Robinson Room: Old Building 3rd Floor Term: Monday-Friday 12noon-2.30pm Relaxed atmosphere with an emphasis on quality home cooked dishes, soups, fresh vegetables and salads. The menu changes daily and includes organic and vegetarian choices. The desserts are to die for. Cafe Pepe: Clement House 3rd Floor Term: Monday, Tuesday, Thursday 9.30am-6pm; Wednesday, Friday 9.30-5pm. Coffee Bar where pastries are freshly baked and panninis are toasted especially for you. There's also sandwiches, hot soup, fresh juices, soft drinks, cappuccino, espresso and regular coffee with a choice of coffee beans. Plaza Cafe: John Watkins Plaza Term: Monday-Friday 9am to 9pm; Saturday-Sunday 11am to 5pm. Vacation: 9am to 6pm Monday-Friday. Ideally located for the Library, this new caf§ features high quality Fair Trade coffees, teas and snacks. There's a selection of sandwiches and baguettes, hot soup, cookies, muffins, cold drinks and mineral water Beavers Retreat Bar: Old Building 4th Floor Term time: Monday-Friday 12noon-2.30pm; 5pm-9pm. Vacation: Monday-Friday 12noon-2pm; 5pm-7pm A traditional pub with a modern touch. There's a great selection of cask conditioned, keg and bottled beers as well as spirits, wines and soft drinks. There's an open fire for chilly winter evenings and a sun terrace for warm summer days. A great place to socialise. Staff Dining Room (SCR members only): 5th Floor Old Building The Staff Dining Room and Coffee Bar is open to all members of staff who choose to become members of the Senior Common Room. Coffee Bar: Monday to Friday 10am - 4.30pm. Speciality coffees include cafetiere, cappuccino, espresso, latte plus traditional, speciality and herbal teas. A selection of alcoholic and soft drinks is also available. Dining Room: Monday to Friday 12.30 - 2pm. Daily changing menu includes a choice of high quality meat, fish and vegetarian dishes, fresh vegetables and soup, salads and desserts. Special Event Catering: A variety of special catering services are available for conferences, business meetings, parties and private dining. Please contact the Catering Services Office ext 7222 or visit the catering section of tie LSE website. Page 6 r/7eBeaver Team veriyiews Howard Davies Biography Life and Times of LSE's new Director Mark Power The School's new Director, Sir Howard John Davies, is due to take office tomorrow after being appointed in December of last year. He will replace outgoing Director, Professor Anthony Giddens, a leading academic who was close to the New Labour project and the so-called third way politics. Sir Howard comes to the LSE after a varied career in both the civil service and the financial services industry. Davies started his career in the Treasury and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office before moving to the city as a management consultant for the firm McKinsey. During his five years there, he was seconded to the Treasury as a special adviser to the Chancellor. In 1987, he became the Controller of the Audit Commission but left this post in 1992 to become the Director-General of Confederation of British Industry. However, he is most famous for his roles as the Deputy Governor of the Bank of New Director Howard Davies England, 1995-97, and as Chairman of the Financial Services Authority (FSA). It is not all work and no play however Sir Howard is a keen football fan and avid supporter of Manchester City. It was suggested at one time that he might become the club's next Chairman and he was head hunted by City's acting Chairman, John Wardle, for the position. but the LSE pipped City to the post. His other hobbies include reviewing books, especially about football, and watching cricket. Sir Howard is also a family man, married with two sons. So how did Lancashire born Sir Howard reach these dizzy heights in his 51 years, finally culminating in a seven-year stint as our distinguished Director? Sir Howard studied for his undergraduate degree in history and modem languages at Merton College, Oxford and for an MSc in management sciences at Stanford Business School, California where he also holds the Harkness fellowship. The question remains, what does Sir Howard have planned for the LSE? How does he intend to improve the institution? Will he be noticeably different from his predecessor and will he still make an annual appearance at the UGM? The answers to all these questions and many more, will be revealed in next week's edition of The Beaver, which along with all the other campus essentials, will include a full interview with the man himself. Delaney's Diary A sidelong look at headline issues Toodle pip! Tom Delaney here, the Beaver's new Diary Editor. As a fresh faced First Year just arrived from the wilds of Berkshire via one of the nation's best minor public schools, I've made it my mission to bring you all the zany news that's unfit to print. I'll be taking you on a wild and wacky tour of the salacious, the odd and the obscure. Along the way we'll be debunking the pompous, shining the Beaver's torch of truth into the crevices the establishment doesn't want you to see and laughing in the face of those with something to lose! So without further to do, here's this week's selection of tantalizing tidbits: another Conservative sleaze stoiy? I emailed Mark, eager to, erm, clarify the nature of his association with these cheap ladies... Sadly the whiff of scandal dissipates like dew in the summer sun. It turns out that the Ward of Cheap Ladies is actually an archaic piece of London's local government rather than a gaggle of hookers after some free market action. Oh well - there's always next time. Delaney's roving eye never closes. touch to offer a phone interview with the testosterone charged candidate himself. Watch this space. Warning! As I leave you young things and return to another week of chasing hot stories (amongst other things.. ) there's something you should know about. Badgers. Now badgers are often seen as cute, cuddly little critters, given uncritical press in works of propaganda like 'The Wind in the Willows'. Don't believe a word of it! TB spreading, pestilence-spreading vermin would be too kind a phrase. Have no truck from badger apologists in your first week at the LSE! Especially not at the Freshers' Fayre, where I can exclusively reveal a cell of brock fondling subversives will be operating. No cheap ladies in sight! Word of scandal reached my ever-attentive ears even before term began. Rumoiu-s reached the Beaver office that oxir local MP, a pleasant Tory chappy called Mark Field, was speaking to a group calling themselves the 'Ward of Cheap Ladies'! Was this social outreach gone mad I asked myself? Or perhaps What will I say when I talk to Tom? Also, as an eager young man keen to make his way in London's political jungle I touched base with Steve Norris, the Tory standard bearer for next year's Mayoral tussle with Red Ken and that preachy Lib Dem. Unfairly christened 'Shagger' by less august organs than my own, I wanted to chat to Steve about the big issues and big hitters. I think he's the kinda guy that a lot of students could vibe with. Luckily my email entitled 'Norris and the Beaver' makes it through his spam filter! Indeed, Mark MacGregor, his Campaign Director no less, gets in Pox carrying