The Bcftvcr Ihr Newspaper e)f ihr ISI SU first I'ublishod Miiy f>th, I'J'IO 1 r»th November 2001 Issue number 545 Cashpoint thefts hit Houghton Street; Natwest £t Police aren't bothered, Page 3 Islam: the enemy withm Page 16 Passfield Put Out To Pasture lain Bundred "At this time it looks increasingly likely that Passfield will be closed in the academic session 2002IT David Tymms, Head of Residential Services This week Passfield students must come to terms with the likelihood that their beloved budget halls won't be opening its doors next September. The reverberations of this news shall be felt far beyond Bloomsbury though as throughout the next academic year the whole of the LSE intake will be without the vital low-cost, catered halls that provides 197 beds - that's 8% of all our accommodation available. This dramatic turn of events has emerged as the 1930s establishment, that is rapidly showing its age, requires major refurbishment in order to even reach requisite Health and Safety standards - the sort of improvements that, it would seem, need more time than the summer vacation would allow. Thus, it seems that the only waj' to keep Passfield running at all in the long term is to not run it next year Three weeks ago The Beaver previewed plans afoot to privatise the management of the hall - introducing private money to empower the costly changes that Passfield needs in order to effect a quick sprucing up and maintenance and electric (M&E) over the summer Yet since then the size of the task has been deemed too great and so it seems LSE students next year are to lose out. Yet the details are far from finalised. All the latest developments are the consequences of findings presented to the LSE Residential Services. Hopes persist that Passfield can be brought up to requirements over the summer. But with time running out, the position of Passfield as an LSE hall available to students for the 2002/3 session looks all but doomed. Quantity Surveyors Wrights & O'Brien have predicted that to couple the M&E improvements with what David Tymms, Head of Residences Services, describes as "a general smartening-up" will cost around £4.6m. The school is unwilling to allow this money to come from LSE coffers and so a public-private partnership has been regarded as the only way forward; in short, money to introduce the refur-. bishment must come from private companies who will then manage Passfield thereafter. Even once the 'sponsors' have been found, it is predicted that a summer vacation of three months won't allow enough time for builders to gut and re-fit the building -and who can disagree that LSE buildings take seemingly iasBil No longer will UCL students be reminded of LSE's great presence every day forever to be refurbished? The essential issue is time -the clock is ticking. To offer the work out to attain planning permission, invite tenders, evaluate applications and then commission the job by summer seems almost impossible - especially since it is in fact the University of London that owns the hall, so all final decisions must be approved by both the LSE and UL. hierarchies. The chances of completion look bleak even if work could be completed in the time frame. This leaves Passfield in limbo. It is becoming increasingly Continued on Page 2 LSE to jam 1,500 more students in Anyone whose been around Houghton St, the library and any of the computer rooms this term is sure to have noticed something - it's much busier. Compared to this time last year when the deteriorating weather seemed to make going into School a non-starter, this term has seen LSE bulging at the seams. In part due to the opening of the on-site library during the summer term, it has also been the result of a shift in LSE admissions policy that hopes to raise the number of students to 8500 by 2006 at the latest. The policy began over the summer with the school admitting 500 more students that usual, taking the tally of total students from 6500 to 7000. The apparent difference made by these extra 500 students already appears to be immense. There have been more complaints about class sizes and lecture overcrowding than ever before arid only last week in a poll conducted for The Beaver a large number of comments were made about Continued on Page 2 Inside ; b;llnk - this week's best featues, 16-21; Biart - the latest films, music, books ft dubs, 21 - 32; Sports - all the latest nem a gossip, 33-44 i • y r v.- . i Page 2 The Beaver Nous Thursday 15th November Move right down inside the classroom please Continued from Page 1 book shortages and computer waiting times in the library and C120. The difference that an extra 500 students have made appears to be immense, yet LSE hopes to boost the student populous by a further 1500. On the plus side, if you don't get on with the eighteen people that currently occupy your class, you'll have 22 to meet and greet by your third year; third years should consider themselves fortunate in being spared this luxury. The more pertinent question, however, is not how LSE intends to find staff for these extra students but how they intend to find space for the necessary increase in facilities. In the long-term LSE hopes to acquire the remaining two Mobil towers behind Clare Market building. Though this may provide the necessary teaching and research space many, including Dave Clay, Education and Welfare officer for the Students' Union, feel that in the short-term this is not enough: 'LSE plan to increase numbers but without the equivalent rise in service provision'. For anyone who has recently tried to get a computer or book during peak times this will ring true. Indeed, sources close to the Director believe that the planned increases do not stop there. The Beaver has learned that the Director's personally prefers a figure in the region of 10,000 students. With figures like this being bandied around the library already looks like a bad long-term investment. With daily numbers this term as high as they were during peak exam periods last year, deputy librarian Maureen Wade is well aware that there are going to be problems come exam time in the summer: 'There were days last term when all the study places in the library were full. This year we are already looking into the creation of new study areas outside the library to meet demand in the summer term.' She denies, however, that there are already problems with computer access: 'Every time I.T. services has done a check in the library they have found that not all the consoles are being used.' Ms Wade also denies the accusation that a large number of these consoles are always broken (see Beaver letters page). However, while most students are happy to wait a few minutes for a computer at the moment, a large increase in the student populous would see both waiting times and tempers rising. When asked about plans to increase computer access in the future the Planning Office admitted that, while they were always looking to expand access, they had no specific plans at the moment. They also admitted that they don't know when I.T services carry out their checks on computer usage, though The Beaver suspects these are done at midnight on a Sunday. In other news The Beaver has also learnt of plans to close Passfield Hall for the 2002/3 academic year. With no plans to purchase another hall of residence in the near future there must now be real doubts as to whether LSE can provide accommodation for existing student numbers, let alone increased ones. The Beaver, for one, already has its eyes on the Penthouse suite in Mobil Tower 3. As always the Beaver has been acting on behalf of its readers this week and would like to give you the following information: Time it takes LSE Security 'Rapid response team" to react to fire alarm in Clare Market Building: 9 minutes Time it takes IT Services "Rapid response team' to fix the Beaver network: 9 days and still counting Time it takes to receive Domino's Pizza: 30 minutes or your money back The Beaver would like to point out the correlation between services not entitled 'Rapid response' and, erm, rapid response. Passfield Closure Plans Continued from Page 1 apparent, Tymms told me, that it wouldn't be available to students for the Michelmas, Lent and probably Summer terms of the next session. Since Passfield consistently comes highest in request from second and third years looking to return to halls, these continuing students are to have no comparable residence to apply. For new students will the lack of such relatively cheap accommodation not scare some from the bright lights of our capital city? Another issue that will be sparked from a closed Passfield is that of pastoral induction. Just this Sunday a new Hall Committee was elected to preside over the Hall for both this year and the start of the next. With no Passfield next September, no Committee can be expected to materialise in Autumn 2003 to induce Freshers. Tymms acknowledges this problem, but plays it down. "There will be a loss of continuity, granted but the problem is surmountable. Even if there is a gap, I think Passfield's community spirit will quickly prevail." He may have a point, but why should Passfield residents have to go through this inevitably awkward, directionless period? It seems as though the reason lies with a complete breakdown in coherent, strategic planning. Where does the blame lie in this terrible state of affairs? The situation is such that, to me at least, no one single body can hold their hands up. Residential Services, past Passfield management, UL, LSE - all have played their part in leaving Passfield in a chronic state. Right now, though, it simply doesn't matter. What does matter? As Dave Clay, LSESU Ed & Welfare Sabbatical says, "If Passfield closes, we'd lose 197 of our budget places and we should make every effort to keep the Hall open for students." Afterall, the unique Passfield identity is not its only pull - at £98 per week for a single room, including full catering, the hall offers students facing the financial excesses of London a certain life-line. Wha*t can we do? Sadly, at the moment there are few options available to students. As Dave tells us, all we can do is try our best to push for Passfield to stay open and if not for those places to be re-distributed. Already plans to sell Silver Walk have been delayed since the places there might help ease any accommodation crisis caused. But the nature of Silver Walk is totally different from that of Passfield and is less than half the size. Tymms has made assurances - and seems quite happy to reiterate these - that Residential Services will try to soften the blow of a closed Passfield as much as is possible, should that situation occur next year. Whilst I don't doubt his authenticity, there seems little he can do. The one pledge that can be made, however, is that the Passfield of 2003 will be of a much-improved state to that of present. But no matter how many assurances are made about the nature of Passfield Hall in 2003, no guarantee can be offered about next year - residents, pack your bags. The Beaver's News In Brief LSEjobs is a new recruitment service aimed at students. LSEjobs has been formed to assist individuals who are current students or graduates at LSE in their search for new full time employment in the UK. A spokesperson at LSEjobs said, "The London School of Economics and Political Science is the leading social science institution in the world. Many employers are attracted to the high calibre and cosmopolitan backgrounds of individuals who have studied at LSE. Their service is free for job seekers, and"can be found at lsejobs.com" The Students' Union has started some language classes - and, best of all, they're free! Students can study Arabic, Chinese (Beginner & Intermediate Level) and Russian (Beginner & Intermediate Level). Classes