THE CASE FOR SCHOOL CLINICS. BY L . HADEN GUEST, M.R.C.S. (Eng.) L .R.C.P. (Lond.) PuBLISHED AND SoLD BY THE FABIAN SOCIETY. PRICE ONE PENNY. LONDON: THE FABIAN SociETY, 3 CLEMENT's I:'\N, S TRAND, W.C . MARCH 191 I . ON SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC SUBJECTS. AN UP-TO-DATE, SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY, DEALING WITH SociALisM, SoCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL PROBLEMS, EcoNOMICS AND EcoNOMIC HISTORY, PoLITICAL SCIENCE, GovERNMENT AND ENGLISH HISTORY. Compiled by the Fabian Society for Students of University Extension Lectures and Classes, for persons investigating Social Problems, and for the general reader. Interleaved, in Paper Cover, 1s. net; bound in Buckram, 2s. net ; postage 2d. THE FABIAN SOCIALIST SERIES. These booklets usually contain about g6 well-printed pages, good paper and good type, and is supplied in two forms; in attractive wrappers at 6d. each, nett, and in quarter cloth boards, gilt top, at 1/-each, nett. Postage: ld. and 2d. each. VOLUMES NOW READY: IX. THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF TRADE UNIONISM. By J. H. Greenwood. Preface by Sidney Webb. VIII. SOCIALISM AND SUPERIOR BRAINS. By Bernard Shaw. With new portrait of the author. VII. WASTAGE OF CHILD LIFE. By J. Johnston, M.D. A study of Lancashire towns. VI. SOCIALISM AND NATIONAL MINIMUM. By Mrs. Sidney Webb, Miss B. L. Hutchins, and others. V. THE COMMONSENSE OF MUNICIPAL TRADING. By Bernard Shaw. With new Preface. IV. THE BASIS AND POLICY OF SOCIALISM. By Sidney Webb and the Fabian Society. III. SOCIALISM AND INDIVIDUALISM. Contents: By Sidney Webb, Sidney Ball, G. Berna.1d Shaw, and Sir Oliver Lodge. II. SOCIALISM AND AGRICULTURE. Contents: By Edward Carpenter, T. S. Dymond, Lieut.-Col. D. C. Fedder, and the Fabian Society. I. SOCIALISM AND RELIGION. Contents; By the Rev. Stewart D. Headlam, the Rev. Percy-'"'"-._-.:'Dearmer, the Rev. John Clifford, and John Woolman. ~'\l"~_ltf Ec.o umes I. to IV. are reprints of Fabian Tracts. L€f /1'. ,AJ,u /~n~~jHE FABIAN SOCIETY, 3 Clement's Inn, trttu -i' J; ~~ ~'/L/ )-1 ,0 ~ -< 5 .,._e:, ' Strand, W.C. ~ 0 ~-/ ~ I THE CAsE FOR ScHooL CLINics. R eprz"nted wz"th addz"tz'ons and correctz'ons by the courtesy of the "Dcnly N ews." IF we were really a practical nation instead of an obscurantist nation, we should do some very simple things for school children. We should, to begin with, treat them as individual boys and girlsand not as administrative units, with the possibility of a decimal point thrown in. The things that children need are known to very many thousands of English men and women ; they comprise good food, good clothing, good housing, and loving care. In educational matters educationists are so far agreed that in a genuinely representative congress, expressing unfettered opinions, there would be no serious differences of opinion on essentials. But we are not a practical nation, and I do not propose to discuss the detail of these practical things. There is a huge gap between what we know how to do and what we immediately proceed to do on any extensive scale. The why and wherefore of this is another matter; at present my concern is with the things that we can immediately proceed to do for the school child. On the roundabout route by which we approach common sense, the medical inspection of school children is a long step. By this inspection the problem is displayed and made graphic before our eyes. Before medical inspection theorists could argue ad infinitum, after medical inspection the argument must at least centre round the facts discovered. What Inspection Shows. The main subdivisions and groupings of children which medical inspection enables us to make, are, broadly speaking, the same for all schools. In every school the bulk of the children show an averagehealth which is comparatively satisfactory. And among the children. presenting defects of mind and physique there are two main groups. In both of these medical defects are present, but in the one the family circumstances are average or above the average, in the other group the circumstances are below the average. The first may be said to present simply medical defects, the second medical defects plus poverty. The children who are average must not be thought by any means to be satisfactory. The average of one school is of necessitymade for that school, and applies to the particular children drawn from the homes round about it. The average of a school in a slum neighborhood would be below the average for a school in a district of well-paid artizans. In London, for instance, parts of Lambeth may be well below parts of Battersea. 