scum. Kill them all. Al .Zxf ny gossip, rumour or scandal that you want my laser gaze to »focus on then email it to: DelaneysDiarv@hotmail. com EXECUTIVE EDITOR Ibrahim Rasheed ACTING BUSINESS MANAGER Aqeel Kadri TECHNICAL DIREaOR Brian Choudhary NEWS EDITORS El Barham; Mark Power BLINK EDITOR Ben Chapman B:ART EDITOR Justin Nolan SPORTS EDITORS Gareth Carter; Ellie Vyras FILM EDITORS Simon Cliff; Dani Ismail MUSICEDITORS Jazmin Burgess; Neil Garett LITERARY EDITOR Dalia King THEATRE EDITOR Keith Postier BrABOUT EDITOR Sarah Warwick THE COLLECTIVE Serif Alp Atakcan, Christina Beharry, Peter Bellini, Matthias Benzer, James 'Mullet' Baker, Leonard Brouwer. Hannah Bryce, Ed Calow. Lome Charles, Jon Clegg, Dave Cole, Naomi Colvin, Dan Cumming, Nafeesa Ernies, Tristan Feunteun, Juli 6an, Sarah Greenberg, Rowan Harvey, Sib Hayer, Lindsay Hoag, Katherine Jacomb, Tom Jenkins, Edward Jones, Paul Kirby, Dan Madden, Vita.. Maynard, Garbrielle Menezes, Linda Morris, Shashwat Nanda, Robin Noble. Phillip Nielsen, Samantha Nicklin. Daniela Ott, Neel Patel, Alison Ferine, Chelsea Phua, Kirstine Potts, Claire Pryde, Adam Quinn, Vanessa Raizberg, Jan Rattay, Zaf Rashid, Loretta Reehill, Matthew Sinclair, Susannah Sava, James Sharrock, Elliott Simmons, Matthew Stoate, Jamie Tehrani, Saija Vuola, Julius Walker, Matt Willgress, Dave Willumsen. PRINTED BY THE NORTHCLIFFE PRESS If you have written three or more articles for the Beaver and your name does not appear in the above list please email thebeaver@lse.ac.uk and we will add your name on for next week The Beaver Tuesday 30th September 2003 Page 7 JheBemxrE/Motid Editorial Comment Struck Off Students will arrive on cam-pvis this week at the start of a new academic year to discover that industrial action has disrupted Fresher's Week. UNISON and AUT members decided to strike in protest of what they see as poor London wage allowances. As students in London wUl have reaUsed, the cost of living in the capital is substantially greater than anywhere else in the country. Thus, it is easy to see the need for a London Weighting. It is also easy to see that the current £2,134 a year needs to be increased for salaries to be on the same level as those outside the capital. Is the strike justified? Undoubtedly it will have negative affects on students. Starting life at university is a bewildering enough experience. Having essential student services disrupted in the first week is inconvenient and potentially dangerous. Confusion at a time when things should proceed as smoothly as possible is the biggest problem this strike wiU cause. Yet it is important to listen to the other side of the story. The School claims that it cannot afford to satisfy the demands of the imions. Even worse is their refusal to take the demands seriously. Not sitting down at the negotiating table to discuss the matter in a reasonable maimer is what has led to the strike. If there is no way by which the school's employees can voice their grievances, it is inevitable that strike action wiU be taken. Working for a world class institution such as the LSE is a privilege. But shoxild those who take the opportunity to do so be penaUsed for their decision to work here? The school is clearly in a strong financial position. When it comes to inspiring confidence in potential investors, the administration is more than delighted to parade their sound financial management. As posters around the school put up by the strikers point out. Professor Giddens wrote this year in a draft Strategic Plan that "the school's financial position is as strong as it has ever been." Of course, having a healthy bank balance does not mean that the school should be anything but prudent with its chequebook. What the Beaver objects to most is the school's attitude towards one of its most vital resources and the fact that it appears to take them for granted. King's College was able to come to a settlement with its employees that was far smaller than what was asked for. The new Director should bear this case in mind and engage in dialogue with the unions to ensure that the teaching and support staff have a fairer deal. The best is yet to come student protest, a phenomenon that was synonymous with the LSE in the 1960's, appeared to be firmly back on campus last year thanks to the war on Iraq. Those of you here will remember the memorable die-ins and occupations that took place, culminating in the massive delegation that joined the two million man march in February. They were exciting times and there was a genuine feeling that through registering opposition by joining the march one was part of a powerful movement capable of change. The Stop the War Coalition at LSE was directed by a small core of vocal activists, many affiliated to socialist organizations. True veterans. Though some tried to shove dogma down your throat using literature such as 'The Socialist Worker', on the whole it was a united front. Many that marched in February would not normally have been involved in protests such as these. Students tend to concentrate much more on the social and academic opportunities that university offers rather than the political ones. With the war effectively over, one would think that this wave of protest would prove to be a temporary anomaly in an increasingly apathetic generation. They may well be proved right. Yet with the non-appearance of those infamous weapons of mass destruction and the reverberations of the Hutton Inquiry, the government is not in the clear. We were led into war under false premises. Tony Blair's government has a lot to answer for. Who better to hold them to account than the progeny of the class of '68. So congratulations to the handful of LSE students who turned out to march in protest over the weekend. With most students tuning out of the political world, it is nice to see that dedicated hardcore still out there and doing their thing. Just make sure you leave The Socialist Worker at home. A Letter from the editor Avery warm welcome to aU our readers. Every new year at the LSE heralds a new beginning for The Beaver. The paper is the heart and soul of the campus, bringing you all the news and highlights of the week that was. This special Freshers' Fayre edition is designed to bring you up to date vHth all that is happening around campus and also to give you information about the student support services available. The Beaver is the newspaper of the Students' Union (STJ). Throughout your time at university you will find the SU a constant companion, whether it is through services such as cheap photocopying or helping you find affordable accommodation. The Beaver is your link with the union. Though the union publishes the paper, we are editorially independent. Run by a 'collective' of students who have written three or more articles. The Beaver essentially represents your interests. For new students, here is a quick guide to the four sections that make up the newspaper. In News you wUl find reports on all the latest happenings with regard to the university administration, the Students' Union, and unvuersities all around the country. We keep a sharp eye on the latest developments in higher education funding and explain how plans to introduce top-up fees affect you. These reports are