are held each week in the evening, and you can find out times and sign up by visiting the SU reception in the East Building, or for general information e-mail Chan,SJ The counting for the Michaelmas term elections is now complete, and the students who won the Academic Board elections are Ariana Adjani and Tom Packer. Lord Radice, Laboiur Peer and Europe Expert, will be giving a talk entitled "A Vision for Europe", the first joint-lunch-time event oi^anised by the European Society and LSE's Socialists. First and foremost. Lord Radice will be addressing Britain's role in Europe. He will, in this context, refer especially to the future role of Europe with regards to crises such as the present one under the light of 'terrorism'. Lord Radice is a well-known expert in the field of Great Britain's relations with the European Union. This will be of special interest for British students and staff, interested in the future of their country within the European Community. The event will take place on 20 November, 12 - 1pm in room Gla. Everyone is welcome, and no tickets are required. It's coming to that time of year again when those dreaded essays and assignments will start to roll in, and many of us who like to make more 'creative' use of our time will busy ourselves with 'constructive procrastination' right imtil the last minute. But what happens then? For some students, the temptation to cheat becomes overwhelming. The internet has opened up new ways for this to occxir, and a new site promising 'academic rescue' has been launched. The site was created by Elizabeth Hall, a former lecturer at the University of Central England in Birmingham, and promises to assist students - basically by writing your ^ays for you. At a minim\im charge of £35, good help doesn't co]^t:heap. The site criticises tutors by saying, "Their commitment ra to the college or university that is paying their salaiy, and that means putting 'academic integrity' before students", a view strongly refuted by LSE's tutors. When contacted by The Beaver, Elizabeth Hall would not comment on the matter, but in the past has commented, "There have always been students who have cheated, this is not a new phenomenon, mediocre students just copy from books." Such comments have only added to the flood of criticisms against the service from all over the country. The situation at LSE hardly needs clarification, the official position can be summed up by Art. 9 of Assessment Offences - the offence of plagiarism with expulsion being the maximum penalty. Ultimately the decision is yours, and whilst cheating remains a real temptation - is the possibility of ending your academic career really worth it? Editor's note: The Beaver does not endorse cheating and does not codone anything from the University of Central England. The American Society are having their annual Thanksgiving Diimer on Thursday 22nd. This year it's being held at the Imperial London Hotel in Russell Square, from 6:30. lickets are £18 for members (£23 non-members) and can be bought on Houghton Street every day (apart from Friday). Seating is very limited, so buy your tickets early! Mature Students are have a weekly get-together, every Thursday from 6pm in the Beavers Retreat (4th floor Old Building). Students can just turn up and ask at bar for details of where mature students will be sitting. Anyone who wants to be added to mailing list for mature and part-time students should e-mail Carol at bonner,cm or leave a message for her at SU reception. Page 3 Thursday 15th November Houghton Street's Views on Closing Passfield Cashpoint thieves hit Houghton St 'Disadvantaged people from low income families are simply going to suffer and not come to LSE. At the end of the day, a petition is going tp do fuck air - Mohammed Senouci 'Closing the cheapest hall for one year to save a small amount of money is typical of LSE's economic approach and disregard for the welfare of poor students' - Donny Surtani 'They're just displacing people without giving them suitable alternative accommodation. Someone's Jacob's should be had for this' - Jenny Beer 'At a time when our Director is trying to attract poorer students, it seems a bit of a famockasham (farce of a mockery of a sham) to close Passfield' - Mark Buttery Jonathan Baylis LSE Head of Security, Bernie Taffs, issued a formal warning this week urging students to be aware of muggings and pick pocketing on and around campus. Five cases have been reported in the last ten days, executed in what he described as a "professional manner." The two men were described as "dark-skinned, possibly of eastern-European origin". Mr Taffs was quick to stress, however, the poor cooperation of the police and the NatWest Student Centre. Targeting victims using Nat West cashpoints on Houghton Street and the Aldwych, the thieves observe pin-numbers before posing as foreigners in need of help. They then distract the victim by dropping cash on the ground and attempting to steal his or her wallet. Mr Taffs clearly feels all should be on guard, adding: "the men are not choosing weak victims and could easily pass for students." Steps to combat the crimes have been made difficult by NatWest who have refused to put up warning posters in the Aldwych branch, despite operating a Student Centre. Mr Taffs and his six-strong staff believe the police are not dealing with the reports efficiently and feel it is unfair that they are being left to deal with crimes taking place on public streets. Indeed, Mr Taffs and fellow security guards have come cl6sest to catching the thieves after a dramatic but unsuccessful street chase. If anyone has any information regarding these crimes, contact Bernie Taffs on 020 79556055, or by e-mail at b.taffs@Ise.ac.uk. So who are the usual suspects? In a week that saw Owain James of the NUS address the UGM on the issue of student funding, warning the student body of imminent reductions and commercialisations of student funding, it seems ironic that some other little bugger has got in there first, beating the Government at their own game, and has swiped students' money from under our noses. It is fair to say though that it's not as if most of those at LSE couldn't afford to lose a quid or two. Indeed, I hear that if you happen to spend a large percentage of your student loan on a couple of night out at a well-known lap dancing joint, the hard(ship) committee will happily inject liquidity into our otherwise limp account. But this resentful, genuinely poor student concedes that this isn't really the point. And me-thinks that for those unfortunate enough to suffer monetary loss, true to form, LSE administration will not give a damn. So what is being done? It seems that the Met Police aren't prepared to raise an eyebrow, let alone a hand, which leaves it to ever overstretched LSE security and the vigilance of you to bring the culprit to justice. However, keeping a look-out for suspicious-looking characters lurking around Wright's Bar is easier said than done because, paradoxically, there are so many of them. Witness sightings suggest the culprits were shifty-looking, and of Eastern European (or was that East of European?). Such an objective and accurate description does require further investigation and we imagine that the authorities are looking out particularly for the following: 1. Kings Students: Always suspicious and always lurking purposelessly about (they've nothing better to do than hang around our library), and surveys show them to be poorer than the average LSE student. Jealously is a terrible thing. And let's face it, they need to pay off their student loans somehow as a McJob only pays about £4.50 an hour 2. Me: I'm skint, I'm desperate and I'm quite capable (as a socialist) of ripping off rich people and out-running middle-aged and overweight security guards. Watch it, right? 3. Anthony 'Tony G' Giddens: Norman Foster is coming soon to open the library. The Princess Royal should be bringing the cheese and Twiglets, but our Tony could do with some 'sponsorship' for the wine, or maybe a new banner for the Houghton Street scaffolding to frustrate students even more. Rumour has it that the scaffolding has been there so long, the Post Office are giving it a post code of its own. 4. London Student Reporters: They have finally been seen about on campus, and as they have a full-time paid editor and a seeming inability to raise much revenue by selling little more than a quarter page advert for Dorothy Perkins, they might need to start thinking about desperate measures. And as they only come out once a fortnight with a smaller paper than our weekly Beaver, they have plenty of time on their hands when not watching 'Trisha'. 5. Eastern European "Gypsies": Obviously the most obvious of subjects. By definition. And let's face it, all Eastern Europeans have a criminal intent (according to the media and the Government's actions, so it must be true). East of Europe may be somebody's way of saying that they just don't know who to suspect since, as the world is spherical, east of Europe covers the globe. Because we would never steal from ourselves, would we? Union Jack Hie armies were assembled. On the right, at least in their opinion, were the Balcony Boys. The word on Houghton street was that attendance was compulsory for every card carrying rugger-bugger, on pain of being dropped, or worse. On the left, and everybody's left, the bowel-movement for social justice, sat on the ground floor, with the 'civilized' people. The mother of all wars was set to kick off, but first the small matter of the President of NUS giving a speech. This was Owain James' second appearance at UGM and, as much as it chokes Jack to say it, he actually did a good job. Sure, he's still mistakenly labouring under the impression that a march is going to make a damn difference, but at least time he knew some of the stats and spoke coherently with the air of a seasoned politician. Just don't hold your breath for the reinstatement of grants. When our own Sabbs took the stage, Dave Clay, refreshed and tanned from his jaimt to Glasgow, told the UGM that due to maintenance work Passfield Hall will not be open next year. Pardon Jack's French, but tWs is a fucking dis-? grace. Passfield is one of the few budget halls available to LSE students, and given the LSE's rapid expansion, is this really the time to lose nearly 200 beds? What is the SU to do? Well, what can they dot We can talk as much as we like in the UGM, but is unlikely that' a damn bit of difference can be: made. Which bring us quite fittingly to the second motion, the Battle Koyal%IVre the Balcony boys sexist? I&jS|Kin's Bridge an insult? Can C&S ii^urately detect the difference bMveen their elbows and their backsides? Time would teU; : The speech for came from a lacfy whose head-dress was as large as the size of her indignation. Whilst the thrust of the motion was that last week's christening of Biffin Bridge should be overturned, it quickly became clear that this was a vehicle to defame the Balcony Boys. How eloquently would they defend their honour? Very badly indeed, as it turned out.: Whilst everyone wiD, agree that Charterhouse (the AU's unofficiri spokesman) is in his element when: he is being offensive, he was utterly unable to defend his position. Lines like "They'll vote for me, they're my bitches" and "Tm.Stalin for Christ's sake" surely failed to endure him to the floating voters. In the end the motion was struck down. The bridge betwem the Old Building to St. Clement's remains nameless and the bowel-movement for social justice is vindicated, tack hopes that this will draw a line imder the sexism issue so we can get back to the real issues. Come back Blackwell and Vedad, aE is forgiven. , Page 4 The Beacer Noes Thursday 15th November Graduate Recruitment Slashed; how screwed are