T'W "H i he Beaver The Newspaper of the LSE SU students union First Published 5 May 1949 State of the Union in blink - Page 8 18th November 2003 Issue number 587 iVIichaei Moore belly-flops into b:art - Page 21 LSE Student wins Prestigious Award - Page 5 When Bush Comes to Town Week of Protests Planned at LSE Mark Power Managing Editor T< |he LSE Stop the War Coalition (STWC), in conjunction with the nationwide movement, has planned a series of demonstrations and protests to coincide with US President George Bush's visit to London this week. The main event due to take place is a large demonstration in central London, organised by the STWC. The LSE component of this demonstration will assemble in Houghton Street at 2 pm before joining the rest of the demonstrators. STWC's Ghada Karmi expected the total number of demonstrators to exceed 50,000. She said that the demonstration would build on the success of the march against the war in February which attracted up to two million by some estimates. She said that Bush's state visit to London was an "insult" to those and millions of other British people who opposed the war. With negotiations still under way between the STWC and the Metropolitan Police as to the route of the march, organisers expect the Police to back down and allow the demonstration to pass along the traditional route, through Parliament Square and along Whitehall. Speaking on Radio 4's Today programme, Liberal Democrat Leader Charles Kennedy declared his sympathy with the demonstrators and called on the authorities to refrain from obstructing it. His voice echoes that of Jeremy Corbyn MP who, on behalf of the STWC, has called for the march to pass by the seat of government and the centre of power in this country. To complement the national demonstrations, the LSE STWC has organised a series of events this week to protest against Bush and his state visit. Starting today, there is scheduled to be an Extraordinary General Meeting at 11am in the Old Theatre to discuss a motion resolving to support the STWC organised teach-in later this evening. The teach-in, which aims at providing a convincing explanation of the STWC's arguments starts at 6pm in the Hong Kong Theatre, with a line up of speakers including Jeremy Leggit, a noted Green author and Ali All-Assan, from Iraqi Democrats Against Occupation. It has been suggested that the teach-in will turn into an occupation, with leading members of the LSE STWC reported to be planning to bring their sleeping bags. Speaking to The Beaver, organiser of the teach-in Matthew Willgress, said he did not know whether or not there would be an occupation. It has been suggested that the school is likely to react to such an occupation by charging the union for the extra security it would have to employ in order to keep Clement House open through the evening. There has also been controversy over the scheduling of the meeting time of the EGM. STWC's James Meadway said that it would be difficult to get enough people to a morning meeting in order to have he necessary 150 students to obtain quoracy. He suggested that the Students' Union could have been "a bit more creative about the use of SU Space", in response to General Secretary Eliot Simmons's defence that it had not been possible to book a room for any other time. It is also understood that SU Treasurer Jo Kibble had issues with a later meeting because off difficulties over Muslim students observing rituals related to Ramadan, although when pressed for specifics, Simmons was unclear exactly how this would affect the meeting. Neither was he able to explain why, if Ramadan were such an issue, the Union was not making protestations to the school about the scheduling of afternoon lectures which would also present problems for students involved. In opposition to the action against Bush, the LSE SU Conservative Party is organising a pro-Bush and pro-America rally. Whilst organisers were sceptical as to the numbers that would attend such an event, they felt that it was important that an alternative view to that of the mainstream student body be heard on campus. stop Bush Posters on Campus / Photo: Aqeel Kadri Galloway insults Chair of LSE Labour - Page 4 ( r ^r/r ) r . , I, , The Beaver Tuesday 18th November 2003 The Beaver Neux Page 2 Cash Row at Kings... Cambridge that is Chris Heathcote Arguments and personality clashes have caused a bitter row at Bang's College, Cambridge, resulting in the suspension of the bursar against a background of a £1.2 million budget deficit. News of the suspension was broadcast to 700 students and fellows in a terse one-line email sent by the college's governing council. Roger Salmon, the bursar at the centre of the calamity, had been at loggerheads with dons because he continued to fight their opposition to plans exploring how to resolve the embarrassing and damaging budget shortfall. Tension is not new to Mr Salmon; in 1996 he resigned as the Government's rail franchise director two years early, following disputes with those opposed to rail privatisation Tensions began to simmer at King's last month, after the arrival of the new provost. Dame Judith Mayhew. Dame Judith, the first woman to hold the post and the only non-Kingman provost for more than 200 years, is a former City power broker and adviser to London Mayor, Ken Livingstone. She had alleged that Mr Salmon had been "undermining" her. The current crisis started when a working party, established to tackle the debt disaster, made unpopular recommendations. It proposed cost-cutting around the college property, through the selling of art, such as Rubens' Adoration of the Magi, which currently hangs in the chapel and is estimated to be worth £40 Million. More importantly, it suggested that private US students be allowed to attend the college in a scheme that could have raised up to £100,000 a year for college coffers. However, traditionalists on the college council then voted down the proposals because they argued that it would turn King's into a "glorified crammer" and amounted to "back-door privatisation". That meant that students from Miami i Kings College - £1 University, in Ohio, who would have each paid £5,000, will not be attending Cambridge. The unorthodox idea, whereby the Americans would not have been members of the University, but taught entirely within the college, made many members of the university administration uneasy. But they said the debacle demonstrated how government underfunding in higher education had forced cash-strapped universities to embark on even more radical entrepreneurial ventures, under the pretext of academic activity. Some dons at Oxford believe that the only way to tackle the problems they face would be to cut all ties with the Government and go private. A number of Oxbridge colleges have complained that the decline in government funding, combined with faltering investments, is leaving them in a similar situation to King's, Cambridge. However, students at .2 million deficit Cambridge say that the cause of the colleges' problems are closer to home, claiming that internal audits at some colleges have revealed mismanagement, extravagance and waste. Though renowned for its vicious high table politics, the college, which was founded by King Henry VI in 1441, has a student body usually regarded as progressive, possibly because 80 per cent of the college's British undergraduates are from state schools, compared to nearer 50 per cent across Cambridge as a whole. However, in a dispute that shows no sign of ending, more than one hundred students are already on rent strike after plans for an above inflation increase to charges at the college. Neither Cambridge University nor the provost would comment on the reasons for Mr Salmon's suspension. Lawrence Summers Lectures Shaphan Marwah Harvard University President Lawrence Summers spoke out against the deterioration of US-European relations last Thursday, in a speech here at the LSE. His speech comes on the eve of President George W. Bush's controversial state visit to the UK. The former US Treasury Secretary and World Bank Chief Economist argued that "continued fracturing of the Atlantic Alliance... could have grave consequences for the United States, Europe, and for the world as a whole." He warned that without cooperation between the United States and Europe,"we will see a return... to the kind of international system that prevailed in Europe before the First World War." Mr. Summers also pointed out that European states could benefit from America's "capacity to project force", and that progress in addressing issues ranging from international trade to global warm- Lawrence Summers at the lectern ing required "successful cooperation with the United States". He also contended that Europe was integral to American foreign policy. "The nations of Europe are indispensable allies", he asserted, "Europe's ability to contribute to peacekeeping efforts and... to the global development effort will far exceed that of the United States." Anti-Americanism is one of the problems undermining relations between the US and Europe, Mr. Summers explained. "Some political leaders in Europe sought to increase... their popular support by attacking the United States," he said, "the idea of the United States as a hyperpower that must be contained...has become increasingly fashionable in Europe." He also criticized "the conduct of diplomacy... over the last year [in which] negotiations... took place through the press." Students had mixed reactions to Mr. Summers' speech. "I agree that there is a lot of anti-American sentiment," said Roli Khare (Msc Development Studies) before adding, "better communication between the US and Europe is very important right now." With the state visit of President George W Bush to Britain on the horizon, the strength of the transatlantic relationship will shortly be put to the test. Greens to Hold Anti-Exxon Event AlykanVelshi A coalition of greens, Labour students, socialists and anti-globalisation activists will be protesting at the Exxon-Mobil building near the LSE on Wednesday afternoon. The LSESU People & Planet Society are organising the event, hoping to draw attention to Exxon's "failure to support the Kyoto protocol" and other "environmental misdeeds." Exxon has been a prime target of environmentalist groups since Exxon-Valdez, the largest oil spill in U.S. history. The oil slick spread over 3,000 square miles and onto over 350 miles of beaches in Prince William Sound, Alaska. The environmental and economic impact of Exxon Valdez are still the subject of heated debate, and the source of much resentment towards the company even today. The organisers of the protest are also concerned about Exxon's current practices: its reliance on non-renewable resources, scepticism of the Kyoto accord on climate change, and current involvement in the Middle East and Africa. The event is also attracting those not exclusively concerned with the environment, but rather with Exxon's role in the spread of global capitalism worldwide. In recent years, the company has positioned itself as a steward of the environment in the U.K., taking on many 'green' projects in order to demonstrate its environmentalist bona fides. Exxon has invested heavily in systems to capture and recover petrol vapours well ahead of regulatory requirements. At its refinery and chemical plant at Eawley, emissions relating to air quality, water quality and waste have been reduced on average by 60 per cent since 1995, according to the company's website. Exxon is also revolutionising the trucking industry, as the U.K.'s leading supplier of Compressed Natural Gas (CNG), an environmentally friendly alternative to diesel for heavy goods vehicles. Nevertheless, organisers of the event argue that these changes have been slow to come and are still woefully inadequate at protecting the environment. The protest, which will feature a variety of anti-Exxon speakers, plans to draw attention to the company's past wrongs and current woes. A similar event was staged last year, which saw students trespassing and occupying Exxon's offices, as well as allegations of vandalism of Exxon property, culminating in a showdown between the more militant event participants and the police which ended with the arrest of an LSE student. Following closely on the heels of SU Environment Week, which was a tremendous success, it is hoped that this year's protest will give students the opportunity to learn about Exxon in a more peaceable setting. Exxon Mobil - prime target The Beaver Tuesday 18th November 2003 Ihe Beaver News Lord Hurd: Iraq a potential "disaster" for UK Andrew Nay lor Former Conservative Foreign Secretary Lord Hurd warned Iraq could prove to be a "disaster" for the UK and US if the situation in Iraq is allowed to descend into anarchy. Speaking at the LSE last Hiesday he added, "Iraq is not a model to be followed but an example to be avoided". His thought provoking words came on a day of mortar attacks against the coalition's Baghdad HQ, highlighting the increasingly desperate situation the occupying forces face in Iraq. With daily increases in resistance and lawlessness, Lord Hurd described Iraq as a "mess". The former Foreign Secretary disputed the original justification for war that the regime was a direct threat to the West, but cautiously acknowledged the humanitarian grounds for the invasion, adding "what counts is what follows". Few people believe the current situation is acceptable. If governments are prepared to use force to execute a regime change they must be prepared to take the burden of responsibility that follows. The coalition, and the Americans especially, have wholly miscalculated the situation. Innocent Iraqi civilians, including policemen, are being killed, heightening the tension between the local population and the occupying forces. He said it "defies belief" that the Blair government made "reckless assumptions" and the Pentagon "ignored their own ignorance". Striking a chord with many, he said that failure to prevent humanitarian atrocities such as the Rwandan genocide is "indefensible", but without the legitimacy of the approval of the UN Security Council, military intervention will run into difficulties. The UK and US going it alone is no longer the answer. He made it clear that the UN must reform to reflect the modem balance of power and EU member states should n . sTQWEBBBKI / .. . .. i. . •- -y. "'' ¦ V- Lord Hurd speaks at the LSE cooperate more closely on issues of defence and foreign policy. Only this way will intervention on humanitarian grounds be both legitimate and successful. In what may be viewed by the Stop the War coalition as an affront to their cause, Lord Hurd accused supporters of the widespread belief that the war was about oil as cynics. Contrasting the recent invasion with previous conflicts in Bosnia and Kosovo, the use of force in these previous situations was not about regime change or about a specific solution. Intervention in the Balkans was about preventing further human atrocities and attempting to secure a peace. Since September 11^'^, intervention has switched from being based on humanitarian grounds to defensive measures involving regime change. The charismatic speaker concluded that there are many lessons to be learned from the recent conflict, not the least to fully prepare for the consequences. Like in Afghanistan, the once welcomed occupying soldiers are being met with increased resistance and hostility from the population. With an outdated UN, the question of with whom the legitimate authority to act as a supranational policeman rests has to be answered. Positive Discrimination? Adrian Li The Department of Education has reopened the controversy over leading universities giving preference to applicants from state schools over public schools. Department of Education officials published their findings in a paper, Post-Qualification Applications on November 12th 2003, concluding that students from public schools are less likely to receive offers at the most sought after universities than similarly qualified students from state schools. The President of the Girls' Schools Association (GSA), Pauline Davies, speaking at the GSA annual conference at St Andrews in Fife, highlighted the growing trend that popular universities were now devising their own admissions tests or even looking into 'exceptional performance in context' to see if they were above average in their school. She claims this would put private school pupils at a disadvantage. Mrs Davies, head of Wycombe Abbey School in Buckinghamshire, is a member of the Government task force devising a fair university admissions policy. She claims "it will be difficult, if not impossible, for many of our students to demonstrate exceptional performance in context since the pupils who attend our schools achieve such high standards." She then suggested the message this sends out to students was that "the only HE Minister Alan Johnson way they can be sure to have their university applications taken seriously is to transfer to the worst achieving school they can find". According to the Department of Education report, there is a "significant" difference in the rate of offers from leading universities depending on whether the applicant attends a state or private school. A department spokesman has said "further work would be done to look at the apparent inconsistency in offers from some universities". These findings come on the heels of the recent furor last spring over Bristol University's admissions policy. Wycombe High School allegedly a form of positive discrimination, where the admissions tutors