complemented by commentary in the form of sharp, incisive columnists and editorials. Blink is the politics and features section. It is the section that provides the biggest link to students. The plethora of views on all the important issues of the day are allowed space in this forum for ideas and dialogue. For features and reviews on dU the latest in the world of film, music and literature turn to B:art. Forget the NME and Empire, this is where it's at. Though the last few pages of the newspaper may look like FHM on a bad day, do not be fooled. The Sports pages cover, in theory, sport. Follow your favourite teams through an odyssey of excess as they do battle with the forces of evil... and Strand Poly. Finally, please remember that the newspaper you hold in your hand is the end product of the hard work put in by all our contributors. Do take the opportunity to get involved. Whether you fancy being a regular writer or just occasionally send in a piece when something catches your eye. The Beaver will be delighted. To find out more, visit our stall at Freshers' Fayre or come to our first collective meeting of the year on Monday 6th October from 4.30 to 5.30pm. I hope to see you then Ibrahim Rasheed Cofliments and letters to the editor are welcome to thebeaver@lse.ac.uk Interested in writing for Come to our collective meeting on Monday 6th October from 4.30-5.30 pm in the Underground bar to find out more ss_^ _____ The Beaver Tuesday 30th September 2003 Page 8 blink Features and Politics Edited by Ben Chapman (b.chapman@lse.ac.uk) Too unhealthy for me? Who's the government to tell us what we can and can't eat, drink and smoke? page 11 Don't blink... ...you'll miss something. This is the Beaver's features and politics section, designed to inform, discuss, expose, investigate, evaluate, analyse; even antagonise and arouse. More importantly, it's your opportunity to talk about whatever you want. Ben Chapman blink Editor To all those new to the LSE, picking up this distinguished publication for the first time, leafing through the hallowed pages of the paper whose name provokes the most repeated innuendoes since the beginning of time, it is with great pleasure that I introduce you to blink: Beaver features and politics. To those continuing students taking an initial perusal of the rag, welcome also -where have you been all your life? And to those tired and weary old hacks gearing up for another year of the to-ings, fro-ings and gnashing of teeth involved in the daily life of the LSESU, welcome also to a section that not only looks different, but which aims to do far more than in its previous clothes. Divided into two parts, blink wiU aim to tackle a wide range of areas and issues of interest to the LSE's broad student community - from student-orientated investigations into social issues and problems, consxmier affairs and the mysterious quirks that are encountered on a regular basis on campus, to feature interviews and articles about David Blaine (page 9). And that's just the Features section. In Politics, the intellectual wealth and stub-bom political perspectives of the student population are put to the test in a real forum for debate, argument and exploration of views, from challenges to the BNP (page 10) to complaints about a nanny-state (page 11). Last year debate ranged from violence in Isreal-Palestine to tuition fees, war in Iraq, gun crime and Hugo Chavez (the slightly controversial president of the South American state of Venezuela). m Follow the bearded man: if you've got something to say, speak up! 'If something intrigues you, sets you thinking or makes you downright angry, write about it' But what will really make this section tick is the willingness of its readers to get involved, blink is the only section of the paper where you can write what you want, on whatever you what, when you want and what's more, that's exactly what it thrives on. At the same time, if you read an article in the section that intrigues you, sets you thinking or just makes you downright angry, we want you to write back. An army of pager writers also means more ideas and more scope to get interesting features in the section. Articles can be any length, from a single column of 400-500 words, right up to a double-page spread of 1500-1800. If you've got something to say, and you fancy writing about it, we want it. Alternatively, if you want to get involved in investigative features, satire or even travel writing, this is the section for you. So if you fancy seeing your name in print, whether you have ideas for an article to write now, or would be interested in contributing in the future, drop me a line by email to b.chapman@lse.ac.uk or come see me at the Beaver's stall at Freshers' Fayre, and make sure you get down to the welcome meeting in the Underground Bar on Monday 6th at 4.30. blink is your section. Be sure not to miss it. Ben Chapman is editor of blink and a second year undergraduate studying Government and History. If you're interested in writing for blink or have an article that you would like to get published, simply email b.chapman@lse.ac.uk All opinions expressed in blink, including those of its editor, are the writers' own and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Beaver or LSESU A picture tells 1000 words... Musings Beginnings and Politicians Arguing Matthew Sinclair Arnold Schwarzenneger is running for the Califomian governorship. He has so far scored points for the fact that people know his name, he did drugs in the sixties and he is NOT Gray Davis. A major failing seems to be that every time he opens his mouth to say something that hasn't grossed at the box offices he soimds like one of the recordings used in public buildings that build sentences out of individually recorded words; "I" "Think" "After-school programmes". The only debate he has taken part in features the novelty of allowing the debaters to see the questions in advance. The conclusion has been drawn in many US papers that this means Schwarzenneger cannot forge a decent argument to save his dumbbells. This inability to argue is a big problem for the newest Kennedy, or so everyone argues. I'm not so sure... I'm not so sure that many politicians are as persuasive as they think. Take Iraq. For all of the arguments that fascinated us there wasn't a substantial change in opinion in either direction until the war started, and there hasn't been one since. Robin Cook gave a legendary speech to the house and then resigned in a moment of high drama. Most people opposed the war before his speech; they opposed it after his speech. Once the war started they supported it. Most Americans supported Vietnam till the end. The majority of Americans did not cany out the protests. Have a majority of Americans ever disapproved of a war in progress? 1812 is the only possibility I can think of. Britain in the modem era is similar. In this regard a muscle-bound movie star is the ideal politician. When it comes to debating Robin Cook may be able to talk the Austrian into little sausagey circles. However, if a war debate were taking place Robin Cook's fine words would have little use. Amie would just need to put on his best Rambo suit, walk over an Iraqi border and throttle a mule. Once the war started most people would support it. Perhaps actions do speak louder than words? Musings is a new regular column for blink, taking a sideways look at topical issues. Matthew Smdair is a regular cotitribva^ to Hie Beaver. . ¦ ¦ ' .v.s .....