we? Armin Schulz investigates Many of those currently on job-search will find this a familiar picture: employers skimming even more carefully through the applications, the "reject-piles" keep on steadily growing on the desks of the human resources managers and the pressure to present oneself as among the best of the best is reaching new highs. Is this all just pessimistic make-believe of the press or are the chances to get a decent job in the next few years practically zero? As often, the truth is somewhere in the middle. The fact is that / of all UK employers slashed recruiting somewhat this year, 1/5 deferring the starting dates of the new employees and 1/10 withdrawing completely from the application process. Vacancies in the companies are filled primarily by existing staff via transfers within the company (especially in the electric industry - mobile phones, computers etc.) so as to fully use the already avail- able resources. There is some good news as well, though: 13% of the companies even reported an increase in hiring as some sectors (retail, distribution, hotels) still show signs of healthy Sept. 11th. This means that the real-life situation at the moment is most likely far worse than the numbers suggest - tourism and airlines -among others- have been badly hit in the aftermath of option, either because they do no have the money for it or because they simply do not want to spend another year outside of the labour force, they have no choice but to face reality deal with BlocynbSfQ df inroi in I CHEOrr I FIRST ^ 'BOSTON [man MmmLyrnA MorganStanley LEHMAN BROTHERS growth. Overall however, vacancies went down by 5.5%. These are the figures released earlier last week based on research by the Institute for Employment Studies; when asked for a reason of this downward development, the 166 surveyed UK recruiters quoted the global economic downturn. Sadly though, this is by far not the end of the story: the research was begun and finished before the attacks of the attacks, which in turn implies layoffs and barely -if any- new recruitment at these companies. What are the consequences for students then? In general, there are two possible lines of attack -either one does as 'accenture' was advising at the AISEC careers fair earlier this month: take a year out, get enrolled in some postgraduate studies etc. and simply hope for better times in the future. For all those for which this is not an the situation. First of all, it should be clear that companies are generally still hiring people - it's not as if no one gets employed from now on onwards. Secondly, career-mangement skills become increasingly more important. This means concretely that CV's, Application Forms etc. must be taken even more seriously (if this is possible) than before, but most importantly, it seems that open-mindedness might be a key ingredient for the success in the job-hunt. The readiness to apply to not just to the main field of choice (i.e. consulting), but to try out new things (IT, investment banking, NGO's etc.) if only for a while, can prove vital here. It can even prove beneficial later on when trying to change careers etc. as one's experiences have grown and one has shown that one truly is able to adapt to unforeseen circumstances. In all, though, confidence is the pillar on which it all rests. If one is not discouraged by the occasional "no" from an employer, the better one is able to present oneself as someone worth hiring and, more importantly, the easier it is to stay sane amidst the whirlwinds of predictions and opinions and forecasts raining down on the applicants. So, good luck to everyone. You might need some of that, too. Does anyone actually want to come to university any more? Jonathan Baylis Think how much effort you put in to getting a place at LSE. From the age of 13 you began training for GCSEs. By the age of sixteen, you'd finished your GCSEs and naively thought things coiild only get better, only to be smacked full on in the jaw by A-levels. So why continue in academic torment for another three years? Obviously, as students, we could easily answer this question: Alcohol, fraternisation and social buffoonery. It seems, however, that an increasingly greater number of more foolish yoimgsters are turning their backs on University, bucking a trend that has lasted for almost ten years. "50% of young people will be in University!" blasted the Tony Blair spin-machine. "Fat chance!" boomed the opposition. But, much to the aimusement of Duncan-Smith and his cronies, University places have only risen 6% in the last five years marking a massive friends and getting a better decline from the 30% increase between '93 and '94. If this continues, Blair will be met with jeers in The Commons and it will stand out alongside Labour's other policy flops regarding universities (need I mention tuition fees?) According to Estelle Morris and her department of education, it would require an extra 100,000 places to bring the proportion of sixth form leavers entering University up to standard with comparative foreign counterparts. It seems the problem Morris lies with the saturation in job at the end of it all seems supply of middle-class stu- to have been enough to woo dents. The attraction of three us - a strange thing that! years partjdng, meeting new The problem now is that children from deprived areas who could fill up new places are not applying. The government think-tank has now come up with the ingenious idea of encouraging universities to improve relation-ships with state secondary schools ( s o m e -thing that probably should have taken place years ago). The aim is for imiversities to encourage higher aspirations in pupils that would otherwise leave school at sixteen and find a job (not necessarily working for McDo^ds). At the same time, postt^ads are not to be ignored with Morris stressing the importance that they should not be neglected in favour of new imdergrads. As Labour aim to solve this problem, from LSE's perspective it is of far little consequence. Universities lower down the pecking order (take "Luton Polytechnic of Burger Flippers", The Beaver, issue 542) try far harder to attract working-class students and will soon receive financial rewards. However, this is unlikely to significantly attract the "top" universities to do the same. For now though, it seems the fraternisation and social buffoonery is the reserve of the middle-class. Page 5 The Beaver Navs Thursday 15th November The Beaver's weekly round up of student news from around the country with Lyie Jackson Fraud investigation experts have found a forgery ring at the University of East Anglia. The investigations centre around the discovery of three Union event tickets in a library photocopier. Later on, two female students tried to claim that the tickets belonged to them, but then refused to give their names. Three Union event tickets? Fucking pathetic. A University security spokesman commented, "The students are committing a criminal offence, and if they are detected then it will be investigated. It is an offence of forgeiy and criminal deception: it's a serious offence." Speculation continues to grow that the tickets were being copied by the event organiser, and after the confiscation of the master copy, the event suffered its worst turn out ever, but only just. Q. J! Greater Manchester's student paper. Student Direct, last week reported on the exploits of two students who hijacked a JCB digger. The JCB, which was situated in a building site close to student digs, was left open with its keys in the ignition. The drunken pair seized the opportunity for a quick dig , as one of them said, "We had a go at pressing the buttons and twiddling the knobs. Most of the time we were tiiming the machine round and round, but I tried to dig a hole in the groimd." A clever, impressive, not to mention rhyming account of events. Cardiff Researchers at the University of Cardiff have caused outrage in environmental circles,_ by claiming that the world needs more greenhouse gases in order to prevent a new Ice Age. Their research, which has angered many well known groups, says that we need more greenhouse gases in order to coimteract the clogging of the earth's atmosphere with cosmic dust. The build-up of such dust would eventually lead to a cooling of the earth's climate, and the subsequent beginning of a new Ice Age. A member of an environmental pressure group allegedly said, "people shouldn't be allowed to release such damaging research, I'd have them killed". A very fair assessment of the situation. Our very own University of London Union has caused uproar by allowing tobacco firm Gaiiloise to hand out free cigarettes. Free samples of Gauloises Blondes have been distributed at regular Saturday night events, which has caused many students to question the Union's right to distribute such potentially harmful products. One student commented, "I think the Union should encourage students to stop smoking rather than doing the opposite. This sort of promotion is completely imethical and should be banned." Her official line, obviously. After grabbing a weeks worth of the Blondes, she was gone. Not the only blondes grabbed at the event, where the lovely ladies from St. Martins College improved everyone's night. c c "C c c Univmitv Page 6 TheBeaverNeLcs Thursday 15th November Tony Giddens' Director's Lectures: the crib notes Lindsay Hoag On November 7th, Director of the London School of Economics and Political Science, Anthony Giddens, gave the first of a five part lecture series on Global Futures at a Time of Transition . Professor Fred Halliday, of the International Relations department chaired last Wednesday's lecture, initiating the question and answer session that followed Professor Gidden's introductory speech. Professor Giddens began the lecture series by discussing The Future of World Order, speaking initially on the implications of the September 11th World Trade center attack on the organization of nation states, and on the topic of globalization. Giddens spoke about the two phases that globalization has gone through. The first phase of globalization was mainly academic, and tended to focus on the question of whether globalization existed at aU and the extent to whether or not the world we live in has shifted over the past 20 or 30 years. Giddens spoke about the globalization skeptics who doubted that the world had shifted and believed that in spite of the talk about globalization, not very much has changed in the world since the late 19 th centiuy, since there already existed open economies, trade in cvirrencies, and mass migration. The skeptics believe that globalization is just a regurgitation of the 19th century systems that were in place. Refuting the belief that globalization is nothing new, Giddens spoke of the second phase of globalization, saying that he beheves that "global society has shifted dramatically, and the differences are more pro-noimced than the similarities." Giddens went on to add that the second global age is 30 or 40 years old, and is "more intensive, more com-prehensive, affects everybody in the world, not just parts of the world, and is much more dynamic, [and] much more fast moving." Giddens believes the second phase of the great glob-alization debate is no longer just academic. Rather, as Gidden said, "it is the political, worldwide movement and it is something we aU have to make sense of. Globalization is talked about today but it is poorly understood." Proponents and opponents see globalization as an economic phenomenon that includes the expansion of the global marketplace and an increase in the role of financial institutions. However, Giddens stressed that globalization is both "political and cultural and most importantly boimd up in communications." Giddens believes that the most