looked for "students who achieved outstanding success against the odds" as indicators of academic quality and potential. Mrs Davies called for the current admissions policy to be changed to allowing students to apply after their A level results have been released, which would give admissions tutors a clearer picture of the applicant's profile. Alan Johnson, the Higher Education Minister, has said the Government accepted that such a system would be "right in principle". However, if this were to be imple- Page 3 Union Jacl< Jack on, Jack off... Now from first impressions. Jack would be unUkely to place Nick 'son of Fudge' Spurrell in the 'moderate' camp. Moderately camp perhaps, but that's an entirely different kettle of fish, and one best left for the back pages of this illustrious paper. Similarly, the less than appealing image of Jimmy 'the hose' Baker greased up and acting the Fireman and saving the Quad from a (Disco) inferno is more of a sports thing, yet last week's UGM was just chock full of such opportunities for crass double entendre. Rise above it. Jack, and we'll aU be the better for it. Politics, then- and lots of it. Everybody likes soap operas*^ but as a rule they don't make for great decision making bodies. This Union's factions, divisions, incestuous relations, and recriminations are beginning to look like a desperate script writer's wet dream. All that's needed now is the unearthing in Houghton street of James Madway's long dead sense of humour and the transformation is complete. Boring boring Dave Cole continued in his private version of the 'yes or no game', and got exceedingly sulky when nobody wanted to play with him. Jack, being far above the sphere of trivial point scoring and petty power struggles is not one to leap to the defence of... well, anyone really, but for Christ's sake, do we need to be subjected to the same useless hot air every single week? Clearly, our editor is a charlatan and a brigand, and the SU has every right not only to summarily kick him out, but to burn his little body and buiy him in a shallow grave somewhere in Lincoln's Inn. Now come up with something more interesting. Please. At this point Jack saw red. Not in anger, mind, but in another ill thought out 'elect me please' gag, in the form of a Fez. Ha, and indeed ha. At least it beats a fucking badger- and speaking of which, is Jack the only one to notice how unnaturally fond our returning officer is becoming of her little furiy friend? There's petting, and there's molesting, and God knows it's a fine line. Just make sure you clip its nails first. (Badgerbating? There's a joke there somewhere. But again, Sportspages.) More elections. More constitution. More steering. Hopefully someone knows whats going on, even if it is only Oliver's Army. Never was a man so ill named- Jelleyman is pure steel I tell you, and stainless at that. Remember. If so very much time wasn't wasted each week, the assembled throng may actually get to hear the now legendary 'business motion five' from the AU. After all, a 'C list celebrity's future may depend on it, in the same way that no doubt that wall is gonna come tumbling down any minute. Finally, it appears next week Bush is going to be quaking at the sight of a pallid mass of unwashed skivers bearing dovrai on his massively armed convoy. Of course, it won't only be the Union Exec...but hell, that'd do the trick. \ Jack off. hohoho. v.':::::: The Beaver Tuesday 18th November 2003 The Beater News Page 4 Galloway supports "resistance by any means necessary If Mark Power Managing Editor The Controversial former Labour MP, George Galloway, lived up to his reputation for outspoken rhetoric by affirming his support for Palestinian and Iraqi 'freedom fighters' at a meeting at the LSE last Wednesday. Galloway was joined by Stop the War Coalition's Ghada Karmi who works in their national office in London. The purpose of their visit was to rally support for the organisation's protests against the impending visit of US President George Bush to London this week. Speaking in the New Theatre to an audience numbering approximately 150 students and interested parties. Galloway spoke of what he described as the Coalition's dismal record in promoting democracy and self-governance in Iraq. Both Galloway and Karmi spoke of the historical precedents of Western intervention in Iraq, citing the British occupation following World War II as a record which invalidated the Coalition's ability to be trusted to restore governance and sovereignty to the Iraqi nation. Controversially, during questions, both Galloway and Karmi lent their support to George Galloway supports freedom fighters all forms of resistance in both Palestine comment on their position with regard to and Iraq to what Galloway called "the ille- suicide bombers, Karmi stated "I refuse to gal occupation" of Iraq and Palestine, condemn suicide bombers." Galloway When the panel was specifically asked to agreed with the sentiment, although he ini- tially avoided answering the question, posed by a reporter from this newspaper. He said that the "Iraqi people have every right to resist [the occupation] by whatever means necessary." The MP for Glasgow Kelvin, who was recently expelled from the Labour Party, also outlined his plans to create a 'Unity movement' to stand candidates in every region for next year's elections to the European Parliament. This announcement was made in response to the query by former LSE SU Treasurer, Peter Bellini, who asked why Galloway would not be fighting a by-election in his Glasgow Kelvin constituency on an independent platform rather than the Labour one he was elected on, given his recent expulsion from the party In response to that expulsion. Chair of the LSE Labour Society, Dave Cole, asked Galloway why he was seeking to persistently undermine the party. Galloway responded by saying he had been kicked out of New Labour, which was an "anti-Labour force." Both Galloway and Karmi were keen to stress that they were not anti-American, that this was a march against Bush and his policies, a man who, according to Karmi, was a man who "hears voices." Howe to run a Government Geoffrey speaks at the LSE Laura Sullivan Politics, professionalism and personal relationships between key players -the three ingredients of a successful government according to Lord Howe, Conservative Foreign Secretary 1983-89, who spoke at LSE Tuesday November 4th. 'Problems Left Over By History', the subject of Lord Howe's address, allowed him to expand upon not only the foreign policy situations he dealt with whilst in office, but also to explain the lessons he learnt serving under Margaret Thatcher's Government. Describing the situation as things stood when he arrived at the Foreign Office, Lord Howe recalled: "I had some feel for international affairs, and was reasonably mature and worldly wise". It was clear that Thatcher was a "totally new phenomenon" with "star quality". Referring to his "quasi marriage" with the : Prime Minister, Lord Howe explained that decisions were governed by the balance of their partnership. Lord Howe The former Foreign Secretary went on to discuss the 'Problems Left Over By History' with which he was required to deal. He highlighted the Cold War as a particular source of concern; both he and Thatcher saw the necessity of presenting a fresh view of the Soviet Union to the United States. They seized upon Mikhail Gorbachev as a potential ally; Lord Howe recalled the Prime Minister's words: "I like Mr Gorbachev. We can do business together". Lord Howe also discussed the negotiations surrounding the Anglo-Irish Agreement (formulated to solve the Anglo-Irish question), once more emphasising that personal relationships may play a large part in determining the success of political ventures. Describing the Irish Premier, Garret Fitzgerald, as "irrepressible, engaging and enthusiastic", Lord Howe explained that both Prime Ministers became "immensely engaged" in their relationship, united in the pursuit of peace. Lord Howe did not shirk from analysing the breakdown of his own relationship with Mrs Thatcher. Central to this, he feels, were two foreign policy issues. Firstly, the US led Strategic Defense Initiative (dubbed the 'Star Wars' initiative, this aimed to build a futuristic missile defense system) caused problems in that it elicited very different responses from the two figures. Lord Howe (a former barrister) described his reaction as legalistic; Thatcher, as a Chemistry graduate, found her scientific sensibilities intrigued. The question of Europe's future was, of course, the second issue which provoked disagreement. Despite having initially represented British interests together, for tiii-.vr'-.fiaj rnmr The Iron Lady - Howe's example when negotiating the Single European Act, Howe apparently began to feel increasingly frustrated as he found himself sidelined in the political decision making process. Commenting, in general, upon the power struggle between government departments and 10 Downing Street, Lord Howe said: "The struggle is not something new, it has always existed. Prime Ministers frequently try to extend their influence. The speed at which policy is made today doesn't help matters." He described the practice of Prime Ministers consolidating power at number 10 as"orofoundlv foolish ... it car- boss Margaret Thatcher ries with it the danger of disregarding professionalism". Finally, Lord Howe found time to offer some advice to the beleaguered Mr Duncan Smith, who at that point, was still the leader of the Tory Party. The former Foreign Secretary said he was not in favour of a leadership contest and advised that the Conservative leader ought to "gather all the older statesmen together and broaden his base". He concluded: "personal relationships make government tick and work. There must be a common will to reach policy agreement; a political machine may support this but not replace it". The Beaver Tuesday 18th November 2003 The Bemxr News Thatcher wins European award Prashant Rao Sarah Thatcher, an LSE PhD student, has been nominated as one of only two finalists for the first European Information Security Awards, recognising her contributions to the field as exceptional throughout Europe, at the annual RSA Conference Europe on November 3rd in Amsterdam. Ms. Thatcher's doctoral thesis, Public Policy and the Social Construction of Cyber Terror: the hunt for the paper tiger, concentrates on the transformation of the image of the computer hacker from 'dangerous criminal' to 'cyber-terrorist', and how the image portrayed by the national press affects thinking, and policy formation in the House of Commons and how this impacts the laws of England and Wales. Ms. Thatcher, who is based in the Computer Security Research Centre (CSRC) of the Department of Information Systems, was nominated in the Academic Research category. She was competing for the award with the staff of Finland's Ministry of Communications, who won it for their National Information Security Strategy project. On the subject of how she came to choose her doctoral thesis topic, she commented, "My interest in cyber-terrorism stems from an interest in hackers, and doing a PhD means you have a problem of scope. September 11^^ happened just after I'd started working on my doctorate, and I got to thinking that within the subsequent barrage of news, people weren't really thinking about what they were saying - a I 1 Sarah Thatcher - award lot of knee-jerk legislation was being passed which wasn't really grounded in reality." "I don't want to be the kind of person who says, 'I'm an academic and I know best.' It's for others to make up their minds about whether or not they agree with me." "I'm a lawyer by profession; I want to know why laws work or not and when there's a law that doesn't work, when there's a public outcry against it, it's something that concerns me deeply." "I haven't set out to make a name for myself, except for my very small area. If it winning PhD student turns out to be important, then that's amazing. I don't expect people to start jumping around." When asked what she thought of her competitor's contribution, Ms. Thatcher responded, "I didn't manage to see the Finnish entry, though I wanted to. All I know about it is that it was submitted by the Ministry of Communications." Taking cover in her humility, Ms. Thatcher added, "I honestly didn't think this was that important. I didn't even tell anyone - somehow the Press Office got hold of it, and now it's a story." Testing Times for UK Exam Regime Prashant Rao Progress is being made towards making A-levels and GCSEs more rigorous after imiversities made numerous complaints about the declining standard of incoming students, with this year's intake being described as the weakest in recorded history. Universities across the country believe that an increasing number of incoming students cannot "answer open-ended questions in a way that shows candidates can marshal facts and arguments and come to a logical conclusion," according to Mike Tomlinson, chairman of a Government working party on reforming the 14-19 age group qualifications, at the annual conference of the Girls' Schools Association in St. Andrew's. This view is contested by the Confederation of British Industry and the Institute of Directors, who have warned against scrapping the existing system, arguing that employers will not be able to accurately gauge the abilities of prospective employees. Basic literacy and numerical skills are so lacking nationwide that some universities have had to enrol many students in remedial courses for English and Maths "to enable them to progress in their degree studies," according to Tomlinson. Tomlinson hopes to combat this problem by bringing to an end the system which encourages students to impress admissions tutors by collecting large numbers of GCSEs. Also in the pipeline is the introduction of a dissertation paper as part of a proposed new diploma. Students would write on a subject of their choice, such as a specialist topic or a topic that related to their imiversity applications. This move will come as part of a wider package of reforms designed to replace the 'rigid' GCSE and A -level system with a more continental style diploma by the end of the decade. Universities have been complaining that incoming freshers have been "led by the hand", according to Tomlinson, through structured multiple-choice questions, and they have asked for candidates to sit O-level style exam papers requiring them to answer more open-ended questions than they do now. There are also concerns that existing testing methods do not stretch students sufficiently, nor do they prepare the more able for the rigours of higher education. Tomlinson said that the change to more structured, multiple-choice based questioning since the inception of GCSEs means that more students than ever before cannot put together a coherent argument without prompting. This change in the style and focus of teaching and examining began in the 1980s with moves to make both systems more structured and formalised. Over time more and more schools have adopted syllabi that stress the attainment of 'assessment objectives.' Critics argue that the shift has come has come at the expense of knowledge and abilities that, while no less important, are harder to specify and quantify. Dazed and confused - changes go on Tomlinson argued, "If [multiple-choice papers] are allowed to dominate over other assessment measures, we risk losing skills which are important, such as logical argument and reflection." "The trend in A-levels have been towards exam papers that ensure that students have covered the entire syllabus. That means there are structured questions, where students are led through the phases of a topic, followed by some multiple-choice questions." Tomlinson's Government working group will deliver its full report next summer. Page 5 SU Fights Visa Extension Charges One postcard El Barham News Editor Over 1,000 postcards signed by LSE students opposing the new visa extension charges were delivered to the Home Office on Friday November 14th. LSESU General Secretary, Elliot Simmons, International Students' Officer, Andrew Schwarz and Sho Shibata, Vice-President of the LSE Japanese Society, delivered the 1,100 signed postcards, which detail the arguments against introducing the new visa charges. The protests come as a result of a recent policy change, which means that it is now necessary for international students to pay for their visa extensions to be able to remain in the UK; extensions are often required in order for students to complete their studies or attend graduation ceremonies. Previously, a visa extension could be granted free of charge, and at the point of entry with the new change only implemented on August 1®^ this year. An international student at the LSE said: "The biggest problem with this change is that many of us were unaware of it until we actually arrived at customs because of the hasty manner in which it was implemented. It was also a rather haphazard application as different students were given different amounts of extensions. Some people got three years whilst others got only three months." The support of other influential actors such as local MPs, foreign embassies and the LSE administration has also been courted to strengthen the campaign. LSESU General Secretary, Elliot Simmons, said: "We are working, alongside other students around the UK, to force the Home Office to review as a matter of urgency this new policy; which contradicts the Prime Minister's public statements that the government intends to make the UK a more attractive destination for international students." Lots of postcards The Beaver Tuesday 18th November 2003 The ver QmtmentcmdAmlym Union Loyalists - Misguided? Unquestioned loyalty to the Students' Union is not in our best interests says Ibrahim Rasheed t Page 6 The Beaver 2nd Floor, East Building LSE Students' Union London WC2A 2AE email: thebeaver@l5e.ac.uk Every student at the LSE is automatically a member of the Students' Union. Some are very involved in the day to day bustle of making sure everything runs smoothly. For others, it is just something that is there, but never utilised. Of course all students are to some degree acquainted with the Union. Before the start of term, the SU makes sure it gets out the message of its existence by sending out information packs giving details of the Freshers' Week and all the other little bits and bobs of information that students need to know about the Union they are about to join. Most of this is contained in a little handbook, produced by the SU, which gives details about cheap photocopying and societies. 