29f[B 2000 ""i/7 "1 erbruary 28th, 2000 BRITISH LIBRAfly OF POIIIOL SECONOMICSCIENCE ished May 5, 1949 paper of the LSESU Executive Editor: Ian D. Curry E-mail: beaver editor@hotmail.com Make your voice heard Tola Soleye A voting frenzy is currently sweeping the world at large. The McCain-Bush saga, the elections in Iran, the farce that is the mayoral race in London, one could go on. But why isn't there a similar urgency towards the Lent Term Elections for the Sabbaticals and there Executive members of the Student Is Student politics thei domain of rabidi extremists on should 'normal'\ people geti involved? And\ more importantly, how does thisruj,^ affect you? Union? Is It because it is 'pointless' and ' they are only doing it to look good on their CVs'? Granted, for a lot of people, the political savvy they hope to display in the future is already revealing itself in their undergraduate years. One only needs to take a look at Home Secretary Jack Straw as evidence of how far a Student Union politician can go. But is that all that it is really about? Is student politics the domain of rabid extremists or should 'normal' people get involved? And more importantly, how does this affect you? Well, these elections will affect policy on all Student Union issues for next year. This concerns EVERYTHING - SU ents, class sizes, library policy, the lot. The Students' Union covers every single sphere of your university life. In a matter as integral to the success of your education, it would be an act of gross negligence not to concern yourself with who is to be in charge of making these decisions that ultimately impact on everyone. Elections are to be held this week and you van do your bit for this process by getting hold of the manifestos and finding out what each candidate has to offer and what they're promising to do. The successful candidates will be working for you so it's up to us all to make sure the best people get the places. Hustings are a very good way of finding out what candidates have to say for themselves and to ask any questions on policy or election promises that you have. The final hustings will take place on Tuesday the 29th of February and it's vitally important to ask difficult questions and watch the candidates squirm to come up with something original! Voting is on the 1st and 2nd of March and will take place across the campus and in all the halls. The Union has a successful past year and it really is up to you to ensure that the good work Two down, two to go: voting for Sabs at the ballot-box continues by picking the best people to carry on the work. The current General Secretary, Jonathan Black had this to say, 'The "'future of the union" changes, backed overwhelmingly by students were about increasing participation and ensuring the Union remains relevant and responsive. Elections and democracy are the foundation upon which this happens. By voting, students get a chance to get their vote heard. If you don't voice, your voice wiH be silent. I hope all students take the chance to decide who will be running their union next year by voting this week. You heard him folks, apathy is sooo 90s, taking an active interest in your union ids totally noughties and totally now!_ Positions up for grabs sabbajical positions: \ General Secretary Treasurer Education and Welfare Officer Entertainments Officer Pic; Bona Fide Archives executive positions; Executive 'Slate' (4 positions) Equal Opportunities (Female) Equal Opportunities (Male) Mature and Part-Time Students Officer Finance and Services Committee (4 positions) International Students Officer Constitution and Steering Committee (7 positions) Returning Officer Representatives to NUS Conference (5 positions) Representative to NUS Women'ns Conference Demonstrating against injustice Mark T'unt Ready In 1982, Mumia Abu-Jamal, a leading American black rights' activist, was convicted of murdering the Philadelphia police officer who had shot him. The prosecution relied on the eyewitness accounts of two prostitutes and a taxi driver who had previously terrorized a high school class. It has since transpired that they were offered immunity from arrest for their testimonies against Mumia. Such a case would be laughable, except that Mumia's final appeal to have new evidence heard in his struggle against the Death Sentence is due to be viewed by Judge William H. Yohn Jnr. in March. For there to be equivalence, the death penalty would have to punish a criminal who had warned his victim of the date at which he would inflict a horrible death on him and who, from that moment onward had confined him at his mercy for months. Camus once wrote about how terrible the Guillotine was. How much more repulsive is an execution that involves broiling the condemned with electricity? Only few can realise the American Dream Pic: Archives Does any ';humane being require more evidence to debunk the myth of 'civilized' Western society? And yet, even if you believe in the dusty principle of retribution - an eye for an eye -there are convincing arguments against capital punishment. The mistakes of the judicial system are the nail in the coffin of the argument for the death penalty. The argument against capital punishment in Britain has long rested upon the case of James Hanratty, hanged for a murder he did not commit. In the United States twenty-three innocents were executed between 1900 and 1992, according to the report In Spite of Innocence. The state was the murderer in these ceases. Could you live comfortably in a state that could murder you? Mumia himself highlights the case of Jay Smith, a man innocent of the crimes for which he spent twelve years on Death Row. He asks "what security exists in a system that plotted, lied, connived, and hid evidence to destroy one man's life." The parallel cases in Britain are the Guildford Four and the Birmingham Six. Continued on page 4 Bedding Down in Houghton Street - Page Three TheBeaver Issue 517 - February 28th 2000 2 LSE consider moving Muslim Prayer Rooms FEATURES Making it at the interview page 8 Lord Strathclyde bringing the House down page 9 look whos bombing now page 10 UNION Getting into Election Fever page 31 Election Special - The Candidates pages 27-30 BART Fed up walking down those same old streets? pages 16-17 The Underwolves howl back for Clubbing pages 24-23 Watering down at a musical Oasis pages 18-19 Going that extra mile with Films ^ c pages14-15 Ramez Mikdashi TheBeaver has learnt that the LSE is considering plans to move the Muslim prayer rooms currently located in the basement of King's Chambers on Portugal Street. The proposal is being backed by the Government Department, whose offices are also located in King's Chambers. The matter was discussed last Monday at a meeting of the Security Advisory Group, which advises Bernard Taffs, the House Manager, on security issues. The meeting was attended by members of the academic community, IT Services as well as representatives from the Students' Union. Mr. Taffs has described the motive for the proposed move as a security concern. By moving the prayer rooms to the