important transformation in people's lives over the past 30 years has not been economic markets or economic interdependence, but rather has been the impact of the communications revolution, ¥ which dates from the late 1960s. In explaining how global communication intertwines with all else, Giddens mentioned how the events of September 11th constituted a global media event, because people aroimd the world were able to see the second plane crash into the tower on live television and were able to see the message that Osama Bin Laden later communicated on television. LSE 3rd year student Katja Kalamaki, agreed with Giddens' argument that the _communications revolution has been of great importance for globalization, saying "communication has been the main impact that has caused all this globalization and I think in that sense I agree with [Giddens] quite well," adding "I wish he would have elaborated on the topic of communication a bit more." Giddens went on to explain that globalization is not a single phenomenon, mentioning that "globalization is responsible for the increasing importance of regionalism, increasing importance of local nationalism, increasing importance of decentralization and the devolution of power in our lives." Furthermore, Giddens explained that globalization is not purely an external force, but that globalization is some- thing produced by people in their every day lives and gave the example of the use of the internet as a way in which people are agents of globalization, because they participate in global conmiimications. According to Giddens, globalization means a shift in the basic institutions of world society in the nature of political sovereignty, economic life, family life, cultural life and the wider global society. The lecture ended with a brief discussion on the three anti-globaliza-tion beliefs, which include, corporate influence, such as commercialization; inequality in the world between the rich and poor; and the idea that globalization is a Western phenomenon that includes 1/5 of the population while excluding the other 4/5. Giddens reminded the audience that anti-globalization advocated do not stand outside of globalization because they make use of the communications technologies, through the Internet and mobile phones, devices that help carry their message globally. After the lecture, student Ivan Zverzhanovski commented about Giddens speech, saying, "I think [Giddens] gave a good lecture on globalization but missed the point of world order. He has not said what the state global order is now. I [also] do not necessarily agree on his view that western values are universal." Perhaps Professor Giddens will comment on the future of world order in future directors lectures that will be held the current and upcoming term. And now for PuLSE's very own section of the Beaver... As PuLSE finally gets an FM licence, we hand over a section of our precious paper to the control of the media upstarts that wdll be hitting the airwaves next year PuLSE Programme Controller Jane Edbrooke writes PuLSE is to become PuLSE FM!!!!!!!! As of the dLlth February we will be traversing the air waves -reaching out to poeple other than the inhabitants of the obscurity of internet radio, the majority of whom are Alaskan. Ofc ourse the Quad has been benefitting from the quality output of PuLSE, but we are all very excited about the licence. This term has seen new DJ's and a new committee - though our esteemed station manager Dave Hunt is continuing over, to share his wisdom and experience - or at least he's hoping to get some experience (preferably on the PuLSE couch). Chances are that you missed mine and Dave's impromptue show in the closing hours of crush - but Im sure our drunken rampblings were well recieved. The normal ^hows however are much more professional and we're churning out some blinding tunes and insightful commentries (Im sure you all listened to my own interview with JULF and Rupert Walker on the pro's and con's of the strip joints surrounding Rosebery). If anyone is interested in getting involve contact us on radio@pulsefm.co.uk. There's plenty of opportunity to get involved. Keep, or rather start, listening. TheBea»xr Comments Nelson's Column It is true that almost all watchers of Who Wants To Be A Millionaire shout and curse at the depressingly familiar sight of some toothless earring wearing simpleton from Wiltshire looking permanently confused about the question in front of him, the rules of the quiz, his own name, the effect of gravity, zips, his own inability to do anything that requires any complexity of thought whatsoever, but most of all how God could let a fuckwit like him fritter away a golden chance to win bundles of cash while we, every one of us, sits at home with debts that would make the third world launch campaigns on our behalf. But last week, WWTBAM exceeded even its own high standards. One of the fastest finger first questions required the 10 contestants to put into alphabetical order, wait for it.....four letters....from the alphabet. It sounds tough I agree, but I think even Chris Tarrant, the doyenne of the criminally stupid, was expecting a fairly high rate of success. Even he chuckled when only three of the assembled managed to cope with the admittedly staggeringly demanding task of putting four letters of an alphabet of a language they were supposed to know pretty well into an order we sing fucking songs about. And perhaps just as bad was that the three that got it right, the giants of the intellectual world, took 7, 10 and about 13 seconds to do it. I mean how is that possible. Most people can probably recite the alphabet in about 10 seconds, at most. I honestly believe my 8 year old nephew would have cracked that question quicker, and it isn't because he's a child genius, it's because he's a normal, functioning, alpha-bet-knowing child, with fingers that work properly. I think even my dog would have a one in 16 chance. But still it goes on, mainly because the makers know that many people will tune in for the sight of these people and the opportunity to feel smug and superior. I'd just like to say to all those prospective WWTBAM contestants, it goes A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I.....I think you get the picture, or do you? It's taken nearly three years but I have finally realised why the selection of sandwiches and rolls at Benjy's is so wide. Seriously, in every outlet they've got more range than your average sea to land cruise missile. It's because they all taste fucking awful. The number of times I have said "I am never having that again" goes off the scale. However, even if, after your body has physically rejected the Minted Roast Lamb torpedo (which actually tastes of aniseed) you still have about three years (exactly equal to the half-life of the Italian Chicken Baguette) of alternatives before you are able to conclude, as I have, that it all tastes fucking awful. Compare Benjy's to, say, Pret A Manger who have about ten different sandwiches/wraps and it all becomes obvious. Unlike Benjy's, Pret A Manger's sandwiches are eminently edible. So, may I take this opportunity to extol the virtues of Safe-Eating. Don't go to Benjy's (or the Brunch Bowl but that goes without saying), avoid those mid-afternoon stomach cramps, don't let your attendance at lectures be dominated by the irregularity of your bowel movements (which, legally, I am obliged to say are more likely caused by something else, like AF101, and not Benjy's). Finally, has anyone else been so pissed that in attempting to take along a few beers and a pipe of Pringles to a party you pull out the goodies upon arrival, only to find that you've brought a set of tennis balls instead? Thursday 15th November r/7eBeaver EXECUTIVE EOnOR Chris Wills "'i c.d.wills@ise.ac.uk ¦ ¦ ; DIRECTOR Nicholas Stoker . ,;: 1 BUSINESS IVIANAGER Celine Infeld : : PHOTOGRAPHY EDITOR Mark Simpson : ; . r ; j i m.j.si m pson® Iseatu k ¦ 1 TRAINING EDITOR - Ian Curry v ; : i.d.cunY@lse.ac.uk NEWS EDITOR : Ruth Molyneux ,. BdJNKEDrrORS Charlie Jufd ¦ ' c.r.jurd@lse.ac.uk Catherine Baker c.e.baker@lse.ac.uk INTERNATIONAL EDITOR Maidah Ahmad., ; ;» m.ahmad@lse.ac.uk;,: : B:ART AND FILM EDITOR:^); -Tom Whitaker t.e.whitaker@lse.ac.uk; ¦ , beaverfilm@yahoo.com : p MUSIC EDITORS Peter Oavles ' ' ¦ p.b.davies@lse.ac.uk Andrew Swann a.i.swann@ise.ac.uk CLUBBING EDITORS Tom Davies .. ' tw.davies@lse.3c,uk Ruth McCormack r.m.mccormack@ise.ac.uk STYLE EDITOR Amy Williams a,c,williams@lse.ac.uk - LIVING SECTION EDITOR ian Curry i.d.curry@lse.ac.uk FINE ARTS EDITORS j,Daniel Lewis . ;; ^eter Skipworth ;v^si:;S %%rURES EDITOR Kerron Rohrer . UTERARY EDITORS Saphiralsa Seniha Sarni seni8s3ph@hotmail.com ^• SPORTS EDITORS Justin Jewell j.j.jewell@lse.ac.uk ; Matt Trenhaile m.s.trenhaile@lse.ac.uk THE COLLECTIVE Serif Aip Atakcan, Matttiew Christina Beharry, :: Matthias Bemer; Vida Bromljy - Tavtnef, Farzan ' Bilimoria, Leonad Brouwcr, Hannah Bryce, lain ^ndred, Peter Calfas. Peter Charterhouse, lornc ChaHcs, Ed Cook, Naomi Cofvin, Peter Coupe, Dan Cummmg, Ru^ Daniels, Amit Desai. Heien Donald, Rttesh Dostil, Nafeesa Eitnes.: Juli Gan, Ian Gascoigne, Juiia Gies^ Sarah Greent^rg, • Laura Hales, Sb Undsay Htoag, Katherine Jacwrib, Lyle Jackson, Edward Jones, Candice MacOona}d,;C^n Madden. Garhrielle Menezei, tinda Monis, Shashwat : Nands, Robin Nobie, Daniela Ott, N«l Patet, Nicholas Pauro, Alison Perine, Chelsea Phua. Klrstine Potts, Oalrc Pryde, Vanessa Raizberg, Jan Rattay, Zaf Rashid, lordta Reehifl. MarkTunt' Ready. Piers Sanda^, Susannah^i/a^ James Sharrock. Matthew Stoate,; Jamie Tehrant, Julfus Walker, Amy Williams Have you written 3 articles for The Beaver? E-Mail thebeaver@lse.ac.uk to be included in our writers list. . Printed by East End Offset, £3 " Baker's Mullet ANOTHER day, in times gone past, I used to be quite the wom-aniser. Oh yes. With a top hat cocked upon my head, a valiant cravat around my gregory and a Castella in one hand, I was the air of sophistication. I remember, quite vividly in fact, how once, while I was playing Hamlet at the Globe, I was caught short for a shilling when dining with Lord Huntingberry at the Savoy. Mere etiquette, dear reader, should alert you to the faux pas to which I was then engaged. Lord Huntingberry tried his paramount to avoid my eyes as I dipped my hand inside my waistcoat attempting to find a mislaid ten bob note. This was to be in vain, I had no note, I was skint. The Lord of course paid my bill as his manners dictated, he left, disgusted with my conduct while I remained to finish my port and lemon in solitude. The night was drawing in so I had it away on my coat tails down to a local Inn I know named the George the Fourth. I, naturally, sampled the fine wines on offer and asked about their fayre, shamefully, I realised that it had passed the hour at which they could feasibly serve a cheese platter. Whilst attempting to elicit some money from a drunken youth at the bar, I happened to stumble upon Lord Huntingberry's good lady wife who was busy playing the fruit machine. I, as you would expect, lent a hand in ||H endeav- ° our to snatch a Jackpot HHHSpJ repeater by advis- ing her the hold the bells. She took my advice and low and behold, to my obvious surprise, she won fuck all, coming away from the Barcrest machine without a pot to piss in and a face like the proverbial smacked arse. It was during this chance meeting with Lady Huntingberry that I decided to make my move. Being the womaniser that I am she was unable to resist my charms. Her loss at the afore mentioned fruit machine, coupled with the fact that she was quite squiffy meant that she did not shudder as I positioned my hand upon her breast. I bought the good treat the fair answered the tenth multiple choice question in order to win a quid. As I manoeuvred the good lady out of the inn, I spotted from the corner of my eye, the shadow of a cape and cane. I, of course, instantly recognised that these items belonged to none other than the fine Lord Huntingberry himsdf. 