'Will I join the Business Society or the Management Society?' or maybe even consider the wonderful choice offered between the Socialist Society and the Socialist Workers' Students Society? These are important questions and they need to be answered. Thank God for the little handbook. Through such material and inductions at the start of the year, we also get to find out a bit more about the figures that lead our Union. The most easily identifiable are the four Sabbatical Officers. They are elected in a cross campus ballot held at the end of the Lent term and take a year out to dedicate their lives to the service of students, or something along those lines. But fear not, they are not the only ones out there. In addition to the Executive Committee, there are plenty of other layers of bureaucracy to guide us. The Constitution & Steering Committee and the Finance & Services Committee are just two essential organs that support us. The members of such committees and other assorted do-gooders form the nucleus of the SU. It is through the work of these loyal hacks that the very fabric and structure of our democracy is upheld. But where is this rant heading, I hear you ask. It is in objection to something which I call Union 'loyalism'. Just as in any other political structure, various opinions and views are to be found in the Students' Union. Party politics exists, and even if it is not through the Labour vs. Toiy with the Lib Dems peering in through the curtains that is manifest in national politics, there is a clear Right vs. Left divide. Yet, all these divisions are cast aside when the greater good of the Union is threatened. They are all quick to rally round the institution that allows them the opportunity to act like politicians and debate the important issues of the day in a half empty chamber in central London. This is fine on a certain level. Of course, we should be quick to stand up for our fellow students and the body that gels it all together. Yet, this should not take the form of blind loyalism. It is ignorant and just plain silly to try and defend it against any criticism, even if there is ample evidence to suggest that something may have been done wrong. To give an example, last year I was looking into a story that revolved around the possibility that the Union was purchasing goods at discounts allowed for higher education institutions and then sold for profit. I remember discussing this with one fellow student heavily involved in Union politics who did not seem to see any problem in this at all. His argument was that there was nothing wrong with it so long as the Union benefited. I then took my query to a member of the Executive Committee. After listening to my story with a solemn expression, he looked up and said "If you care about this Union at all, you must never ask anyone that question again." Subsequently I discovered that there was no truth at all to the allegations made. It turned out to be someone mouthing off in the Three Tuns after a drink or three. Yet, the worrying thing was the way in which people were quick to believe that the accusation might be true but were not willing to investigate it fvurther in case it undermined the whole Union. Just like any other political organization, the individuals rurming the SU may not always be acting out of an altruistic desire to help fellow students. In some cases, while they think they may be acting in the common good, the feel that positions of responsibility put them above scrutiny. This is an unhealthy aspect of our democracy and is something that needs to be rectified. Anyone who has been attending Union General Meetings recently or just simply picked up and browsed through a copy of The Beawer will see that there currently is a debate about the transparency of our institutions. We feel strongly that there are important issues that need to be resolved. This does not just stem out of our belief that important information is ; being withheld from the press, but out of f ':: our concern that this is being done, sup- V v posedly, in the best interests of our community, while the question of what exactly is the best interest of the community is being decided by a few bUnd loyalists. Bird's Seeds - Little Nuggets of Wonder Good day to you fellow minions of our beloved L S of E. Fear not, as we are over half way there.....before we know it we'll be free of 4) I buy A, despite having altema- hours out to let him know, tives If anyone else tripped and fell in the EXECUTIVE EDITOR Ibrahim Rashced MANAGING EDITOR Mark Power BUSINESS MANAGER Aqeel Kadri TECHNICAL DIRECTOR Brian Choudhary NEWS EDITOR El Barham BUNK EDITOR Ben Chapman B:ART EDITOR Neil Garrett SPORTS EDITORS Gareth Carter; Ellie Vyras EDtTORIAL ASSISTANT Olivia Mantle FILM EDITORS Simon Cliff; Dani Ismail MUSIC EDITORS Jazmin Burgess; Neil Garett UTERARY EDITOR Dalia King t THEATRE EDITOR Keith Postler; Matt Rushworth FINE ART EDITOR Caroline Bray BcABOUT EOrrORS Katie Davies: Sarah Warwick stinking great big mother f*' gap A Bellini Tit? our books and celebrating the birth of Christ.....again.......even if we don't believe in him. Bellini you are a tit. Peter's motion at the upcoming UGM has certainly moved me. We are asked to support the MP Dianne Abbot for choosing the welfare of her child over her political sentiments. She's a 'left wing' politician (ah-hem) who is sending her kids to private school. So here is her argument broken down: 1) I do not believe in A (private education), I therefore represent those who would prefer and believe in B (State education) 2) In order for A to exist it must be bought by people 3) I would prefer that A didn't exist between premises 3 and 4, then vote against this piss poor motion. Some have conmiended Dianne for her honesty. As do I, in a sense. However, if she's going to be honest about being crap then she's not going to get very far. Sorry about that. So legislation is being proposed in Moscow to criminalise kissing and touching on the underground. This is with the aim of improving 'public morality'. No-one's thought then to identify other reasons why 'public morality' might be in 'decline', for example the fact that tube users might well be pissed. Not that I have a problem with vodka.....in fact it's a close friend of mine. But chaps, kissing is the way forward, lets not have it curbed please. On a serious note I'd like to remind you to turn out at 2pm in Houghton St. on Thursday to demonstrate against Bush. I don't think you have to be one of the unwashed comrades to join in; all at you need as a prompt is a respect for hvimani-ty. This is an undeniably unintelligent (ignorant) person who wields pant cack-ing power throughout the world. This leaves me repulsed, but even if it leaves you slightly skeptical then take a few Is it just me, or has EUot got 'something of the day' about him? There's something dodge about boys who only ever wear 4 t-shirts in rotation....I bet he's got loads of embarrassing clothes....! bet he's got two wardrobes of them! THE COLLECTIVE "•-P. :: 'v • • Satan- Coming to a Week 6 Near You? There was something pretty unattractive about last week as well. An undoubtedly somber mood fiUs the LS of E in week 6.....the end is not nigh enough and we've all got deadlines looming. I propose that from now on this week is called 666. Once again I'm obUged to apologise to any who take offence to any of my blabbering this week. If you wish to bring me to account..........I am Jess Ting. May your week be one full of heady days. Bird x x x James Allen, Serif Alp Atakcan, Jon Baylls. Christina i : Beharry, Peter Bellini, Matthias Benzer, Jimmy Baker, ^ Edd Bariey, Leonard Brouwer, Hannah Bryce, Ed Calow, Lome Charies, Jon Clegg, Dave Cole, Naomi Colvin, Dan Cumming, Tom Delaney, Jan Duesing, Nafeesa Ermes, Tristan Feunteun, Daniel Freedman, Juli San, Sarah Greenberg, Rowan Harvey, Sib Hayer, Chris Heathcote, Lindsay Hoag, Katherine Jacomb. Tom Jenkins, Edward Jones, Paul Kirby, Adrian Li, Will Macfariane, Dan Madden, Ion Martea, Vita Maynard, Garbrielle Menezes, Linda Morris, Shashwat Nanda, Robin Noble, Phillip Nielsen, Samantha Nicklin, Daniela Ott, Neel Patel, Alison Perine, Chelsea Phua, Kirstine Potts, Claire Pryde, Adam Quinn, Vanessa Raizberg, Jan Rattay, Zaf Rashid, Loretta Reehill, Matthew Sinclair, Susannah Sava, James Sharrock, Elliot Simmons, Nick Spurrell, Omar Srouji, Matthew Stoate, Sarah Taylor, Jamie Tehrani, Chenai Tucker, Alykhan Velshi, Saija Vuola, Julius Walker, Matt Willgress, Dave Willumsen. At a meeting of The Beaver Collective on Thursday 13th November, a motion of censure was passed against Dave Cole. PRINTED BY THE NORTHatFFE PRESS If you have written three or more articles for the Beaver and your name does not appear in the above : list please email thebeaver@lse.ac.uk and we will add your name on for next week The Beaver is available online at www.lse.acuk/union and in alternative formats . Page 7 ineaeaver (jmtmemamiimuysts EdUorial Comment A Clear Message - Galloway Go Away Preparations are underway for demonstrations against the visit of George W Bush to London this week. As has been reported in other sections of this paper, the STWC has been very active in promoting the protests. Speakers at the LSE have included the distasteful and offensive, in the form of George Galloway. His address to the New Theatre last Wednesday, whilst perhaps typical of Galloway, was none the less as simplistic and objectionable as President Bush himself. Galloway has adopted the habit of his American opponents, namely over simplification. When asked about what he thought would be a useful blueprint for Humanitarian intervention, he launched into a stinging and populist critique of British and American foreign policy over the course of the twentieth century. There were not many people in the audience who would defend this record, but this is evading the point. Here was Galloway, presented with the opportunity to make a useful contribution to a vibrant intellectual debate, and he chose to turn against the member of the audience who asked the question, deriding his intelligence and delivering a few cat calls against imperialism, guaranteed to raise a cheer from a largely left-wing audience. Galloway should learn that the reason so many people find him despicable is not because of his views, but because of the lack of sound and reasoned arguments to support them. His speeches contain as much nuance as Bush's address to the US Navy in Norfolk, Virginia. The STWC has organised a full schedule of events for this week including a teach-in on Tuesday evening and the main demonstration on Thursday. The movement that has been hailed as the fastest growing political group in the country is planning once again on a significant public display of its dissatisfaction with this government and its continued close relations with the Bush administration. The most scandalous aspect of this state visit is that it was intended, when first promulgated almost 18 months ago, we are told, as a way of helping Bush secure his second term in office. That this government should be helping re-elect an American president is outrageous, and we should all be out on the streets of London, on Thursday to protest against the almost incestuous involvement of this government in American domestic politics. This is an American Government that has done nothing to help the British people. It has imposed illegal tariffs on all European steel imports; it has dragged this country into an ill-conceived and increasingly protracted war, and has given mere token concessions to British public opinion. Continued British support of the Bush administration should be strongly opposed, if only on the grounds of British interest. An Unclear Message - Think about it T ihs week is dsailiibleits arenswaes week. It is iprtanmot taht we are arawe of how oehtr poelpe srugtgle uivesmty. Smoetmies, dsailiibleits are not ovbouis. For isntacne one of the msot cmomon dsailiibleits is dxysleia. If you eaxnime tihs clomun craeflluy, you wlil see taht toguh, at frist it apepras to be gbbireish, it is not. The frist and Isat Itteer of eervy wrod satys the smae as the ogrinial wrod, but tje rset are raeramegd. The atrilce is not ipmoss-bile to raed, but it deos need a bit mroe cnocnetartoin. Hree's hpoing you fnid dsailiibleits arenswaes week an elnghit-neing epxerinece. Correction Last week, we published an article entitled More Pay Deals: Unions Un-united, in which we named the LSE's Resource Director as being Alison Hunt. We would like to clarify that her name is in fact Alison Johns. We regret any confusion that this may have caused and apologise to Alison Johns for the error. PtofLS vt^rt foK tffteens mammsam the union: STALIN F»tz£ PoR •UX .iK H i TC H3 H < 3T0 Ae.liS/ir Ch 51 fli'Ks ;IH {U c* ycne.iH tu peos.-M OHblUfH Min wHf ni f.KJ OTKaWV BKVCOB M n )eMKecTf K KH«x )( I) 6e3o((>B0; I tUCH <5lOpOf •u aoc.ieiic bfepKaMTa.K *fiDtheir ft dcfence andj The team fZS T»P Tiw :M»W T« FVC* Men NAtOCft NO -T^VTH IN THE news AWD NO NEwr i/v THE TR.VTH Letters to the Editor Dear Sir, Congratulations for your excellent news article and corresponding editorial exposing the tensions and mendacities within the Union. Against those Union hacks who see fit to withhold information from the Beaver and subsequently attack its credibility (witness the latest UGM): your attempts to Soviet-ise the Beaver, along with much else in the Union, have not gone unnoticed. Against those who repeatedly furrow their brow in self-righteous indignation at Beaver Sport: turn the page if your fragile sensibilities are offended, but don't ruin the fun for the rest of us. The Beaver embodies the true breadth of talent within the Union. Any given issue will have articles from across the political spectrum, as well as features catered to all likes and tastes. Continue to stand on guard against those who wish to take the Union down a dangerous path: to wit, serfdom. Always, Alykhan Velshi. Sir, I am writing this letter to express my despair over some recent events at the LSE. When Member of Parliament Galloway spoke at the LSE on Wednesday he made anti-Semitic remarks, saying that he did not condemn suicide bombings in Israel and that Palestinians should resist, "by all means necessary," receiving applause. In another incident on Thursday, someone posted a flier of sorts. This flier is made to look like a dollar bill marked with "9-11" on all four comers and the phrases "Fraudulent Event Note" and "One Deception." Scattered about the bill there are numerous websites like, "whatreallyhappened.com." Many of these websites were claiming that 9-11 was masterminded by Israel or that Jews, including American-Jews, were somehow directly involved in the attacks by spying and covering up certain information. I feel frightened and intimidated, especially when considering the deep divisions already plaguing this campus. As a student, I have the right to leam without fear and intimidation. A copy of this letter will be forwarded to the General Secretary and Howard Davies. Yours Ethan Sommer Dear Sir, Having seen the National Theatre's production of 'Tales from the Vienna Woods', I would like to express my concern at the pompous attitude shown by the b:theatre reviewer. Although I agree with some of the points made about 'Tales from the Vienna Woods'; was there really a need to include a passage about how it reminded the reviewer of a T.S. Eliot verse? What an extraordinarily ludicrous way of articulating your feelings on the matter Does it make you feel superior or as though you are debating on some grandiose intellectual plane to write like that? Well it shouldn't because all pretentious trite like that achieves is perpetuating the notion that theatre is an outdated playing field used by academic bullshitters as an intellectual point of exercise. It is absurd to talk in such a manner about a play which in fact parodies the very kind of attitude shown by the reviewer. For a challenging, truly harrowing piece like '...Vienna Woods' to be reviewed in such a way is completely missing the point of a brutally simple play. Yours, Jamie Stevens. Dear Sir, You mention in your editorial last week with regard to the UGM, the motion on the Wall in the Middle East, that 'Criticism of Israel does not automatically become criticism of Jews'. I completely agree. Unfortunately criticism of Israel can be anti-Semitic though, and that is something that our campus must take into account. As an active member of the Jewish society over the past couple of years I can say while all these 'debates' take