- ........ , . .......... / The Beaver Tuesday 30th September 2003 Page 9 blink Features London has certainly had its fair share of the weird and wonderful this summer but the public reactions to FlashMobbing and David Blaine have been markedly different, Ji m. MOBBING BLAINE Dave Cole Had you been at Sofa UK on Tottenham Court Road on the seventh of August at exactly 6:30pm, you might have been a little perplexed. You might have been a little perplexed because you would have seen a couple of hundred people - a mob of people, no less - walk into the shop and start worshipping the furniture before calling a friend and describing the experience without using the letter 'o'. This apparently random group was London's first FlashMob, following on the heels of its progenitor in New York. The FlashMobsters have hit London a further two times, even using the George IV on Portugal Street near the LSE as a meeting place. Although the New York project has now finished, its London counterpart continues and the phenomenon has spread across the Americas, Europe and Australasia. The idea is simple enough: a group of people, unknown to each other except through the FlashMob, meet up in pubs, all join together in a single place and do something out of the ordinary, all co-ordinated by email. Not for any reason, just for the hell of it. While these people have been running around London in groups, one person has been doing just the opposite: David Blaine. In his lonely Perspex box, nine metres up for 44 days with nothing but water coming in, Blaine seems to be doing very little except giving the gutter press endless 'amusing' headlines ('Blaine in the arse', 'Chil-blaines' and the like) and having food thrown at him. Blaine has attracted crowds, estimated at 20,000 over the course of a single weekend, but the press coverage has been overwhelmingly negative, rather than the positive reactions his previous stunts (standing on top of a thirty-metre pole for forty-eight hours, sixty-one hours encased in ice and so on) have engendered. Indeed at one point his backup team were on the point of pulling the plug on the whole venture. He has had all manner of objects thrown, hit, shot and generally propelled at his box, people trying to cut him down and even a model helicopter dangling a cheeseburger around his Perspex palace. The Great British Public are evidently trying to Cut That Pretentious Upstart Down To Size. Given that both are essentially random acts that appear to be impossible, done simply for the sake of doing them, the difference in reactions to FlashMobbing and David Blaine's 'Above the Below' stunt is somewhat strange. Granted, sitting in a transparent box for 44 days is more extreme than pointing with umbrellas at imseen objects in the sky, but the principle is the same inasmuch as there is no principle or point to it. This, perhaps, is what irks and causes the bemusement that leads to amusement in the case of FlashMobs and rotten eggs in the case of Above the Below; no pretence of doing things for art's sake (take note, Tracy Emin), no political statements and no commentary about how people react. This lack of a political statement has in itself attracted criticism; FlashMobbing, reminiscent of protests, marches. Reclaim the Streets and so on in its gathering of people could carry a message (freedom for sofas now! You have ...... $ nothing to lose but your futons!) while Blaine has been attacked for starving himself needlessly when so very many people have no choice in the matter, without trying to highlight the plight of the latter group. Indeed, they could (and maybe should) have tried to promote a message. In doing so, however, they would have changed the veiy nature of their actions from being solely about the actions themselves to a political agenda, no matter how universal or inoffensive. Not everything has to be political. There are, however, some other differences that are rather more germane. Where Blaine is actively seeking publicity and wanting to be looked at (he is, after all, in a glass box up in the air), FlashMobbing has attracted incidental press attention but hasn't sought it out; indeed, in order to preserve the air of randomness, the media were positively cold-shouldered, with no advance warning of where things were going to happen. The spontaneity of FlashMobs and their peculiar disconnection from any other part of society or groupings therewithin means they can only be explained in terms of the enjoyment they cause to their participants. David Blaine, meanwhile, is continually in the press; you can watch him twenty-four hours a day on Sky One and the Channel Four website. It is this public exposure that has caused Blaine's prob- lems. Aside from being an easier target, his odd manner and saturation coverage have enervated people in a way that FlashMobs, no less bizarre or self-serving, have not. Ignoring the objections of the gutter press, it has to be remembered that there is a point to the so-called liberal democracy we live in. Firstly, people doing things that are out of the ordinary - coming up with new ideas, unconventional art forms or sitting in glass boxes - will most of the time fall flat on their face. Occasionally, however, they come up with something interesting. Maybe the glass box stunt is not interesting; it is worth doing it, though, 'just to see what happens'. What is more important than the generally accepted legal principle of freedom of expression is the social pressures that are brought to bear David Blaine is clearly not having a pleasant time in his room with a view, and not just because of the lack of food. Innovation requires at least the possibility of failure and the good people of London seem to be betting heavily on Blaine's demise. The next time, though, that Blaine or anyone else considers doing some sort of public performance, they may well choose not to do it in the city on the Thames. Dave Cole is a third year Government student and a former Chair of the UGM. The Beaver Tuesday 30th September 2003 Page 10 blink Politics The Fight for Tolerance The BNP has proved that ignoring extremist parties does not necessarily prevent them from succeeding. To win the fight, we must have the courage to confront the arguments they present. OneEyeOpen Apparently (well, according to the BBC, but then perhaps I should be careful about relying on it too heavily in light of recent developments) Iain Duncan Smith, the man widely: believed to be leading the Tory party (though again, we should not be so sure) : called :for Sony Blair's resignation last week following the summing up from all sides down at the Hutton Inqutcy. It is no great surprise that few people were aware that he'd called for the PM's departure, and even less of one that anybody who was didn't really care. As much as Blair would probably dearly love an early retirement given the present circumstances, those who live in the real world take it for granted that it just ain't going to happen. ; The thing is, the affair into which the Hutton