'You!' Shrieked the Lord. 'I knew it, I knew you were the one doinking my wife!' 'Ney noble Lord!' I replied as a sweat began to encroach my brow. The Lord made a dash towards me and raised his cane as if to strike. 'I never laid a glove on her!' I cried, for in truth, I have never doinked his wife. The Lord, thankfully, accepted this as fact and departed with his wife to find a Hackney Carriage. And that is the story as it occurred even though my memory has surely failed in places. But remember this dear reader, if a Lord of this Realm asks you to dine, always remember your manners. If asked whether you have manhandled his wife, always deny it. Again, to conclude, I must make it clear that I never laid a glove on his lady wife, but I had however been doinking his daughter ever since her sixteenth birthday. Chin Chin! Page 8 The Beaver Noes Thursday 15th November The Beaver chats to the latest IR professor at LSE: James Rubin The following is an excerpt from an interview with James Rubin, who was Assistant Secretary of State for the US State Department under President Clinton. Mr. Rubin is now teaching at LSE in the International Relations Department and a partner at The Brunswick Group, a local public relations firm. The Beaver's Stephen Linaweaver caught up with Mr Rubin last Wednesday. SL: Could you give us an idea of what your corresponding position in the British government is, compared with your role in the State Department? James Rubin: There is no perfect analogy, but it would be basically like the Junior Minister in the Foreign Office- but a Junior Minister who had a very, very close relationship with the Foreign Minister. SL: Have you sensed a change in British mood or opinion towards the States in the last six weeks? James Rubin: With respect to September 11th, I think the first weeks were very moving - the way in which just average British citizens came up to me and expressed their condolences just because they knew I was American. Now since the bombing of Afghanistan has begun those groups that have a blatant anti- Americanism have been getting a little more attention. However, people need to distinguish between anger towards the United States that is generalized and this particular group of extremists who have attacked the United States for very narrow reasons, and they are really political reasons. Bin Laden has used religious ideology to try to gain political power so that he can run Saudi Arabia, so that he can run the Islamic world, and people need to understand that is what he is about. SL: Getting that information out is obviously extremely difficult. The State Department is planning a television and advertising campaign to try to influence Islamic public opinion. Do you think that will be effective, or is there the danger of a backlash? James Rubin: Look - It is going to be hard to change opinions about the United States while American bombs are landing in Afghanistan. It is an extraordinarily difficult thing to do. Those pictures are much more powerful and unfortunately the pictures of September 11th are fading, and the pictures of daily bombs are what people are focusing on. I think that PR, and advertising, and pubUc diplomacy are important, and certainly the moderates in the Arab and Muslim world need to be forced to speak up. By engaging them and using media and advertising you Rubin are hopefully helping them. But there are limits and I don't really think that we are going to change the perceptions of American foreign policy during the course of this conflict. The real way to change those perceptions in Afghanistan are to be able to prove six months from now that Afghanistan is in better shape than it would have been prior to September 11th. That is the way to say to the Arab world - okay, you had a lot of complaints, but talk to the Afghans. When the Afghans can in lai^e number stand up and be heard from next summer and next fall and say, "We are better off for America having gotten involved here." That is when you will win the propaganda war. SL: Some people argue that econonlic development, like the Marshall Plan, is needed. The Marshall Plan was implemented within a set geographical area for a certain period of time - how could the coalition attempt redevelopment in so many countries, considering that this conflict may carry on for a long time? James Rubin: That is a very good question. And I do not have a great answer for you. Certainly I hope that one of the silver linings in all of this is a recognition in the developed world, in particularly the United States, that foreign assistance, investment in developing countries, are smart policies, because they not only win friends, but they limit the pool of angry terrorist individuals. The Marshall Plan is thought of as the great example of foreign aid, but there were foreign assistance programs that were not good examples of foreign aid. What we have to do is get them right. American willingness to pay attention to what is happening in poor and underdeveloped countries, failing states where this kind of terrorism can breed, like Somalia and Afghanistan - this newfound willingness to focus on that is encouraging. But again it is a big, decades-long, centuries-long challenge. SL: What would you say to current LSE students - what is going to be the specialty needed in the next ten years? James Rubin: Whatever motivates you, a lot. When I was a Master's student at Columbia University, it was nuclear weapons and arms control, and that motivated me a lot, where I was prepared to put in 12 and 15-hour days every day for years, to become a real expert in that area. From that, once you are really, really spe-ciaUzed, and you understand the politics, technicalities, public affairs, expert opinion, and how policy works in your area, then you immediately understand how it works in another areas. Be motivated enough to be an intern or to work at a low paying job for a while until you actually find that you know about as much as most of the other people know. And then you will be able to transfer that to other areas and find a real profession. Democratic ideals vs cynical apathy - The end of me-isfn? Simon Bailey On Tuesday 11th November there was a lecture on the subject of Globalisation, Democracy and Terrorism at Chatham House, entitled "The End of Me-ism?" given by the Secretary General for the Commonwealth, Don McKinnon. In it he set out his, and his organisations, political ideology in the context of the global market. As a believer in a more equitable political and economic world , . , r- though especially concerned with those covmtries in The Commonwealth, his lecture had at its basis principles of socialism, among other things, and an imaginative, uplifting socialism at that. Since September 11th, he claimed, that a greater sense of social solidarity, and collective conscience had been felt, and that if this movement of increased social responsibility could be maintained we could be seeing the beginning of the end for the culture of 'Me-ism' -The lingering headache of the individuality and selfish hedonism of Thatcher culture. He went on to wider issues such as poverty alleviation, terrorism clamping - by diplomatic means, and world trade. On the latter subject \he stressed the importance of creating a free market, that was free for everybody, rather than one set of rules for one camp and another for the rest. This he claims could have the effect of boosting global income and lifting 320 million people out of poverty within the next 10 to 15 years. After questioning him briefly at the end I discovered that 'could' was reaUy the operative word here. The problem with this concept, and in fact the ideals behind a lot of the lecture, is: What can we or anyone do to ensiire the fruition of such ideals. For McKinnon, rational democracy gives us the best chance, but even then there is no organisation outside the legislators themselves who can ensure such things. For me, added to this is the questionable state of our system of democracy at the moment. There seem to be as many people in favour of eradicating developing countries debt, as there are opposed to the war in Afghanistan. As many people opposed to the inequitable economics of the global world as there are in favour of proportional representation. Yet these issues remain unresolved. The consequence in all this has been to produce a downward spiralling, self-fvdfill-ing prophecy: A nation of voters, looking for visible change, made cynical and apathetic, by what they see as the systems failures. However it is this cynicism and apathy that ensures the systems continued failure. If ever there was a time for social action then it is now, we need something to kick start a long overdue process of global, political recovery. For McKinnon - and here I am in total; agreement - this is only possible through a greater collective responsibility. However one only has to take a quick trip on the tube to see just how much 'Me-ism' there is still in existence. fe^Track. teachers help pupils A through their exams VlhUc -tekirvj -their owrt. The Fast Track Teaching Programme allows rapid progression towards a leadership role in education. If you have a strong academic record, and at least a 2:1 or equivalent, you are eligible to apply. Successful candidates will still complete a one year Initial Teacher Training course, before becoming a Fast Track teacher. The closing date for applications Is December 31. Rnd out Vv more at www.festtraGlcteachli^gov.uk or request a brochure on 08000 56 22 66. 1 Cl jLL I ^ Teaching department for education and skills Those who can, teach. Last year I was extremely honoured and humbled to receive the Dev Cropper Memorial Award. This award was established" in recognition of the amazing work and personality of Dev Cropper, a student at the LSE who died tragically after finished his final year. Upon receiving the award I announced to the AGM of the Students Union that I was going to ensure that I would undertake a charity fund raising event that would reflect the importance of this award. Nearly six months later it is time to update the student body of what is going on, what has been planned, and what you can do to help. I announced at the AGM that I would be cycling from John O' Groats to Lands End. This journey will cover 1,400 kilometres, and take 19 days. We will be going through the highlands of Scotland, through the Peak District, the Cotswolds and moors of Devon. We will be leaving on the first day of the Easter holidays, and return in the third week. Since announcing my intentions I have been joined by others who are just as devoted to completing this immense task, and to raising a huge amount of money for charity. Jarlath O' Hara, the Treasurer of the Students Union, will be on board, and will bring his undoubted fitness and organisational skills. Justin Jewell has already started training, and will be a huge help in raising a large amount of money for charity. We have had interest from other people, who now only have to make their mind up as to whether they want to come along. From now on the training gets serious, and we go into massive fund raising mode. Last weekend I went on a bike ride, and ended up in Cambridge. For those of you not familiar with the geography of this country, that is approximately 90 kilometres from outside the M25. We will have to do this distance every day we are on the road for over two weeks. Each person who is on board will have chosen a charity, and as soon as we start raising money from the student body we will make these charities