place, the comments and abuse I have received as a Jewish student on campus have been no less than terrifying. The Friends of Palestine society are responsible for the motion but not the abuse! the FOP however much I disagree with their political stance, I respect their motives and they are not to blame! My issue is that these debates provide a platform for others to be anti-Jewish through the issue of Israel. Call me paranoid, but the issue is apparent all over Europe. The number of Synagogues and Jewish community centres throughout Europe that have been attacked and trashed is the highest since the thirties and forties, and is unquestionably as a result of the current situation in the middle east. When I was in the south of France last Easter the local police warned us not to wear our yarmulkes (those head caps that religious Jews ware) because of the risks of anti-Semitic attacks. In the middle east the press is happy to make statements about the 'Jewish State', and the Jews being responsible for aU kinds of things. That whole business with the Malaysian bloke and his comments were pretty bloody scary, as a Jew, as a westerner and as an open-minded human being. It does get tiresome when Jews play the anti-Semitic card, but although the motions are by no means anti-Semitic, the consequences of the motions whether they are past or not, leave the campus open to disharmony and full of tension. Yours Faithfully Robert Lanzkron The Beaver Tuesday 18th November 2003 Page 8 blink Features and Politics Edited by Ben Chapman (b.chapman@lse.ac.uk) Balkan Bliss The Grimshaw Club travels to Croatia pages 10 and 11 - V- 4 4 rJr Musings Corporal Punishment; Badgers; Unconvincing Unionists Matthew Sinclair blink Columnist_ Labour MPs are banning smacking; any physical correction is to be outlawed. Not particularly funny. Not particularly enforceable. Not really a matter for parliament. One argument for the ban gave me a very definite picture of the glory that must be David Hichliffe. "The abolition of a husband's I'ight to beat his wife surely did something about the status of women in our society" -says Mr HinchlifEe. Failing to spot the difference between a woman and a child is a mistake that, had it been known to stand up sufficiently to be printed in the Guardian, could have done huge favours for glam rock. While disciplining a woman is a shady business at the best of times, disciplining a child is generally accepted as necessary from time to time. The problem is one of method. You know the problem with a ban on smacking? It's far too all-inclusive... it's a "blanket ban". Union complaints are getting a little less convincing. Horror stories of poor public workers being forced to live on the streets, feeding oiHy on the homeless and possessing only the clothes that evil capitalist-imperialism forces them to wear as a badge of servitude are being replaced with tales that would make Dickens roll in his grave. The current complaint is that a worker, who had spent 20% of his career off sick, was off work for some time complaining of a sprained ankle. He was caught playing squash and promptly fired. Oh the humanity. Even 'Red' Ken isn't impressed - he told the Evening Standard that he was with the bosses. Clearly he has joined the aristocracy of bureaucracy that complements its laboiu- cousin. Bob Crow says it was just a gentle game of squash to get his ankle better. I've played squash. Several times. I would think that if you can play the game you are more than capable of driving an underground train. The revolution might have to wait a few years. At the moment its labour vanguard don't quite have the pain threshold. Great news. The reactive badger cull is over. Farmers found that when culling was introduced in response to Bovine tB outbreaks rates of the disease actually grew. The minister responsible cancelled reactive culling. On that high I must regrettably announce that the Badger group is unlikely to last the month. As a consequence we will have to return the fees of those who have paid and consign this... interesting... episode to history. We died well. The State of the Union Recent events have highlighted some problems within the Students' Union. Isn't it time for hacks to stop taking things so seriously? Gareth Carter The LSE Students' Union is in turmoil. Subjected to claims of being fascist and racist, its members are at each other's throats and it is in danger of splitting with its media representative The Beaver. Relations between the SU Exec and The Beaver have never been vrorse, and internal discontent within the Exec threatens the viability of its leadership. At the same time. Athletic Union dissatisfaction with the way it is perceived by the wider audience of the SU has erupted in a storm of criticism culminating in confrontational motions tabled at the UGM and in a bellicose petition organized by antagonistic anti-censorship campaigners. Ready to confront this stands the aforementioned SU, steeling itself against for a moral crusade against the decadence and debauchery of the AU -something wholly incompatible with the smooth and stable running of the Student's Union. It would only take the Sabbatical team to move to DefCon 1 for the whole thing to blow sky high. What on earth have we got here? Regardless of the over-exaggerated description, there is something fundamentally wrong with this situation -a situation where barely one thousand students have contrived to create such an atmosphere of mutual distrust and antipathy, students who, for the better part of it, are rational and sensible not-quite-adults. Is this really the case? Have we been led to imagine such schisms through inaccurate reporting on behalf of The Beaver? Have meaningless power struggles between Exec members escalated needlessly and spilled out into the wider SU via hearsay, conjecture and Tuns gossip? Or is the truth that we as students have been taking ourselves, our institutions and our role in them, far too seriously and to the ultimate detriment of our Student's Union? University is a complicated time; a rite of passage between the overtly supervised nature of primary and secondary education and the land of clocking-in, nine-to- five, overtime and sick days. It's where we first begin to chisel ourselves into the trader/ journalist/ investment wanker we want to be/will end up being, and start to shed ourselves of our youthful exuberance, our childish naivety and adolescent outlook on life, politics and everything. Over the course of three years here we're expected to grow into sensible adults, ready for the mad, bad and dangerous to know world, and we each do it in our own way, and at our own speed. And here is where the problems start. The clashes witnessed in recent weeks between the SU and The Beaver, between The Beaver and the Sabbs and between the AU and everyone have their foundations in the outlook each group has on the way LSE has shaped them, or indeed, how they've wanted to be shaped. On the one hand we see those who have begun in earnest to prepare themselves for the cut-throat nature of power politics, for forming coalitions in smoke filled rooms and for exerting their own agendas and pursuing them in a way that would make Niccolo Machiavelli blush. You have those whose dedication to student journalism would leave Kate Adie proud, and give Alistair Campbell many a sleepless night (are we looking into a Hutton-esque inquiry over a certain Sabb withholding certain intelligence from the public? Don't bet against it). At the same time, you have those who have simply sacrificed enduring the painful transition from fun-loving carefree student to dry and dour Deloitte worker for the sake of eking out three more years of fun in an environment where responsibility is somewhat out of their hands, if only for a little while longer. The point I am trying to get at is that there is a huge dichotomy over the role the Student Union plays in the lives of each individual student here at the LSE. In short, some people take it all too seriously. Take it to heart. Take it too far. Perhaps, take legal action? Whilst I can understand the motivation for certain peoj le to act in the ways they do concernin;^ their role in the Student's Union, it perplexes me that some do not have a realistic understanding of the role of the LSE Student's Union in the wider world. We are just students, and while I do not say this to denigrate any initiatives that the LSESU has been involved in, I say it to hopefully make some people sit back and get a greater understanding of the futility of such antagonistic divisive-ness within it. We ARE just students, and while our dedication to institutionalism is admirable, we should not for one moment allow it simply to mirror the political and social divisiveness that the outside world waits with baited breath to smother us with the moment we graduate. We are at the LSE to experience university and to leam, not just in the field of academics, but also how to make a worthwhile contribution to the world we're stepping into. We should be thankful of the chances we have to practice that here, and remember that, as a fictional character once said: 'what we do in life, echoes in eternity...' but not stuff we do in college. Short of Jo Kibble taking up arms against The Beaver or lb Rasheed firebombing the Ed and Welfare office, what is needed is a greater realisation that student politics is not the be all and end all of life, and that perhaps it would be better for the Union as a whole if people didn't act as though it was. Oh, and give the AU a break, we're Good People. Gareth Carter is Beaver Sports editor and likes drowning his many sorrows in cheap alcohol. He's also the first team Footy captain, and is a very considerate lover. The two are completely unrelated. If you're interested in writing for blink or have an article that you would like to get published, simply email b.chapman@lse.ac.uk All opinions expressed in blink, including those of its editor, are the writers' own and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Beaver or LSESU Page 9 OneEyeOpen The Beaver Tuesday 18th November 2003 blink Features The LSE's weekly Union General Meeting is a unique experience in student politics, but risks being undermined by time-consuming motions that have no relevance to student life. Eliot Pollak Ariel?" George, my man, ma nishma as we say over here?" "You what pal? Ariel, I got bad news for you." "What is it George? The US isn't withdrawing its millions of dollars in backing is it?" "No no. It's worse than that pal." "Sweet mother. Dana International's not back is she?" "Listen Ariel, like I said pal. This is seriously bad news." "Wait a sec, let me sit down. I'm old enough to be your father you know. Well, I'm all ears. What is it?" "The results have just come in from the London School of Economics Union General Meeting. And the overriding verdict is that the wall must fall. I'm soriy Ariel, there's nothing I can do." "Wait a sec, what is this LSE Dubya?" "I don't know. Some college in Wales or something. I used to do business with the director." "Wait a minute...isn't that the place that produced the nutcase who was the mastermind behind the death of Daniel Pearl?" "Yes, but they keep that quiet." "And that other guy, what's his name? 'Who would live in a house like this,' Masterchef. You know who I mean George." "Oh yeah, I love that English daytime stuff. Lloyd Grossman." "That's the boy." "Yes. He also studied there, but they keep that even quieter." "Well in that case, if it's got Lloyd Grossman's backing, there's nothing I can do. Now I know who I'm dealing with, I have no option. The waU must be stopped. Forget all the billions we've put into if thus far, I'll get on to my Chief of Security straight away. I'll tell him the LSE Students' Union has spoken. Thanks George for letting me know. I guess we'll just have to get back to the drawing board in our plans to stop terrorism in Israel." "I guess so. Talk to you soon pal." "Yeah, bye. Oh, and good luck in Iran.. .or is it Syria? Christ we're not being bugged are we?" The line goes dead. A conversation that probably did not take place last Thursday afternoon. But what certainly did take place last Thursday afternoon was a UGM that left a 'very sour taste in the mouth' (as reported by OneEyeOpen in last week's Beaver.) It is not this article's aim to regurgitate the rights and the wrongs of the fence; the arguments have been heard many times on both sides. Rather, I wish to question the value of the UGM if its central purpose is to pass through motions that make absolutely no difference to any of our lives. The way the victorious side celebrated at the end of the aforementioned debate was as if not only had the wall actually come down, but that all the Israelis had suddenly decided to go for a permanent swim in the Euphrates. But let's get real here kids. Nothing is going to happen as a result.That's right. Don't cry now. NOTHING. Indeed, when the question was raised in the meeting as to the value of the debate, it was pointed out that letters would be sent to leading diplomats and that with weight of numbers, things were bound to change. Bollocks! If the war in Iraq taught us anything it was that the people don't matter Two million people blocked the traffic for the day in London, and such rational, balanced people as John Pilger and George 'brown envelope' Galloway (soon to be seen at a dole queue near you,) spouted forth. Yet what did Tony Blair do? (It could be pointed out that he merely followed the majority of the fifty-eight million people in Britain who didn't show up to this march. But that would of course be incorrect and miss 'the point' entirely.) Politicians, be they Blair, Bush or Ariel Sharon, are fairly elected, given a mandate and as such are entitled to behave as they wish until a time when the people who put them in power decide to remove them from power. Does anyone seriously believe that a letter to Frank Dobson MP is any more than a waste of paper? I thought he was dead. It must be such a comfort to those who voted against the motion that in the course of the half hour or so spent debating its merits and otherwise, the waU just kept on being built. As hands went up, and people celebrated, cement was being laid and bricks were being placed, one on top of the other. Let me just make one thing clear. This is not a rant in favour of the wall. I am neither wildly for nor against its erection. nor indeed any erection anywhere or any time that offends people. Any issue could have sparked this rant off. By all means people should and must feel free to oppose the wall, but the UGM should not be an opportunity for self-important, narcissistic people with extreme delusions of their own grandeur to propose motions on issues such as these. As was the case last week, out of the eleven business motions, only one could be discussed; the one with the least chance of making an impact upon our student lives. This whole sorry episode merely seived to prevent other more relevant motions from being debated. For example, the Athletics Union has wrongly had its name dragged through the mud over the John Leslie affair. The Mutton inquiry is a serious matter (can anyone else hear the sound of straws being clutched?) Even local issues (e.g. the Diane Abbott case) are more worthy of being debated, as Ms Abbot may at least read the letter sent by the general secretary of our union, even if it makes little difference to her decision on whether to end her career in hypocrisy/politics. We should be debating student issues and resolving to change the things that we can change. The status of our UGM is at stake here. So my proposal is that from now on, the UGM should be used to pass motions which concern student and local issues, and resolve to do things which will help all students enjoy a better campus life. It must not be used as a platform for Galloway wannabes to inflate their own egos by debating issues which we can't influence. Anyone want to second it? Eliot Pollak is a first year undJergraduate who has just attended his last UGM. President George W Bush visits London this week, and don't we all know it. Massive security operation, massive protests and massive press coverage all combining to ensure this will be a ihassively controversial state visit from start to finish. The reasons why Mr Bush requires 250 Secret Service agents and a total entourage of 500 is quite obvious even to the most ardent anti-Bushers, and any attempt to argue the point is naive. And I'm sure the last thing Stop the War would want is for the president to be assassinated by a mad anarchist posing as a peaceful anti-war protester. Not too sure that would do the cause much good. The motivations for Bush's visit remain hotly debated. The Queen-may be having second thoughts about accepting him in the first place, in light of his intention to give her and the rest of the haughty British establishment a hot Texan feast at the return banquet hosted by the American Ambassador. We are told by the Standard that Her Majesty's palate is not accustomed to spicy food -assumptions are the dinner at the Palace will be a far more conservative and dignified affair. Somewhat altogether more British, shall we say. Talking of things British, Blair has been planning to introduce Bush to his local in Sedgefield, for a traditional English pub lunch. On the menu, "loin of pork with Brimley apple sauce and roast sirloin of beef with fresh horseradish cream". Doesn't sound too traditional to me. Whatever happened to "steak and ale pie with chips and peas, a pint a lager and packet of