Inquiry delved had the potential to be one of the most damaging to a sitting government in living memory, but even for those relatively clued up and engaged with the political process, it failed to do anj^hing but tire, bore and prompt swift channel-switching when-, ever the news hit the screen. The government may not have sexed up the dossier, but Alastair Campbell did a fine job of sexing up the inquiry with the startling revelation in his diary that he hoped the whole affair would 'f*ck Gilligan', the BBC journalist at the centre of one of several rather unpleasant rows. Yet it appeared to me that the inquiry did little but serve aS: a bit of rammy for: the heavyweights of the British estab-i lishraent; a nice day out and a bit of a verbal punch-up for government, media,' lawyers,: the civil service and the intelligence community alike. Whilst the BBC soul-searched, ITV gloated. As Geoff Hoon sought to cover his tracks, his aide turned up the next day to stitch him up.. Now the refers in this right-royal mess. Lord Hutton, has two months to review the video evidence and write his report. Let's be dear - whilst there will, by the end, have undoubtedly been many casualties in this affair, Blair will not be one of them, and neither will the government itself. We all know what the outcome will be; a lengthy report which probably won't say very much or be brave enough to point the finger at the highest level, confirmation of what we know already regarding mistakes by the BBC, partial vindication of Alastair Campbell, grave errors at the MoD, followed swiftly by Geoff Hoon's resignation and as far as Number 10 is concerned, Blair is ultimately responsible for what went on withtni his government yet ultimately not to blame. Happy families, and they all lived joyfully ever after. Meanwhile, the Tories are nowhere, the Lib Dems (despite what they might try to tell you) are not serious challengers and never will be, and even if they were, their target is not government but opposition; to take seats from the Conservatives is their goal, not Xabour. ; Which all means we'll have a nice new,: albeit smaller, government under Blair in two or so years time, after which he will gracefully retire and hand the reigns to Gordon Brown who, rubbing his hands together with glee, may, wffl have even; welcomed this whole shebang, : El Barham Beaver News Editor Although it pains me to say it, there is a definite problem with racism in Britain. The British National Party (BNP), with a manifesto pledge to exclude all non-British nationals from the government, law and media as well as halting any fm-ther immigration, brought its total number of council seats to a record 17 this August. Superintendent Ali Dizaei, tipped as Britain's first ethnic minority chief superintendent, has called on all other black and Asian people to boycott the Metropolitan Police Force until the 'cancer' of prejudice, which has driven him out of his job and into the arms of anti-depressants, is eliminated. Investigations into Britain's education system conducted by the University of Sussex, Canterbury Christ Church University College and the University of Brighton, have concluded that it is 'institutionally racist'. The government's answer to address this evident xenophobia is to introduce a citizenship test for all would-be immigrants, resolving differences by eliminating them, but is this enough? The inadequacy of the government in tackling the problems of race is illustrated by the examples above. It has failed to reduce institutional racism in organisations such as the police force. It has failed to initiate an educational program to teach tolerance to the youth of Britain and it has failed to address the concerns of people in the community. Its inadequacy is two-fold: it has not come up with solutions of its own to help tackle prejudice, and it has allowed others to exacerbate ethnic divisions for their own ends without challenging them. An imwillingness to give the BNP a 'legitimate platform' from which to air its views means that the major parties ignore it during the run-up to elections. The major parties are not the only ones guilty of this: numerous universities, ours included, have banned the BNP from campus. However, this does not deny the party legitimacy as it is still in a position whereby it can convince the electorate and legally win seats. In fact, its position is actually strengthened since it does not have to answer the critical questions that the major parties are in a position to ask. But why is indigenous Britain so mistrustful of those from different ethnic backgrounds? A spokesman for the BNP explained that many of its members join because they "feel invaded" and are worried that "ethnic British will be in a minority in their own country in 60 years". This anxiety is, however, distorted. According to the National Office of Statistics, the entire ethnic minority, i.e. non-white British and non-British, population in April 2001 was a mere 7.9% of the total. However, people settle in distinct communities: in Birmingham, a drive from the mostly white Solihull to Chinatown in the centre through the Muslim and Hindu pre-dominated Sparkbrook, illustrates how people are geographically divided. This tendency to cluster into large groups gives those living near an ethnic community an unrealistic idea of how many non-British people actually inhabit the UK as a whole. The desire to live in a community is not unnatural - living within close proximity to others who speak the same language as you, have the same religious beliefs and come from a similar background is unsurprisingly appealing; no one likes to be the odd one out. Unfortunately, the creation of one ethnic community usually drives those who do not belong to it into a community of their own out of fear or mistrust of the unfa-mihar. The BNP uses this to assert the notion that people from different backgrounds cannot co-exist, that people "resent multiculturalism being thrust dovra their throats by organisations like the BBC". The BNP believes that such differences are fimdamental, and that non-British are unable to act in the interest of those who class themselves as British, hence their policy of excluding all ethnic minorities from positions where they might be able to "have law-making influences". The government's policy for introducing US-style citizenship tests for all would-be immigrants also gives weight to this theory. Making people answer a load 'the number of mixed marriages is so small that they are not an issue. I have the greatest sympathy for mixed race children - the poor devils don't know which camp they fall into' BNP Spokesman of questions on 'Britishness' seems to imply that one cannot function in Britain if one does not conform to the pre-exis-tent culture - that the only way to ensure fuU integration is by homogenising the population. However, tensions between communities are not merely the result of an inability to get on with others from different backgrounds, but are more commonly as a result of perceived inequalities in the distribution of council funds and jobs. The main grievances of those who live in areas where the BNP has most support are economic: anger over the creation of a language centre or the