known. We also need help in other forms. It would be great if people could think about; Places to stay. If anyone lives along the route, which will be published fully in Tnhe Beaver, but is essentially along the line of text on the map, we would like to stay for a night! This will help us to keep costs low, but more importantly give us flexibility in case anything goes wrong on the road. Companies to badger. If anyone knows any companies that are likely to want to sponsor an event like this, and get high profile coverage around LSE, also let us know. Fund raising. If anyone wants to get involved in fund raising from next term, manning stalls in the Quad or going round with sponsorship forms, then also let us know. We want to turn this event into something that the whole LSE can become involved in. Whilst on the road we will be posting regular updates on a website that is at the moment being constructed. We will be having regular half page updates and information slots in the newspaper right up until we leave. I very much hope that you will be able to get involved, and help make a real difference to our fund raising ability. •V S?' % CP B o a c OJ K xT* ¦o CycleUK 2002 Ian Curry was formerly editor of this newspaper, and was awarded the Dev Cropper Award for the year 2001 - 2002 at the AGM in March. He is a final year Government and History Student From the top Ian Gurry Jarlath O' ^ra Justin Jev^f^ O X3 C Xu o •S- 0 m For more information please contact Ian Curry on i.d.curry@lse.ac.uk Letters to The Beaver Have Your Say - thebeaver@lse.ac.uk Letters and contributions to The Beaver are welcome at the address above. Please keep letters under 200 words, and be aware that we might have to edit them for clarity. Sir, While enjoying much of the amusing article about the Library in your last issue (Beaver, 8 November), may I correct some factual errors. Far from 20 per cent of the PCs being out of order, a maximiun of 4 per cent have been out of action at any one time over the last month. Money for the redevelopment was raised outside normal Library funds; we are still purchasing just as many books for the Course Collection as before. There are certainly queues in the Library at peak times - this is difficult to avoid but we are timetabling extra staff on the service points to keep the queues moving quickly. Some areas of the Library can be quite noisy, particularly roimd the ramp, where students like to stand and chat. This is why the building is designed to have the study desks aroimd the perimeter; away from the ramp and protected by the shelving, these areas remain quiet even when it is busy elsewhere. And, sorry, but you can't blame King's College students for the Library being crowded - it is just LSE students using it more than ever before. The agreement between all the colleges of London University allowing reciprocal use of libraries has been in existence since the 1980s without causing any problems. Only LSE members are allowed into the Course Collection. King's students are not allowed to use LSE computers, either. The reciprocal agreement will work to LSE's advantage on 27 November, when part of our Library wiU closed off for the official opening ceremony. On that day LSE students will be particularly welcome to study in King's new library in Chancery Lane (the old Public Record Office building). Maureen Wade Deputy librarian Sir, In your editorial last week regarding Ken Livingstone you wrote: "This is why [as a Londoner through and through] there can be no doubt that in a terrorist crisis London's Mayor would stand up and be counted." This ignores the fact that Ken Livingstone, as leader of the Greater London Council did have to deal with a terrorist crisis. In July 1982, two bomb attacks on the Household Cavalry in Rotten Row and at the band stand in Regent's Park killed 11 people and injured another 50 and in December 1983, an IRA bomb at Harrods killed 6 people and injured another 90. Ken Livingstone invited Gerry Adams to London to discuss the matter and was vilified by much of the press for doing so but this was a real attempt to publicly start a peace process (and in fact Tory ministers were having secret talks with thei IRA about a possible ceasefire at the time) and showed that Ken did have what it takes, in terms of looking for a peaceful solution and attempting to imderstand the underlying problems that lead to such a loss of life. Lewis Allan Sir, Sometimes the UGM is undoubtedly offensive and the line of decency is crossed. The recent Biffen's Bridge motion was deemed by many as offensive and thus was rightly voided in last weeks UGM. However the article in the Beaver by a member of the Movement For Justice campaign fails to acknowledge the valuable contribution the so called "arrogant clique of conservative, white, male students". The Balcony regularly call officers and sabbs to account, provide much constructive debate and are very occasionally funny. These members, like all students, are an integral part of the Union and certainly help, not hinder, the UGM. If you have any problems vnth the UGM or other issues please contact the relevant sabb. or executive officer, instead of causing confrontation. Duncan Adams Equal Opps Officer (MALE) Sir, I am clearly the hottest topic of news and the foremost source of entertainment aroimd, and I am enraged that I have not yet been featured in your excellent 'Sporting Legends' column. I fail to understand how Peter Callas can be featured before me, when, despite his admirable pot-holing feats, I am patently the 'Original Sporting Legend'. To name but a few of my hilarious antics; the two pint testicle stretch; the amazing pubic inferno™; the Houghton Street Streak, and Paris' 'Fistful of Francs' Scandal, not to mention the 'My name is Anal Rapist' skit which resulted in my being banned from halls. I feel that this is clearly enough evidence of my legendary status, and would urge your 'Sporting Legends' committee to reconsider my exclusion. Charterhouse Sir, Please stop printing dvdl shit about some bloke called "Charterhouse", whom 99.999% of the imiversity doesn't give a fuck. Bored Kid Agree? Disagree? Think we've accidently mispelt pasture? E-Mail thebeaver@lse.ac.uk For your eyes LSEjobs is a brand new recruitment service exclusively for the School's graduating students and alumni. Our service is completely free for job seekers and enables employers to recruit from a community of the world's brightest and most able graduates. 10 Bedford Street, London WC2E 9HE T 020 7420 8097 www.lsejobs.eom Page 12 The Beacer News Thursday 15th November Bianca Jagger hits Houghton Street Sarah Greenberg On Tuesday the 6th of November, an impressive array of panellists gathered for the LSE Question Time debate on "The Global Environment". The panellists' viewpoints were all passionate and wide-ranging. On the far left for environmental concerns sat Bianca Jagger, an 'eco-warrior', human rights activist, and Mick's ex-wife. The most right wing participator was Bjom Lomborg, author of the controversial new book "The Skeptical Environmentalist", which argues against turning too much focus to environmental problems. Before the debate, Dr. David Viner, who is associated with the United Nations and is an expert on the data distribution associated with climate change, commented that he was particularly excited to see these two extremes head off. The other debaters were Alyce Tidball (coimsellor for environment, science, and technology at the US Embassy in London), Stephen Tindale (the current policy director for Greenpeace UK and soon to be executive director), and Julian Morris (economist and director of the International Policy Network, "helping to create free societies around the world"). A major issue that kept coming up is the role of the United States in "The Global Environment" which directly ties in with the highly controversial Kyoto Protocol. The Kyoto Protocol is an international treaty calling for the reduction in emissions of greenhouse gasses, which may lead to such dangers as a rising sea level, changing weather patterns, and serious health effects. The US signed the protocol on 1998, but refuses to submit it to congress until the developing countries also agree to set emission reduction targets. Since the treaty cannot be ratified until the senate reviews it and passes a 2/3-majority vote, the US is preventing the treaty from being enacted. How responsible is the US for the world's environmental problems? "The US emits 25% of the C02 emissions and was the only coimtry not to ratify the Kyoto protocol...in the end this will endanger our lives," argues Bianca Jagger who is very unimpressed by the lack of attention given to environmental matters by politicians. Though he acknowledges that the US has done plenty of good things for the rest of the world, Steve Tindale argues, "climate change is the most serious threat we're approaching ...( with the Kyoto protocol), the US has been extremely dishonest... that's the treaty you agreed to, I'm sorry if you didn't read it... It's entirely immoral...Free Trade to the US is more important than health concerns...Kyoto is a much better treaty than it seems to be. Cutting emissions is NOT actually bad for the economy. It has actually been good for the economy where it's been implemented." Bjom Lomborg brings economics and cost into the picture. "We have to ask ourselves," he says, "Is the Kyoto treaty a good idea?...It will do almost no good.. .aren't there better covurse for action? How do we spend scarce resources... Generally the economy increases 2% a year...It's true that both can increase, but we have to face that it's a trade off." Other issues that enter the debate are the role of the individual in the fight for the global environment, ecological modernisation, what to do when the water supply is mostly depleted, the question of ownership of resources, and more about the economic costs of environmental action. Do people have an impact with their consumer choices? We have a [profound] ability to influence corporations...we can redictate and make them accountable, say Bianca Jagger. "Know what each corporation does and how they harm the environment." Bjom Lomborg feels that individual action through consumer choice "can make an impact...but is not a very active way of doing things...on one's own, there's an enormous cost. Why should only the good people pay the price." He feels that action should lay more in the hands of government and its policies. Unfortunately, since the debate only lasted one hour, the plethora of interesting and controversial topics brought up could not possibly receive the attention they each deserve. One LSE student literally called out for a more in depth serious discussion about the real economics behind environmental action, "C'mon, you're at the LSE!" Bianca would have liked to elaborate on the alarming links between the war, oil, and the Caspian Sea. One of the main topics she was preparing before the debate is the fact that George Bush and members of his cabinet have assets in oil, which in turn affects their actions in the realm of war and the environment. "And that is unethical," she argues. "With the environmental concerns decreasing, the young people have to fight." I would like to applaud LSE's QT society's ability to bring such extraordinarily influential guests, and to pick the perfect group for a debate of this sort. Were I the producer of a 'survivor' type show where the guests had to choose with whom to stay stuck on a desert island, I would choose exactly the same group. Bianca Jagger would entertain me with past Studio 54 highlights, and Bjorn Lomborg could ease my concems. "Is the cost of cleaning really worth the cost of the effort it will take? Sit back and drink coconut milk with me, my friend!" Bang