pork scratchings"? All for a fiver, naturally. Then again of course, traditionality seems to be on the way out, as shown by England's wonderful inability to crash out of the Rugby World Cup at the semi-final stage last weekend. Cynics have argued that the only reason Bush is coming this week is so that Blair can do the president a bit of a domestic political favour ahead of next year's presidential elections. Personally, 1 think it's just so Dubya can fulfil a lifetime ambition of wandering round the streets of London aimlessly with a snap-map, annoyingly asking hurried Londoners as to the location of "Bucking-Ham Palace". Supervised by a dozen snipers on nearby roofs, of course. As for me, I'm not sure we wouldn't have been having this visit had it been anyone other than Bush occupying the White House at present. It's been a while since the last State Visit by an American president and, bearing in mind the reliance of Britain on the US both political (but more importantly) economically, it should come as really no surprise when appearances have to be kept up. At the same time, I can't understand why Stop the War opposes his visit. It means a huge level of press coverage for a week, the chance to demonstrate in front of the president himself and, of course, the opportunity (in the spirit of democracy that the movement claims to cherish so dearly) to hear what the man has to say in an atmosphere of free speech and expression, along with a right of reply. And when it's all over, perhaps even a pub lunch to wind down. Peanuts, Mr Bush? The Beaver Tuesday 18th November 2003 PageJ^ blink Features The LSE Grimshaw Club reminisces about its experiences at this year's fourth International GRIMSHAW in ZAGREB Natalie Black and Irina Janakievska One for the grandchildren: Natalie meets the Croatian president, Stjepan Mesic. M Revelling in the natural beauty of the Croatian wilderness: Plitvice National Park, which is also a World Heritage Site. From the 4th to the 11th of October 2003, we represented the Grimshaw International Relations Club, as Macedonia and England respectively at the 4th International Summer Academy, which was held this year in Zagreb and hosted by the European Circle Croatia. Its aim was to present Croatia in a broader context within the region of South-Eastem Europe, focussing on promoting young Europeans' understanding of the need for enhanced cooperation between South-Eastem European states. Particular emphasis was placed on the implementation of the EU's two main policy initiatives for the region: the Stabilisation and Association Agreement (SAA) and the Stability Pact for South-Eastem Europe. Participants came from across the globe, from the former states of Yugoslavia, Westem and Central Europe and as far a field as Mexico. Our first official day was intended to give us an impression of local Croatia via a field trip around the country. First stop Pakrac. Perhaps the most telling part of the visit was a meeting with the Mayor of Pakrac. Poignantly standing in front of a portrait of the former President, Pranjo Tudjman, we were told what Pakrac had been doing in terms of reconstruction and what had been done with the funds being provided by the intemational community. Pakrac had built new schools, a music academy, and new housing estates, all intended to provide incentives for Croats to retum to or settle in Pakrac. When asked however, the Mayor refused to answer as to whether he would allow his children to marry Serbs. What was obvious from the beginning of our tour was the difference between the reconciliation agenda being imposed by the government top-down and the reality being faced by local politicians. Inevitably this lack of co-ordination has caused a step backwards. Vukovar, a town close to the Serbian border has the appearance of a sleepy town, where cafes are intermingled with bombsites. During the war, Vukovar was under siege for three months. It is estimated that 200 people died and 600 are still missing, nut presumed dead. We were subsequently taken to the cemetery of the victims of the Vukovar siege. An expanse of white crosses marked the 600 missing persons, while the inscriptions of the known dead read "Croat hero". There were no Serbs buried there. Mr T\idjman was accused (by Vukovar's defenders) of deliberately sacrificing Vukovar, which has been dubbed the Croatian Stalingrad because of the devastation it endured, so as to reinforce his portrayal of Croatia as the victim of Serb aggression. When the Serb forces took control of Vukovar on 19 November 1991, several hundred people took refuge in the town's hospital in the hope that they would be evacuated in the presence of neutral observers. We were taken to visit the mass grave at Ovcara, four kilometres outside Vukovar, where the Serbs execut- ed and buried the bodies of 260 wounded patients, soldiers, hospital staff, and Croatian political activists. The 'Vukovar three' accused of the massacre were later extradited to the Hague along with Croats accused of similar crimes perpetrated against Serbs. After what had been an emotionally draining day the scene was set, and it was back to the conference centre in the Croatian Cultural Heritage Foundation for the week to try and understand the origins of the problems that face South-East Europe and offer some solutions! Over the course of the week, numerous lectures, numerous discussions, and workshops took place. Guest speakers were drawn from a variety of backgrounds including politics, diplomacy, public administration, acade-mia, business and civil society. They came from across South-Eastem Europe, the EU, and other intemational organisations engaged in the region. It is not possible (nor is it allowed by the Beaver editors) to drone on about every lecture, but, more often than not there was a lot of heated (but constmctive) debate. We leamt early however, that what was more interesting was what was not said. One of the most meaningful presentations was by Dr. Nada §vob-Dokic, Assistant Minister in the Ministry for Science and Technology. The debate however, went straight to politics. A Serbian post-graduate who had previously proposed a research programme with Croat students via the Croatian govemment, wanted to know why his idea had been turned down. It brought to the surface the fact that politics and the collective memory permeate even scientific co-operation and highlighted the differing perspectives of the older and younger generations. That being said, the extent of reconciliation since 1991 should not be underestimated, yet there remains a long road in front of Croatia. In the following lecture Dr. Ivo Banac, currently the Croatian Minister for Tourism and Environment, who gave an excellent discourse on the history of South-Eastem Europe, but significantly evaded the more contentious aspects of Croatian history. Mr. Jacques Wunenburger, Head of the Delegation of the European Commission to Croatia was a speaker who managed to get England's blood boiling. He repeatedly avoided her question concerning measures to ensure that new states entering Europe had realistic expectations of what membership could provide. It was also at this point that our delegation experienced an epiphany inspired by Dr. Ivan Vejvoda, Adviser for European Integration and Foreign Policy for the Govemment of the Republic of Serbia. There is a lot of irony concerning the way Europe is being sold. In Westem Europe, the debate on "Europa" is predominantly seen as the enshrinement of sovereignty versus the fear that the state will be sidelined and become redundant. In the former states of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, "Europa" is more than a geographical and economic con- The Beaver Tuesday 18th November 2003 Page 11 blink Features 8: Politics Summer Academy in Croatia's capital city. text, but an exit from the proverbial "self imposed immaturity," towards the Kantian vision of peace and the stability that has been pursued for so long. In a sense, the EU is seen as a replacement for Yugoslav federalism, where borders become insignificant, and small entities do not have to vie for their piece of the power cake in a globalized world. Membership of Yugoslavia translates into membership of the European Union, and the possibility that South-Eastern Europe can become simply "Europe". Similarly, a line of thinking was raised during the discussions maintaining that if the states of the former Yugoslavia had been offered membership in the EU once the disintegration of Yugoslavia began, the Balkan blood bath might have been avoided. The European Circle of Croatia had organized some fantastic workshops. 'The Remaining Issues of Privatization' is not something one usually gets out of bed for but in this case England made an exception. It highlighted the frustration of countries like Croatia that have been labelled 'transitional economies'. A theme that emerged again and again was "When does the transition end?." England would have been able to report in detail on her second workshop if she hadn't been loyally representing Cool Britannia in front of Croatian news crews. Meanwhile, it was Macedonia's turn to reach blood boiling point during a workshop on "EU and US Foreign Policy Towards Third World Countries" in which the responsibility of the international community for the internationalization, and subsequent internalization of the Yugoslav conflict was brushed aside. Macedonia's second workshop was "Reform of Judiciary and Increase of Transparency as imperative for Progress" started out with the question - "If you had absolute power for 5 minutes, what would you do to reform the judiciary?" In true Balkan style, the consensus was that ideally several judges would be fired. But in reality the issue remains, how does the government reform an independent judiciary and make it accountable in the case of countries in transition? If that was not enough work, our skills were also demanded elsewhere. England spent far too many hours locked in a cupboard with a German trying to bang out a Joint Declaration. After lots and lots of amendments (just another Thursday in the UGM) we finally had the finished paper. This was presented to the President of Croatia, Stjepan Mesic, on the final evening of the conference, when participants of the Academy attended a reception at the Presidential Palace. England is pleased to report that she eventually managed to get the paper out of its WHSmith plastic wallet despite sweaty and nervous hands. During the week Macedonia had laboured away locked in a small dingy room debating legal and procedural matters with representatives of all the student organisations of the Politea network. The Politea network is an initiative by the original participants of the International Summer Academies, most notably the Conference Oliviant (Ftance) and the Studentenforum, Tonissteiner Kreis (Germany), to formalize a working student partnership between student societies from around the globe dedicated to proliferating dialogue and debate on international affairs. The Grimshaw Club is extremely pleased to report that we are now part of this global network and as a result will provide working papers, newsletters and co-ordinate international trips with our partner student organisations. We would like to thank the International Relations Department for giving us the opportunity to take part in the International Summer Academy in Zagreb. We hope that the Academy, scheduled to take place in Mexico next simimer, will be as successful. It was a lot of hard work, but throughout it all, we were as conscientious in our study of Croatian politics as we were of its local traditions. International agreements aside, unanimous consensus was reached that it is possible to live off two hours of sleep per night for a week if the following is consumed on a daily basis: V2 litre of sljivovica (any alcohol above 70% will do..) Generous amounts of lemon V2 jar of honey Water Sugar "Na zdravje" and drink! (Mixture should not be poured in plastic cups...) The Grimshaw Club is the student society of the IR Department. Natalie Black is the club's Social Events Officer. Irina Janakievska is Speakers' Officer. Natalie (left) and Irina (right), with the French Ambassador to Croatia. March Comrade! March for the right to march a Glyn Gaskarth We all know the problem. It's the Americans, Jews, big businesses etc. They are trying to take over the world by stealth. They conduct this campaign by holding public meetings, writing articles for national newspapers and speaking on TV. But now we have discovered their plan and we must act. Act now to stop them spreading human rights and democracy throughout the Middle East. As part of their evil campaign they spend huge quantities of US taxpayers money setting up an infrastructure in Iraq. Part of this money is spent on US companies that engage in this construction. When will this madness end? Next they will be telling the Iranians to stop stoning women for adultery and prostitution. Syria may be pressured to stop training people to strap on bombs and hurl themselves into heavily populated areas. As for North Korea, Kim IL Jung may be removed from power and the glorious Stalinist leader will not be able to continue starving millions more of his own people. We cannot allow this to occur. Evidence of the unjust and repressive nature of the occupation is easy to find. Thousands of Shia dissidents have demonstrated against the occupation. In answer, the Americans did not even fire into the crowd. How can we respect such people? Comrade Stalin would never have made this mistake. It is all about oil. As soon as the Americans got into Baghdad the first building they secured was the Ministry for Oil. How dare they try to rebuild Iraq's major export earner. This campaign is a racist form of Imperialism. America's multi coloured national security team of Condoleeza Rice (black), Paul Wolfowitz (Jewish) and George Bush (white) plan to use military force to enslave the citizens of dictatorships. Those who read the Mirror will be well aware of how happy the people were under Saddam and how sad they are that he is gone. This new doctrine of preemption is dangerous. It is far better to wait until you are attacked before taking action. As we all know this strategy was highly successful in stopping the threat of Those who read the Mirror will be well aware of how happy the people were under Saddam, and how sad they are that he is gone' Nazi Germany in the 1930's and 1940's with minimal loss of life. It would have been far worse had we acted in 1933 before he built up his armaments. The US should leam from the French approach. International public opinion must be respected and a UN mandate given before action is taken. The French demonstrated their faith in these ideals by blowing up a Greenpeace boat when faced with condemnation of their nuclear testing program and intervening in Rwanda to protect the side that committed the genocide against their victims. No one could say they are not true to their ideals. Brothers and sisters we must march and march now for if we do not Dictatorships may become a thing of the past. Then what would we have to protest about? That was the thing about the Afghan war. The coalition forces won so quickly I hardly had time to make a banner. But I did get to march with all the sexy Arab ladies. What a weekend! Here is to the next anti war rally. Solidarity, brothers...and sisters of course. Glyn Gaskarth is a third year undergraduate in the International Department. He is also Chair of the LSE Conservatives. '¦•AA'-' r >.f.y rf-'-'r '..r.f.rr-T ^ r,; .""f • r«T The Beaver Tuesday 18th November 2003 Page 12 blink Features r/ie Bushmen Aren't Forever The Kalahari Bushmen are being brutally evicted from their homeland. A group of LSE students have taken up the cause. Tracy Alloway On a grey Wednesday afternoon, I find myself standing on the comer of Old Bond Street and Piccadilly, planted firmly in front of the London flagship store of De Beers, international diamond giant. Like most days, the area is deluged with a steady flow of the well-off; businessmen in Armani suits, fashion intelligentsia, and determined shoppers huny along the pavement, pausing occasionally to admire the beauty (and price-tags) of the diamonds on display in the shop windows. Their dreams of gold and glitter however, are soon interrupted, "Do you know about De Beers and the Bushmen?" I ask, offering an informative pamphlet. Most simply glance at our small group of protesters then scurry along without afterthought. Nevertheless, a few will stop and ask questions, take a pamphlet, and read the signs which ominously proclaim "The Bushmen Aren't Forever." The De Beers' store manager makes an appearance, politely attempting to persuade us to desist in our protestation, arguing that De Beers is one of the foremost opponents of conflict diamonds. This provokes an interesting question: when is a conflict diamond not classified as a conflict diamond? The answer is when the diamond is procured through the forcible eviction of the Bushmen from their tribal lands, with the Botswana government's assistance. Today a small group of LSE students, along with Survival International, a non-profit organisation aimed at protecting indiginous people's rights, are working together to promote public awareness of this largely unrecognized issue. The Bushmen are Africa's oldest inhabitants, having lived in the subcontinent for at least 20,000 years. They have no collective name for themselves (Bushmen, San, or Basarawa have been imposed on them by others). In the harsh Kalahari Desert, an