fear that indigenous Britons are being undercut in the labour market by immigrants prepared to work for lower wages. These are tangible complaints that can be addressed by explaining exactly why money and jobs are being distributed the way that they are and by redressing any imbalance. The fact that those of different ethnicity cannot live without conflict is shown by statistics. The BNP ignores the fact that 14.6% of those who describe themselves as ethnic minorities state that they are mixed race, according to the 2001 Census. The BNP spokesman said, "the number of mixed marriages is so small that they are not an issue. I have the greatest sympathy for mixed race children - the poor devils don't know which camp they fall into". The truth is that the BNP chooses to ignore the 677,117 people of mixed origin in the UK, myself included, because we undermine its assertion that non-British and British people cannot exist side-by-side. Us "poor devils" are not in a quandary over our identity because there are not necessarily separate camps for us to choose between. In the absence of any helpful government intervention, it is up to everyone who believes that tolerance is possible to argue this with the BNP. Denying the BNP a voice is not going to make it go away. We need to challenge it, argue with it and ultimately reveal its ideas for what they are - complete fallacy. El Barham is Beaver News Editor and a second year undergraduate studying Government and History. The Beaver Tuesday 30th September 2003 Page 11 Politics Adam Quinn blink Political Correspondent Remember how an old reductio ad absurdum aimed at the 'sin tax' on booze and fags used to be that, if that was allowed, then we should tax fatty food because it's bad for you too? Well laugh no longer my friends, because in Ireland (as I discovered while there a few weeks ago) they're seriously considering it. And as if part of a spreading contagion, the 'health campaigners' who so often crop up all over the media are now starting to mention it a little more boldly over here too. Meanwhile, as the nation gets ever fatter and the day's regular exercise increasingly consists of popping out of the office to get a Mars Bar for lunch, the Department of Health ponders ever more loudly about what is to be done to save the nation's health and waistline. Well here's a suggestion to which I don't think they've given due consideration: Do nothing. Leave us alone. For our European brothers and sisters, ever-used to having a government official call around to demonstrate the nationally approved nose-blowing technique etc., the idea that the state should take it upon itself to improve the quality of the nation's diet may sit very comfortably with their preconceptions. But there was a time when this sort of nanny-statism would have been an outrage to British ears. It's time to regain some of that libertarian spirit. Never mind just steering clear of diet: repeal the booze tax; abolish the tab duty. Let freedom reign. Don't get me wrong here - I'm as keen as the next man that people should have enough information to make some-way sensible choices. Billboards with slogans like 'Ease that hacking cough with a cool, smooth Marlboro' shouldn't go unchallenged by all that medical science has taught us. But when the health mafia get on the TV and start banging on about how everyone needs to be better informed about their diet so they can make the right choices, we all know what they really think. Not so deep down they're thinking that there is only one 'right' choice, and that it's the uber-healthy lifestyle that they want to see everyone sticking by. We know that even if every house in the country was sent a portfolio of photos of smokers' lungs and George Best's liver, and even if a chart indicating daily fruit and veg requirements was pinned to every tree, so long as there were still smokers, boozers and couch potatoes in the world they'd still be hammering their 'stop that now' message home relentlessly. They don't mean it when they say they just want people to be informed so they can make their own choices. They mean they believe that if everyone was 'informed' sufficiently then they'd have no rational alternative but to make the decision to follow them down the yellow brick road of healthy living. The idea that someone might look at their curry, look at a Can the Government ever be made to just mind its own business? 'It's time to regain some of that British libertarian spirit. Never mind just steering clear of diet: repeal the booze tax; abolish the tab duty. Let freedom reign.' packet of artichokes, do the net-gain sums in their head and decide to stick with unhealthy living doesn't truly get on the mental radar of the health police, and it gets lip service from them at best. The joke that regular exercise doesn't make you live longer - it just feels longer - has always left them stony-faced. After aU, if it was just about information, the Government should just issue us all one leaflet detailing what we know about the effects of 'bad' lifestyle on health and then forget about it until they have something new to say. But instead, presimiably on the basis that even with plentiful information people still don't know what's good for them, tax is slapped on at extortionate rates, allegedly with the intent of pricing people out of their bad habits. And as anyone who's ever lived in Scotland will tell you, the Government's not averse to bombarding the media with pro-health propaganda, paid for by the taxpayer, if it thinks people aren't getting The Message. What this ceaseless barrage of publicly funded dogma and regressive taxation shows us is just one glimpse of a deeply unpleasant aspect of modem Government: its perception that it is somehow its job to look after us aU in all aspects of our lives. If the population is eating badly by the standards of the nutrition intelligentsia, then that's somehow a 'problem' that it's down to the Government to solve, in league with the various obsessives and busy-bodies who volunteer to help. Well, quite frankly, to hell with that. There's only one thing the Government has a responsibility to do, and that's to make sure no one is so ignorant they have no idea when confronted with producers' pushy advertising that there's a down-side to self-indulgence. While everyone knows booze makes you sick, pies make you fat, cigs rot your lungs and too much of any can put you in the morgue, their work is done. And let's be honest: I rather suspect that most people know these things already. Going beyond that point is enlisting all of our wallets in an elite-driven project to corral and coerce people into living the lives that someone else has decided would be better for them. As both a taxpayer, a drinker and a connoisseur of fatty foods, I for one want their hand out of my pocket, their puritan tax off my pricelist and their propaganda out of my face. God knows we seem to have gone a long way towards undermining the idea that people should be allowed to live their own lives and, so long as they have a rudimentary mental competence, to do themselves whatever damage they see fit in the pursuit of whatever they fancy. With a Government like the current one in power it would do us good to remember