ground floor of nearby Lincoln's Chambers, both the Government Department and LSE Security hope to better control the flow of outsiders entering King's Chambers. The proposal is based upon the refurbishment of a post-graduate study room and of an adjacent furniture storage room, including the installation of a swipe-card controlled entrance as well as washing facilities which are essential for Muslims, who must perform ritual ablutions before each of their five daily prayers. Yet both Bernard Taffs and Professor O'Leary, Convenor of the Government Department, have maintained that they do not perceive LSE Muslim students as a threat to King's Chambers. Professor O'Leary told the Beaver last Wednesday that: "I have checked very carefully with my staff and all of them are of the view that the men least likely to be of threat to them are men who are about to go and pray." King's Chambers is currently freely accessible during the day and even though access is restricted during evenings and weekends by a code, that code is widely known, However, such incidents have been rare and have only been reported twice to LSE Security in the past two academic years. Harris Waseem, Treasurer of the mm Heading for Upheaval King's Chambers Prayer Room Picture: IVIark Simpson according to SU General Secretary Jonathan Black. Mr. Taffs insists that installing a swipe card system at the main entrance of King's Chambers for weekend and after-hours access would not be sufficient. According to him, much of the issue is psychological and hinges upon on the concept of control: "[There are] fears, irrational though they may be, of workers seeing people they don't know come in and out of areas which .they share. [...] My job is to try and make people feel secure." An additional concern voiced by the Government Department was the occasional leafleting conducted by political Islamic groups such as Hizb ul Tahrir outside King's Chambers. LSE Islamic Society (ISOC) told the Beaver last Tuesday that he had spoken to Hizb ul Tahrir in late January and expressed his disapproval of their actions: "We've always made it clear from the very start that the LSE Islamic Society has no affiliation with outside political factions." The move to Lincoln's would hinder Friday prayers, as ISOC usually book K05, the classroom opposite the existing prayer rooms, to cater for weekly rise in attendance. Veteran ISOC member Badrul Hasan spoke to the Beaver last week: "...We'd like to help with security and we'd cooperate with any measures that were taken but we didn't feel that justified moving the prayer rooms, particularly since the new prayer rooms would be much smaller; we're already short of space and ideally we'd like more space." Surprisingly, Jonathan Black was even more assertive than ISOC in his stance, taking the position that the prayer room issue was more an accommodation/facilities issue than a security issue: "For me, the Muslim prayer rooms is not mainly a security issue but an issue of facilities for students. I think there's a problem with the prayer rooms . because I don't think the facilities are good enough, not because they're a security risk." The matter has now been referred to the Committee on Accommodation, which will next meet on June the 6th. However, no decision will be made without the consent of those affected, as pointed out by Jonathan Black: "It is totally inconceivable that there would be a compulsory move; that would have to be based on the consent of the SU representatives on the Committee." Yet the issue highlights the continuing problem with security at the LSE. In an interview with the Beaver last week, Bernard Taffs voiced his concerns about the limited resources made available to him by the School: "The issue is trying to use the small force that I've got most effectively [...]. I really have got to try and structure the way the campus is used so that they [LSE Security staff] control it most effectively and with least effort." Even though the School is moving towards a swipe-card system of access, it is enlightening to learn ' that there are currently only four security guards available at night to patrol the 20 buildings of the LSE campus. SPORT |_SE Copy Shop questioning democracy? Over hill and yonder vale : LSE X-Country page 32 Anyone for tennis? page 33 A story of credit cards, Paris, apd prostitutes / page 35 Paris Special; The AU goes mental page 36 IVIatthias W. Benzer, News Editor he following article is based on an occurence reported to TheBeaver only hours before publishing. The elections are coming up, and, as you do, the candidates are campaigning. Apart from the hustings, held last Thursday, posters, flyers, and similar serve as means to get the voters' attention. These posters have decided elections in the past, for the simple reason that it is often the only way how people are actually made aware of the candidates' manifestos, their aspirations, ideas, programs and -as profane as it seems - their faces. As it was reported to the Beaver candidates wanted to have their paper allocation printed in the LSE Copy Shop after the agents' meeting last Thursday. The questioned institution was very busy at that time. As a result candidates were told they had to expect a delay until the following Friday, 12 o'clock. The problem was the fact that other candidates running for the same positions had already received their posters on Thursday. This fact gave some candidates the opportunity to start their poster-campaigns on Thursday - one day before others were able to do so. When pressed, the Copy Shop did print for a candidate whose running mates had both got their posters. Some might argue that this is the punishment that late-comers have to face. Another aspect of the story, however, puts the concept of democratic campaigning in a different light: It was reported that the same candidates who had been 'outsmarted' before were allowed using machines to print their posters themselves and others were not. On the one hand some candidates' posters could be seen by LSE students on Thursday night and throughout Friday morning, whereas on the other hand other candidates had to face the disadvantage of having to start their poster-campaign at the beginning of last weekend. The campus was practically empty from Friday afternoon to Monday morning. What was left were the posters in the residences, where efficent campaigning is possible during weekends too. General Secretary Jonathan Black: "The union will always be completely impartial in union elections. The Copy Shop prints candidates' publicity as quickly as it can. Priority this year is being given to our new manifesto booklet, which has the statement of all candidates [...] LSE students can make a more informed choice, when voting for the people who will run their union next year." -News 7/ieBeaver Issue 517 - February 28th 2000 Have you lot not got homes to go to? You can tell those who had joined the Cubs Picture : Brendon Cox All tucked in and ready for bed Picture: Brendon Cox Fuzzy Monkey, Editor Without Portfolio So, you may be asking, what is a monl