area roughly the size of Denmark, they have eked out an existence based on hunting and gathering, relying on their intricate knowledge of the Desert eco-system for survival. Until around 1,500 years ago, their lifestyle remained largely unchallenged. However, with the invasion of cattle-herding Bantu tribes in 500 a.d and White colonists in the nineteenth century, both the Bushmen's population and quality of life have been in steady decline. In 1961, the Central Kalahari Game Preserve, was created to provide a place where the Bushmen could continue their traditional lifestyle. Yet, since Botswana's independence of 1966, the government has demonstrated increasing oppression against the Bushmen. Today the Preserve's founding puipose has been forgotten, the area is used for safari-tourism, and, to the Bushmen's dismay, diamond-mining. Botswana has become an economic showcase among African nations, enjoying the highest per capita income on the continent. Most of its economic success however, is based on diamond mining and exporting. The discovery of diamonds in the Kalahari Game Preserve in the early 1990's, was closely followed in 1997 with the start of the Bushmen's forced eviction. Through continuous campaigns of harassment, including threats of violence and the destruction of water supplies, the government of Botswana, has relocated the Bushmen (specifically the Gana and Gwi tribes) to settlements, for the purpose of "redevelopment". These settlements are in locations of sparse wildlife and flora, thereby denying the Bushmen their traditional lifestyles and removing them from their ancestral heritage. In such settlements, the Bushman are forced to find work as farm hands or languish from boredom and depression. As one Bushman has observed, "We didn't want to come here. Government officials told us to go. They said we would get no water if we stayed. The life here is very difficult. [In the reserve] we could gather wild fruits. There is nothing like that here." Under pressure from Survival International, the Botswana government is incurring increasing suspicion regarding its forced eviction of the Bushmen people. There is little doubt that an element of racism exists within the government. At a recent lecture at BOAS, the Botswana Foreign Minister Merafhe admitted that his government had relocated the Bushmen to "where we want them to be", claiming it was in order to allow them to "....enjoy the better things in life, like driving Cadillacs... Why must they continue to commune with the flora and fauna?" In addition President Festus Mogae once described them as "Stone Age creatures" who must be forced to modernize. The most hotly-contested issue however, is whether De Beers is involved in the forced expulsion. There seems to be some convincing evidence linking the diamond-mogul to the scandal. Prior to the Bushmen's eviction from the Game Preserve, about 15% of the Preserve area was designated for diamond exploration. Following the Bushmen's expulsion in 1997 however, land marked for diamond mining has come to encompass around 90% of the Preserve's area. Most tellingly perhaps, is the fact that the Botswana government holds a 50/50 share in De Beers. President Mogae has stated "The partnership between De Beers and Botswana has been likened to a marriage. I sometimes wonder whether a better analogy might be that of Siamese twins." For the "Siamese twins", the constraint of world opinion is escalating. The government of Botswana has been forced to hire a Public Relations company to counter Survival International's assertions, has recently banned all Survival International publications from Botswanan schools, and described the group as a "terrorist organisation" (I assure you it's not). Survival International, with new support from its LSE branch, continues its campaign to allow the Bushmen to return to their ancestral home and to have recognition of their land rights in accordance with international law. Standing outside the De Beers store, I note a new tightness in the manager's restrained smile. The appearance of new, younger, more determined protesters is yet another sign that the pressure is moimting. Survival International at LSE will be campaigning on campus within the next few weeks. For more information on what you can do to help the Bushmen see www.survival-intemational.org, or contact Judy Walcott at j.a.walcott@lse.ac.uk Tracy Alloway is a second year International Relations student. 'At a recent lecture at SOAS, the Botswana Foreign Minister Merafhe admitted that his government had relocated the Bushmen to "where we want them to be", claiming it was in order to allow them to "enjoy the better things in life, like driving Cadillacs".' ii'SWM One for the granacnildren: Natalie meets the Croatian president, Stjepan Mesic. The Beaver Tuesday 18th November 2003 Page 13 B:art Edited by Neil Garrett: N.Garrett@lse.ac.uk B:Music - P13-15 B:Film - P16 17 B:Literature - P18 B:About P19-20 B:Theatre P21 B:Fineart - P22 m I Do not ever claim that the Beaver isn't fantastically good to you. Just back from ^ 11 rv I H* I a two week US tour supporting Prefuse 73, Kieran Hebbden gives an exclusive interview with B:IVIusic. Here's what the great man had to say for himself... This is a man with enormous hair; great gravity defying locks which don't even require the implementation of a decent strong hold mousse. Terms such as "wiry 'fro" and "fluffy tresses" overlook the power and mystical aura of the majestic beast. Now there's no proven correlation between innovative hair and good musicians - the unfortunate existence of the singer out of Toploader (the one who just loves to dance in the milky rays of Mr Moon) - dispels such notions. However, a momentary glance at some of the greats contemporary music has to offer us would seem to propose a tentative link at least: Hendrix - mighty 'fro, Tim Buckley - partial 'fro (of sorts). Bob Dylan - credible 'fro (even to this day, which, assuming the absence of hair growth medication, toupees and the rest, deserves respect), to name but a few. Whether in this (or any) instance the hair makes the music good or the music makes the hair good we can never tell. What is clear is that the music Kieran Hebden in the guise of Four Tet has created is some of the freshest, most original sounding magic that has been put together in the last five years. And he likes a hearty mound of hair. It was at Manchester University (once upon a time etc.) where Kieran began making music from his bedroom. One of my first questions is why he choose to study maths there rather than a music related degree. "I didn't want to be told how to make music reaily. I did maths in the end because 1 felt that was something I wouldn't be able to do unless I was taught it" is his response. Judging by his success since graduating, his faith in his ability wasn't misplaced. His setup has changed very little from those early days at university "messing a bit with samples". He still works from home on a computer, "...there's no mixing desk or anything like that. I play some of the guitar parts directly into the computer but the rest is just samples". Samples which range from dusty jazz records to albums of "happy clappy children songs" (where the voice on the single "No more Mosquitoes" originates from). Without wanting to use the term unclassifiable, the music of Four Tet is genuinely tricky to pigeonhole. Folk-tronica, psycadelica and free jazz are but a few adjectives you could attach to It. I ask how he came up with the unique sound that Is now his trademark. "That's really why I'm here talking to you today" is his answer, an apt reply. Four Tet's three albums are each original, intelligent and interesting pieces of work but don't cross into realms so inaccessible that It could ever be labelled avent garde. Kieran has mastered the art of making music that sounds simple but is in fact incredibly complex. To use a cliche, it works on different levels. Music geeks are mesmerised by the adept beat programming: syncopated percussive layers are cut up, rearranged and pasted back together with a warped twist. Above this backdrop of heavy, deep beats glide gentle quirky melodies; often playful, melancholic in parts but always effective. Perhaps the music's greatest pull though is the organic sounds it incorporates. Despite being entirely produced on computer, the sounds are natural. The drums for example, despite their intricacy and practical impossibility you'd swear blind they were recorded live. Similarly, the melodic parts used jangle and sparkle so cleanly you believe you're in a room being serenaded by the very instruments themselves. Kieran 'not only has an ear for a tune but he has the production skills to realize it as well. At the recent Domino records 10th Anniversary bash at The End, the set Kieran played lived up to the hype; upbeat extended versions of his tunes were drawn out, the beats messed with even more then on record, and extra harmonies subtly integrated to create an ensemble of hectic wizardry. But what is he actually doing up there I ponder. Is he merely pressing a play button and bopping around? It's a process of live improvisation he responds, using two laptops. "One laptop does the rhythm, drums and bass lines and the other computer does a lot of the melodies, guitar parts, the harp and stuff". Kieran goes on to explain that he views playing live as an opportunity to experiment with his pieces and let people hear something different to what's down on record. Is there any chance that some of the extended live versions will be released I ask, particularly hopeful that the house version of No More Mosquitoes he played to a great reaction might be pressed? "It would be nice to release a live version of the live stuff I do, it's just a matter of finding the time really." * Indeed, this is a very busy chap. It's hard to find time for a nifty cup of char | in-between his assortment of projects. Innovative long established indie band Fridge in which Kieran has played guitar in since the age of 15 has | been put on hold for the moment due to the three members commitments; drummer Sam has taken time out to concentrate on an International Relations degree whilst bassist Alan is working on a solo album, due for release on Domino records in March next year. Kieran meanwhile has no end to his schedule. First there's the touring. Prior to the recent tour he's completed supporting Prefuse 73 in the US, he supported Radiohead on the European leg of their tour, a group he describes as "...pleasant well reared Oxford boys". Then there's his role as a producer. I ask whether rumours of him producing the new Beth Orton album are true. "There's nothing set in stone" is the reply, 'WeVe done a few demos but I don't know if I'm going to be producing the final thing though". Still, this is a big name to be producing demos for. Then there's the record label he has set up. Text records. Having released "The Battle Times EP" by Koushick, a fantastic jazzy beat fest, on limited vinyl last year, there's another two releases planned for 2004, one of which is a 30 piece live improvisation project in which the conductor finds new ways to conduct the band each time. Then there's his solo material which he plans to work on during the winter. Finally there's his prolific output of remixes for artists as diverse as The Super Furry Animals and Ninja Tune's Bonobo, That's a man who would make good use of a diary for Christmas. Not that he's resentful in the slightest: "/ have such a great life at the moment I have to say" he happily concedes. The git. Yet you can't be envious (well, just a j tiny bit) of someone so unassuming. The three times I have seen Kieran | at gigs he's always been wandering around the audience happily chatting i to people beforehand; it's how I managed to swing this interview in fact, i At a Fridge gig a couple of years ago in Camden he was on-stage selling I the bands t-shirts after they'd played. Now Bob Dylan wouldn't do that i despite his durable 'fro. | NEIL GARRETT | Check out Kieran's remix of the new Radiohead single, his latest EP "-As Serious as Your Life", his latest album "Rounds", or anything he's ever touched in fact. j 1=2 "a "a c 0 CD o (/) The Beaver Tuesday 18th November 2003 Page 14 'q JON DE KEYSER jaunts along to ULU to see rock upstarts the 20-20's. A very daft name but fcw O perhaps they were good... J Thank the Gig-God for the White Stripes. As well as introducing a whole generation of nu-nnetal kids to classic, stripped down guitar music, they have opened the door for numerous other talented bands in the same bluesy mould to burst onto the music scene. The 22-20s are one such band. Fresh from the release of their live EP "05/03" (there are lots of cardboard posters telling us about it) the band set out to impress us on the University of London Union stage with their live prowess. They obviously have a cardboard fetish. A nice lady hands me some stickers, housed in a cardboard sleeve. The CD sleeve is also made out of cardboard. To stick with the theme, I order a JD and coke from the bar (it tastes like cardboard). Cardboard is boring, often used to package dog food, and usually thrown away. Mercifully, the 22 20s are quite unlike it. Musically exciting and with a stage presence that scoffs at bands such as BRMC and I Am Kloot, they rocked the ULU. Songs like "Such A Fool" make the support acts look like pre-pubescent girls ("Dogs Die In Hot Cars" sound like a poor man's Hot Hot Heat, never listen to them) with its raw energy, big guitars and thunderous drums making it an instant crowd-pleaser. "Well I hate the world, everything I see", sings Martin Trimble during "Devil In Me", summing up the bands obviously bleak outlook on life. Hopefully they'll stay unhappy, otherwise, God forbid, they might venture out of blues territory and start writing songs for S Club 8. Some of the tunes they choose to play tonight are the result of reiationships-gone-wrong and the jealousy that follows. During "I'm The One", Trimble tells us about his fears regarding the commitment of his girlfriend, and "Messed Up" Is a beautifully timed plea for forgiveness - "I didn't mean... to make you blue". Let's hope that girls continue to upset Trimble, because this is when his songs are at their most powerful and affecting. If the 22-20s can build on their reputation and record an album worthy of their live performances, an exciting future lies ahead... JON DE KEYSER DASHBOARD CONFESSIONAL AMELIA HUTCHSION checks out Florida's favourite emo-punk heartthrob at his recent gig at Shepherd's Bush.. Florida's finest purveyors of acoustic emo-pop rounded off a short tour in support of their latest album, 'A Mark, A Mission, A Brand, A Scar', with their largest London show to date. The transition from venues of the tiny and dingy variety to those with three tiers of seating within a year, is a testament to the growing appeal of this band. Love and err... the lack of it are still the major themes lyrically for Chris Carrabba and it seems that sceptics of the Dashboard phenomenon particularly object to his somewhat histrionic handling of his 'pain'. Fans would argue that to be a true convert one has to witness the man in action, self-defacing, witty and importantly genuine, as opposed to the self-obsessed loser one might expect. Ever the crowd pleaser, tonight the band manage to combine old and new songs seamlessly, in a carefully crafted show that is no doubt a result of two years of incessant touring. The varied set list allows them to show off their development from solo j acoustic outfit to fully blown plugged in band. Including 'So Impossible' from the EP of the same name keeps the old-school fans happy, whilst their perhaps slightly ill-advised cover of 'Teenage Dirtbag', certainly amuses those not so familiar with the band. The new single, 'Hands Down' inevitably saved till last, raises the loudest cheer of the night . Yes, this is a great song, but quite why| Dashboard have felt the need to release it for what is now the fourth time, is something only they and their record label know. In return the crowd are in great form, faithfully chanting the lyrics to every song. During favourite, 'The Best Deceptions', any sound the band were attempting to make is easily drowned out. Chris Carrabba always does seem to be overawed by the reception he receives, but surely this must be waning slightly considering the millions of albums sold and sell out stadium tours in the US. Tonight is everything one would want and expect from a man who has the lyric, 'do you like making out?'