that the Government of a free country doesn't just do its job by stepping in to improve people's lot. Just as often it does it by leaving them the hell alone. That means no state campaigning beyond what's needed to spread plain information, and no targeted taxes to promote an approved lifestyle. It's an idea called individual liberty, and it used to count for something around here. Adam, Qtunn is a PhD student at the LSE. b:art edited by Justin Noian stinging and a minging since 1864 o [EDITORIAL jfeJl heilo there, and welcome to .the first-bcart of the new . school yean I trust that your summer has a been a good one and the stories of your sunshine exploits reverberate |from Houghton Street to er, Kingsway. We at b:art have had a thoroughly enjoyable summer, from Radtohead at Glastonbury, to Yann-Arthus Bertrand; at the National History Museum. From arguing about the Perrier Award, to arguing about the Mercui'y Music Prize, to arguing about the Booker Prize, to arguing about the turner Prize. From being sunburnt at the Gtobe to being sunburnt m Ibtza. Martin Amis, Dizzie Rascal, David Blaine, 24, Second Generation Pirates of the Carribean, Jerry Springer the Opera; wherever you ve been the Arts have been in the news, and all. thiS; set io a backdrop of awesorhely un-British weather. So as the nights draw In, the leaves start falling, the , -V-conkers start getting varnished and the weather gets worse, b:art aims to keep you entertained and intrigued with the best from film, music, theatre, literature, fine art and the places to eat, drinK and be merry in London. We take your welfare as students very seriously here and we wouldn't dream of having you part with your government-assited allowances for something we haven't seen, tried and reviewed. So put your trust in our hands and we will show you just a slice of the one of the most diverse arts scenes in the world. Have a good year. a bluffers guide to b:art what to expect from the section that mal THE IJ\KE HOUSi Horrifying experiments; Winged children - it's James Patterson like you've never seen him before! Jusi Ths Facts. Author: James Patterson Publisher: Headline Date: 30 June 2003 yPrice: £17.99_ I've read almost all of James Patterson's novels (apart from the questionable romance ones) but I've never given any of them DIK status - a Desert Island Keeper. If I'm stranded on a lump of sand with a scraggly little coconut tree for shade and only the chance of rain to prevent dehydration , but I had the great fortune to have lugged a bag full of great 'keeper' books with me to while away the years Tom Hanks style, Patterson books won't make the cut. It's not that I don't enjoy them, but despite all the hype that surrounds all of his work, I think he's more than slightly overrated as a pure storyteller. The Lake House is the sequel to 'When the Wind Blows' which is about a girl (and some otheres) who were born with wings and could fly courtesy your friendly neighbourhood psycho scientist. Though Patterson has taken five years between the two books, he picks up only shortly after where he left us in the prequel. Here, Frannie O'Neill and Kit Brennan are trying to gain custody of the winged children. They were the ones to discover them in 'When the Wind Blows' and expose the whole shebang, but now the children have been returned to their biological parents and Frannie and Kit think that they would provide the best kind of love, care and support for them. The children think so as well, especially Max, the eldest and most extraordinary of them. She's aware of another horrifying biological experiment taking place somewhere in the U.S. by an evil surgeon called Dr Ethan Kane who wants to use her and the others for his research. Terrified, she keeps it all a secret, even as the hunt begins to drag them back into undeground labs. If you didn't like When the Wind Blows, you're definitely not going to like this. If you've never read When the Wind Blows and are wondering if you shold give The Lake House a try, ask yourself this: Do you fancy reading about part-human part-bird children who long to fly freely without fear of persecution but still crave the love and family life of 'normal' children? There'll be some who think this is creativity and imagination at its best and there'll be those who think it's just plain silly. My problem with this book is not the premise, but Patterson's writing style. I know it's supposed to be light reading and goodness knows I'd prefer to read silly than serious anyday, but his prose was pedantic and eerily Danielle Steele like. Lots of 'he said' 'she saids' and thinly drawn characters with an ending that left me wondering if some pages had been ripped out of my £17.99 hardcover book. But don't let that stop you from taking in a breezy summer read in late September. You're not going to want to smack it against your wall to chapters in but you're not going to want to be stuck with it on a desert isle either. Dalia King Author: Sybille Knauss Publisher: Black Swan Date: May 2003 ^rice: £6.99_ iLw'i Covsrsi i \ " Eva was a good teacher of the art of outshining other women... as to make other women wonder what they're doing wrong..." And so it was that Eva (Braun), Gertraud's cousin, constantly fascinated her and the wider community no doubt, as she played the most inconceivable role as Adolf Hitler's 'mistress' at the very height and downfall of his trecherous reign. The novel, albeit a fictitious account, is written as an aging Gertraud othenwise known as Marlene, recounts with explicit detail the days of her youth and describes the physical and mental landscape as well as the unforgettable events that she shared with her cousin at Hitler's Berghof in Berlin, Germany. When asked to pay Eva a visit, young Gertraud blindly ignores the consternation of family members who view the relationship between cousin and Fuhrer as destined for doom.She often questioned the unusual relationship , yet Gertraud, delighted by her cousin's flamboyant lifestyle learned from Eva about the world of high fashion, social etiquette... as well as the negative effects of one's ignorance. The young cousin is enchanted by Eva's social escapades such as the daring escapes to go skinny dipping and dining at the prestigious 'Hotel Platterhof, then Sibylle knauss (author) introduces an aura of dread.Gertraud encounters " sullen, sly, dangerous" Mikhail, an exploited child labourer who toiled on the construction site of hitler's retreat. Furthermore, the dark side to her glamorous world becomes more apparent when she listens to the 'enemy station' on a secret radio and a visit to a one armed friend results in a tragic encounter with death. The novel is simply written yet provides extraordinary detail so it engages the senses as it draws the reader into the true to life setting. Conflicting emotions arise as one reads of Eva's contentment, young Gertraud's confusion, enlightenment and their Fuhrer's insensitivity and imprudence set against the enchanting almost pristine natural landscape. While I found 'Eva's Cousin' a well- written and engaging novel, I had hoped to be more moved due to the nature of the subject. Kavelle Savary Interested in writing for the Lit section of ther Beaver? Free books - what more