4 The average is in no case very high, in the London CountyCouncil schools three decayed teeth are charted as normal, manyslight eye defects, many slight degrees of feeble nutrition, and manyslight deformities are " normal." None the less these things are handicaps in schoolwork, and in after life. Such average children are very "average" in general capacity, in character, and in graspof the duties of citizenship and of their part in life. To raise the average of child life in all schools to the level of the school with the highest average among children drawn from the same social stratum, to raise the average of all slum schools to the average of the best slum school, is a non-utopian ideal with a very concrete measure of its success, which we might well adopt into our municipal politics. The problem of the average child is largely a problem for the statesman and social reformer ; medical knowledge has made the problem concrete and definite, and can suggest some needed reforms. But the problem of the child with defects, whether purely medical or medical plus poverty, is predominantly a doctor's question. The Medical Group and the Poverty Group. The division into two groups is important from the standpointof treatment. The purely medical cases can get cured comparativelyeasily, the poverty cases only with difficulty. To treat a child with obstructed breathing and adenoids who is otherwise fairly sound and who comes from a decent home, is simple, and cure is probable. The parents of such a child will take trouble to see that the defect is remedied when it is pointed out to them. The decent home and the child's fairly sound condition are an indication that the parents have the desire and probably the time to see that proper treatment is applied. In every large town and accessible for most small towns and villages there are hospitals and dispensaries supplying facilities for treatment which can be taken advantage of by those having the desire and the time to do so. On the whole the great bulk of children presenting medical defects pure and simple will have those defects attended to by existing institutions when the parents become aware of what is needed. In this respect medical inspection putsthe child of the poor man on a level with the child of the rich man, by giving him an expert opinion on what should be done to put the child in the fittest possible condition. Medical inspection does a great work if it makes medical knowledge available to the parentsof all children. Difficulty of the Poverty Group. In the case of children presenting medical defects plus poverty, the case is far different. To begin with, such children often present not one or two but a group ot defects, and complicated and continuous treatment may be required. The general condition of such children is not good, and the children do not give good results from treatment. Discharging ears in a badly nourished poor child for instance, take longer to get well than in a decently nourished 5 average child. But, worst of all, the parents of such poor children do not take them for medical treatment. Sometimes the parentswill not take them-these, I think, are the rarer cases-sometimes the parents do not think medical treatment necessary, these are commoner cases. Sometimes the parents cannot spare time to getthe children treated. This last class is as large as either of the two others, and may in certain localities be larger. In the first group come the children from drunken and vicious homes, in the second from feckless homes, in the third from overworked and underworked homes. We might call them the vicious, the feckless, and the poorhomes. The remedy for these conditions lies outside the scope of school organization, but the recognition of the existence of these conditions is very much a matter for school authorities. For the plain A B C af the facts is this, that it is no use treating defects of nose and throat, eye and ear, unless you treat the underlying debility of constitution produced by the home conditions. That means remedial school feeding firstly and open-air schools, school baths and gymnasia among other things as secondary methods. This state of thingsmeans also a new organization for getting the children treated. It may, in theory, be highly desirable to ''insist" on the parentsgetting remedied the defects pointed out to them by medical inspection. In practice the parents will either not do so, or onlypretend to do so, for in the matter of getting treatment it is fatally easy to pretend. If the poverty group children are to have their illnesses and ailments remedied, they will have to be (a) fed on a diet designed to improve their physique, and (b) sent to hospital or school clinic in charge of someone from the school by the authority of the school. The home conditions of such children also need tackling ; the necessity of open windows and soap and water need pointing out, and all kinds of complicated little details need discussing with the parents. These are the duties of the care committee, but if they are to be effectively carried out, if remedial feeding is to become a reality instead of a pretence, and if medical defects are to be cured, there is only one effective way of doing these things-all of these activities must centre round a school clinic. And the school clinic, the school doctors, and the school nurses must be as much a part of the school organization as the school teachers. The average children in council schools (who are nevertheless below the standard of their own possibilities), and the children with medical defects only, may be put aside for the moment; the children with defects plus poverty are an urgent problem demanding instant attention. The Morass of Destitution. Children belonging to the poverty group, as already defined, are the children sprung from the morass of destitution which quakes and shivers around the foundations of our civilization. These children come from definitely localized neighborhoods, from particular streets, 6