. Nice guy with some brilliant tunes, who is entertaining in a way that you are kind of embarrassed to admit to. AMEUA HUTCHISON THE VON BONDIES Playing the 100 club, MATT BOYS experiences his favourite band live!!! A young man, not much older than 19 pushes past me. There is blood streaming down his face from a crack in his forehead. A few seconds earlier he had been dancing with the crowd: then he had the misfortune of being on the receiving end of the edge of the stage. No, this isn't a hardcore gig, where angry young men throw themselves around in an attempt to vent their emotion (and hurt someone....mmm, feel my pain), this is pure rock and roll. Okay, so there's some soul in there too. Let's call it rock and soul. No, actually, that sounds shit. f The Von Bondies play from the heart, they play with a soul that's been screwed up and chewed on and spat out into the street for all to see. Singer Jason Stollmeister has the wailing, disconsolate voice of a heartbroken man, singing songs about heartache and heartbreak. Following him is Don Blum, King of the Drums - a drummer so good, he only needs 3 drums and a cymbal: throughout the night he delivers his trademark pounding backbeat. Then there's the sexiest backline in rock music today: Marcie Bolen and Carrie Smith - two sassier hip-swingers I defy you to find. They had an awesome presence from the moment they got on stage - it's bands like this that make you realise that some have it, and some don't. The crowd went nuts as they tore through most of 2001's debut Lack of Communication, rose to a fren zy as they punctuated this with songs from the upcoming Pawn Shoppe Heart, and came in their collective pants as The Datsuns joined them on stage for an impromptu encore. This is what music should be. You people are really missing out. MATT BOYS The Beaver Tuesday 18th November 2003 Page 15 Album Reviews suede SUEDE SINGLES Suede were back in the headlines recently, though sadly the publicity was not about the release of this, their greatest hits collection. It was because they had split up. Sadly they had long since to be relevant to our newly Invigorated alternative nfiusic scene, they're thunder having been stolen by the Strokes, White Stipes and the Music amongst others. Still this retrospective gives us a chance to give an appraisal of what were one of the most important British bands of the nineties. Handily the band decided not to put the songs in chronological order, or else I would have stopped listening after "Trash", their last great song. You see Suede had actually stopped being good after the release of their magnificent second album, "Dog Man Star". Its almost as if Brett Anderson couldn't believe thattheir glam indie masterpiece hadn't blown away all opposition and established them as the standard bearers of Britpop, and had consciously decided to take the band on a more commerical route. This was unfortunate because, "The Wild Ones" and "We are the Pigs" are the bands definitive statement, swirling anthems that built on the intial promise of "Stay Together", "So Young" and the iconic "Animal Nitrate". "The Beautiful Ones" and "Filmstar" appear tiny in comparison. And by the time of the release of "Electricity", Suede had long since become Irrelevant. So Suede were a band who had it, but lost their nerve. And that will be there epitaph. JUSTIN NOLAN ^ 1 PARTY MONSTER SOUNDTRACK My problem with electroclash is that every single track reminds me of the 'Clothes Show' theme tune. Add to that the fact that everything on International Deejay Gigolos sounds the bloody same. Yeah yeah I appreciate the aesthetic - exemplifying the shallowness of the fashion-ista culture by elevating it to the forefront of the music - but who said it had to be so fucking dull? No, hang on, scratch that: to express passion would debase the entire nature of the genre. So, onto the record... well, I'd love to tell you that the "IQ-track collection... [features] a mix of electro-dance music celebrating the period of the film as well as classic 80's (sic) dance music from the era" (as the press-release does), but I can't. Why? Because all the promo-release entails a four-fucking-track EP: one bog-standard electroclash number (feat, generic woman droning atonally); one darker electroclash number; one harder electroclash number (from International Deejay Gigolos) and 'How to be a Millionaire' by bloody ABC. Okay, okay it's all deeply infectious, but so is every other electroclash song. Ever. They all sound the same (unless you play them at the wrong speed, which always reminds me of melting plastic for some reason: good stuff). Anyway, the full length album will feature the likes of Ladytron, Miss Kitten & The Hacker and Felix Da Housecat: so it may well be worth buying if you're not too bored by all that yet. The film sounds pretty good too, I might even go and see It. MATT BOYS SOMETHING CORPORATE NORTH Okay, first thing's first. Something Corporate have grown up with their second album-there are most definitely not any songs on here about kissing drunk girls or punk rock princesses as those which featured so heavily on debut album 'Leaving Through the Window'. But!Despite that, all the songs on their sophomore attempt, 'North', still have that same infectious tune and beaming enthusiasm. Easily the highlight of the album is the anthemic 'Space' (trust me, people will be throwing their hands in the air like they just care to that one at Reading next year), but tracks suck as the hyperactive '21 and Invincible' and the brilliant 'Only Ashes' ensure that there are pretty much no glitches during the course of 'North'. Fair enough, the piano heavy elements of the songs on 'North' can get slightly annoying after awhile. What's more, is that its pretty mindless music ,so you probably won't want to listen to it more than once in a row (or maybe week for that matter). BUT! as it goes Something Corporate have managed once again to produce a perfect pop-punk album. And they deserve serious respect for proving that the piano has a well deserved place alongside rock. There's no use pretending that 'North' is a totally accomplished, musically brilliant album. But it is fun and cheerful enough to make even the most passive want to jump around. So. after all that Intense post-hardcore gets too much for you, there really isn't anywhere better to turn. JAZMIN BURGESS PEARUAM LOST DOGS Since their first album was released in 1991, Pearl Jam have been pushing the boundaries in music to the limit. Their first two albums were massively successful, yet after that they have been less than willing to allow their music to be commercialized. Eddie Vedder and co. decided to take the ambitious step of releasing every show they played as an official 'bootleg' album. Success in this venture resulted in it being repeated for their next tour. F^ns who bought these albums will notice that Pearl Jam's huge set lists often feature b-sides, covers and original tracks that have never been released. 'Lost Dogs', a collection of rarities, is a tribute to all the PJ favourites which have never been available before. A collection of thirty one tracks, of which fourteen have been released for the first time, is sure to whet the appetites of the faithful, eagerly waiting for a new release. Tracks like 'Yellow Ledbetter', 'U' and 'Down' are relatively well known. Even 'Last Kiss' one of the bands biggest hits, a cover song released as a single to raise money in aid of Kosovo, has found its way here. The opportunity of owning these songs as well as previously unre-leased songs like 'In the Moonlight' and 'Dead Man' should not be missed. It's a brilliant package and well worth the price tag. IB RASHEED MADRUGADA GRIT This chisel chinned, Norwegian foursome, chose rightly the title 'Grit' as a gravelly voiced H0em grinds out his lyrics in low husky tones. It sends me back to those golden years: oh the excitement of following grit lorries down the frosty roads. See the little stones scattering all around. I get my kicks from other places now, unfortunately not from this album though. The first two songs, Bloodshot adult commitment and Ready try a punk rock sound but end up with a formulaic type 'cool' which keeps on raising it's ugly head throughout the album. Now then...if we wack in some big guitar chords that slide like an Oasis anthem and...go on then H0em, you use your deep bear-like voice to make the lyrics sound seductive...oh and lets concentrate on love/old /new /unrequited etc. as our theme. It'll be really soulful and pensive and we'll sound trendy and interesting. I'm not feeling the love, unfortunately So hard do I try, but the lyrics seem to get in the way. It seems that the melee with the English language was fought too hard on their part so they appear contrived and unoriginal. In my favorite song Hands up - I love you, the slower rhythm doesn't loose itself to boring repetitiveness thanks to the weird whale like noises in the background and compliments the faintly Nonwegian Jarvis Cocker esq. speaking/singing style 4/10 SIAN BEYNON Singles CLEARLAKE CAN'T FEEL A THING THE GHEARS-INTER FLEX While an obvious choice for a single, the upbeat song about depression does not demonstrate Clearlake Whether being sung by ultra-serious besuited Japanese businessmen, or ultra-twat AU at their understated, innovative best. The same goes for "We All Die Alone," but "I Want To Walk" should give listeners a better feel for the unusual appeal of the cold-loving foursome from Hove. BONNIE JOHNSON THE TENDERFOOT WAKING ME UP AGAIN Three down tempo wonderfully hushed songs for lazy Sunday mornings spent in bed drinking coffee and being with the one you love. Admittedly, they're treading familiar ground (throw Doves & a hint of Coldplay in here as a lazy comparison), and the songs just slightly fail to come off quite properly on the record: but I think they'd be magical live; think Tindersticks and you're in the right neighbourhood for the ballpark you want. MATT BOYS CORAL SECRET KISS The Coral had an extremely difficult childhood. If growing up in Liverpool w/asn't bad enough then they quite clealry only had an album of knackered old fairground music to listen to when they were growing up. This single Is the painful result. JUSTIN NOLAN members, karaoke is indeed a funny thing. As is this single, which sounds like Brian Moiko singing a Lou Reed song. Thank fuck they don't do 'my way'. BEN HOWARTH ERIN MCKEOWN BORN TO HUM Looking like Carrie but sounding like a toned down PJ Harvey, Erin McKeown is an interesting lady. Although it has been done 2,413 times before, "Born To Hum" adds a fresh, quirky dimension to folk balladry, ploughing a similar field to Beth Orton. In this field she frolics with the spring lambs and eats curd and whey. JON DE KEYSER HEADWAY VITAL SIGNS The press release compares them (laughably) to the great Led Zep. Average rock 'n'roll, with a B-side ballad worthy of the mighty Natalie Imbruglia. They won't be making Headway into the Top 40. Or even the Top 700 JON DE KEYSER The Beaver Tuesday 18th November 2003 Page 16 o3 JD -o 0) Review of the week... The Fighting Temptations DANIISMAIL, notorious for nof fighting temptation, flexes her vocal chords at home after jealously watching Beyonce strut her stuff Director: Jonathon Lvnn Starring: Cuba Gooding Jr, Beyonce, Mike Epps Running Time: 123 mins Certificate: PG 13 Release Date: OUT NOW!! f y m ml Let's face it - Beyonce can sitiq^jhC* fully heterosexual, but her writhing and flaunt^^e^ ^ vocal chords' versatilityjn her « >< rendition of Peggy L^e% Fever was quite hot. Other than"that though, the movie was ijj cheesy, predictable, had Cuba" Gooding Jr in it (which we aH i| know is generally a bad thing) and once again cheesy. There £ seemed to be a major/ minor fw plotline going on, the major ^ being getting Beyonce to ishake ¦ v i her stuff in church (such btatent T' blasphemy) and the minor some- T what revolving around .fraud,<^and J faked identity - why they added ^ this in is beyond me. Obviously just a ploy to allow Gobd^jjg||^to act smarmy and patrqiH^^^Bfeyi i< both unconvincit^lPPMj^^^^n To wrap it up for you -fearing lad from the Deep hometown to choir in a competition^H||H^^S^ nee. What have I forgotten? ts that Hollywood feels compelN^P^^^^'f saturate crappy films with - a love story, a tew crying men. a twist. And never, ever, forget the prwt' dictable enditjgf'* Classic Review... The English Patient lONMARTEA finds that in love there are no boundaries... Director: Anthony Minghella Starring: Ralph Fiennes, Juliette Binoche, Willem Dafoe, Kristin Scott Thomas, Naveen Andrews, Colin Firth, Julian Wadham Running time: 160 minutes t Release date: 14th March 1997 Certificate: 15 It is a when a filmmaker manages to shine in his first features, especially after 20 years of continuous work in television. Well, Anthony Minghella is such a case: an artist to discover the boundaries of poetry only when reaching complete maturity. And what an artist! Truly Madly Deeply (1991) and Mr. Wonderful ("1993) were respectable pieces that established him as a craftsman in his field, but it wasn't until The English Patient (1996) that we got to see the godlike creative power of the man who later gave us The Talented Mr. Ripley (1999). The English Patient Is veritable poetic art, and, as with poetry, it opens delicately and invites you to share the experience of a lifetime. It tells the story quietly enough so we can hear Gabriel Yared's harmonious tunes in the process. Hana (Juliette Binoche) a Canadian nurse, lost in the deserted minefields of World War II Italy, is in search of life and scope. As in Ondaatja's novel, she gradually starts to rediscover reality once she is put in the care of an amnesiac Count Laszio Almasy (Ralph Fiennes). Neither Kip Singh (Naveen Andrews), her new found lover, nor David Caravaggio (Willem Dafoe), her countryman, manage to fulfill her soul's need. None, but Almasy and his stories about the Egyptian deserts, about the winds of the Sahara, and more importantly his own story. A truly moving relationship unfolds, which reduces to a blubbering mess even the most cold-hearted among us. Binoche, in her Oscar-winning role, is at once a simple character and completely realistic, which makes Hana's breakdown even more tragic. Scott Thomas, in her best performance, is quite beautiful in the entire sense of the word: sensual, talented, ignorant, and so passionately in love. And then Fiennes captures exquisitely the sheer complexity of the English patient, the vastness of Herodotus's poetry of the desert. The English Patient is a definite must-see for any serious filmgoer. It is a rare case when art managed to transcend the boundaries of the cinematic world, and mainly because it was a film made out of love for beauty. The production ran over the budget before the film was finished, which meant that the cast and crew were left with largely empty pockets and received only the catharsis of creation, hoping of a smashing success. There was no alternative, but superlatives at all levels. dani's movie matters... Bunnies and Hunnies After spending bucket loads of money to keep her tits out of the centrefolds, Cameron Diaz seems to have no problem getting paid to play a Playboy centrefold in her upcoming film, X-Girls. Based on a true story, she will be one of three bunnies who competed in possibly the most gruelling reality TV show in 1992, Eco-Challenge. No doubt this will prove these models have long legs and stamina. Another Charlie's Angel is back to form in a rom-com with Adam Sandler, perfectly cast as a ditz with short-term memory loss. Sandler has to keep getting Drew Barrymore to fall in love with him every day in 50 First Dates since she just keeps forgetting him.. does it seem to anyone else like a desperate plot to get the vaguely annoying Sandler a date? Maybe she's forgetting who he is for a reason. And will probably be better than a sequel to The Wedding Singer, the idea of which barely seems that implausible in this day and age. The making of X3 is being talked about, as is a knock-off for Wolverine on his very own. Rather expected, to be honest. A slightly less expected sequel? That of the one to The Goonies.. yes it's true. The Groonies will feature many of those old familiar faces that filled our dreams during our youth - but they will be much older, jaded, out of breath etc. And honestly who really still watches 'adventure' movies? Speaking of the aged playing childish roles, Will Ferrell of Saturday Night Live fame is playing an over-grown elf in his latest, originally entitled flick. Elf. The allure of 6/g-style films, if 1 recall correctly, died out after Big. It's hard to beat such a classic. Love Actually opens next week - for a movie that got lukewarm reviews, it seems to have done good in getting every bloody well known British actor to commit to it. The posters all over the tube flaunt that it's from the director of Four Weddings and Notting Hill -back track! Notting Hill was 3 hours of boring, cliched, crappy fil-mography. How this is a good advertising ploy is beyond me. And did anyone else know that Hugh Grant has only acted in a dozen movies since he caught everyone's eye in Four Weddings? Till next week.. The Beaver Tuesday 18th November 2003 Coming Soon to Cinemas... THE SHAPE OF THINGS SAMUELOOl seems frustrated after seeing the latest from Rachel How do you describe 93 minutes of pure confusion? A film that also seems to be a play, full of strong, yet bewildering characters? The Shape of Things, written and directed by Neil LaBute, is just that. Based on LaBute's identically titled London play, this latest offering will leave you uncomfortable and unsure of what you've just seen. The film rotates around the insecure and shy Adam (Paul Rudd) who is smitten by the gregarious Evelyn (Rachel Weisz of the Mummy fame). Coerced into changing "for the better," Adam is transformed scene by scene into a confident young man. Evelyn then reveals that her entire relationship with Adam was just the sacrifices of a mega artist - that Adam himself Something film-related to make your weekend interesting... The Lord of the Rings Exhibition SARAHCOUGHTRIE needed a LOIR fix rather desperately. To relieve her frustration, we reluctantly let her loose in the Science Museum for an hour or so. Here, she reports back on how it went... That time is upon us again. The decorations are up, people are wandering around with an excited glow, the weather is getting cold, shoddy merchandise is piling up in the shops and we're all talking about what a big fat man is going to bring us come December. Yes, Lord of the Rings comes but