could you possibly need - or want?! Email Dalia at beaverlit(gyahoo.co.uk We proudly present a great deal for students. The 360° career. This is your chance to see what investment banking is really all about. After a few well chosen words from the management, we'll give you a lightning tour of the various business areas in which you might work as a graduate. Don't expect any pumpy yoof music or dodgy free gifts because we spent all the freebie money on decent wine. After all, we do have to drink the same stuff as you and we're not getting acid burns for anyone, no matter how many qualifications you've got. Also we're keeping the presentation to about twenty of your student minutes, so there will be more time to chat. This event will take place on Wednesday October 29 in the Great Hall, JPMorgan, 60 Victoria Embankment, starting at 6 p.m. sharp. Places are limited, so please register online at 360career.com by Tuesday October 14. I 360career.com JPMofgan is a maiitetlng name of J.P. Motgan Chase & Co. and its sulKidlaries wortdwide. ©2003 ).P. Moigan Chase & Co. All rights reserved. JPIWoigaii b an equal opportunities employer. 'jPMorgan CPie Dailg ^etegmph ®heIk%CCi BEN SCHOTT fteoci hw ritw Mnx«u ui Miinhuttan PAUL. HAYWARD Sports W'riHT U-wr-aiidn BRITAIN'S BEST-SELLING QUALITY DAILY Read a bestseller every doy. If you would like to read The Daily Telegraph at our special student price of 20p weekdays and half-price or less at the weekend, then freephone 08CX) 181 222 or e-mail studentpapers@te[egraph.co.uk for a voucher booklet for the whole term. Please state your name, address, university, the year your course ends and ref 205. The right to vote... Direct Votes: ...on the issues Is there more to democracy than just casting one vote every 4 years for a representative to mate all the decisions for you? Do you want the right to participate in the decision-making process through referenda? For more information, or to support this campaign^ see the web page: www.directvotes.info or email: info@directvotes.info or write to: Direct Votes, PC Box 13739, London, N17 OWF Representation: The poorest possible form of democracy. Democracy is a wonderful thing, except that part about letting (just any old yokel vote. Wednesday 26th February The BeaverSport Page 19 Stay Relevant: A Glossary Of Terms Okay, in-jokes are often exclusionist, contrived and un-funny. However, they're also the basis for an entirely (so far) successful career at BeaverSports and in the AU. Knowing just when to switch into AU word-play mode can be the key to a happy LSE existence. Conversely, used at the wrong moment, such efforts could leave you open for Tuns-wide ridicule or just bitter irrelevancy. To avoid such emotionally scaring moments, read our well-thought out and not-at-all-cobbled-together-at-the-last-minute guide to what certain words, phrases and 'things' mean. NB: Due to the fickle nature of fashion, anything written here might be regarded back-dated at the time of reading. Oh well, easy come, easy go. Backpackers: Up past King's Cross, it's great to drink there. There's saw dust on the floor, and the giris are struggling to even look their 14 years of age. Barrel: Last Friday of Lent Term, lots of drinking and fancy dressing, and debauched behaviour. Followed by the infamous Run, led by the strangely up-for-it Streaker. A hundred odd drunken and boistorous students charging through a packed Peacock Theatre lecture. IVIagic. B:Art: Edited by a convicted pederast, and seasoned woman beater, this is a waste of a section. Nothing more to say. BeaverSports: The light at the end of the B:Art tunnel. The only reason to read B:Art is because this section comes after it. Car Bomb (Irish): Half a pint of Guiness, two shots of Jamesons'. Tip in two shots of Baileys and drink! Up the Republic! Champagne: Variously, the third team, the first team's style of play, the Rugby club's drink of choice, and generally an all-round symbol of our sporting excellence and established superior quality. The Dark Ages: When clothed breasts were draped all over the Sports pages, a petition was circulated and signed by all manner of SU big-wigs. Breasts belong in the dark ages, they said. Next week, BeaverSports was rebranded The Dark Ages, to general apathy. Euston Tech: The University College, London (UCL). Gimperial: Imperial College. But a name that better encapsulates the gimpish nature of their sports teams. A barrel, but not THE Barrel. Green Death: The drink to have at Backpackers. Gets you very drunk, exceedingly fast. Gypsy: A person of Romany origin, usually characterised by their travelling culture. Kevin Walitee: An example of an Half time with the Champagne Fooitballers ingenius attempt at word play. Giving a first name to the first letter of a well-known word, hence the examples of 'Simon Coolboy' and 'Barry Arrel' for 'Schoolboy' and 'Barrel' respectively. Limeabout: Nightclub that's now a Walkabout, but used to be called Limelight. Hence, Limeabout. The Lovers Guide: 101 positions to get through. The prize awarded to the first man or woman to 'guess the breasts' in last year's quiz thingy we did. A Mr Oily Ranson won it, and we can only assume is giving insane amounts of pleasure to numerous willing and able women. Mixed Grill: The Wright's Bar speciality. Eaten in-situ whole, or blended and mixed with wine to be drunk at the Barrel. Lovely stuff. Moral Majority: See 'Women's Lib.' QMWank: Queen Mary Westerfield College. Royal Holloway: Student suicide capital of Britain. Nasty place. Nasty people. Royal School of Mincers: Royal School of Mines. Yes, Mines. Rum Sodomy and the Lash: By graduation, you may have had your fair share of these things. Also, a Rogues album. Sambucca: Stick it in your mouth and light it. Effortlessly brilliant, and with that tiny edge of danger that you think makes women feel more attracted to you. They don't. Be sure to follow correct Sambucca drinking procedure. Avoid lighting face on fire. School Of Piss: Pharmacy. Sport: Played Celebrated often. School Of sometimes. Strand Poly: King's College. The City to our United. Women's Lib: The female equivalent of the Black Panthers. Picket FHM often. Wrong: Not right. So there you are, a Grade A page-filler. We'll see what happens this week at Freshers Fayre, and Sports Trials. Maybe we'll have something to report next week. There, on tenterhooks aren't you? Or: Porn for Cowards... We Need A Photographer. For Journalistic Purposes. Own Qarnera Would Be Advantage. Talent Also. J&eaverSports Free at last from the parents' leash, Schoolboy went wild. Thursday 2nd October 'If history repeats itself, I think we can expect the same things to happen again' - Terry Venables BeaverSports: Admit it: You've missed us... Precious Little Of Note! Shock!... as BeaverSports has nothing to report on. LSE Rugby: A scoundrels game played by gentlemen? LSE Netball: Even in Lapland, Santa Claus Pic. 'They used to be the 7ths, but now they are the Make up your mind in the Tuns... couldn't escape Sexual Equality Legislation. 6s!' Too good for their name, the newly-named 6s take on the School Of Piss. We Need Photographers: Turn Your Voyeuristic Tendancies into A Vaiuabie AU Asset. Piease. So here we are again. Fresher's Fortnight becl