Bang Bangs On and On and On "In my book, there is only one reason to do anjrthing; as a statement to the imiverse of who you are. Used in this way, your life is self-creative. You use life to create yourself as who you are and who you've always wanted to be for as long as your soul can remember. Let us even go as far as setting aside society's 'right and wrongs' and instead see life as the benevolent passage of experience which we need in order to be able to experience ourselves through time and create ourselves in the highest image of ourselves. We must not be threatened in order to be 'good' nor live in the opinions of others for what authority do others possess and is 'good' anyway? Who sets the guidelines and rules of what is 'right' and 'wrong'? I tell you this: You are your own rule maker and you decide how well you have done; how well you are doing. For you are the one who has decided who you are and want to be. Nobody else has the authority to judge you who vdon't live yoiir life, not even God. For how and why could the God of free wiU and creation ever call his own cre- ations bad? We could hold that we came from a state of perfection (forget that Darwinism monkey thing). But, in order to know what 'this' was, we had to experience ourselves as we truly wished to be and we could not be that imless we also had the choice to be something else. From our actions, we are thus given the experiences that allow us to leam lessons and remember who we are and want to be. You get me rude boy? Mm..." Global Uni News Camegie Mellon University, Pennsylvania The Interactive Animatronics Initiative at Camegie Mellon has created Dr Beardsley, a robotic representation of an absent-minded professor. It/he can respond to questions, exhibit mood changes, discuss a topic, sing, burp, hiccup, sneeze and snore. Through speech recognition technology, synthetic interview technology, discussion engines, and audio, visual and animatronic technology, Dr Beardsley can interact with humans and display life-like emotions. Its creators are also looking into making Beardsley look more human-like, by developing featxires such as a complete silicon skin. The plus point about making this robot absent-minded is that if he is unable to cany on a particular discussion, Dr Beardsley can provide ambiguous repUes and still fit in with his character. Great idea, but it's not as though we don't have enough human versions of Dr Beardsley around. Coliunbia University, New York The things people do. The things business professors do. One at Columbia University's Business School decided to send 240 letters to New York restaurants, complaining that his wedding anniversary was ruined after eating food at these restaurants that made him and his wife extremely sick. In fact, this was his study of how restaurants react to complaints. More than 200 of the restaurants responded quickly, trying to find out what was wrong with their food. Many restaiurant managers became suspicious when they found the professor's letters looking similar to those sent by people trying to get free meals (by complaining that they ate bad food in the restaurant). They also responded very efficiently when they found out that the complaints were false - several restaurants are now suing both the professor and Columbia University. Asian University of Science and Technology, Thailand Instead of being ambushed by society committee member at Freshers' Fair, freshers at the AsianUST are introduced to the university with a spiritual ritual. This involves singing, being blessed with fragrant powder water, and walking down a candle-lit path. The freshers then stand in a semi-circle holding candles, and their hands are tied with white string, signifying their joining of the university family. Compare this with Freshers' Month of Madness...the disparity is almost fimny. MeGill University, Quebec The latest debate at McGill is over the use of a computer program - WebCT, which includes a tracking feature that allows professors to view the number of times a student has logged »n, viewed specific parts of a course online, and posted or re^ discussions. If that doesn't sound dodgy enough, there's also time fact that few students are actually aware of this function. The manager of the Learning Technologies Resoiurce'Section of the Instructional Communications Center (ICC) at McGill, Gerry Leclerc, claims that the tracking feature is not a violation of students' privacy rights; it is a function that allows professors to monitor which WebPages are being used most regularly and effectively by students. He adds that professors don't tend to be very interested in this utility. However, as a McGill Economics Professor points out, if there is no interest or need in this 'tracker', then why have it in the first place? To make matters worse for those aiding against the use of the tracking function, McGiil's computing policies provide only a vague explanation of users' privacy rights: "Users have a right to privacy. The level of privacy does not exceed, however, that of reasonable expectations". I would imagine that the phrase "reasonable expectations" is easily contestable. Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong The School of Business and Management at HKUST has been ranked the Number 1 MBA school in Asia, according to a survey conducted by Asia-Inc magazine. This is the first time a Hong Kong institution has been ranked first in regional business school rankings; and to further impress - the HKUST is the yoixngest of the top ten business schools in the region (of Asia and Australasia). The Asia-Inc survey investigated three aspects, and HKUST was ranked first in both faculty resources and student quality, while coming second in academic reputation. The HKUST is followed by the Australian Graduate School of Manag^ent at second place, and the National University of Singapore at third. Page 13 TheBecttxr Comment Thursday 15th November From the Thames to the Patomac with Mark Paustenbach 'Peace in our time and chicken in every pot' Much theoiizing has occurred over the past two months over why middle eastern covmtries so hate the United States and Israel, and partake in acts of terrorism. In the case of Afghanistan, a religious regime, the Taliban, which ruled over an impoverished region, allowed a known terrorist to train his followers in their country. Many have concluded that in return for taking such a risk, the Taliban were bought off with bin Laden's money. Writers such as Thomas Freidman argue that the attacks of September 11th could have been avoided had there been greater economic opportimities in Afghanistan. Others also conclude that if Palestinians had access to good-paying : jobs, that they would not become stiicide bombers. A telling portrait of this scenario is painted by Joseph Lelyveld in the New York Times Magazine of two weeks ago. In that issue, he interviewed the family of a young university student who became a bomber, in the new home provided for them by political organizations who violently oppose Israel. The deal here is quite simple: if you become a suicide bomber, you will live in paradise and your family will be taken care of. To a young man living in the slums of the West Bank, this seems like a fantastic opportunity. Those who look to economics to solve the aforementioned problems, argue giving would be terrorists an economic incentive to put down their rocks and c4, will make them pick up a palm pilot. The problem with this analysis is that it avoids looking at other factors such as culture and elite behavior, both of which could seriously landercut any move toward globalization progmade by Afghanistan or those living in the West Bank, for example. First, globalization and unfettered capitalism does not thrive well in theocracies or near theocracies. Capitalism can thrive in such situations. But, in areas where the free flow of capital is not of paramount importance and the rule of law is determined by religious leaders whose main goal is not the preservation of private property, for example, then globalization will be slow to take hold. The establishment of the nale of law, that protects the rights of minorities is also important. Second, elite behavior must change in such coim-tries. Many heads of state, for example, would find themselves of very little use once peace is made with Israel and tl^e West. These leaders are vgenerally not dei^ocraticayjf elected and derive their p^er from scare tactics. Whi|^ many argue that the alterative to Yasir Arafat, for example, would be & much pi^rer leader for the Palestini^, that fails to support theip.'^guments that ecofiomic -opportunities would solve the problem of terrorism, .^ain, it wovdd take the ele<^n or installation of leaders who were accountable to the populace and obtained their power not from scare tactics and appeasement of the most hawkish domestic factions. As long as sudi leaders are in power solely to fight an interminable battle against a long-time enemy, then an economic upswing will be far off. While i agree that a weaMirn economic intervention into some regions fi^y be helpful, and possibly the only way to reduce the chances of future terrorist acts, it is a long and arduous process. The lag time betweent implementing such an aid |ffogram and its future succe» may be too large and tenjprism will surely continue ^ the meantime. It is import^, however, to address both culture and the notion of ad^ncing democracy in deteE^EBning the fate of nations that foster terror. The move from rocks to RAM and plastic explosives to palm pilots, if attempted, will take a long time. Catherine Baker on how an enemy in need is a friend indeed If any of the strategists who manoeuvred George W Bush into the presidency this time last year - when the only little white things in federal buildings we had to worry about were hanging chads - are in Texas now instead of indulging their West Wing fantasies in Washington, on his return from the Apec summit in Shanghai last month he might even have pronoimced: 'Houston, we have a rapprochement.' How different from the Kosovo war, during which Boris Yeltsin at one point came very close to predicting World War Three, or even from a few months ago, when American suspicions that Russia would draw closer to China intermingled with Vladimir Putin's fears of the USA's missile defence shield, which can't be constructed without violating the 1972 anti-baUistic missile treaty. AU of a sudden Russian sateUites in central Asia whose heads of state Bush would have been hard-pressed to name have become vital staging-posts for America's war in Afghanistan; and Putin, for his part, wiU have been quick to perceive that when half the world is taking part in a coalition against one kind of terrorism in central Asia, it's much more difficult for them to condemn Russia's war against Chechen separatists on the other side of the Caucasus. One bone of contention has already been addressed: Russia has withdrawn from Cuba, vacating the Lourdes spy base from where they were said to be able to eavesdrop on Washington and NASA. When Putin meets Bush for talks this week, they're widely expected to continue negotiating an agreement under which Russia will allow NMD tests in return for a bilateral reduction in their holdings of nuclear warheads. If not even Tony Blair has been prepared to play the 'candid friend' so far, don't expect Putin to point out that the reasoning behind the 'Son of Star Wars' programme on which Bush still insists, designed to intercept missiles fired by rogue states, couldn't have been proved more outdated. These would be the 'rogue states' such as Iran, still a member of the coaMtion despite the obvious political dangers involved in hitching the government's star to a war opposed by many Muslims and Ccirried