once a year. To commemorate this and make obscene amounts of money, the nice folk who made LOTR have put together an exhibition, currently showing at the Science Museum. I was sent to weasel my way through the barriers without any kind of press credentials (cheers Simon) and see what all the fuss was about. For those of us with an interest in Peter Jackson's little project, this is a geek orgasm. When you walk in one of the first things you see is the costume worn by Viggo Mortensen, accompanied by a video of him smouldering away to himself, rasping about his role. More costumes are dotted around, but the temptation to hump the mannequin wearing Orlando Bloom's clothes became overwhelming, so I moved on. There are video screens everywhere showing clips about every aspect of the movies, from concept to make up to filming. Do not miss the section about armour. The amount of time it took to make all that chain mail is going to keep me supplied in nightmares for weeks, as is the revelation that it took 10 hours in the make up chair every night to turn a really tall guy into Lurtz, big chief Uruk-Hai. Explore further and you find The One Ring hidden in a cavern bathed in red light, loads of weapons and truly massive models of cave trolls, black riders and the like. A major highlight was a section showing how the crew turned the scary Anthony Serkis into Gollum, with some nice side-by-side shots showing how the actor and digital technology merged. And did you know that sexy Viggo got so attached to his horse that he bought it after filming was over? Sweet. With a student discount it's pretty good value for money at around £7 on a weekday, and if you are a fan this is an opportunity not to be missed, as the exhibition will only be in London until the 11th January, and this is its only European venue. To be honest, a lot of the conceptual drawings and filming tricks were shown to an extent on the extended Fellowship DVD, but that didn't diminish the experience in the slightest. There is much to see and enjoy, including a once in a lifetime opportunity to get up close and personal with a life-sized Legolas gear. If you time it right you should get in a good few seconds before security gets to you. The Lord of the Rings Exhibition is on until early January at The Science Museum. Page 17 Director: Neil LaBute Starring: Gretchen Mol, Paul Rudd, Rachel Weisz Running Time: 96 min Weisz... Certificate: 15 Release Date: 28 November is her thesis project. Adam gets rightly upset, and we are treated to the climatic scene of lethargic rage. Sounds entertaining, doesn't it? Well it wasn't - but that's because I'm still rather perplexed with almost every aspect of the film. Or should I say "the play"? Long blocks of dialogue with absolutely no background music are interspersed with Elvis Costello blasting the last three seconds of each shot then introducing the setting of the next scene. I could almost hear people moving chairs and backdrops around the "stage." Getting the same actors of the play to play in the film creates a bizarre feel to the movie. Although gifted, with obvious talents (Weisz and Rudd being established Hollywood actors), there were instances where I felt that Casting could have done a better job. Such was the case when Adam's lifelong friend Phillip (Frederick Weller) proclaims to be just an undergraduate, whilst looking like an early-thirty executive dressed in shorts and goggles. If you can stop bursting out in laughter in that scene, you would realize that Weller delivers a sensational performance - for a play. It doesn't help when screenplay adaptation consists of erasing lines of the play's script. The lines of dialogue read like a conversation you'd have with yourself, disjointed and repetitive in order to emphasize a plot development: "I don't understand." "Get me out of here." "What should we do next?" "I hate you, Adam." Weisz looks quite stunning, as she usually does; a good solid reason to watch the film if nothing else. She does the American accent to perfection in this role although I wish we did not have to see scene after scene of her "I'm lying to you when I say I love you" look, so blatantly obvious to the audience but seemingly spellbinding to Adam. Would i recommend this film? Well, perhaps. Just be warned-this isn't the sort of movie to see on a night out. Nor is it one with an ending a la the Usual Suspects. Be prepared to be confused, but then again, be prepared to essentially watch a play. 2.5/5 the editor's cut After so much rambling about this year's piss-poor excuses for cinema, Simon lazily lists all his reasons to still love the movies... 1. One day soon, Jerry Bruckheimer will die. 2. Quentin Tarantino is younger than Jerry. 3. Everyone owns a video of The Shawshank Redemption. 4. No-one owns a video of Blair \Mtch 2: Book of Shadows. 5. Jack Nicholson was in Batman. 6. Jack Nicholson wasn't in Batman and Robin. 7. No-one understands 2001: A Space Oddyssey. 8. Everyone understands that Spaceballs was bol-lucks. 9. People still like Star Wars. 10. People who dislike Star Wars are generally disliked themselves. 11. Gandalf the Grey, Homer Simpson and Indiana Jones are apparently immortal. 12. Ewoks, Johnny Knoxville and Trinity from The Matrix clearly aren't. 13. Return of the King will be fantastic. 14. Return of the Jedi was short. One more thing. I received a complaint last week from one reader (my Dad) criticising my use of foul language. To that reader and any others to whom I caused offence, I wish my sincere and unreserved apologies. However, to those who've seen The Matrix Revolutions and weren't offended by its inane dialogue, sparse action and constant IQ-insulting ram-blings, you can all go eat shit and die. Until next time we meet, in this crazy world of ours, behave yourselves... Si, b:film editor Get in touch with any comments. Ideas or Michael 'Nosferatu' Howard cartoons; s.e.cliff@lse.ac.uk ATTENTION DEAR READERS = WRITERS NEEDED - Do you eat, sleep and breathe movies? Can you string a few coherent sentences together which your peers consider to be remotely interesting? Fancy going to see films for free and weeks in advance of their release? Look no further than b:film, currently looking for writers and reporters to bless these pages with words of wonderment. Sound like fun? E-mail beaverfilm@vahoo.coin for further details. Go ahead punk, make my day... COMPETITION RESULT - The correct answer to last week's RESFEST competition was Christopher Walken. Well done to all those of you who got it right, and comiserations to those same people, not one of which emailed the answer to us. Bloody idiots. We've donated the two tickets to the 'Bodysong' Premiere to the Justin Nolan Testimonial Fund in the hope that he'll leave us alone. The Beaver Tuesday 18th November 2003 Page 18 Dude, Where's My Country? ALEXANGERT: Dude, WE get it already! Just The Facts Author: Michael Moore Publisher: Allen Lane Date: Out now Price: £7.99 Like Bill Maher, Al Franken and Eminem before him, Michael Moore picks a no-holds-barred fight with the Bush administration in his new book Dude, Where's My Country? That this fight teems with playground grandstanding, not to mention adolescent namecalling, does not necessarily make it unjust. Moore's book is valuable because it fills its readers in on crucial things that most people would not know unless they caught Seymour Hersh and Elsa Walsh's New Yorker pieces on the Saudi Royal Family or combed the newspapers for stories of the Taliban's involvement with Texas oilmen. Armed with an arsenal of clippings, Moore does not balk, but fires off accusations like a man on a mission. He raises red flags over the dubious Patriot Act, and calls the administration to task for its perennial obfuscations and half-truths. In his own overblown way, he stresses the need to question justifications of U.S. security policy framed in post-9/11 patriotic terms. He correctly points out that President Bush may be guilty of bigger sins than dabbling with a White House intern. If his work is enhanced by the issues it raises, it is crippled by the way in which it raises them. In other words, Moore suffers from serious issues of style. He thinks he is funny but-giddy book jacket endorsements be damned-he is not. One might argue that Moore serves the useful purpose of repackaging seri- MiCHAEl MOOR! ous reporting from The New Yorker, The Washington Post, and Time magazine in a bright and eye-catch-ing manner that will actually reach the average Joe-shmoe on the street. But does Joe really need to be bombarded with 217 pages of sarcasm, exaggeration and boldfaced italicized CAPITALS before he gets the point? Isn't there a more subtle way of letting Joe know that his government may be lying to him? Even when Moore sets aside the overblown humour, it can be tough to take him seriously. Among other things, he links Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania's membership in the Coalition of the Willing to their WWII past as Nazi collaborators. He then claims with a straight face that September 11th is being manipulated by some nebulous right-wing "Bush/Cheney/Ashcroft/Wall Street/Fortune 500" cabal to satisfy "their feverish desire to rule the world." Shortly after, he chides Bush's tendency to speak for God (an occasionally valid criticism) only to do so himself for an entire chapter. Ultimately, Michael Moore is no political scientist, and while this might make him easier to read, it also means that much of what you get is garbage. Behold his solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: give each side four billion dollars in weapons so "they can just blow each other up and leave the rest of us the hell alone." Time and again, the author paints a world divided much too neatly into rich people who are scum, foreign nationals who can do no wrong, and ignorant masses who adore Moore for bringing them the truth. He offers no program for a better world, short of making Oprah president of a lollipop-land America whose entire population is politically aware and voting Democrat. With some very real challenges confronting world leaders today, it is Moore's imperative to question that makes this book important, and not the angry man who is asking those questions. The Discovery of Slowness Just The Facts. Author: Sten Nadolny Publisher: Canongate Date: Out now Price: £10.99 NOAMSCHIMMEL slows down Slowness is something that few individuals appreciate. Modern society favours speed and product over careful deliberation and process. Sten Nadolny's, The Discovery of Slowness, a work of fiction based on the life of the nineteenth century explorer, John Franklin, is an eloquent articulation of the virtue of slowness and of the value of savouring the present moment as it progresses and time passes. The Discovery of Slowness begins with John Fi'anknn's childhood, when he suffers in school from being teased because of his lack of physical coordination, his inability to speak at a normal pace, and his generally dreamy and unusual character. He longs to travel and to become an explorer - to leave the dull and inhospitable firmness of land and the cruelty of bullies, to take to the less stable, but possibly more welcoming seas. Indeed, in the sea Franklin finds a mixture of freedom, challenge, and consolation. The sea has no prejudices against him and accepts him from the first moment that he joins the crew of a warship. At sea he learns to accept his own personality trait of slowness without regretting it - finding that it can contribute to his capacity to be diligent and aware of aspects of reality that quicker minds gloss over. The Discovery of Slowness narrates Franklin's life from childhood through adulthood, including his final voyage towards the North Pole that he did not succeed in completing. It includes an interesting account of his experiences as Governor of Tasmania, and of his respect for its inhabitants and the decency and humility that marked his leadership. At times the book seems plodding, and the details of Franklin's adventures can be dull. The power of for a bit and takes a read... the message that Nadolny wishes to make about the virtues of slowness is undercut by the book's, meandering style. The book will be of greatest Interest to those with a passion for the life stories of 18th century explorers, but it will probably be of less interest to the general reader. Nevertheless, there is wisdom and beauty in The Discovery of Slowness and Nadolny's prose is often graceful, emotionally perceptive, and philosophically wise. Nadolny's reflections on what inspires individuals to leave home and begin to travel are especially strong. One passage in particular, about the . reasons for Franklin's final voyage to the North Pole, is exemplary: "He was ineluctably drawn to the Pole, but not because he wanted to start all over again from then on. After all, it had already begun, The goal had been important only for the sake of finding the path to it." , He had now taken that path, and the Pole reverted to being a mere geographical concept. He longed only to remain en route just as he was now, on a voyage of discovery for the rest of his life." Nadolny shows great empathy in his writing for Franklin. One scene evokes with tenderness the mixture of loneliness, lack of self - confidence, and admiration that John experiences as he watches a group of well-educated friends debate literature with speed and wit. "Poems, like conversation, were after all about feeling and t>asic elements. They were talking about the basic elements of sympathy and about the particles of fire that inhere in all matter, giving all things their specific temperaments... John was very glad that nobody asked him anything. He remained silent and watched the others with growing wonder..." There is a soft kind of wonder present in The Discovery of Slowness. It is subtle and not always readily apparent, but when finishing the book 1 felt it. Towards the end of his life Franklin is asked about his thoughts of death, and he responds, "What remains of me need not always be my personal self." The Discovery of Slowness successfully conveys the transcendent aspects of Franklin's life and character, and the importance of living deliberately. Jyst Ths Faets. Author: Nick Hornby Publisher: Penguin Date: November 2003 Price: £6.99 31 SONGS KATEBURKE: Me and my friend Nick like Robbie and that's all that really matters! or yours (Rod Stewart never did anything for me really, but then I didn't lose my virginity to Side 2 of Smiler. I do, however, get chills when I hear Rufus Wainwright languorously covering his father Loudon's hit "One Man Guy" so Nick and 1 can at least agree on that), but that is much of the point Hornby is trying to make. Everyone gets their own soundtrack that plays for them in their drama, their tragedy, their comedic misunderstandings or during the love scenes. This seems like a suitable time and place for a confession (nicely anonymous yet demonstrably public): I enjoy Robbie Williams' music. Yes, ok, fine, I'm not copping to ritual murder; this isn't the worst crime in the world but trust me in that I will tie receiving some shocked and certainly mocking correspondence about this. 31 songs.. But it's ok, because I have been told by a man whose post-High Fidelity name is a by-word for hipster eclectic music appreciation: it's ok to like pop music - nay, it is Good to be Entertained. If Nick Hornby says 1 don't have to pretend that 1 play Hayden to get wound up for a night out, then I feel 1 have right on my side. Besides, Nelly Furtado's "I'm Like A Bird" is on his top 10 songs ever so I think I can get away with "Road to Manderlay". 31 SONGS is a collection of short essays about songs that Hornby loves and loved and for some reason got into his head and under his skin. This 1 add because truly, who could love "Frankie Teardrop", by Suicide - a 10 minute viialk through a wretched and violent existence set to ear-crushing metal? Right: even Hornby agrees with me on this one - not loveable, as such. The point though is that Frankie somehow fits into the weave of pop culture, and somehow, fit himself into Hornby's life. Obviously, there isn't going to be a lot of cross-over between these 31 songs and mine Pop music is a part of everyone's lives and you don't have to even know what musicology means to know when a particular lyric seems to know where you live. Hornby is asking for a little consideration for the (sometimes) humble pop song, with no grandiose claim to universal artistry or immortal lyricism, that is still able to add something new to your life, or to make you feel not quite alone in your misery. Hornby's book is a paean to pop music over the last 30 years, and a plea for a little respect, please. There are problems with this collection - in his appreciation for pop music, Hornby has nothing nice to say about hip hop, rap, jazz, or classical music of any sort, and little to add about the blues and R-fB. He is also somewhat preoccupied with justifying his changing musical tastes as he gets older (with the exception of Bruce Springsteen, Hornby's Man For All Seasons). This is an interesting read about music as part of your life, from a man who is clearly devoted and knowledgeable about the subject matter, but the subject is actually why - and how - to be a fan of music, rather than music criticism per se. And as Miss Brodie would say, it's the kind of thing you'll like, if you're the kind of person who likes that sort of thing. And if you are that sort...the companion CD soundtrack Is available at finer bookstores (and independent record shops) everywhere. tuo