out by a country which that government formerly denoimced as the 'Great Satan'. Or, of course, Iraq. Much as certain hawks at the Pentagon might wish the result of the FBI's profile of the suithrax attacker to have turned out otherwise, it now seems possible that America's exposure to biological warfare could have been brought about not by a shadowy fundamentalist network that can be traced back to Baghdad, but by an ail-American loner who could have set up his apparatus in an attic room for less than the price of a used car. So the New Detente between Russia and the US, after what was hardly a reprise of the Cold War anyway, as welcome as it is, is founded on shaky principles. If a missile defence scheme really could protect AmeriCcin security or anyone else's, it would have to lock on to envelopes stuffed with anthrax spores, or uranium-laced Semtex in a suitcase. Maybe it would still hit the Chinese Embassy. But at least they would have tried. Amy Kamchanapee on the linguistic idiosyncracies of us Brits I knew I was in for trouble on the day that I walked into lecture angry. "I'm pissed!" I huffed and threw my stuff on the chair. At home, in New York, that kind of statement usually draws complacent smiles. Here, I was greeted with knowing smiles. "When did you have time for that-between classes?" a British classmate asked. "What?" I had no idea why I was not given that sympathetic treatment that I was so accustomed to at home in the United States. Everyone was being, well, cheeky, about my heightened state of intolerance. Little did I know that it was not my being annoyed that had set off this reaction. It was my choice of words. In Britain, I've learned that "pissed" means drunk, or "trashed" in American. And I have learned to compliment ones' "trousers" rather than "pants" especially if in a pub and if the object of the compliment is a member of the opposite sex. In the future, if I choose to express annoyance, I cannot for- get the important modifier "pissed off." No longer can I abbreviate. In trying to be imderstood, my daily usage of language has reached a higher degree of clarity than ever before. While some of my classmates struggle with using English, a second language, as a first language, I struggle through relearning my native tongue. There are times that my second language Swedish, seems a lot easier thsm trying ta understand why people laugh When I say that I got a "shag" hairdo (I've learned that it's called "The Rachel" here). Now that I've learned, I've been trying to be careful. But there are little issues that present themselves in my daily hfe. I am usually confounded with the issue of trying to conform or trying to hang on to my heritage. I could just as easily say "apartment" as "flat" but I wonder if I'll be vmder-stood. The other night I referred to my cell phone as my "mobile" whilst speaking to my father, a Thai immigrant to the United States. This launched into an hour lecture on how he worked so hard to come to America in the 1960s and how my mother's family waited in a leaky, creaky boat from Scand^avia to EUis Island in 1905 fw truth justice and the Americ^^ay. But surely, I wondered,these inspiring immigrant stories exclude some tales of adaptation in my language. There is, you see, a strong double standard. If a British person flattens his accent after hving in America, he's adapting. If an American flattens his accent after hving in England, he's affected. Despite aH of the qualms I've outlined, it's great fun to try and translate Briti^ to American and vice vCTsa. Sometimes I'm tempted to write "fluent American" ka tke languages section of my CV. ABd I'm not taking the piss {»Oj I don't have to use the toilet}). Comments on the Editorial Pages should be sent c.d.wills@lse.ac.uk V Thursday 15th November rWlt ¦ % A T ^ Page 14 The Beaver Acaaemcs The voice of student protest has been Universities and demos used to go hand in hand. What broke the link? And where, asks Rodney Barker, have all the students gone? In the 1960s "student", "radical", and "demonstrator" were synonymous. Go to any demonstration, and not only would large numbers of the marchers and protesters be young, but they would be carrying banners with their university names and crests, or the titles of their student societies. They were there. not as citizens or environmentalists, but as students. To be young was to be a student, and to be a student was to be A protester. That has all gone. There are no students out there any more. There may be young people among the groups Who are out on the streets, but you no longer look at a protest to see nothing but the waving banners of Essex, Oxford and North London student unions. There may be flags, but they are as likely to denote religious or political allegiance as campus of origin. Where have all the students gone? What has broken the link between universities and protest? Why are protesters organised not by campus but by collectivity or creed? Three things have changed: the printed word has lost its monopoly; class has lost its dominant place in the mapping of political identity, and a simple social and political map has been qualified and confused by the dimensions of ethnicity, nationalism, gender and religion; and the politics of verbal argument has been supplemented by the politics of carnival and theatrical protest. The loss of the monopoly of the word printed on paper has meant a loss of monopoly for the universities which were always, essentially, people sitting around on rocks talking about the books they had read. Universities were the natural sites for dissent, criticism and the propagation of alternative visions because they were where the printed paper was. Politics was rooted in argument, argument was conducted principally through the printed word, and books were the raw material of university life. The fax, the mobile phone and the internet have broken that dominance and have disseminated and democratised verbal communication. The campus has not disappeared but it is now simply one forum among many. The internet has ended the need for colleagues and collaborators to be in the same place, and a committee can confer with its members spread around the globe from Wester Ross to Waikiki. The second change is the decline in the importance of class. Class analysis was relegated to one dimension amongst many by the end of the 1980s. The end of the cold war and the disappearance of the conununist enemy, or hero, finally demolished the old famiUar structures of friend and foe. Demonstrations are campaigns, and for campaigns to work you need friends and enemies, two sides, progress and reaction, revolution and repression, socialism and capitalism. You were either for or against, and there were only two sides to a barricade. A class analysis I "You were either for or against, and tliere were only two sides to a barricade." helped here, because it divided people neatly into historical platoons. Even on trivial issues, the significance of an action was clear, and the motives of a group transparent. If the other side did something, you knew what they must be up to, even if the immediate reason for their action was a bit obscure. When in the early 70s students at LSE occupied the Senior Common Room, an outraged colleague told me of the ultimate subversive act: "They've broken into the kitchen, and" -he paused, as if he thought I might not be tough enough to take the shocking revelation -"they've eaten all the ice cream." There was no doubt that eating icefcream, since it had been committed by students, was a revolutionary act, a tactic for consuming the foundations of the capitalist system. Even a vanilla whip could be a bastion of the old order, and conservatives could imite not just in support of property but in defence of strawberry ripples. Everything had its place in the pattern. Once you understood that, you knew whether to demonstrate or not, and against what. You knew who your friends were and what your enemies were up to, and what they would be up to in the future. You knew where people were coming from. Socialism in one country translated quite easily into socialism in one coffee bar. But by the time of Seattle, London and Genoa, American trade unionists supporting protective tariffs could briefly join with third world workers denoimcing US economic expansion. The new solidarities were temporary, shifting and unpredictable. The classic student protests had been either about education or foreign policy: sexism, racism, and capitalism in the syllabus, or nuclear weapons and Vietnam. As the political map broadened and shifted, so the issues on which people rallied became more diverse. There aire no simple patterns any more; or rather there are a score of shifting patterns. The end of the old simple bi-polar pCilitics, into which the student as organic - or at least genetically modified -intellectual fitted so readily, was accompanied by a shift in the manner of politics outside the institutions. It was no longer a matter of marches, banners and chants. If politics is about communication and argimaent, ¦ then there were more ways of communicating a message than with a placard and a megaphone. • It was seen to be important, too, to define the agenda, to extend the context of discussion beyond the boundaries within which conventional politics set it. This could be done by the politics of theatre, by tactics such as those of the Greenham Women or the guerrilla gardeners. Making your opponents' solemnities seem comic may be a ^ classic debating device, but it trans- lates, too, into street theatre: picnics on missile silos and dope planted in Parliament Square. The new crisis following the attacks on New York and Washington might seem to have just the old combination which wpuld revive student protest.: The rhetoric of the US government almost invites it. When George Bush declared that people were either for the , US and against terrorism, or against the US, that seemed to reinstate the old maps of us and them, justice and injustice. But the simple fcjrmulas looked threadbare eifren ' before the words were th® president's mouth. There were a dozen "yes, buts" to qualify the picture. It's not difficult to make a case against terrorism which reasonable people would take for granted. Applying that to a world where loyalties and identities are shifting and unpredictable, and where there is no easy, imiversal division of friends and enemies is the problem. If the war against terrorism develops the features of real war, there will be demonstrations, and there will be banners in the streets. But the old constituencies will have gone, and students with them, and the allegiances and alliances will reflect the chaos and flux into which politics have now moved. Rodney Barker is a lecturer in Government at the LSE Uleek 7 (19lh -S5lh, fley). updale Brpughl lo you by ISG SludenI/ Union Gnleitoinmenl/ niendQi| I9lh flovember: ISE Cinemo feol nime/l romeu/ ! ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ,/xl .-Ifi fTue/doy 30lh november: 5Tfl Quiz IKl Ia' ;J > r'_" .-Tr-34S\ £50 fo ................... ledne/doy 2 I/I november: Koraeke in Ihe Tun/ llternoUve Se//ion/ in the Underground. Bubblegum in Ihe Oucid i ^ J- ' L^.4;:J,i« .......^:, v" . '£iii iss^Ksi» n ?¥7dS'^If7J ...It :..,iAl^r-.'r.'-|- t -I*- .'itI - ...f* ¦*-; .lu' ^T" SL. &is^! liJW ^ ^ ^ivi§2 ' t^roiMn VN itti A VicMv: Zi>p WfltiAinaktM te-achcs Hv'v:;'*''ar'.s rei-riiits Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone Just The Facts Starring: Daniel Radcliffe, Robbie Coltrane Directed by: Christopher Columbus Release Date: 16.11.01 Running Tinne: 152 mins It's been sitting on my boolishelf since Ciirlstmas. "You've just got to read It," I've been repeatedly told. "It'll only take you a few hours." Maybe so, but I seem to l